Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 5 minor 1 cited by

Exploring the Structural Properties of Anisotropic Dark Matter-Admixed Quark Stars

T0 review · 3 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-07 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read Dark matter-admixed quark stars are more compact yet less massive than pure quark stars, with the effect controlled by quark anisotropy.

desk verdict A standard two-fluid TOV parameter scan whose abstract contradicts its own results for positive anisotropy; the numerics look solid but the headline needs fixing before citation. read the letter →

arxiv 2505.20545 v1 pith:FOJCFLQB submitted 2025-05-26 gr-qc astro-ph.HEastro-ph.SRhep-ph

G. Panotopoulos , A. Rincón , I. Lopes This is my paper · ORCID
classification gr-qcastro-ph.HEastro-ph.SRhep-ph MSC 83C5585A15 PACS 04.40.-b95.35.+d97.60.Jd
keywords anisotropiccompactstarsquarkdarkmatteradmixedtwo-fluidTolman-Oppenheimer-VolkoffequationsMITbagmodelBose-Einsteincondensatemass-radiusrelationcompactness
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper numerically computes the structure of compact stars made of two non-interacting fluids, quark matter and condensed dark matter, by solving the two-fluid Tolman-Oppenheimer-Volkoff equations. Its central claim is that dark matter-admixed quark stars are more compact yet less massive than pure quark stars, and that this effect is controlled by two dials: the central dark matter fraction and the sign of the star's pressure anisotropy. With negative quark anisotropy the computed maximum masses often fall below the two-solar-mass band set by known pulsars, while with positive anisotropy the trend reverses. The paper presents these mass-radius curves as testable predictions that can be compared with X-ray, radio timing, and gravitational-wave constraints on neutron star structure.

What carries the argument

The central object is the two-fluid TOV system: $m' = 4\pi r^2 \rho$, $p'_{QM} = -(\rho_{QM}+p_{QM})\,g + 2\Delta_{QM}/r$, $p'_{DM} = -(\rho_{DM}+p_{DM})\,g + 2\Delta_{DM}/r$, with $g(r) = (m + 4\pi r^3 p)/(r^2(1-2m/r))$, closed by the quark matter relation $p_{QM} = (\rho_{QM} - 4B)/3$ and the dark matter condensate relation $p_{DM} = K\rho_{DM}^2$. The anisotropy is encoded by $\Delta_{QM} = \kappa_1 p_{QM}(2m/r)$ and $\Delta_{DM} = \kappa_2 p_{DM}(2m/r)$. The integration is normalized by the central ratio $\alpha = f/(1-f)$ with $f = \rho_{c,DM}/(\rho_{c,DM}+\rho_{c,QM})$, and the star is defined by the single-surface matching conditions $p(R)=0$, $m(R)=M$, joined to a Schwarzschild exterior.

What would settle it

Integrate the same two-fluid TOV system but stop each fluid where its own pressure alone vanishes and compare the two radii; if $R_{DM} \neq R_{QM}$ for the quoted $f$ and $\kappa$ values, the single-surface matching assumed here is invalid and the reported masses, radii, and compactness values are not physical. On the observational side, a confirmed pulsar with mass at or above $2\,M_\odot$ and a radius in the range predicted by the negative-anisotropy models would rule out those parameter combinations.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

Working with the MIT bag equation of state $p_{QM} = (\rho_{QM} - 4B)/3$, a polytropic condensate equation of state $p_{DM} = K\rho_{DM}^2$, and anisotropy terms $\Delta_{QM} = \kappa_1 p_{QM}(2m/r)$, $\Delta_{DM} = \kappa_2 p_{DM}(2m/r)$, the paper integrates the two-fluid TOV system outward from central densities related by $\alpha = f/(1-f)$, with $f = 0.58, 0.60, 0.62$. For negative quark anisotropy ($\kappa_1 = -0.1$), increasing the dark matter fraction produces stars that are more compact yet less massive than pure quark stars, with maximum masses that typically fall below the $\sim 2\,M_\odot$ constraint from PSR J1614-2230 and PSR J0348+0432. For positive quark anisotropy ($\kappa_1 = +0.1$), the same fractions produce less compact yet more massive configurations, occasionally exceeding the pure-quark maximum mass. The quark mass fraction peaks near $\rho_{c,QM} \approx 2.75\,\rho_s$ and is shifted downward as $f$ grows, and the maximally massive configurations satisfy the adiabatic index stability criterion $\Gamma \ge \Gamma_{cr} = 4/3 + (19/21)(M/R)$. The authors take these results to show that dark matter content and anisotropy jointly shape the observational signature of quark-matter cores and to align with recent theoretical predictions and gravitational wave observations.

