Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 7 minor 287 references

Nine epochs of NGC 1142 confirm that detecting X-ray column-density swings needs many observations and favor many clouds crossing the line of sight at once.

Reviewed by Pith at T0; open to challenge. T0 means a machine referee read the full paper against a public rubric. the ladder, T0–T4 →

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

T0 review · grok-4.5

2026-07-31 05:21 UTC pith:EQJDKPWH

load-bearing objection Solid nine-epoch NH campaign on NGC 1142 with careful multi-model fits; the detection-fraction trend is real, the cloud-count bound is only illustrative. the 3 major comments →

arxiv 2607.28501 v1 pith:EQJDKPWH submitted 2026-07-30 astro-ph.GA astro-ph.HE

X-ray Absorption Variability in NGC 1142: Another Constraint on the Nature of the Torus/Broad-Line Region in Active Galactic Nuclei

Isaiah S. Cox , N\'uria Torres-Alb\`a , Stefano Marchesi , Vittoria E. Gianolli , Xiurui Zhao , Marco Ajello , Indrani Pal , Andrealuna Pizzetti This is my paper
classification astro-ph.GA astro-ph.HE
keywords AGNX-ray absorptioncolumn density variabilitytorusbroad-line regionNGC 1142clumpy obscurerNuSTAR
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

Active galaxies hide their central engines behind clumpy gas whose line-of-sight column density can be read from X-ray spectra. This paper measures that column density in NGC 1142 across nine epochs spanning roughly twenty years, including a new five-epoch NuSTAR plus XMM-Newton campaign. Three physically motivated torus models all find highly significant variability. The chance of catching the variability rises from about half when only two epochs are used to certainty once seven or more are included, matching a trend already seen in larger samples. A simple multi-ring cloud model is then sampled the same way as the real data; the observed detection fractions prefer several clouds simultaneously in the beam, while the size of column-density changes versus time lag is consistent with material on both broad-line-region and torus scales. The result matters because sparse monitoring can miss real variability and because the same statistics can begin to constrain how many clouds and at what radii dominate the obscuration.

Core claim

With nine X-ray epochs of NGC 1142, line-of-sight hydrogen column density varies at high significance in all three torus models; the fraction of observation subsets classified as variable climbs from roughly 40–60 percent at two epochs to 100 percent at seven or more, and comparison to simulated multi-ring obscuration curves favors roughly nine to twelve clouds simultaneously crossing the line of sight.

What carries the argument

Simulated obscuration curves built from concentric Keplerian rings whose column density oscillates as NH,i(t) = NH,max sin^{2}(π n t/T + φ), sampled exactly like the real campaigns to predict variable fractions versus number of epochs and ΔNH versus time lag.

Load-bearing premise

The mapping from observed detection rates and lag-dependent swings onto cloud number and location assumes the real absorber can be treated as a handful of independent azimuthally oscillating Keplerian rings with fixed filling factor and size–density profiles.

What would settle it

A dense multi-epoch campaign that densely samples lags of tens to a few hundred days and finds either far fewer simultaneous clouds (variable fraction near 1 already at two to three epochs) or ΔNH amplitudes that systematically exceed the BLR-plus-torus 90th-percentile envelope would rule out the preferred multi-cloud picture.

Watch this falsifier — get emailed when new claim-graph text bears on it.

If this is right

  • Sparse two-epoch campaigns will continue to under-count truly variable obscured AGN at roughly the 50 percent level.
  • Population statistics of variable fraction versus number of epochs can be inverted for a typical number of simultaneous line-of-sight clouds.
  • ΔNH versus time-lag distributions become a practical discriminant between BLR-dominated and torus-dominated variability once enough mid-lag pairs exist.
  • Geometry parameters of the reflecting torus remain secondary: NH trends are stable across UXCLUMPY, XSKIRTor and RXTorusD even when photon index is free.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the multi-cloud preference holds for the larger sample, single-cloud eclipse models commonly used to size BLR clouds will systematically under-estimate covering complexity.
  • Continuous wind or inflow geometries that lack discrete opposing crossings should produce systematically higher variable fractions at low Nobs than the ring model predicts, offering a clean population test.
  • The same sampling statistics could be folded into survey design so that future monitoring programs allocate epochs to maximize leverage on Nclouds and radial scale.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 7 minor

