Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 major objections 5 minor 67 references

A magnetic white dwarf formed through a binary merger within 35 million years

T0 review · 4 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-05 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read RSG5-WD, a magnetic white dwarf in the 35-million-year-old open cluster RSG 5, must have formed through a binary merger: single-star evolution cannot make it within the cluster's age.

desk verdict An interesting object, but the paper's own cooling-age estimate contradicts its proposed merger timeline. read the letter →

arxiv 2509.01069 v1 pith:F4O6S6FG submitted 2025-09-01 astro-ph.SR astro-ph.GA

Huahui Yan , Jiamao Lin , Rizhong Zheng , Li Wang , Genghao Liu , Liangliang Ren , Zhen Guo , Siyi Xu
show 10 more authors
Zhangliang Chen Chun Chen Bo Ma Yong Shao Zhenwei Li Xianfei Zhang Christoffer Fremling Jan J. Eldridge Hongwei Ge Chengyuan Li
This is my paper · ORCID
classification astro-ph.SRastro-ph.GA
keywords whitedwarfsmagneticbinarymergersopenclustersstellarevolutioncircumstellardebrisrapidrotation
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper reports a white dwarf, RSG5-WD, sitting in the 35-million-year-old open cluster RSG 5, and argues that the cluster's youth forces a binary-merger origin. Standard stellar evolution needs at least 54–57 million years for the heaviest plausible progenitor of a ~1.05 solar-mass white dwarf, plus tens of millions of years of cooling — more than the cluster's entire lifetime. The white dwarf's own oddities — a ≥200 megagauss magnetic field, a 6.556-minute rotation period, and a half-ring of ionized debris co-rotating with the star — all point to a recent merger of two stars into one. If the claim holds, it gives the youngest, best-dated example of a merger-born white dwarf and shows that binary interactions can manufacture white dwarfs far earlier than single stars can.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing observable is the co-rotating half-ring of ionized debris: its double-peaked Hα emission moves at ~1300 km/s, its radial velocity matches the cluster's mean, and its ~6.6-minute orbital period equals the white dwarf's spin period, so the ring is magnetically locked. That one feature ties the object to the cluster (shared velocity), to the merger channel (debris from a companion disrupted during common-envelope inspiral), and to the rapid spin. The second pillar: BSE population synthesis across ~76 million initial conditions, verified with MESA, where the only route to a 1.0–1.1 solar-mass white dwarf within 40 Myr is a merger of an ~8.5–11 solar-mass primary with a low-mass

What would settle it

Take a high signal-to-noise spectrum of RSG5-WD and measure its radial velocity against the cluster's mean (−3.4 ± 3.2 km/s), then re-fit its total age with models that allow post-merger heating. If the white dwarf's velocity is inconsistent with RSG 5 membership, or if its total age exceeds the cluster's upper bound of ~57 Myr even when merger reheating is included, the central claim is falsified.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

RSG5-WD, a ~1.05 solar-mass magnetic white dwarf in the 35 Myr old open cluster RSG 5, formed through a binary merger, the paper claims; single-star evolution cannot make it within the cluster's age. Models need the progenitor ≥54–57 Myr to evolve and another ~60 Myr to cool, so single-star formation is excluded with probability >0.99 across three initial–final mass relations. Instead, a ~9.5 solar-mass star and a ~0.2 solar-mass red dwarf in a ~300-day orbit pass through two common-envelope episodes and merge at ~32 Myr, leaving ~1.03 solar masses. The merger explains the ≥200 MG magnetic field, the 6.556-minute spin, and the co-rotating half-ring of ionized debris moving at ~1300 km/s.

Load-bearing premise

The claim stands or falls on RSG5-WD being a true member of the 35 Myr old cluster RSG 5 — matched in position, parallax, proper motion, and radial velocity — because if the white dwarf is actually an unrelated field star, the cluster's age does not apply to it and the entire merger timeline collapses. The paper's own best-fit cooling age (60 +10/−20 Myr) already exceeds the cluster's age, which is why membership is the load-bearing premise.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • White dwarfs can be produced within ~35 Myr via binary mergers, far sooner than the ≥25 Myr single-star floor, so youth alone no longer excludes a white dwarf in a cluster.
  • The co-rotating, double-peaked Hα half-ring is an observable fingerprint of a recent non-degenerate merger, recognizable without needing a surviving companion.
  • Binary channels let stars above the usual single-star white-dwarf limit (8.5–11 solar masses) end their lives as intermediate-mass white dwarfs within 40 Myr.
  • The merger path leaves an isolated, strongly magnetized, fast-spinning white dwarf, so surveys of young clusters should target such objects as merger products.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the merger interpretation is right, the standard cooling-age fit of ~60 Myr for RSG5-WD needs revision: post-merger white dwarfs may cool more slowly (residual envelope, debris accretion reheating), which future spectral fitting can test directly.
  • The debris half-ring is a clock: if it is a merger relic only ~3 Myr old, it should dissipate, spread, or accrete on decade timescales, so monitoring the Hα double peak offers a direct way to confirm the proposed 32 Myr merger date.
  • If young clusters commonly host such remnants, a systematic search among Gaia's ~350,000 white dwarfs for short spin periods and Zeeman-split lines in clusters of known age could turn this single object into a rate measurement for the merger channel.
  • The case would be sharpened by an independent age tracer for RSG 5 (for example, the lithium content or spin-down ages of its low-mass stars), which would test the 35 Myr isochrone age that the whole argument leans on.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