Load-bearing premise

The model assumes both fluids terminate at exactly the same radius, with the total pressure $p_{QM}+p_{DM}$ vanishing there, and never checks whether the two pressures separately reach zero at that point; if the dark matter extended further out, the star's mass, radius, and compactness would all change.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • If the negative-anisotropy models are correct, the presence of dark matter lowers the maximum mass of quark stars, so a confirmed two-solar-mass pulsar would rule out the largest dark matter fractions studied here.
  • For positive quark anisotropy the trend reverses, so measuring a single precise mass and radius for a candidate quark star could indicate which sign of anisotropy is realized in nature.
  • The quark mass fraction peaks near $\rho_{c,QM} \approx 2.75\,\rho_s$ and shifts downward as $f$ increases, giving a direct relation between the inferred central density and the dark matter content.
  • Because the paper's particle model has no dark matter-nucleon interaction, the large dark mass fractions shown are not in conflict with capture-based limits, so the predicted curves are legitimate targets for observation.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the single-surface assumption is relaxed, dark matter would naturally form an outer halo around the quark core; the exterior would no longer be a single Schwarzschild spacetime, and the inferred mass-radius relation could shift, potentially bringing the negative-anisotropy models back above the two-solar-mass threshold.
  • The reversal of the dark matter effect with the sign of $\kappa_1$ suggests that anisotropy, not just dark matter content, is the controlling lever; a single accurate mass-radius measurement of a compact object could therefore distinguish between the two anisotropy mechanisms and, by extension, between the underlying microphysical sources.
  • A natural follow-up, which the paper states is in progress, is to compute tidal deformabilities for these models; enforcing the GW170817 bound $\Lambda \le 800$ would further shrink the allowed $(f,\kappa_1)$ region and could turn the predicted curves into a sharper test.
  • If such stars exist, their compactness encodes both the boson self-interaction strength of the dark condensate and the bag constant of quark matter, so precise radius measurements would constrain fundamental constants of both sectors at once.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 5 minor

Summary. The manuscript numerically integrates the two-fluid Tolman-Oppenheimer-Volkoff equations for static, spherically symmetric compact stars containing quark matter described by the MIT Bag model and dark matter described by a Bose-Einstein condensate polytropic EoS, with an anisotropy ansatz Δ = κ p (2m/r) for each fluid. The authors fix B = 57.64 MeV/fm^3, K = 0.01/B, κ2 = -0.2, κ1 = ±0.1, and vary the central density ratio α = f/(1-f) = ρ_c,DM/ρ_c,QM. They present mass-radius curves, compactness factors, quark mass fractions, and an adiabatic-index stability check for negative and positive quark anisotropy, overlaying pulsar mass bands and NICER regions. The paper's headline conclusion is that dark-matter-admixed quark stars are more compact and less massive than pure quark stars, but Section 5.2 reports the opposite behavior for positive quark anisotropy.

Significance. If the technical issues are resolved, this parameter study would provide a useful benchmark family of two-fluid equilibrium sequences with transparent EoS choices and explicit observational overlays. The framework is standard, the input parameters are stated concretely, and the comparison with PSR J1614-2230, PSR J0348+0432, PSR J0740+6620, and NICER constraints is a useful way to frame the results. The main limitation is that the advertised universal conclusion is not supported by the paper's own Case II results, and the common-surface and stability assumptions require scrutiny before the quoted masses and radii can be interpreted as physical predictions.