Summary. This paper presents a multi-epoch X-ray spectral analysis of the Seyfert 2 galaxy NGC 1142 using nine observations spanning ~20 years, including five new NuSTAR(+XMM-Newton) epochs from a 2024–2025 monitoring campaign. Spectra are fit simultaneously with three physically motivated torus models (UXCLUMPY, XSKIRTor, RXTorusD), with MCMC posteriors, and with photon index both tied and free across epochs. Line-of-sight NH is found to vary significantly (p ≪ 10^{-10} for the full set). The fraction of observation subsets classified as variable rises from ~0.4–0.6 at N_obs=2 to 1.0 at N_obs≥7 across models and two p-value methods, confirming a previously reported detection-probability trend. The authors also introduce a simple multi-ring Keplerian cloud simulator (Eq. 3) and compare its predicted variable fractions and ΔNH(Δt) behavior to the NGC 1142 data, suggesting a preference for ≳6–12 clouds simultaneously in the line of sight and consistency with BLR and/or torus-scale material.

Significance. If the observational results hold, the paper supplies a high-quality, well-sampled NH time series for a Compton-thin/thick borderline source and a clean single-source confirmation that the probability of detecting NH variability scales strongly with the number of epochs. The spectral analysis is careful: three independent torus tables, simultaneous multi-epoch fits, MCMC posteriors, photon-index tied vs free vs per-epoch checks, and three variability classifiers (χ², Nowak likelihood-ratio, 99% difference distributions). NH trends agree across models even when Γ and geometry differ. That robustness is a genuine strength and will be useful for the community’s multi-epoch CTAGN program. The interpretive cloud-count and location constraints are more provisional; they rest on a deliberately simplified forward model and are best read as a demonstration of method rather than a firm physical measurement.

major comments (3)
  1. [§5.2, Eq. (3), Fig. 5] §5.2 and Fig. 5 (bottom left): The mapping of observed variable fractions onto N_clouds ≳6–12 depends on the multi-ring simulator of Eq. (3) with fixed f~0.01, prescribed NH,max(r) and D_cloud(r), and a flat 5% NH error. The text does not state whether the 1000 Monte-Carlo ‘observations’ of each simulated source are drawn on the actual irregular MJDs of the nine NGC 1142 epochs (clustered 2006–07, 2017, and five epochs inside ~7 months) or on a uniform/random cadence. If the sampling is not matched to the real temporal window function, the comparison of black points to the colored curves is not equivalent. Please clarify the sampling procedure and, if needed, recompute the curves with the true cadence before retaining any numerical N_clouds preference.
  2. [§5.2–5.3, §6 Summary point 6] §5.2–5.3 and Summary point 6: The manuscript correctly flags the simulator as simplistic and states that strong conclusions are not warranted, yet still reports that ‘<6 clouds [are] apparently being ruled out’ and that ‘many clouds (≳6) are likely required.’ Because continuous outflow/inflow models with correlated density fluctuations can produce a similar rise of detection fraction with N_obs without a well-defined N_clouds, the numerical bound is non-unique under the paper’s own caveats. Please either (i) demote the N_clouds statement to an illustrative example of how such data could constrain future models, removing ‘ruled out’ language from the Summary/Conclusions, or (ii) add at least one alternative kinematics realization (e.g., a continuous wind or correlated random field) to show that the preference is not an artifact of the sin² ring construction.
  3. [§5.1, §6 point 3, Tables 2 and 4] §5.1 and Table 2/4: RXTorusD prefers a near face-on inclination and, when Γ is tied, pegs r/R at its upper limit—geometry that is inconsistent with UXCLUMPY/XSKIRTor and with a Type 2 classification if taken at face value. The paper notes the discrepancy and shows that NH variability is unaffected, which is the right scientific priority. However, the claim that torus geometry parameters are ‘quite well constrained’ (§6, point 3) overstates the case for RXTorusD. Please qualify that sentence to make clear that inclination/covering-factor agreement is limited to UXCLUMPY–XSKIRTor, and that RXTorusD geometry remains model-dependent.
minor comments (7)
  1. [Table 1, §2] Table 1 and §2: Exposure times are given as effective times; it would help the reader to note briefly whether any of the new AO-23 XMM exposures were heavily flared relative to the requested time.
  2. [Figure 2] Figure 2: The chopped time axis with three different scales is necessary but easy to misread. Consider adding explicit Δt labels on each panel segment or a secondary axis in days from a common reference.
  3. [Table 3] Table 3: The parenthetical values (variable-Γ case) are useful; a one-sentence note in the caption that the two methods and two Γ treatments all give the same qualitative rise would help skimmers.
  4. [§3] §3: Freezing E_cut=300 keV is standard and stated, but a short check that thawing it (or trying 100/500 keV) does not move NH outside the quoted errors would strengthen the free-parameter ledger.
  5. [§4, Table 3] §4 / difference-distribution method: The plan to recompute the full sample with posterior differences is welcome; a forward reference to that future work in the caption of Table 3 would avoid the impression that the 99% CI row is incomplete.
  6. [Title, §3] Minor typography: ‘V ariability’, ‘T orus’, and similar spaced capitals in the title/headers look like PDF ligature artifacts; please clean in production. Also ‘apectemperatures’ → ‘apec temperatures’ in §3.
  7. [References] References: Several 2025–2026 group papers are cited as in press/arXiv; ensure final bibliographic keys and DOIs are updated at proof stage so the detection-probability trend papers remain findable.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity: NH posteriors and variability fractions are data-driven; the multi-ring simulator is a forward comparison, not a fit renamed as prediction.