4 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper reports the discovery of RSG5-WD, a magnetic DA white dwarf in the young open cluster RSG 5, and argues that its properties require a binary-merger origin. The authors identify the white dwarf as a cluster member from Gaia astrometry and radial-velocity agreement, measure a mass of 1.05 ± 0.08 Msun, Teff ≈ 31,600 K, log g = 8.68, a 6.556-minute rotation period, a magnetic field of about 200 MG, and a co-rotating half-ring of ionized debris. Since the cluster age is 35 ± 5 Myr and single-star evolution would require ~60 Myr of cooling plus a progenitor lifetime, the authors conclude that the white dwarf formed through a non-degenerate binary merger at ~32 Myr, leaving only ~3 Myr of post-merger cooling. BSE population-synthesis and MESA binary-evolution models are used to show that a 9.5 + 0.2 Msun binary could produce a 1.03 Msun white dwarf on this timescale.

Significance. If the central claim were correct, this would be an unusually direct observational constraint on binary-merger formation of white dwarfs: a young cluster age, a high magnetic field, rapid rotation, and a circumstellar debris structure would all be tied to a single formation channel. The observational characterization is substantial: the Keck/LRIS and Gemini/GMOS spectroscopy, ZTF time-series photometry, the detection of the 6.556-minute period, and the identification of Zeeman-split Balmer lines are all valuable. The BSE grid covers ~76 million initial conditions and the MESA cross-check is a useful test of the evolutionary channel. However, the paper's own photometric cooling-age measurement is in direct conflict with the proposed merger timeline, and the binary models do not connect the formation time to the observed cooling properties. The central claim therefore is not currently supported.

major comments (4)
  1. [§2.1, Fig. 6, Fig. 1F] The MCMC fit in Fig. 6 gives a cooling age of 0.06+0.01−0.02 Gyr, i.e., ~60 Myr. Yet the merger scenario in §3 forms the white dwarf at ~32 Myr, which within the 35±5 Myr cluster age leaves only ~3 Myr of cooling. These are mutually incompatible. The observed Teff ≈31,600 K and G-band photometry place RSG5-WD on the 60 Myr Bédard et al. (2020) cooling track, not on a 3 Myr track. At 3 Myr, a 1.05 Msun white dwarf would be substantially hotter and brighter; the magnetic field and debris ring cannot plausibly suppress the broadband continuum by the required factor. The paper never resets the cooling clock after invoking the merger, so the central 'extremely young WD formed through binary-channel' claim contradicts the paper's own parameter estimates.
  2. [§2.1, total-age analysis] The Monte Carlo and wdwarfdate analyses rule out single-star formation by comparing total age (pre-WD evolution plus cooling) to the cluster age. However, the same measured cooling age of ~60 Myr enters this calculation. If the white dwarf instead formed via merger at ~32 Myr, its total age would be ~32 + 60 = 92 Myr, not 35 Myr. The analysis therefore does not support the proposed timeline; at best it shows that a single WD formed at the observed Teff and mass is older than the cluster, which is equally consistent with non-membership. A viable merger interpretation must explain why a 3 Myr old post-merger object appears to be a 60 Myr old cooling WD.
  3. [§3, Appendix C] The BSE and MESA simulations only demonstrate that some 8.5–11 Msun primaries can produce a ~1.03 Msun white dwarf by ~32 Myr. They do not predict or verify the post-merger observable properties Teff, log g, and luminosity. MESA is terminated before merger (§C), and BSE stops at the WD stage. Thus the models do not establish that a merger product formed at 32 Myr would match the observed SED at the cluster age. The quoted 'optimal' solution is selected to reproduce mass and age; it is not independently tested against the full white-dwarf cooling properties.
  4. [§4, Discussion] The discussion contrast with Cristea et al. (2025) is framed as single-star versus binary evolution, but the real tension is the photometric cooling age. Cristea et al. report a cooling age of ~70 Myr and use it to argue for non-membership; the present paper does not reconcile that measurement with a 3 Myr post-merger cooling age. The disagreement is not resolved by invoking binary evolution, because the cooling age is determined from the observed temperature and luminosity, independent of whether the progenitor evolved as a single star or in a binary. The paper should directly address this inconsistency.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Abstract / Table 1] The abstract states the mass is 'lower than 1.05 Msun', while Table 1 and §2.1 report 1.05 ± 0.08 Msun. Please make the value and uncertainty consistent.
  2. [Fig. 6] The corner plot labels the cooling age as 0.06+0.01−0.02, presumably in Gyr, but the text quotes ~60 Myr. Please state units explicitly in the figure and caption.
  3. [§2.2 / Abstract] The magnetic field is reported as '≥170 MG' in §2.2, 'about 210 MG' in the same section, and '≥200 MG' in the abstract. Please unify the reported value and uncertainty.
  4. [§3 / Fig. 4] The BSE and MESA first common-envelope timings differ by ~2.2 Myr (26.88 vs 24.62 Myr), yet the text says 'timing variations < 2 Myr'. Please reconcile or rephrase this statement.
  5. [§2.1] Program IDs are given as C266/C267 in the text but 'C367' appears in §2.2. Please correct the typo.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the merger inference rests on an independent single-star age rule-out and a BSE feasibility search, not on a self-referential fit.

