Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

WONDER: Weighted one-shot distributed ridge regression in high dimensions

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 1903.09321 v2 pith:EPCK4SAR submitted 2019-03-22 math.ST cs.DCcs.LGstat.COstat.TH

classification math.STcs.DCcs.LGstat.COstat.TH
keywords ridgedistributedregressioncomputingone-shotweightedwonderestimators
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

In many areas, practitioners need to analyze large datasets that challenge conventional single-machine computing. To scale up data analysis, distributed and parallel computing approaches are increasingly needed. Here we study a fundamental and highly important problem in this area: How to do ridge regression in a distributed computing environment? Ridge regression is an extremely popular method for supervised learning, and has several optimality properties, thus it is important to study. We study one-shot methods that construct weighted combinations of ridge regression estimators computed on each machine. By analyzing the mean squared error in a high dimensional random-effects model where each predictor has a small effect, we discover several new phenomena. 1. Infinite-worker limit: The distributed estimator works well for very large numbers of machines, a phenomenon we call "infinite-worker limit". 2. Optimal weights: The optimal weights for combining local estimators sum to more than unity, due to the downward bias of ridge. Thus, all averaging methods are suboptimal. We also propose a new Weighted ONe-shot DistributEd Ridge regression (WONDER) algorithm. We test WONDER in simulation studies and using the Million Song Dataset as an example. There it can save at least 100x in computation time, while nearly preserving test accuracy.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Uncertainty of high-dimensional genetic data prediction with polygenic risk scores

    stat.ME 2024-12 reject novelty 6.0 of 10

    Marginal and reference-panel ridge PRS estimators are claimed to be asymptotically normal with explicit variance formulas, but a key quadratic-form lemma appears to use the wrong variance normalization.

Pith tools