full rationale

The load-bearing chain is: (i) reduce nine epochs with published torus tables (UXCLUMPY, XSKIRTor, RXTorusD) and external responses; (ii) extract NH posteriors and apply standard p-value / difference-distribution tests (Eqs. 1–2, Table 3); (iii) report that the variable-subset fraction rises with Nobs, matching an empirical trend previously seen in other sources. None of these steps defines the measured NH in terms of the claimed trend, nor fits a parameter to a subset and re-labels it a prediction. The §5.2–5.3 multi-ring construction (Eq. 3) is an explicit forward toy model with externally cited f≈0.01 and prescribed NH,max(r), Dcloud(r); simulated detection fractions and ΔNH(Δt) are compared to the data, and the paper itself declines strong conclusions from it. Group self-citations supply the prior trend being confirmed and sample context; they do not supply the NGC 1142 NH values or force the variable fractions by construction. Idealizations of the simulator (Keplerian rings, sampling cadence, uniqueness of Nclouds) are assumption/correctness issues, not circular reductions. The derivation is therefore self-contained against the spectral data and external model tables.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

6 free parameters · 6 axioms · 1 invented entities

The observational NH curve rests on standard X-ray spectral assumptions and published torus radiative-transfer tables. The interpretive claim about cloud number/location additionally rests on an ad hoc multi-ring kinematic toy with several hand-set radial scalings. No new physical entities are postulated beyond discrete eclipsing clouds already standard in the clumpy-torus literature.