full rationale

The derivation chain is self-contained with respect to circularity. The cluster age (35±5 Myr) is determined by independent CMD isochrone fitting to turn-on/turn-off stars (Section 2.1), not from the WD. The WD's mass, Teff, and cooling age are fit from its own photometry/spectra (Figure 6). Single-star formation is ruled out by comparing progenitor lifetimes plus cooling age to the cluster age using standard models (MIST, PARSEC, wdwarfdate), which is an externally falsifiable test. The BSE/MESA grid is a feasibility search over initial conditions for a ~1.0–1.1 Msun WD within 40 Myr; the result that nearly all such solutions are mergers is an emergent model output, not imposed by construction. The conclusion 'must have experienced a merger event' follows from the single-star rule-out plus the model demonstration, and the paper explicitly cautions that 'stellar evolution uncertainties mean other pathways may exist.' Self-citations (e.g., Ge et al. 2022, 2024 for CE efficiency) are not load-bearing because both alpha=1 and 3 are examined. The apparent tension between the MCMC cooling age (~60 Myr) and a 32 Myr merger is a serious physical/correctness concern—especially since MESA cannot model post-merger cooling—but it is an inconsistency, not a circular reduction of the prediction to its inputs.

Assumptions & free parameters 7 free parameters · 7 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central claim depends on a chain of fitted parameters (cluster age, WD mass, Teff, log g) and on model assumptions (CE efficiency, IFMR, magnetic locking). The most serious issue is that the WD's best-fit cooling age (~60 Myr) contradicts the claimed 3 Myr post-merger age, so the fitted parameters are not mutually consistent.

free parameters (7)
  • Cluster age = 35 +/- 5 Myr
    Fitted by matching PARSEC isochrones to the cluster CMD turn-on and turn-off.
  • WD mass = 1.05 +/- 0.08 M_sun
    MCMC fit of Gaia photometry to cooling tracks, cross-checked with spectra.
  • WD effective temperature = 31,622 K
    MCMC fit from photometry and blackbody/spectral fits.
  • WD log g = 8.68 cgs
    MCMC fit from photometry and spectral fitting.
  • Common envelope efficiency alpha = 3.0 (default), also 1.0
    Ad hoc model input in BSE; the quoted example assumes alpha=3, which is high for low-mass stars.
  • Reimers wind mass loss eta = 0.5
    Adopted from literature, not fitted here.
  • Binary initial conditions for example = M1=9.5 M_sun, M2=0.2 M_sun, P=300 d
    Chosen to reproduce the observed WD mass and formation time; one of many solutions from the BSE grid.
assumptions (7)
  • domain assumption Bédard et al. (2020) WD cooling tracks
    Used to convert CMD position to mass, log g, Teff, and cooling age.
  • domain assumption Initial-final mass relation (Cummings, Marigo, MIST)
    Used in wdwarfdate to estimate progenitor mass and total age for single-star evolution.
  • standard math WD mass-radius relation
    Implied by the cooling tracks and by log g and mass determination.
  • domain assumption PARSEC isochrones for cluster age
    Used to derive the 35 Myr cluster age and distance modulus.
  • domain assumption 6.556 min period is the rotation period
    Assumed after ruling out pulsation and binarity; no spectroscopic confirmation of rotation is provided.
  • domain assumption Half-ring of debris is magnetically locked to the WD
    Used to derive the half-ring radius and to connect the debris kinematics to the WD; no direct measurement supports the locking.
  • domain assumption BSE and MESA prescriptions for common envelope and mass transfer
    The binary evolution models rely on these prescriptions, which carry significant uncertainties.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of A magnetic white dwarf formed through a binary merger within 35 million years." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/F4O6S6FG

@misc{pith2026250901069,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: A magnetic white dwarf formed through a binary merger within 35 million years},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/F4O6S6FG}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2509.01069}
}
abstract

