Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 cited by

When and why PINNs fail to train: A neural tangent kernel perspective

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2007.14527 v1 pith:ER353KTM submitted 2020-07-28 cs.LG cs.NAmath.NAstat.ML

classification cs.LGcs.NAmath.NAstat.ML
keywords trainingneuralkernelpinnsdescentduringgradientnetworks
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Physics-informed neural networks (PINNs) have lately received great attention thanks to their flexibility in tackling a wide range of forward and inverse problems involving partial differential equations. However, despite their noticeable empirical success, little is known about how such constrained neural networks behave during their training via gradient descent. More importantly, even less is known about why such models sometimes fail to train at all. In this work, we aim to investigate these questions through the lens of the Neural Tangent Kernel (NTK); a kernel that captures the behavior of fully-connected neural networks in the infinite width limit during training via gradient descent. Specifically, we derive the NTK of PINNs and prove that, under appropriate conditions, it converges to a deterministic kernel that stays constant during training in the infinite-width limit. This allows us to analyze the training dynamics of PINNs through the lens of their limiting NTK and find a remarkable discrepancy in the convergence rate of the different loss components contributing to the total training error. To address this fundamental pathology, we propose a novel gradient descent algorithm that utilizes the eigenvalues of the NTK to adaptively calibrate the convergence rate of the total training error. Finally, we perform a series of numerical experiments to verify the correctness of our theory and the practical effectiveness of the proposed algorithms. The data and code accompanying this manuscript are publicly available at \url{https://github.com/PredictiveIntelligenceLab/PINNsNTK}.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 3 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Cosmo-SPINN: Fuzzy Dark Matter Simulations with Physics-Informed Generative Networks

    astro-ph.CO 2026-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Physics-informed generative U-Nets evolve and super-resolve fuzzy dark matter fields under Schrödinger–Poisson constraints with far less supervised data than pure data-driven baselines.

  2. SPINN: Advancing Cosmological Simulations of Fuzzy Dark Matter with Physics Informed Neural Networks

    astro-ph.CO 2025-06 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    A physics-informed neural network (SPINN) solves the Schrödinger-Poisson equations for fuzzy dark matter collapse in 1D and 3D, matching a spectral solver on a sinusoidal test case.

  3. Variational Boosting for Physics-Informed Neural Networks

    cs.LG 2026-07 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    A staged boosting method for PINNs, using small correction networks and per-stage Newton/CG optimization, converges on several stiff ODE/PDE benchmarks where monolithic PINNs do not, while being slower on easy problems.

Pith tools