Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 cited by

What can Large Language Models do in chemistry? A comprehensive benchmark on eight tasks

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2305.18365 v3 pith:FDYCWLGE submitted 2023-05-27 cs.CL cs.AI

classification cs.CLcs.AI
keywords llmschemistrytasksbenchmarkeightlanguagemodelsacross
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Large Language Models (LLMs) with strong abilities in natural language processing tasks have emerged and have been applied in various kinds of areas such as science, finance and software engineering. However, the capability of LLMs to advance the field of chemistry remains unclear. In this paper, rather than pursuing state-of-the-art performance, we aim to evaluate capabilities of LLMs in a wide range of tasks across the chemistry domain. We identify three key chemistry-related capabilities including understanding, reasoning and explaining to explore in LLMs and establish a benchmark containing eight chemistry tasks. Our analysis draws on widely recognized datasets facilitating a broad exploration of the capacities of LLMs within the context of practical chemistry. Five LLMs (GPT-4, GPT-3.5, Davinci-003, Llama and Galactica) are evaluated for each chemistry task in zero-shot and few-shot in-context learning settings with carefully selected demonstration examples and specially crafted prompts. Our investigation found that GPT-4 outperformed other models and LLMs exhibit different competitive levels in eight chemistry tasks. In addition to the key findings from the comprehensive benchmark analysis, our work provides insights into the limitation of current LLMs and the impact of in-context learning settings on LLMs' performance across various chemistry tasks. The code and datasets used in this study are available at https://github.com/ChemFoundationModels/ChemLLMBench.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 4 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Decompose, Plan in Parallel, and Merge: A Novel Paradigm for Large Language Models based Planning with Multiple Constraints

    cs.CL 2025-06 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    DPPM, a decompose-plan-in-parallel-and-merge framework with verify-and-refine feedback, improves final pass rates on travel-planning benchmarks over Direct, CoT, and LLM-Modulo.

  2. NOCL: Node-Oriented Conceptualization LLM for Graph Tasks without Message Passing

    cs.LG 2025-05 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    NOCL lets an LLM handle node, edge, and graph tasks on text and non-text graphs by compressing each node's description into one semantic embedding and turning the graph into a text prompt.

  3. Fine-Tuning and Prompt Engineering of LLMs, for the Creation of Multi-Agent AI for Addressing Sustainable Protein Production Challenges

    cs.AI 2025-06 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

    A proof-of-concept multi-agent GPT system for microbial protein literature extraction shows both fine-tuning and prompt engineering improve cosine-similarity scores, with fine-tuning slightly ahead but more variable.

  4. Foundation Model Empowered Synesthesia of Machines (SoM): AI-native Intelligent Multi-Modal Sensing-Communication Integration

    eess.SP 2025-06 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

    The paper proposes a systematic classification and two roadmaps for using foundation models (LLMs and wireless foundation models) to design Synesthesia of Machines systems for 6G, with preliminary case-study evidence ...

Pith tools