White dwarfs (WDs) represent the final evolutionary stage of most stars, typically originating from progenitor stars with masses below approximately 8 $M_{\odot}$ to 10 $M_{\odot}$. Formation through single-star evolution generally requires at least 25 Myr, with the youngest WDs often near the Chandrasekhar limit of 1.4 $M_{\odot}$. In contrast, WDs formed via binary channels, such as mergers or mass transfer, can develop smaller masses in a shorter timescale and may exhibit unique characteristics, including strong surface magnetic fields and rapid rotation. Accurately determining the ages of these WDs is essential for understanding their formation. A valuable method involves studying WDs in star clusters, where member stars share the same age and chemical composition, allowing for precise constraints on the formation times and metallicities of the WDs' progenitors. Here we report a WD found in the open cluster RSG 5, which is only 35 Myr old. The WD's mass is lower than 1.05 $M_{\odot}$, indicating it may not have formed through single-star evolution. The WD possesses an exceptionally strong surface magnetic field ($\ge 200$ MG), a short rotational period ($\sim 6.5$ min), and, most notably, a co-rotating half-ring of ionized circumstellar debris. This distinctive feature provides evidence for a binary merger origin, a scenario further substantiated by our stellar evolution models.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2509.01069 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Gaia astrometric parameters and color-magnitude diagram for RSG 5 and RSG5-WD. Left panel: (A): The col￾or-magnitude diagram (BP − RP vs. G band) of the star cluster with isochrone fits. The solid blue line represents the fit for an age of 35 million years (Myr), while the dashed blue lines represent the fit for ages of 30 Myr and 40 Myr. The black dots represent the member stars of the star cluster, while the red p… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. RSG5-WD light curve and power spectrum. (A): ZTF g-band light curves folded with a period of 6.556 minutes. The square markers represent binned data, where every 20 points are averaged into a bin. (B):Same as (A), but for r-band light curves. (C): The power spectrum in the g-band. The gray shading highlights the frequency corresponding to the maximum value of the power spectrum. (D): The power spectrum in the r-band… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. RSG5-WD spectrum with Zeeman components of Hydrogen indicated. (A):The blue section spectrum of RSG5-WD from Keck I telescope. (B): The wavelength as a function of magnetic field for the hydrogen lines. The green line represents the hydrogen absorption lines in the spectrum, and the shaded area indicates the corresponding magnetic field range. (C): Same as (A), but for red section spectrum. (D): The Hα emission line… view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (6 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: An example illustrating how binary interaction can result in the formation of the observed white dwarf within 35 Myr. (A): The evolution of the binary star on the Hertzsprung-Russell diagram from BSE result. (B): The evolutionary flow chart according to BSE result. In …
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Phase-averaged spectrum with the best-fitting blackbody model. The black line represents the spectra of RSG5-WD from Keck, the red line indicates the best-fit result, and the yellow shaded area represents the 25% to 75% confidence interval based on the MCMC fitting. en…
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Corner plots. Corner plots for parameter estimates based on Gaia photometry [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_6.png]
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Comparison of RSG5-WD system ages and physical parameters under three different IFMR: (Upper panel) The MIST IFMR from J. D. Cummings et al. (2018), (Middle panel) The PARSEC IFMR from J. D. Cummings et al. (2018), (Lower panel) The IFMR from P. Marigo et al. (2020). T…
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: The phase-resolved spectra of RSG5-WD. (A): The blue-end spectra from program C266. We arranged the spectra in order of phases from top to bottom, and the percentage represents the relative flux ratio, where the reference spectrum is set to 100%. (B): The red-end spect…
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: Initial binary mass combinations capable of producing a CO white dwarf. Red points represent those combinations that yield a CO WD with a mass between 1.02 M⊙ and 1.06 M⊙. The outcome of all these combinations is a single WD, with its companion having been engulfed dur…

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

67 extracted references · 12 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    , " * write output.state after.block = add.period write newline

    ENTRY address archivePrefix author booktitle chapter doi edition editor eprint howpublished institution journal key month number organization pages publisher school series title misctitle type volume year version url label extra.label sort.label short.list INTEGERS output.state before.all mid.sentence after.sentence after.block FUNCTION init.state.consts ...

  2. [2]

    write newline

    " write newline "" before.all 'output.state := FUNCTION format.url url empty "" new.block "" url * "" * if FUNCTION format.eprint eprint empty "" archivePrefix empty "" archivePrefix "arXiv" = new.block " " eprint * " " * new.block " " eprint * " " * if if if FUNCTION format.doi doi empty "" " " doi * " " * if FUNCTION format.pid doi empty eprint empty ur...

  3. [3]

    9 H& 0 D2vH I `

    thebibliography [1] 20pt to REFERENCES 6pt =0pt \@twocolumntrue 12pt -12pt 10pt plus 3pt =0pt =0pt =1pt plus 1pt =0pt =0pt -12pt =13pt plus 1pt =20pt =13pt plus 1pt \@M =10000 =-1.0em =0pt =0pt 0pt =0pt =1.0em @enumiv\@empty 10000 10000 `\.\@m \@noitemerr \@latex@warning Empty `thebibliography' environment \@ifnextchar \@reference \@latexerr Missing key o...

    arXiv 2017

  4. [4]

    Almeida , A., Monteiro , H., & Dias , W. S. 2023, title Revisiting the mass of open clusters with Gaia data , Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 525, 2315, 10.1093/mnras/stad2291

    doi:10.1093/mnras/stad2291 2023

  5. [5]

    2020, title On the Spectral Evolution of Hot White Dwarf Stars

    B \'e dard , A., Bergeron , P., Brassard , P., & Fontaine , G. 2020, title On the Spectral Evolution of Hot White Dwarf Stars. I. A Detailed Model Atmosphere Analysis of Hot White Dwarfs from SDSS DR12 , The Astrophysical Journal, 901, 93, 10.3847/1538-4357/abafbe

    doi:10.3847/1538-4357/abafbe 2020

  6. [6]

    2017, title Measurements of Physical Parameters of White Dwarfs: A Test of the Mass-Radius Relation , The Astrophysical Journal, 848, 11, 10.3847/1538-4357/aa8bb6

