REVIEW 2 cited by
A Survey on the Explainability of Supervised Machine Learning
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
Predictions obtained by, e.g., artificial neural networks have a high accuracy but humans often perceive the models as black boxes. Insights about the decision making are mostly opaque for humans. Particularly understanding the decision making in highly sensitive areas such as healthcare or fifinance, is of paramount importance. The decision-making behind the black boxes requires it to be more transparent, accountable, and understandable for humans. This survey paper provides essential definitions, an overview of the different principles and methodologies of explainable Supervised Machine Learning (SML). We conduct a state-of-the-art survey that reviews past and recent explainable SML approaches and classifies them according to the introduced definitions. Finally, we illustrate principles by means of an explanatory case study and discuss important future directions.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
Surrogate Modeling for Explainable Predictive Time Series Corrections
A before-and-after parameter comparison makes black-box corrections to time series forecasts explainable, with integrated-gradient scores attributing the correction to base-model parameters.
-
The State of Post-Hoc Local XAI Techniques for Image Processing: Challenges and Motivations
A review of post-hoc local XAI techniques for images, covering motivations, challenges, and suggested future directions.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.