Pith. sign in

REVIEW 13 cited by

VILA: On Pre-training for Visual Language Models

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2312.07533 v4 pith:EJZD36WT submitted 2023-12-12 cs.CV

classification cs.CV
keywords pre-trainingvisuallanguagemodelsdatainstructionviladuring
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Visual language models (VLMs) rapidly progressed with the recent success of large language models. There have been growing efforts on visual instruction tuning to extend the LLM with visual inputs, but lacks an in-depth study of the visual language pre-training process, where the model learns to perform joint modeling on both modalities. In this work, we examine the design options for VLM pre-training by augmenting LLM towards VLM through step-by-step controllable comparisons. We introduce three main findings: (1) freezing LLMs during pre-training can achieve decent zero-shot performance, but lack in-context learning capability, which requires unfreezing the LLM; (2) interleaved pre-training data is beneficial whereas image-text pairs alone are not optimal; (3) re-blending text-only instruction data to image-text data during instruction fine-tuning not only remedies the degradation of text-only tasks, but also boosts VLM task accuracy. With an enhanced pre-training recipe we build VILA, a Visual Language model family that consistently outperforms the state-of-the-art models, e.g., LLaVA-1.5, across main benchmarks without bells and whistles. Multi-modal pre-training also helps unveil appealing properties of VILA, including multi-image reasoning, enhanced in-context learning, and better world knowledge.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 13 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Q-GeoMem: Question-Guided Geometric Memory for Video Spatial Reasoning

    cs.CV 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 6.0 of 10

    Question-guided dual geometric memories with relevance-novelty utility reportedly reach state-of-the-art video spatial reasoning on two in-domain and five out-of-distribution benchmarks.

  2. SpaceTools: Tool-Augmented Spatial Reasoning via Double Interactive RL

    cs.CV 2025-12 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    A two-phase interactive RL framework (DIRL) lets a 3B VLM learn to coordinate multiple vision and robot tools, reaching top benchmark scores and 86% real-robot pick-and-place success.

  3. Video Reasoning without Training

    cs.CV 2025-10 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    An entropy-guided, inference-time value-cache controller improves video reasoning accuracy and cuts output tokens versus RL-trained baselines.

  4. Estimating the Empowerment of Language Model Agents

    cs.AI 2025-09 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    EELMA estimates the mutual information between an LM agent's actions and future text states, and this 'empowerment' is shown to correlate with task performance across toy games and WebArena.

  5. MESH -- Understanding Videos Like Human: Measuring Hallucinations in Large Video Models

    cs.CV 2025-09 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    MESH, a three-layer video hallucination benchmark, shows LVMs ace basic objects and coarse traits but slip badly on fine character details and multi-subject actions in longer clips.

  6. AuroraLong: Bringing RNNs Back to Efficient Open-Ended Video Understanding

    cs.CV 2025-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    A 2B-parameter video-language model using an RWKV linear-RNN backbone and sorted token merging achieves competitive long-video QA accuracy with far lower memory cost than transformer-based models.

  7. GenRecal: Generation after Recalibration from Large to Small Vision-Language Models

    cs.CL 2025-06 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    A learnable Recalibrator bridges different tokenizers so that small VLMs can distill knowledge from any large VLM, improving their benchmark scores.

  8. Affordance Benchmark for MLLMs

    cs.CL 2025-06 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    A new 2,000-question benchmark finds multimodal AI models recognize object affordances far worse than humans, with top model Gemini-2.0-Pro at 18.05% versus 85.34% human best.

  9. Decoupled Visual Processing: Efficient Multimodal Adaptation via Modality-Specific Transformer Substitution

    cs.CV 2026-07 reject novelty 5.0 of 10

    The paper's proposed decoupled visual pathway, as described, would receive no gradient from the loss, so the central claim is not supported.

  10. MagicVL-2B: Empowering Vision-Language Models on Mobile Devices with Lightweight Visual Encoders via Curriculum Learning

    cs.CV 2025-08 unverdicted novelty 5.0 of 10

    MagicVL-2B is a 2B vision-language model for mobile phones that claims state-of-the-art-matching accuracy at 41.1% lower on-device power, via a lightweight encoder, dynamic resolution, and curriculum learning.

  11. BcQLM: Efficient Vision-Language Understanding with Distilled Q-Gated Cross-Modal Fusion

    cs.CV 2025-09 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

    A roughly 1.2B-parameter VQA model with a distilled 31M CLIP encoder and Q-gated cross-attention reports accuracies comparable to 7B-13B baselines on GQA, VQAv2, and VizWiz.

  12. KptLLM++: Towards Generic Keypoint Comprehension with Large Language Model

    cs.CV 2025-07 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

    KptLLM++ unifies keypoint semantic understanding, visual-prompt detection, and text-prompt detection in a single multimodal LLM, reporting SOTA accuracy on COCO, AP-10K, Human-Art, and other benchmarks.

  13. A Survey on Autonomy-Induced Security Risks in Large Model-Based Agents

    cs.AI 2025-06 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

    The paper surveys security risks of LLM agents, organizes them into a five-level autonomy taxonomy, and proposes an untested CMDP-based architecture called R2A2.

Pith tools