    B \'e dard , A., Bergeron , P., & Fontaine , G. 2017, title Measurements of Physical Parameters of White Dwarfs: A Test of the Mass-Radius Relation , The Astrophysical Journal, 848, 11, 10.3847/1538-4357/aa8bb6

    doi:10.3847/1538-4357/aa8bb6 2017

  7. [7]

    C., Kulkarni , S

    Bellm , E. C., Kulkarni , S. R., Graham , M. J., et al. 2019, title The Zwicky Transient Facility: System Overview, Performance, and First Results , Publications of the Astronomical Society of the Pacific, 131, 018002, 10.1088/1538-3873/aaecbe

    doi:10.1088/1538-3873/aaecbe 2019

  8. [8]

    K., & Ruiz , M

    Bergeron , P., Leggett , S. K., & Ruiz , M. T. 2001, title Photometric and Spectroscopic Analysis of Cool White Dwarfs with Trigonometric Parallax Measurements , The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series, 133, 413, 10.1086/320356

    doi:10.1086/320356 2001

Show all 67 references
  1. [9]

    G., Kerr , R., Curtis , J

    Bouma , L. G., Kerr , R., Curtis , J. L., et al. 2022, title Kepler and the Behemoth: Three Mini-Neptunes in a 40 Million Year Old Association , The Astronomical Journal, 164, 215, 10.3847/1538-3881/ac93ff

    2022 doi

  2. [10]

    P., Ferrario , L., Tout , C

    Briggs , G. P., Ferrario , L., Tout , C. A., Wickramasinghe , D. T., & Hurley , J. R. 2015, title Merging binary stars and the magnetic white dwarfs , , 447, 1713, 10.1093/mnras/stu2539

    2015 doi

  3. [11]

    Bruzual A. , G. 2010, title Star clusters as simple stellar populations , Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London Series A, 368, 783, 10.1098/rsta.2009.0258

    2010

  4. [12]

    B., Fuller , J., et al

    Caiazzo , I., Burdge , K. B., Fuller , J., et al. 2021, title A highly magnetized and rapidly rotating white dwarf as small as the Moon , Natur, 595, 39, 10.1038/s41586-021-03615-y

    2021 doi

  5. [13]

    A., Clayton , G

    Cardelli , J. A., Clayton , G. C., & Mathis , J. S. 1989, title The Relationship between Infrared, Optical, and Ultraviolet Extinction , The Astrophysical Journal, 345, 245, 10.1086/167900

    1989 doi

  6. [14]

    2016, title Mesa Isochrones and Stellar Tracks (MIST)

    Choi , J., Dotter , A., Conroy , C., et al. 2016, title Mesa Isochrones and Stellar Tracks (MIST). I. Solar-scaled Models , , 823, 102, 10.3847/0004-637X/823/2/102

    2016 doi

  7. [15]

    A., Caiazzo, I., Cunningham, T., et al

    Cristea, A. A., Caiazzo, I., Cunningham, T., et al. 2025, title A half-ring of ionized circumstellar material trapped in the magnetosphere of a white dwarf merger remnant, 2507.13850

    2025

  8. [16]

    D., Kalirai , J

    Cummings , J. D., Kalirai , J. S., Tremblay , P. E., Ramirez-Ruiz , E., & Choi , J. 2018, title The White Dwarf Initial-Final Mass Relation for Progenitor Stars from 0.85 to 7.5 M _ , The Astrophysical Journal, 866, 21, 10.3847/1538-4357/aadfd6

    2018 doi

  9. [17]

    2013, title Stellar Multiplicity , Annual Review of Astronomy and Astrophysics, 51, 269, 10.1146/annurev-astro-081710-102602

    Duch \^e ne , G., & Kraus , A. 2013, title Stellar Multiplicity , Annual Review of Astronomy and Astrophysics, 51, 269, 10.1146/annurev-astro-081710-102602

    2013 doi

  10. [18]

    Ferrario , L., de Martino , D., & G \"a nsicke , B. T. 2015, title Magnetic White Dwarfs , Space Science Reviews, 191, 111, 10.1007/s11214-015-0152-0

    2015 doi

  11. [19]

    T., Bailey , J

    Ferrario , L., Vennes , S., Wickramasinghe , D. T., Bailey , J. A., & Christian , D. J. 1997, title EUVE J0317-855: a rapidly rotating, high-field magnetic white dwarf , Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 292, 205, 10.1093/mnras/292.2.205

    1997 doi

  12. [20]

    A., & Bildsten , L

    Fuller , J., Cantiello , M., Stello , D., Garcia , R. A., & Bildsten , L. 2015, title Asteroseismology can reveal strong internal magnetic fields in red giant stars , Science, 350, 423, 10.1126/science.aac6933

    2015 doi

  13. [21]

    Gaia Collaboration , Prusti , T., de Bruijne , J. H. J., et al. 2016, title The Gaia mission , , 595, A1, 10.1051/0004-6361/201629272

    2016 doi

  14. [22]

    L., Sarro , L

    Gaia Collaboration , Smart , R. L., Sarro , L. M., et al. 2021, title Gaia Early Data Release 3. The Gaia Catalogue of Nearby Stars , Astronomy and Astrophysics, 649, A6, 10.1051/0004-6361/202039498

