Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 cited by

GeoGPT: Understanding and Processing Geospatial Tasks through An Autonomous GPT

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2307.07930 v1 pith:FDKEROFN submitted 2023-07-16 cs.CL cs.AI

classification cs.CLcs.AI
keywords geospatialgeogpttaskstoolslanguagesolveunderstandingused
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Decision-makers in GIS need to combine a series of spatial algorithms and operations to solve geospatial tasks. For example, in the task of facility siting, the Buffer tool is usually first used to locate areas close or away from some specific entities; then, the Intersect or Erase tool is used to select candidate areas satisfied multiple requirements. Though professionals can easily understand and solve these geospatial tasks by sequentially utilizing relevant tools, it is difficult for non-professionals to handle these problems. Recently, Generative Pre-trained Transformer (e.g., ChatGPT) presents strong performance in semantic understanding and reasoning. Especially, AutoGPT can further extend the capabilities of large language models (LLMs) by automatically reasoning and calling externally defined tools. Inspired by these studies, we attempt to lower the threshold of non-professional users to solve geospatial tasks by integrating the semantic understanding ability inherent in LLMs with mature tools within the GIS community. Specifically, we develop a new framework called GeoGPT that can conduct geospatial data collection, processing, and analysis in an autonomous manner with the instruction of only natural language. In other words, GeoGPT is used to understand the demands of non-professional users merely based on input natural language descriptions, and then think, plan, and execute defined GIS tools to output final effective results. Several cases including geospatial data crawling, spatial query, facility siting, and mapping validate the effectiveness of our framework. Though limited cases are presented in this paper, GeoGPT can be further extended to various tasks by equipping with more GIS tools, and we think the paradigm of "foundational plus professional" implied in GeoGPT provides an effective way to develop next-generation GIS in this era of large foundation models.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 4 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. SCOPE and SCION: A Benchmark and an Auditable Reference Pipeline for Schema Induction and Fusion from Text

    cs.AI 2026-05 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    A 24-dataset benchmark for inducing schema graphs from raw text, plus an auditable LLM-based pipeline that reports the highest scores on the benchmark's four schema-similarity metrics.

  2. GeoSR: Cognitive-Agentic Framework for Probing Geospatial Knowledge Boundaries via Iterative Self-Refinement

    cs.AI 2025-08 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    An iterative multi-agent prompting loop that applies Tobler's first law of geography improves LLM accuracy and reduces geographic bias on four geospatial estimation tasks across four models, but key details and baseli...

  3. EarthSE: A Benchmark for Evaluating Earth Scientific Exploration Capability of LLMs

    cs.CL 2025-05 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    EarthSE provides a two-level QA benchmark and an open-ended dialogue benchmark for Earth science and shows current LLMs perform poorly on both.

  4. A Modular Multitask Reasoning Framework Integrating Spatio-temporal Models and LLMs

    cs.CL 2025-06 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    STReason uses in-context learning to convert spatio-temporal queries into executable programs with specialized modules, outperforming plain LLMs on a new 150-query benchmark.

Pith tools