free parameters (6)
  • E_cut (high-energy cutoff) = 300 keV (fixed)
    Frozen at 300 keV for all epochs and models because the data cannot constrain it (§3).
  • Per-epoch NH,i and cross-normalizations C_i = NH ~ (52–268)×10^22 cm^-2 across epochs/models
    Primary free parameters of the simultaneous spectral fit; modes and 5–95% percentiles reported in Tables 2 and 4.
  • Torus geometry parameters (σ_Tor, CTKcover, θ_inc / CF, log NH,avg, cosi / r/R, NH,eq, Inclination) = See Tables 2 and 4
    Tied across epochs and fitted; some peg at bounds (CTKcover→0, r/R→1 when Γ tied).
  • Scattering fraction f_s and two apec (kT, norm) = f_s ~ (0.2–1.2)×10^-2; kT~0.16–0.9 keV
    Soft excess and scattered continuum normalizations fitted per global model.
  • Simulator: f, NH,max(r), D_cloud(r), N_rings, 5% NH uncertainty = f~0.01; N_rings in {6,9,12,15}
    Hand-chosen scalings in §5.2 (f~0.01; BLR vs torus NH and size ranges; 6–15 rings; 5% errors) that drive the Nclouds preference in Fig. 5.
  • Variability p-value threshold = p<0.01; 99% C.I.
    Campaigns called variable if p<0.01 (Torres-Albà χ² and Nowak methods) or if 99% difference interval excludes 0.
axioms (6)
  • domain assumption Primary X-ray continuum is a cutoff power law reprocessed by a toroidal/clumpy cold reflector whose tables (UXCLUMPY, XSKIRTor, RXTorusD) correctly describe the spectrum.
    §3 model definitions; geometry parameters tied across epochs while NH,los is free.
  • domain assumption Galactic absorption fixed at NH,Gal=5.56×10^20 cm^-2 (Kalberla et al. 2005); redshift and cosmology fixed.
    §3 TBabs setup and §1 cosmology statement.
  • ad hoc to paper Observed NH variability is dominated by discrete clouds on circular Keplerian orbits crossing the line of sight, representable as NH,i(t)=NH,max sin^2(π n t/T+φ).
    Eq. 3 and §5.2; authors note real flows are likely more complex (intro cites Kaastra, Mehdipour, Kara).
  • ad hoc to paper Volume filling factor ~0.01 at all radii and prescribed NH,max and D_cloud radial scalings from BLR to torus.
    §5.2 citing Almeyda et al. 2020; Matthews et al. 2020 for f; radial ranges stated without fit to NGC 1142.
  • domain assumption Simultaneous NuSTAR–XMM cross-normalization may be fixed to 1 without biasing NH.
    §3 footnote 3; chosen to avoid unphysical reflection-dominated splits.
  • standard math Standard Cash/χ² spectral statistics and Barlow one-sided errors suffice for variability classification.
    Eq. 1 (Torres-Albà et al. 2023) and Eq. 2 (Nowak 2016) in §4.
invented entities (1)
  • Multi-ring sinusoidal obscuration-curve simulator (concentric azimuthally oscillating cloud rings) no independent evidence
    purpose: Generate mock NH(t) to predict variable-fraction vs Nobs and ΔNH vs Δt for comparison with NGC 1142.
    Introduced in §5.2 as a simple semi-physical construct; not a new particle/force, but a new analysis entity without independent empirical calibration in this paper.

pith-pipeline@v1.2.0-daily-grok45 · 30240 in / 4417 out tokens · 80460 ms · 2026-07-31T05:21:02.805763+00:00 · methodology

0 comments
read the original abstract

The physics, geometry, and kinematics of the gas and dust surrounding the central engine of active galactic nuclei (AGN) are not well understood. In some sources, this material obscures the coronal X-ray emission, allowing its line-of-sight column density ($N_H$) to be measured. Many sources display $N_H$ variability across multiple epochs. Studying this variability can provide information about the distribution and dynamics of the obscuring material. Particularly, previous works have shown that the probability of observing $N_H$ variability increases with the number of observations available. Additionally, the observed magnitudes of the $N_H$ variability depend on the timescale between observations. In this work, we present the $N_H$ variability analysis of NGC 1142, which has a total of nine X-ray observations over $\sim20$ years, including five from a NuSTAR+XMM-Newton monitoring campaign performed in 2024-2025 and reported here for the first time. We use the physically-motivated torus models UXCLUMPY, XSKIRTor, and RXTorusD to model the spectra. Our results confirm the previously observed trends, and we compare these trends to simulated obscuration curves assuming different locations and distributions of obscuring clouds.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2607.28501 by Andrealuna Pizzetti, Indrani Pal, Isaiah S. Cox, Marco Ajello, N\'uria Torres-Alb\`a, Stefano Marchesi, Vittoria E. Gianolli, Xiurui Zhao.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Left: The best fit UXCLUMPY models for each of the 9 epochs with the residuals. The solid line indicates the best fit model while the shading indicates the 90 % credible interval from the MCMC chain. The plot has been rebinned to 3σ to improve clarity. Middle: Same as left but for the XSKIRTor model. Right: Same as left but for the RXTorusD model [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: The line-of-sight NH as a function of time assuming a constant photon index (dots) and a variable photon index (crosses). The top row shows the UXCLUMPY model results in blue while the middle and bottom rows show the XSKIRTor and RXTorusD results, respectively. The axes have the same scale for all three models. The x-axis has been chopped up (vertical, dashed lines) to get rid of dead time in the data. Not… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Contours enclosing the 90 % credible intervals for L2–10 keV with photon index (top row) and L2–10 keV with NH,los (bottom row). The left column shows the results for UXCLUMPY while the middle and right columns show the results for XSKIRTor and RXTorusD, respectively. The solid contours show the results assuming no variability in the photon index, while the dashed contours show the results allowing photon … view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Posterior distributions of the photon index (left column), cross-normalization (middle column), and NH (right column) for each epoch (time increasing downward) and each model. The colors indicate the different models and are the same as [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Top: Examples of the simulated obscuration curves using Equation 3. The colors match the corresponding colors in the bottom two panels. Bottom Left: The observed variable fraction of the curves as a function of the number of observations sampled. The colors represent the number of rings (or ‘clouds’ participating in simultaneous absorption) simulated. The dashed, orange line represents the curve where the … view at source ↗