    2021 doi

  15. [23]

    2012, title Double Degenerate Mergers as Progenitors of High-field Magnetic White Dwarfs , Astrophysical Journal, 749, 25, 10.1088/0004-637X/749/1/25

    Garc \' a-Berro , E., Lor \'e n-Aguilar , P., Aznar-Sigu \'a n , G., et al. 2012, title Double Degenerate Mergers as Progenitors of High-field Magnetic White Dwarfs , Astrophysical Journal, 749, 25, 10.1088/0004-637X/749/1/25

    2012 doi

  16. [24]

    A., Chen , X., et al

    Ge , H., Tout , C. A., Chen , X., et al. 2022, title The Common Envelope Evolution Outcome-A Case Study on Hot Subdwarf B Stars , The Astrophysical Journal, 933, 137, 10.3847/1538-4357/ac75d3

    2022 doi

  17. [25]

    A., Webbink , R

    Ge , H., Tout , C. A., Webbink , R. F., et al. 2024, title The Common Envelope Evolution Outcome. II. Short-orbital-period Hot Subdwarf B Binaries Reveal a Clear Picture , The Astrophysical Journal, 961, 202, 10.3847/1538-4357/ad158e

    2024 doi

  18. [26]

    P., Tremblay , P

    Gentile Fusillo , N. P., Tremblay , P. E., Cukanovaite , E., et al. 2021, title A catalogue of white dwarfs in Gaia EDR3 , Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 508, 3877, 10.1093/mnras/stab2672

    2021 doi

  19. [27]

    M., Drout , M

    Grondin , S. M., Drout , M. R., Nordhaus , J., et al. 2024, title The first catalogue of candidate white dwarf-main sequence binaries in open star clusters: A new window into common envelope evolution , arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2407.04775, 10.48550/arXiv.2407.04775

    2024 doi arXiv

  20. [28]

    S., Schreiber , M

    Hernandez , M. S., Schreiber , M. R., Landstreet , J. D., et al. 2024, title Rotation plays a role in the generation of magnetic fields in single white dwarfs , Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 528, 6056, 10.1093/mnras/stae307

    2024 doi

  21. [29]

    M., J rgensen , I., Allington-Smith , J

    Hook , I. M., J rgensen , I., Allington-Smith , J. R., et al. 2004, title The Gemini-North Multi-Object Spectrograph: Performance in Imaging, Long-Slit, and Multi-Object Spectroscopic Modes , The Publications of the Astronomical Society of the Pacific, 116, 425, 10.1086/383624

    2004 doi

  22. [30]

    L., & Reffert , S

    Hunt , E. L., & Reffert , S. 2023, title Improving the open cluster census. II. An all-sky cluster catalogue with Gaia DR3 , Astronomy and Astrophysics, 673, A114, 10.1051/0004-6361/202346285

    2023 doi

  23. [31]

    L., & Reffert , S

    Hunt , E. L., & Reffert , S. 2024, title Improving the open cluster census. III. Using cluster masses, radii, and dynamics to create a cleaned open cluster catalogue , , 686, A42, 10.1051/0004-6361/202348662

    2024 doi

  24. [32]

    R., Tout , C

    Hurley , J. R., Tout , C. A., & Pols , O. R. 2002, title Evolution of binary stars and the effect of tides on binary populations , Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 329, 897, 10.1046/j.1365-8711.2002.05038.x

    2002

  25. [33]

    1990, title On the Consequences of Low-Mass White Dwarf Mergers , The Astrophysical Journal, 353, 215, 10.1086/168609

    Iben , Jr., I. 1990, title On the Consequences of Low-Mass White Dwarf Mergers , The Astrophysical Journal, 353, 215, 10.1086/168609

    1990 doi

  26. [34]

    2024, title Massive White Dwarfs in the 100 pc Sample: Magnetism, Rotation, Pulsations, and the Merger Fraction , The Astrophysical Journal, 974, 12, 10.3847/1538-4357/ad6905

    Jewett , G., Kilic , M., Bergeron , P., et al. 2024, title Massive White Dwarfs in the 100 pc Sample: Magnetism, Rotation, Pulsations, and the Merger Fraction , The Astrophysical Journal, 974, 12, 10.3847/1538-4357/ad6905

    2024 doi

  27. [35]

    2025, title The 100 pc White Dwarf Sample in the SDSS Footprint

    Kilic , M., Bergeron , P., Blouin , S., et al. 2025, title The 100 pc White Dwarf Sample in the SDSS Footprint. II. A New Look at the Spectral Evolution of White Dwarfs , The Astrophysical Journal, 979, 157, 10.3847/1538-4357/ad9bb3

    2025 doi

  28. [36]

    K., et al

    Kiman , R., Xu , S., Faherty , J. K., et al. 2022, title wdwarfdate: A Python Package to Derive Bayesian Ages of White Dwarfs , , 164, 62, 10.3847/1538-3881/ac7788

    2022 doi

  29. [37]

    2013, in Planets, Stars and Stellar Systems

    Koester , D. 2013, in Planets, Stars and Stellar Systems. Volume 4: Stellar Structure and Evolution, ed. T. D. Oswalt & M. A. Barstow , Vol. 4, 559, 10.1007/978-94-007-5615-1_11

    2013 doi

  30. [38]

    Lau , M. Y. M., Hirai , R., Gonz \'a lez-Bol \' var , M., et al. 2022, title Common envelopes in massive stars: towards the role of radiation pressure and recombination energy in ejecting red supergiant envelopes , Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 512, 5462, ...