major comments (3)
  1. [Abstract; §5.2; §6] The abstract and the final paragraph of §6 state as a universal result that dark matter-admixed quark stars are 'more compact and lighter' than pure quark stars 'regardless of whether the anisotropic quark matter satisfies ΔQM>0 or ΔQM<0'. This is directly contradicted by §5.2, where for positive quark anisotropy (κ1=+0.1) the hybrid configurations are described as 'less compact yet more massive structures compared to pure quark stars', with the maximum mass slightly increasing as α increases. Since this universal statement is the paper's headline claim and the basis for the claimed alignment with gravitational-wave observations, it must be corrected to a sign-dependent statement or restricted to the negative-anisotropy case.
  2. [§3, Eqs. (9), (14), (16)] The boundary condition p(R)=0 in Eq. (14), with p=pQM+pDM from Eq. (9), assumes that both fluids terminate at one common radius and that the interior can be matched to a single Schwarzschild exterior. Because the quark and dark matter fluids have independent equations of state and interact only gravitationally, there is no a priori reason for pQM and pDM to vanish at the same radius; one fluid could extend beyond the other, and continuing the MIT-bag EoS beyond pQM=0 would produce negative quark pressure. The manuscript does not verify simultaneous vanishing of the two pressures. Since the reported M, R, and compactness all depend on this surface choice, the authors should either demonstrate numerically that the common-surface condition is satisfied for the parameter sets used or reformulate the matching with separate surfaces.
  3. [§5, Eq. (31), Fig. 3] Stability is asserted using the approximate adiabatic-index criterion Γ≥Γcr=4/3+(19/21)(M/R), and §5.2 argues that stability of the most massive pure quark configuration 'guarantees that all other configurations must be stable as well' because their masses and compactnesses are lower. This inference is not valid for two-fluid stars, as the paper itself acknowledges via Refs. [135,136]: the maximum-mass configuration need not coincide with the last stable configuration, and extended stable branches can exist. The stability claims should be downgraded to consistency with the approximate Γ criterion, or supported by a proper radial-oscillation analysis of the two-fluid configurations.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Throughout] Several typographical errors should be corrected: 'posotive' after Eq. (1), 'Alternativelly' in Section 1, 'thorugh' in the Acknowledgments, and 'eigenvalue value problem' in Section 5.2.
  2. [Fig. 1 caption] The caption lists 'the light HESS compact object (purple region)' twice, attributing it to Refs. [146] and [147]; Ref. [147] is a NICER paper on PSR J0437-4715, so the region labels and references should be reconciled.
  3. [§5.1, Fig. 1 bottom-right panel] The quantity plotted as 'Mass fraction' is not defined in the text; please state explicitly whether it is M_QM/M_total and how it is obtained from the integrated density profiles.
  4. [§4.1, Eqs. (20), (27), (28)] The units of K are not specified; since B is given in MeV/fm^3 and the TOV equations are integrated in geometric units, please state the conversion used for K and the resulting units of the polytropic EoS.
  5. [§5, paragraph before Eq. (25)] The sentence 'As the anisotropic factor of dark matter condensate is always negative [107]' should be qualified, since with the ansatz of Eq. (21) the sign is set by the input parameter κ2, which is chosen as -0.2 here.

Circularity Check

1 steps flagged · score 2.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the structural curves are direct numerical outputs of the stated EoSs, anisotropy ansatze, and two-fluid TOV equations; the only self-citation is the negative DM-anisotropy sign taken from Ref. [107], which is a modeling input rather than a fitted prediction.

  1. other [Section 5, first paragraph after Eq. (24); with Eq. (21) in Section 4.1]
    "As the anisotropic factor of dark matter condensate is always negative [107], in the present study we have considered two cases, namely: a) anisotropic quark matter where ∆QM(r) < 0 (case I) ... and b) anisotropic quark matter characterized by a positive anisotropic factor, ∆QM (r) > 0 (case II)."

    The negative sign of the DM anisotropic factor is not derived in this work; it is taken from Ref. [107], whose authors include two of the present authors. In Section 4.1 the DM anisotropy is introduced as an assumption ('we assume an anisotropic contribution similar to the previous case, but adapting the parameters'), so the cited 'always negative' property fixes the input κ2 = -0.2 rather than following from the present calculation. The Case I structural result (more compact, less massive than pure quark stars) is a direct consequence of this input. Because the sign is an assumed parameter rather than a fitted output, this is a minor self-citation and not a circular derivation of the mass-radius predictions; it does not by itself force the central claims.

full rationale

The central derivation is self-contained: two-fluid TOV equations (3)-(7) are integrated with explicit EoSs (17), (20) and anisotropy forms (19), (21), and boundary conditions (11)-(16). No parameter is fitted to the quantities later called predictions; the M-R curves are direct numerical outputs, and pulsar/NICER/GW constraints are used only as external comparison. The sole self-citation is the use of Ref. [107] to set the negative DM-anisotropy sign (κ2 = -0.2); this is a modeling input rather than a fitted or derived target, so it does not make the results circular. Under the review rule, an internal inconsistency is flagged separately: the abstract and Section 6 assert that DM-admixed stars are always more compact and lighter, but Section 5.2 and Fig. 2 report that for positive quark anisotropy they are 'less compact yet more massive structures compared to pure quark stars.' This is a correctness/consistency problem, not a circularity, and does not increase the circularity score.

Assumptions & free parameters 5 free parameters · 7 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The model depends on five hand-chosen parameters and several modeling assumptions. None of the parameters are fit to data, but the qualitative results, which sign of anisotropy dominates and how much dark matter is present, are governed by these choices. The boundary condition of a common surface and the stability criterion are load-bearing assumptions that are not independently verified.