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

287 extracted references · 28 canonical work pages · 4 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    A&A , author =

    ". A&A , author =. 2010 , note =. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/200913985 , abstract =

    doi:10.1051/0004-6361/200913985 2010

  2. [2]

    , keywords =

    ``Comets'' orbiting a black hole. , keywords =. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/200913985 , archivePrefix =. 1005.3365 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  3. [3]

    ApJ , author =

    An. ApJ , author =. 2004 , note =. doi:10.1086/424380 , abstract =

    doi:10.1086/424380 2004

  4. [4]

    , keywords =

    An Unveiling Event in the Type 2 Active Galactic Nucleus NGC 4388:A Challenge for a Parsec-Scale Absorber. , keywords =. doi:10.1086/424380 , archivePrefix =. astro-ph/0407291 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  5. [5]

    , keywords =

    Rapid N _ H changes in NGC 4151. , keywords =. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2007.11634.x , archivePrefix =. astro-ph/0612021 , primaryClass =

    arXiv 2007

  6. [6]

    ApJ , author =

    The variable and non-variable. ApJ , author =. 2020 , note =. doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ab92ab , abstract =

    doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ab92ab 2020

  7. [7]

    , keywords =

    The Variable and Non-variable X-Ray Absorbers in Compton-thin Type II Active Galactic Nuclei. , keywords =. doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ab92ab , archivePrefix =. 2005.06079 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2005

  8. [8]

    Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society , author =

    First. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society , author =. 2014 , note =. doi:10.1093/mnras/stt2492 , abstract =

    doi:10.1093/mnras/stt2492 2014

  9. [9]

    , keywords =

    First X-ray-based statistical tests for clumpy-torus models: eclipse events from 230 years of monitoring of Seyfert AGN. , keywords =. doi:10.1093/mnras/stt2492 , archivePrefix =. 1402.2779 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  10. [10]

    AGN STORM 2. I. First results: A Change in the Weather of Mrk 817. , keywords =. doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ac2159 , archivePrefix =. 2105.05840 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  11. [11]

    Science , keywords =

    A fast and long-lived outflow from the supermassive black hole in NGC 5548. Science , keywords =. doi:10.1126/science.1253787 , archivePrefix =. 1406.5007 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  12. [12]

    Astronomy & Astrophysics , volume=

    Chasing obscuration in type-I AGN: discovery of an eclipsing clumpy wind at the outer broad-line region of NGC 3783 , author=. Astronomy & Astrophysics , volume=. 2017 , publisher=

    2017

  13. [13]

    High-Energy Spectra of Active Galactic Nuclei. II. Absorption in Seyfert Galaxies. , keywords =. doi:10.1086/313057 , adsurl =

    work page doi:10.1086/313057

  14. [14]

    ApJ , author =

    X-ray redshifts for obscured. ApJ , author =. 2021 , note =. doi:10.3847/1538-4357/abc9c7 , abstract =

    doi:10.3847/1538-4357/abc9c7 2021

  15. [15]

    Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society , author =

    Inferring the morphology of. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society , author =. 2021 , note =. doi:10.1093/mnras/stab3250 , abstract =

    doi:10.1093/mnras/stab3250 2021

  16. [16]

    A&A , author =

    The properties of the. A&A , author =. 2021 , note =. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202140297 , abstract =

    doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202140297 2021

  17. [18]

    ApJ , author =

    New. ApJ , author =. 2018 , note =. doi:10.3847/1538-4357/aaa7eb , abstract =

    doi:10.3847/1538-4357/aaa7eb 2018

  18. [19]

    A&A , author =

    X-ray spectral and eclipsing model of the clumpy obscurer in active galactic nuclei , volume =. A&A , author =. 2019 , note =. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201834771 , abstract =

    doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201834771 2019

  19. [20]

    ApJ , author =

    Bayesian. ApJ , author =. 2006 , note =. doi:10.1086/507406 , abstract =

    doi:10.1086/507406 2006

  20. [21]