    2022 doi

  31. [39]

    Y., Yagi , K., & Arras , P

    Lau , S. Y., Yagi , K., & Arras , P. 2025, title Astrophysical systematics on testing general relativity with gravitational waves from Galactic double white dwarfs , Physical Review D, 111, 024039, 10.1103/PhysRevD.111.024039

    2025 doi

  32. [40]

    2024, title Evolution and Final Fate of Solar Metallicity Stars in the Mass Range 7 15 M _

    Limongi , M., Roberti , L., Chieffi , A., & Nomoto , K. 2024, title Evolution and Final Fate of Solar Metallicity Stars in the Mass Range 7 15 M _ . I. The Transition from Asymptotic Giant Branch to Super-AGB Stars, Electron Capture, and Core-collapse Supernova Progenitors , T...

    2024 doi

  33. [41]

    Loi , S. T. 2020, title Magneto-gravity wave packet dynamics in strongly magnetized cores of evolved stars , Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 493, 5726, 10.1093/mnras/staa581

    2020 doi

  34. [42]

    Marchant , P., Pappas , K. M. W., Gallegos-Garcia , M., et al. 2021, title The role of mass transfer and common envelope evolution in the formation of merging binary black holes , , 650, A107, 10.1051/0004-6361/202039992

    2021 doi

  35. [43]

    D., Curtis , J

    Marigo , P., Cummings , J. D., Curtis , J. L., et al. 2020, title Carbon star formation as seen through the non-monotonic initial-final mass relation , Nature Astronomy, 4, 1102, 10.1038/s41550-020-1132-1

    2020 doi

  36. [44]

    R., Dhillon , V

    Marsh , T. R., Dhillon , V. S., & Duck , S. R. 1995, title Low-Mass White Dwarfs Need Friends - Five New Double-Degenerate Close Binary Stars , Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 275, 828, 10.1093/mnras/275.3.828

    1995 doi

  37. [45]

    McDonald , I., & Zijlstra , A. A. 2015, title Mass-loss on the red giant branch: the value and metallicity dependence of Reimers' in globular clusters , Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 448, 502, 10.1093/mnras/stv007

    2015 doi

  38. [46]

    2021, title The TianQin project: Current progress on science and technology , Progress of Theoretical and Experimental Physics, 2021, 05A107, 10.1093/ptep/ptaa114

    Mei , J., Bai , Y.-Z., Bao , J., et al. 2021, title The TianQin project: Current progress on science and technology , Progress of Theoretical and Experimental Physics, 2021, 05A107, 10.1093/ptep/ptaa114

    2021 doi

  39. [47]

    T., Costa , G., Girardi , L., et al

    Nguyen , C. T., Costa , G., Girardi , L., et al. 2022, title PARSEC V2.0: Stellar tracks and isochrones of low- and intermediate-mass stars with rotation , Astronomy and Astrophysics, 665, A126, 10.1051/0004-6361/202244166

    2022 doi

  40. [48]

    S., Metzger , B

    Nordhaus , J., Wellons , S., Spiegel , D. S., Metzger , B. D., & Blackman , E. G. 2011, title Formation of high-field magnetic white dwarfs from common envelopes , Proceedings of the National Academy of Science, 108, 3135, 10.1073/pnas.1015005108

    2011 doi

  41. [49]

    O'Donnell , J. E. 1994, title R v-dependent Optical and Near-Ultraviolet Extinction , The Astrophysical Journal, 422, 158, 10.1086/173713

    1994 doi

  42. [50]

    O'Grady , A. J. G., Drout , M. R., Gaensler , B. M., et al. 2023, title Cool, Luminous, and Highly Variable Stars in the Magellanic Clouds. II. Spectroscopic and Environmental Analysis of Thorne- \.Z ytkow Object and Super-AGB Star Candidates , The Astrophysical Journal, 943, ...

    2023 doi

  43. [51]

    B., Cohen , J

    Oke , J. B., Cohen , J. G., Carr , M., et al. 1995, title The Keck Low-Resolution Imaging Spectrometer , Publications of the Astronomical Society of the Pacific, 107, 375, 10.1086/133562

    1995 doi

  44. [52]

    2011, title Modules for Experiments in Stellar Astrophysics (MESA) , , 192, 3, 10.1088/0067-0049/192/1/3

    Paxton , B., Bildsten , L., Dotter , A., et al. 2011, title Modules for Experiments in Stellar Astrophysics (MESA) , , 192, 3, 10.1088/0067-0049/192/1/3

    2011 doi

  45. [53]

    2013, title Modules for Experiments in Stellar Astrophysics (MESA): Planets, Oscillations, Rotation, and Massive Stars , , 208, 4, 10.1088/0067-0049/208/1/4

    Paxton , B., Cantiello , M., Arras , P., et al. 2013, title Modules for Experiments in Stellar Astrophysics (MESA): Planets, Oscillations, Rotation, and Massive Stars , , 208, 4, 10.1088/0067-0049/208/1/4