free parameters (5)
  • MIT bag constant B = 57.64 MeV/fm3
    Chosen from the allowed range in Eq. (18); sets the quark matter mass scale and surface density.
  • Dark matter polytropic constant K = 0.01/B
    Hand-chosen in Eq. (28); controls stiffness of the DM EoS and hence how much DM contributes to pressure.
  • Quark anisotropy coupling κ1 = +0.1 and -0.1
    Chosen as 'low values' in Eq. (30); sign determines whether stars are more compact and lighter or less compact and heavier.
  • Dark matter anisotropy coupling κ2 = -0.2
    Assumed negative following Ref. [107]; magnitude chosen by hand in Eq. (29).
  • Central density fraction f (or α = f/(1-f)) = 0.58, 0.60, 0.62
    Chosen representative ratios in Eq. (25); the central claim is a scan over these values.
assumptions (7)
  • standard math General relativity with static, spherically symmetric metric and two-fluid TOV equations
    Section 3, Eqs. (1)-(15): standard background for relativistic stellar structure.
  • domain assumption Quark matter is described by the MIT bag EoS p = (ρ - 4B)/3
    Section 4.1, Eq. (17): well-known but not derived in this paper.
  • domain assumption Dark matter is described by the polytropic BEC EoS p = Kρ^2
    Section 4.1, Eq. (20): valid only in the low-density limit of a BEC scalar field, as the text itself notes.
  • ad hoc to paper Anisotropy ansatz Δ = κ p (2m/r) for both fluids
    Section 4.1, Eqs. (19) and (21): no first-principles derivation; sign and magnitude are chosen by hand.
  • domain assumption Dark matter condensate anisotropy is always negative, so κ2 < 0
    Invoked to fix κ2 = -0.2; depends on the prior study [107] by two of the authors, so it is not an independent external benchmark.
  • ad hoc to paper Both fluids terminate at a common surface where total pressure vanishes
    Section 3, Eq. (14): not demonstrated for two independent fluids; the paper does not verify that p_QM and p_DM vanish at the same radius.
  • domain assumption Stability can be judged with the relativistic adiabatic index criterion Γ ≥ Γcr
    Section 5.2 and Eq. (31): approximate criterion; the paper itself notes that radial-oscillation analysis would be needed for multi-fluid stars.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Exploring the Structural Properties of Anisotropic Dark Matter-Admixed Quark Stars." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/FOJCFLQB

@misc{pith2026250520545,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Exploring the Structural Properties of Anisotropic Dark Matter-Admixed Quark Stars},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/FOJCFLQB}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2505.20545}
}
read the original abstract

We investigate anisotropic compact stars comprising two non-interacting fluids: quark matter and condensed dark matter. Using the MIT Bag model equation of state for quark matter and Bose-Einstein Condensate equation of state for dark matter, we numerically compute interior solutions for those two-fluid component spherical configurations. Varying the initial central density ratio of dark matter to quark matter, we examine how different proportions of these components influence the mass-radius profile, the factor of compactness as well as the quark mass fraction. Recent studies suggest that quark matter may exist in the cores of massive neutron stars, significantly affecting their structure and stability. We calculate the factor of compactness for both negative and positive anisotropy cases explored in this article. Our findings demonstrate that dark matter-admixed quark stars are more compact yet less massive compared to pure quark matter stars, aligning with recent theoretical predictions and gravitational wave observations.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2505.20545 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_1.png] view at source ↗

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Role of density profile of sub-GeV dark matter in the properties of dark matter admixed quark stars with Bayesian analysis of dark-NJL model

    hep-ph 2025-09 reject novelty 5.0 of 10

    A model of quark stars with a variable dark matter density profile claims sub-GeV dark matter can satisfy all current compact star constraints.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

147 extracted references · 74 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper

  1. [1]

    ¨Uber das Gravitationsfeld eines Massenpunktes nach der Einsteinschen Theo- rie

    Karl Schwarzschild. ¨Uber das Gravitationsfeld eines Massenpunktes nach der Einsteinschen Theo- rie. Sitzungsberichte der K&ouml;niglich Preussischen 10 QM and DM(α=1.50) QM and DM(α ≈1.63) QM and DM(α ≈1.38) 5.5 6.0 6.5 7.0 7.5 8.0 8.5 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0 1.2 R(km) M(M☉) QM and DM(α=1.50) QM and DM(α ≈1.63) QM and DM(α ≈1.38) Pure QM 6 8 10 12 14 16 0.5 ...

    1916

  2. [2]

    The Field Equations of Gravitation

    Albert Einstein. The Field Equations of Gravitation. Sitzungsber. Preuss. Akad. Wiss. Berlin (Math. Phys. ), 1915:844–847, 1915

    1915

  3. [3]

    S. L. Shapiro and S. A. Teukolsky. Black holes, white dwarfs, and neutron stars: The physics of compact ob- jects. 1983

    1983

  4. [4]

    Probes and Tests of Strong-Field Gravity with Observations in the Electromagnetic Spec- trum

    Dimitrios Psaltis. Probes and Tests of Strong-Field Gravity with Observations in the Electromagnetic Spec- trum. Living Rev. Rel. , 11:9, 2008

    2008

  5. [5]

    D. R. Lorimer. Binary and Millisecond Pulsars. Living Rev. Rel., 11:8, 2008. 11

    2008

  6. [6]