    ApJ , author =

    Confidence limits for small numbers of events in astrophysical data , volume =. ApJ , author =. 1986 , pages =. doi:10.1086/164079 , abstract =

    doi:10.1086/164079 1986

  21. [22]

    ApJ , author =

    The. ApJ , author =. 2017 , note =. doi:10.3847/1538-4357/aa7563 , abstract =

    doi:10.3847/1538-4357/aa7563 2017

  22. [23]

    ApJ , author =

    X-ray spectral properties of seven heavily obscured. ApJ , author =. 2017 , note =. doi:10.3847/1538-4357/836/1/116 , abstract =

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/836/1/116 2017

  23. [24]

    ApJ , author =

    Chandra and. ApJ , author =. 2017 , note =. doi:10.3847/1538-4357/aa8ee6 , abstract =

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/aa8ee6 2017

  24. [25]

    ApJ , author =

    Compton thick. ApJ , author =. 2018 , note =. doi:10.3847/1538-4357/aaa410 , abstract =

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/aaa410 2018

  25. [26]

    ApJ , author =

    Compton-thick. ApJ , author =. 2019 , note =. doi:10.3847/1538-4357/aaf1a0 , abstract =

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/aaf1a0 2019

  26. [27]

    ApJ , author =

    Compton-thick. ApJ , author =. 2019 , note =. doi:10.3847/1538-4357/aafbeb , abstract =

    doi:10.3847/1538-4357/aafbeb 2019

  27. [28]

    ApJ , author =

    Compton-thick. ApJ , author =. 2019 , note =. doi:10.3847/1538-4357/aaf80b , abstract =

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/aaf80b 2019

  28. [29]

    ApJ , author =

    Compton-thick. ApJ , author =. 2019 , note =. doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ab340a , abstract =

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ab340a 2019

  29. [30]

    ApJ , author =

    A broadband. ApJ , author =. 2020 , note =. doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ab879d , abstract =

    doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ab879d 2020

  30. [31]

    ApJ , author =

    Compton-thick. ApJ , author =. 2021 , pages =. doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ac1c73 , abstract =

    doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ac1c73 2021

  31. [32]

    ApJ , author =

    Compton-. ApJ , author =. 2021 , note =. doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ac1fee , abstract =

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ac1fee 2021

  32. [33]

    Compton-

    Marchesi, Stefano and Zhao, Xiurui and Torres-Albà, Núria and Ajello, Marco and Gaspari, Massimo and Pizzetti, Andrealuna and Buchner, Johannes and Bertola, Elena and Comastri, Andrea and Feltre, Anna and Gilli, Roberto and Lanzuisi, Giorgio and Matzeu, Gabriele and Pozzi, Francesca and Salvestrini, Francesco and Sengupta, Dhrubojyoti and Silver, Ross and...

  33. [34]

    Compton-thick AGN in the NuSTAR Era. VIII. A joint NuSTAR--XMM-Newton Monitoring of the Changing-look Compton-thick AGN NGC 1358 , author=. The Astrophysical Journal , volume=. 2022 , publisher=

    2022

  34. [35]

    A&A , author =

    Hard. A&A , author =. 2012 , note =. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201117974 , abstract =

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201117974 2012

  35. [36]

    and Bautz, Mark W

    Garmire, Gordon P. and Bautz, Mark W. and Ford, Peter G. and Nousek, John A. and Ricker, Jr., George R. , editor =. Advanced. , url =. 2003 , pages =. doi:10.1117/12.461599 , abstract =

    doi:10.1117/12.461599 2003

  36. [37]

    A&A , author =

    X-ray spectral variability of. A&A , author =. 2015 , note =. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201526127 , abstract =

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201526127 2015

  37. [38]

    , keywords =

    X-ray spectral variability of Seyfert 2 galaxies. , keywords =. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201526127 , archivePrefix =. 1505.01166 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  38. [39]

    Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society , author =

    Classifying. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society , author =. 2018 , note =. doi:10.1093/mnras/sty2535 , abstract =

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/sty2535 2018

  39. [40]

    A&A , author =

    Searching for intergalactic star forming regions in. A&A , author =. 2019 , pages =. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201935686 , abstract =

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201935686 2019

  40. [41]

    ApJ , author =

    Rapid. ApJ , author =. 2005 , pages =. doi:10.1086/430252 , abstract =

    doi:10.1086/430252 2005

  41. [42]

    Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society , author =

    A study of the ionized gas in. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society , author =. 2014 , pages =. doi:10.1093/mnras/stu851 , abstract =

    doi:10.1093/mnras/stu851 2014

  42. [43]

    A&A , author =

    The. A&A , author =. 2001 , pages =. doi:10.1051/0004-6361:20000066 , abstract =

    doi:10.1051/0004-6361:20000066 2001

  43. [45]

    A multi-epoch

    Pizzetti, Andrealuna and Torres-Alba, Nuria and Marchesi, Stefano and Ajello, Marco and Silver, Ross and Zhao, Xiurui , month = jun, year =. A multi-epoch

  44. [46]

    The Astrophysical Journal , volume=

    A Multiepoch X-Ray Study of the Nearby Seyfert 2 Galaxy NGC 7479: Linking Column Density Variability to the Torus Geometry , author=. The Astrophysical Journal , volume=. 2022 , publisher=

    2022

  45. [47]

    Lynne and Brightman, Murray and Stern, Daniel and Malkan, Matthew A

    Saade, M. Lynne and Brightman, Murray and Stern, Daniel and Malkan, Matthew A. and Garcia, Javier A. , month = may, year =

  46. [48]

    A&A , author =

    The. A&A , author =. 2022 , note =. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202141266 , abstract =

    doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202141266 2022

  47. [49]

    A&A , author =

    The. A&A , author =. 2021 , pages =. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202039313 , abstract =

    doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202039313 2021

  48. [50]

    A&A , author =

    The. A&A , author =. 2022 , note =. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202141631 , abstract =

    doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202141631 2022

  49. [51]

    A&A , author =

    Mock catalogs for the extragalactic. A&A , author =. 2020 , note =. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202038622 , abstract =

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202038622 2020

  50. [52]

    and Aird, James and Barger, Amy J

    Mushotzky, Richard F. and Aird, James and Barger, Amy J. and Cappelluti, Nico and Chartas, George and Corrales, Lia and Eufrasio, Rafael and Fabian, Andrew C. and Falcone, Abraham D. and Gallo, Elena and Gilli, Roberto and Grant, Catherine E. and Hardcastle, Martin and Hodges-Kluck, Edmund and Kara, Erin and Koss, Michael and Li, Hui and Lisse, Carey M. a...

  51. [53]

    Obscured

    Hickox, Ryan C and Alexander, David M , year =. Obscured

  52. [54]

    Unified. Annu. Rev. Astron. Astrophys , author =. 1993 , pages =

    1993

  53. [55]

    , keywords =

    Unified Schemes for Radio-Loud Active Galactic Nuclei. , keywords =. doi:10.1086/133630 , archivePrefix =. astro-ph/9506063 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  54. [56]

    ApJ , author =

    Molecular tori in. ApJ , author =. 1988 , pages =. doi:10.1086/166414 , abstract =

    doi:10.1086/166414 1988

  55. [57]

    , keywords =

    Radiation-Pressure--supported Obscuring Tori around Active Galactic Nuclei. , keywords =. doi:10.1086/186597 , adsurl =

    work page doi:10.1086/186597

  56. [58]

    , keywords =

    AGN Obscuring Tori Supported by Infrared Radiation Pressure. , keywords =. doi:10.1086/515432 , archivePrefix =. astro-ph/0702396 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  57. [59]

    A&A , author =

    C-. A&A , author =. 2018 , note =. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201834105 , abstract =

    doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201834105 2018

  58. [60]

    A&A , author =

    C-. A&A , author =. 2011 , note =. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201015264 , abstract =

    doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201015264 2011

  59. [62]

    2022 , note =

    ApJL , author =. 2022 , note =. doi:10.3847/2041-8213/ac83a0 , abstract =

    doi:10.3847/2041-8213/ac83a0 2022

  60. [63]

    ApJ , author =

    A. ApJ , author =. 2016 , pages =. doi:10.3847/0004-637X/825/2/85 , abstract =

    doi:10.3847/0004-637x/825/2/85 2016

  61. [64]

    and Fabian, Andrew C

    Zhang, Zuobin and Jiang, Jiachen and Liu, Honghui and Bambi, Cosimo and Reynolds, Christopher S. and Fabian, Andrew C. and Dauser, Thomas and Madsen, Kristin and Young, Andrew and Gallo, Luigi and Yu, Zhibo and Tomsick, John , month = aug, year =. The