    2013 doi

  46. [54]

    2015, title Modules for Experiments in Stellar Astrophysics (MESA): Binaries, Pulsations, and Explosions , , 220, 15, 10.1088/0067-0049/220/1/15

    Paxton , B., Marchant , P., Schwab , J., et al. 2015, title Modules for Experiments in Stellar Astrophysics (MESA): Binaries, Pulsations, and Explosions , , 220, 15, 10.1088/0067-0049/220/1/15

    2015 doi

  47. [55]

    B., et al

    Paxton , B., Schwab , J., Bauer , E. B., et al. 2018, title Modules for Experiments in Stellar Astrophysics (MESA): Convective Boundaries, Element Diffusion, and Massive Star Explosions , , 234, 34, 10.3847/1538-4365/aaa5a8

    2018 doi

  48. [56]

    Paxton , B., Smolec , R., Schwab , J., et al. 2019, title Modules for Experiments in Stellar Astrophysics (MESA): Pulsating Variable Stars, Rotation, Convective Boundaries, and Energy Conservation , , 243, 10, 10.3847/1538-4365/ab2241

    2019 doi

  49. [57]

    R., Buckley , D

    Pelisoli , I., Marsh , T. R., Buckley , D. A. H., et al. 2023, title A 5.3-min-period pulsing white dwarf in a binary detected from radio to X-rays , Nature Astronomy, 7, 931, 10.1038/s41550-023-01995-x

    2023 doi

  50. [58]

    2023, title Uncovering new white dwarf open cluster associations using Gaia DR3 , Astronomy and Astrophysics, 678, A20, 10.1051/0004-6361/202245706

    Pri s egen , M., & Faltov \'a , N. 2023, title Uncovering new white dwarf open cluster associations using Gaia DR3 , Astronomy and Astrophysics, 678, A20, 10.1051/0004-6361/202245706

    2023 doi

  51. [59]

    X., Hennawi , J., Cooke , R., et al

    Prochaska , J. X., Hennawi , J., Cooke , R., et al. 2020, title pypeit/PypeIt: Release 1.0.0 , , v1.0.0 Zenodo, 10.5281/zenodo.3743493

    2020 doi

  52. [60]

    1977, title On the absolute scale of mass-loss in red giants

    Reimers , D. 1977, title On the absolute scale of mass-loss in red giants. I. Circumstellar absorption lines in the spectrum of the visual companion of alpha ^ 1 Her. , Astronomy and Astrophysics, 61, 217

    1977

  53. [61]

    2016, title Nine new open clusters within 500 pc from the Sun , Astronomy and Astrophysics, 595, A22, 10.1051/0004-6361/201629158

    R \"o ser , S., Schilbach , E., & Goldman , B. 2016, title Nine new open clusters within 500 pc from the Sun , Astronomy and Astrophysics, 595, A22, 10.1051/0004-6361/201629158

    2016 doi

  54. [62]

    1994, Stationary Lines and White Dwarf Spectra (Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg), 89--108, 10.1007/978-3-642-78820-8_7

    Ruder, H., Wunner, G., Herold, H., & Geyer, F. 1994, Stationary Lines and White Dwarf Spectra (Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg), 89--108, 10.1007/978-3-642-78820-8_7

    1994 doi

  55. [63]

    2021, title Evolutionary Models for the Remnant of the Merger of Two Carbon-Oxygen Core White Dwarfs , The Astrophysical Journal, 906, 53, 10.3847/1538-4357/abc87e

    Schwab , J. 2021, title Evolutionary Models for the Remnant of the Merger of Two Carbon-Oxygen Core White Dwarfs , The Astrophysical Journal, 906, 53, 10.3847/1538-4357/abc87e

    2021 doi

  56. [64]

    P., Jao , W.-C., Henry , T

    Subasavage , J. P., Jao , W.-C., Henry , T. J., et al. 2017, title The Solar Neighborhood. XXXIX. Parallax Results from the CTIOPI and NOFS Programs: 50 New Members of the 25 parsec White Dwarf Sample , The Astronomical Journal, 154, 32, 10.3847/1538-3881/aa76e0

    2017 doi

  57. [65]

    A., Wickramasinghe , D

    Tout , C. A., Wickramasinghe , D. T., Liebert , J., Ferrario , L., & Pringle , J. E. 2008, title Binary star origin of high field magnetic white dwarfs , Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 387, 897, 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2008.13291.x

    2008

  58. [66]

    A., Fontaine , G., et al

    Van Grootel , V., Dupret , M. A., Fontaine , G., et al. 2012, title The instability strip of ZZ Ceti white dwarfs. I. Introduction of time-dependent convection , Astronomy and Astrophysics, 539, A87, 10.1051/0004-6361/201118371

    2012 doi

  59. [67]

    A., Jordan , S., et al

    Vincent , O., Barstow , M. A., Jordan , S., et al. 2024, title Classification and parameterization of a large Gaia sample of white dwarfs using XP spectra , Astronomy and Astrophysics, 682, A5, 10.1051/0004-6361/202347694

    2024 doi

Pith tools

Reviewed August 5, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.