    Schreiber

    Monica Zorotovic and Matthias R. Schreiber. Cata- clysmic variable evolution and the white dwarf mass problem: A Review. Adv. Space Res. , 66:1080–1089, 2020

    2020

  7. [7]

    Evidence for quark- matter cores in massive neutron stars

    Eemeli Annala, Tyler Gorda, Aleksi Kurkela, Joonas N¨ attil¨ a, and Aleksi Vuorinen. Evidence for quark- matter cores in massive neutron stars. Nature Physics, 16(9):907–910, June 2020

    2020

  8. [8]

    Quark matter in compact stars? Na- ture, 445:E7–E8, 2007

    Mark Alford, David Blaschke, Alessandro Drago, Thomas Klahn, Giuseppe Pagliara, and Juergen Schaffner-Bielich. Quark matter in compact stars? Na- ture, 445:E7–E8, 2007

    2007

Show all 147 references
  1. [9]

    Quark Matter In Massive Neutron Stars

    Simon Weissenborn, Irina Sagert, Giuseppe Pagliara, Matthias Hempel, and J¨ urgen Schaffner-Bielich. Quark Matter In Massive Neutron Stars. Astrophys. J. Lett. , 740:L14, 2011

    2011

  2. [10]

    Orsaria, Germ´ an Malfatti, Mauro Mariani, Ig- nacio F

    Milva G. Orsaria, Germ´ an Malfatti, Mauro Mariani, Ig- nacio F. Ranea-Sandoval, Federico Garc ´ ıa, William M. Spinella, Gustavo A. Contrera, Germ´ an Lugones, and Fridolin Weber. Phase transitions in neutron stars and their links to gravitational waves. J. Phys. G , 46(7):07...

    2019

  3. [11]

    Powell, Yifan Song, and Tatsuyuki Takatsuka

    Gordon Baym, Tetsuo Hatsuda, Toru Kojo, Philip D. Powell, Yifan Song, and Tatsuyuki Takatsuka. From hadrons to quarks in neutron stars: a review. Rept. Prog. Phys., 81(5):056902, 2018

    2018

  4. [12]

    S. Pal, M. Hanauske, I. Zakout, H. St¨ ocker, and W. Greiner. Neutron star properties in the quark-meson coupling model. Phys. Rev. C, 60(1):015802, July 1999

    1999

  5. [13]

    Dayanandan, and Anirudh Pradhan

    Ayan Banerjee, ˙Izzet Sakallı, B. Dayanandan, and Anirudh Pradhan. Quark stars in f(R, T) gravity: mass-to-radius profiles and observational data. Chinese Physics C , 49(1):015102, January 2025

    2025

  6. [14]

    Behaviors of quark stars in the Rain- bow Gravity framework

    Takol Tangphati, ˙Izzet Sakallı, Ayan Banerjee, and Anirudh Pradhan. Behaviors of quark stars in the Rain- bow Gravity framework. Physics of the Dark Universe , 46:101610, December 2024

    2024

  7. [15]

    Strange stars

    Charles Alcock, Edward Farhi, and Angela Olinto. Strange stars. Astrophys. J., 310:261–272, 1986

    1986

  8. [16]

    Exotic Phases of Hadronic Matter and their Astrophysical Application

    Charles Alcock and Angela Olinto. Exotic Phases of Hadronic Matter and their Astrophysical Application. Ann. Rev. Nucl. Part. Sci. , 38:161–184, 1988

    1988

  9. [17]

    Physics and astrophysics of strange quark matter

    Jes Madsen. Physics and astrophysics of strange quark matter. Lect. Notes Phys. , 516:162–203, 1999

    1999

  10. [18]

    Strange quark matter and compact stars

    Fridolin Weber. Strange quark matter and compact stars. Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys. , 54:193–288, 2005

    2005

  11. [19]

    You-Ling Yue, X. H. Cui, and R. X. Xu. Is psr b0943+10 a low-mass quark star? Astrophys. J. Lett. , 649:L95– L98, 2006

    2006

  12. [20]

    Supernova SN2006gy as a first ever Quark Nova? Mon

    Denis Leahy and Rachid Ouyed. Supernova SN2006gy as a first ever Quark Nova? Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc., 387:1193, 2008

    2008

  13. [21]

    Quark Matter May Not Be Strange

    Bob Holdom, Jing Ren, and Chen Zhang. Quark Matter May Not Be Strange. Phys. Rev. Lett., 120(22):222001, June 2018

    2018

  14. [22]

    Alvarez- Castillo, Tobias Fischer, and Stefan Typel

    Sanjin Beni´ c, David Blaschke, David E. Alvarez- Castillo, Tobias Fischer, and Stefan Typel. A new quark-hadron hybrid equation of state for astrophysics. I. High-mass twin compact stars. A&A, 577:A40, May 2015