  62. [65]

    The Astrophysical Journal , author =

    Two. The Astrophysical Journal , author =. 1999 , note =. doi:10.1086/312358 , abstract =

    work page doi:10.1086/312358 1999

  63. [66]

    , keywords =

    The Hard X-Ray Spectrum as a Probe for Black Hole Growth in Radio-Quiet Active Galactic Nuclei. , keywords =. doi:10.1086/588776 , archivePrefix =. 0804.0803 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  64. [67]

    ApJ , author =

    The. ApJ , author =. 2009 , note =. doi:10.1088/0004-637X/700/1/L6 , abstract =

    doi:10.1088/0004-637x/700/1/l6 2009

  65. [68]

    Statistical Problems in Particle Physics, Astrophysics, and Cosmology , year = 2003, editor =

    Asymmetric Errors. Statistical Problems in Particle Physics, Astrophysics, and Cosmology , year = 2003, editor =

    2003

  66. [69]

    arXiv e-prints , keywords =

    The Hot and Energetic Universe: A White Paper presenting the science theme motivating the Athena+ mission. arXiv e-prints , keywords =

  67. [70]

    Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers (SPIE) Conference Series , year = 2017, editor =

    Optical design of the STAR-X telescope. Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers (SPIE) Conference Series , year = 2017, editor =. doi:10.1117/12.2273803 , adsurl =

    work page doi:10.1117/12.2273803 2017

  68. [71]

    , year = 2022, month = jan, volume =

    Optical design of type-1 x-ray telescopes and their application to STAR-X. , year = 2022, month = jan, volume =. doi:10.1364/AO.446958 , adsurl =

    work page doi:10.1364/ao.446958 2022

  69. [72]

    Pattern recognition letters , volume=

    An introduction to ROC analysis , author=. Pattern recognition letters , volume=. 2006 , publisher=

    2006

  70. [73]

    Remote sensing of Environment , volume=

    Selecting and interpreting measures of thematic classification accuracy , author=. Remote sensing of Environment , volume=. 1997 , publisher=

    1997

  71. [74]

    Proceedings of the Joint IBM/University of Newcastle upon Tyne Seminar on Data Base Systems , volume=

    Information retrieval: theory and practice , author=. Proceedings of the Joint IBM/University of Newcastle upon Tyne Seminar on Data Base Systems , volume=

  72. [75]

    , keywords =

    Dust Emission from Active Galactic Nuclei. , keywords =. doi:10.1086/340857 , archivePrefix =. astro-ph/0202405 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  73. [76]

    AGN Dusty Tori. II. Observational Implications of Clumpiness. , keywords =. doi:10.1086/590483 , archivePrefix =. 0806.0512 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  74. [77]

    , keywords =

    Long-term X-ray spectral variability in AGN from the Palomar sample observed by Swift. , keywords =. doi:10.1093/mnras/stw878 , archivePrefix =. 1604.03556 , primaryClass =

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  75. [78]

    Hydrogen Column Density Variability in a Sample of Local Compton-Thin AGN

    Torres-Albà, N. and Marchesi, S. and Zhao, X. and Cox, I. and Pizzetti, A. and Ajello, M. and Silver, R. , keywords =. Hydrogen Column Density Variability in a Sample of Local Compton-Thin AGN , publisher =. 2023 , copyright =. doi:10.48550/ARXIV.2301.07138 , url =

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.48550/arxiv.2301.07138 2023

  76. [79]

    Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society , volume=

    The incidence of obscuration in active galactic nuclei , author=. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society , volume=. 2014 , publisher=

    2014

  77. [80]

    The Astrophysical Journal , volume=

    The Chandra COSMOS Legacy survey: optical/IR identifications , author=. The Astrophysical Journal , volume=. 2016 , publisher=

    2016

  78. [81]

    The Astrophysical Journal , volume=

    X-ray redshifts for obscured AGN: a case study in the J1030 deep field , author=. The Astrophysical Journal , volume=. 2021 , publisher=

    2021

  79. [82]

    Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society , volume=

    Multi-epoch hard X-ray view of Compton-thick AGN Circinus Galaxy , author=. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society , volume=. 2023 , publisher=

    2023

  80. [83]

    Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society , volume=

    A hard look at the X-ray spectral variability of NGC 7582 , author=. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society , volume=. 2023 , publisher=

    2023

Showing first 80 references.