    2015

  15. [23]

    Strongly interacting matter exhibits decon- fined behavior in massive neutron stars

    Eemeli Annala, Tyler Gorda, Joonas Hirvonen, Oleg Komoltsev, Aleksi Kurkela, Joonas N¨ attil¨ a, and Aleksi Vuorinen. Strongly interacting matter exhibits decon- fined behavior in massive neutron stars. Nature Com- munications, 14:8451, December 2023

    2023

  16. [24]

    History of dark matter

    Gianfranco Bertone and Dan Hooper. History of dark matter. Reviews of Modern Physics , 90(4):045002, Oc- tober 2018

    2018

  17. [25]

    J. A. Frieman, M. S. Turner, and D. Huterer. Dark energy and the accelerating universe. ARA&A, 46:385– 432, September 2008

    2008

  18. [26]

    A survey of dark matter and related topics in cosmology

    Bing-Lin Young. A survey of dark matter and related topics in cosmology. Frontiers of Physics, 12(2):121201, April 2017

    2017

  19. [27]

    Planck 2018 results

    Planck Collaboration. Planck 2018 results. VI. Cosmo- logical parameters. A&A, 641:A6, September 2020

    2018

  20. [28]

    Jonathan L. Feng. Dark Matter Candidates from Parti- cle Physics and Methods of Detection. ARA&A, 48:495– 545, September 2010

    2010

  21. [29]

    Solar-stellar astrophysics and dark matter

    Sylvaine Turck-Chi` eze and Il ´ ıdio Lopes. Solar-stellar astrophysics and dark matter. Research in Astronomy and Astrophysics, 12(8):1107–1138, August 2012

    2012

  22. [30]

    Kim, and Leszek Roszkowski

    Howard Baer, Ki-Young Choi, Jihn E. Kim, and Leszek Roszkowski. Dark matter production in the early Universe: Beyond the thermal WIMP paradigm. Phys. Rep., 555:1–60, February 2015

    2015

  23. [31]

    WIMP dark matter candidates and searches—current status and future prospects

    Leszek Roszkowski, Enrico Maria Sessolo, and Sebas- tian Trojanowski. WIMP dark matter candidates and searches—current status and future prospects. Reports on Progress in Physics , 81(6):066201, June 2018

    2018

  24. [32]

    Piat- tella

    Stefano Profumo, Leonardo Giani, and Oliver F. Piat- tella. An Introduction to Particle Dark Matter. Uni- verse, 5(10):213, October 2019

    2019

  25. [33]

    Dark matter capture and annihilation in stars: Impact on the red giant branch tip

    Jos´ e Lopes and Il ´ ıdio Lopes. Dark matter capture and annihilation in stars: Impact on the red giant branch tip. A&A, 651:A101, July 2021

    2021

  26. [34]

    Sagun, V

    V. Sagun, V. Sagun”, E. Giangrandi”, O. Ivanytskyi”, I. Lopes”, and K. Bugaev. Constraints on the fermionic dark matter from observations of neutron stars. In Par- ticles and Nuclei International Conference 2021 , page 313, April 2022

    2021

  27. [35]

    Linking solar bosonic dark matter halos and active neutrinos

    Il ´ ıdio Lopes. Linking solar bosonic dark matter halos and active neutrinos. Phys. Rev. D , 108(8):083028, Oc- tober 2023

    2023

  28. [36]

    Bosonic dark matter dynamics in hybrid neutron stars

    Zakary Buras-Stubbs and Il ´ ıdio Lopes. Bosonic dark matter dynamics in hybrid neutron stars. Phys. Rev. D, 109(4):043043, February 2024

    2024

  29. [37]

    What Is the Nature of the HESS J1731- 347 Compact Object? ApJ, 958(1):49, November 2023

    Violetta Sagun, Edoardo Giangrandi, Tim Dietrich, Oleksii Ivanytskyi, Rodrigo Negreiros, and Constan¸ ca Providˆ encia. What Is the Nature of the HESS J1731- 347 Compact Object? ApJ, 958(1):49, November 2023

    2023

  30. [38]

    The Effects of Self-interacting Bosonic Dark Matter on Neu- tron Star Properties

    Edoardo Giangrandi, Violetta Sagun, Oleksii Ivanyt- skyi, Constan¸ ca Providˆ encia, and Tim Dietrich. The Effects of Self-interacting Bosonic Dark Matter on Neu- tron Star Properties. ApJ, 953(1):115, August 2023

    2023

  31. [39]

    Ivanytskyi, V

    O. Ivanytskyi, V. Sagun, and I. Lopes. Neutron stars: New constraints on asymmetric dark matter. Phys. Rev. D , 102(6):063028, September 2020

    2020

  32. [40]

    S. C. Leung, M. C. Chu, and L. M. Lin. Dark-matter admixed neutron stars. Phys. Rev. D , 84:107301, 2011

    2011

  33. [41]

    Z. Rezaei. Study of Dark-Matter Admixed Neutron Stars using the Equation of State from the Rotational Curves of Galaxies. Astrophys. J., 835(1):33, 2017

    2017

  34. [42]

    H. C. Das, Ankit Kumar, Bharat Kumar, Subrat Ku- mar Biswal, Takashi Nakatsukasa, Ang Li, and S. K. Pa- tra. Effects of dark matter on the nuclear and neutron star matter. Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. , 495:4893– 4903, 2020

    2020

  35. [43]

    del Rosario Alessandroni, Milva G

    Mauro Mariani, Conrado Albertus, M. del Rosario Alessandroni, Milva G. Orsaria, M. Ange- les Perez-Garcia, and Ignacio F. Ranea-Sandoval. Constraining self-interacting fermionic dark matter in admixed neutron stars using multimessenger astron- omy. Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. ...

    2024

  36. [44]

    Dark matter effects on the properties of quark stars and the implications for the peculiar ob- jects

    Hong-Ming Liu, Peng-Cheng Chu, He Liu, Xiao-Hua Li, and Zeng-Hua Li. Dark matter effects on the properties of quark stars and the implications for the peculiar ob- jects. arXiv e-prints , page arXiv:2501.04382, January 2025

    2025 arXiv

  37. [45]

    WIMP annihilation and cooling of neu- tron stars

    Chris Kouvaris. WIMP annihilation and cooling of neu- tron stars. Phys. Rev. D , 77(2):023006, January 2008

    2008

  38. [46]

    Axion cooling of neutron stars

    Armen Sedrakian. Axion cooling of neutron stars. Phys. Rev. D , 93(6):065044, March 2016

    2016

  39. [47]

    Asteroseismology: Looking for Axions in the Red Supergiant Star Alpha Ori

    Clara Severino and Il ´ ıdio Lopes. Asteroseismology: Looking for Axions in the Red Supergiant Star Alpha Ori. ApJ, 943(2):95, February 2023

    2023

  40. [48]

    Axion spectra and the associated x-ray spectra of low-mass stars

    Il ´ ıdio Lopes. Axion spectra and the associated x-ray spectra of low-mass stars. Phys. Rev. D, 104(2):023008, July 2021

    2021

  41. [49]

    Nguyen, Erwin H

    Ngan H. Nguyen, Erwin H. Tanin, and Marc Kamionkowski. Spectra of axions emitted from main sequence stars. JCAP, 2023(11):091, November 2023

    2023

  42. [50]

    Constraints on primordial black holes as dark matter candidates from capture by neutron stars

    Fabio Capela, Maxim Pshirkov, and Peter Tinyakov. Constraints on primordial black holes as dark matter candidates from capture by neutron stars. Phys. Rev. D, 87(12):123524, 2013

    2013

  43. [51]

    Blanchard et al

    A. Blanchard et al. Euclid preparation. VII. Forecast validation for Euclid cosmological probes. Astron. As- trophys., 642:A191, 2020

    2020

  44. [52]

    Spergel et al

    D. Spergel et al. Wide-Field InfrarRed Sur- vey Telescope-Astrophysics Focused Telescope Assets WFIRST-AFTA 2015 Report. 3 2015

    2015

  45. [53]

    The DESI Experiment Part I: Science,Targeting, and Survey Design

    Amir Aghamousa et al. The DESI Experiment Part I: Science,Targeting, and Survey Design. 10 2016

    2016

  46. [54]

    B. Wang, E. Abdalla, F. Atrio-Barandela, and D. Pav´ on. Dark matter and dark energy interactions: theoreti- cal challenges, cosmological implications and observa- tional signatures. Reports on Progress in Physics , 79(9):096901, September 2016

    2016

  47. [55]

    B. P. Abbott et al. Observation of Gravitational Waves from a Binary Black Hole Merger. Phys. Rev. Lett. , 116(6):061102, 2016

    2016

  48. [56]

    Acernese et al

    F. Acernese et al. The Virgo Detector. In Alessia Tricomi, Sebastiano Albergo, and Massimiliano Chior- boli, editors, IF AE 2005: 17th Italian Meeting on High Energy Physics , volume 794 of American Institute of Physics Conference Series , pages 307–310. AIP, Octo- ber 2005

    2005

  49. [57]

    Laser Interferometer Space Antenna

    Pau Amaro-Seoane et al. Laser Interferometer Space Antenna. 2 2017

    2017

  50. [58]

    M. et al. Punturo. The Einstein Telescope: a third- generation gravitational wave observatory.Classical and Quantum Gravity, 27(19):194002, October 2010

    2010

  51. [59]

    Science case for the Einstein telescope

    Michele Maggiore, Chris Van Den Broeck, Nicola Bar- tolo, Enis Belgacem, Daniele Bertacca, Marie Anne Bizouard, Marica Branchesi, Sebastien Clesse, Stefano Foffa, Juan Garc ´ ıa-Bellido, Stefan Grimm, Jan Harms, Tanja Hinderer, Sabino Matarrese, Cristiano Palomba, Marco Peloso...

    2020

  52. [60]

    W. B. Atwood et al. The Large Area Telescope on the Fermi Gamma-ray Space Telescope Mission. Astrophys. J., 697:1071–1102, 2009

    2009

  53. [61]

    Jansen, D

    F. Jansen, D. Lumb, B. Altieri, J. Clavel, M. Ehle, C. Erd, C. Gabriel, M. Guainazzi, P. Gondoin, R. Much, R. Munoz, M. Santos, N. Schartel, D. Texier, and G. Va- canti. XMM-Newton observatory. I. The spacecraft and operations. A&A, 365:L1–L6, January 2001

    2001

  54. [62]

    Arzoumanian, K

    Z. Arzoumanian, K. C. Gendreau, C. L. Baker, T. Cazeau, P. Hestnes, J. W. Kellogg, S. J. Kenyon, R. P. Kozon, K. C. Liu, S. S. Manthripragada, C. B. Markwardt, A. L. Mitchell, J. W. Mitchell, C. A. Monroe, T. Okajima, S. E. Pollard, D. F. Powers, B. J. Savadkin, L. B. Winterni...

    2014

  55. [63]

    The enhanced X-ray Tim- ing and Polarimetry mission—eXTP

    Shuang-Nan Zhang et al. The enhanced X-ray Tim- ing and Polarimetry mission—eXTP. Sci. China Phys. Mech. Astron., 62(2):29502, 2019

    2019

  56. [64]

    Ray et al

    Paul S. Ray et al. STROBE-X: X-ray Timing and Spec- troscopy on Dynamical Timescales from Microseconds to Years. 3 2019

    2019

  57. [65]

    The Lynx Mission Concept Study In- terim Report

    The Lynx Team. The Lynx Mission Concept Study In- terim Report. arXiv e-prints , page arXiv:1809.09642, September 2018

    2018 arXiv

  58. [66]

    Kirpal et al. Nandra. The Hot and Energetic Uni- verse: A White Paper presenting the science theme mo- tivating the Athena+ mission. arXiv e-prints , page arXiv:1306.2307, June 2013

    2013 arXiv

  59. [67]

    Constraints on density dependent MIT bag model parameters for quark and hybrid stars

    Soumen Podder, Suman Pal, Debashree Sen, and Gargi Chaudhuri. Constraints on density dependent MIT bag model parameters for quark and hybrid stars. Nucl. Phys. A , 1042:122796, February 2024

    2024

  60. [68]

    Jeet Amrit Pattnaik, D. Dey, R. N. Panda, M. Bhuyan, and S. K. Patra. Dark Matter Effects on the Curva- ture of Neutron Stars within the new Quarkyonic Model Coupled with Relativistic Mean Field Theory. arXiv e- prints, page arXiv:2501.11435, January 2025

    2025 arXiv

  61. [69]

    A Rel- ativistic Compact Stellar Model of Anisotropic Quark Matter Mixed with Dark Energy

    Theophanes Grammenos, Farook Rahaman, Saibal Ray, Debabrata Deb, and Sourav Roy Chowdhury. A Rel- ativistic Compact Stellar Model of Anisotropic Quark Matter Mixed with Dark Energy. Adv. High Energy Phys., 2021:6966689, 2021

    2021

  62. [70]

    S. K. Maurya, Abdelghani Errehymy, Ksh. New- ton Singh, Abdul Aziz, Sudan Hansraj, and Saibal Ray. Modeling Compact Object Mergers GW190814 and GW200210 and Other Self-bound Compact Stars with Dark Matter Induced by Gravitational Decoupling and Its Significance to the Mass Gap...

    2024

  63. [71]

    Self-gravitating anisotropic fluids

    Tom Cadogan and Eric Poisson. Self-gravitating anisotropic fluids. I: context and overview. General Rel- ativity and Gravitation , 56(10):118, October 2024

    2024

  64. [72]

    Herrera, J

    L. Herrera, J. Martin, and J. Ospino. Anisotropic geodesic fluid spheres in general relativity. Journal of Mathematical Physics, 43(10):4889–4897, October 2002

    2002

  65. [73]

    Herrera, J

    L. Herrera, J. Ospino, and A. di Prisco. All static spheri- cally symmetric anisotropic solutions of Einstein’s equa- tions. Phys. Rev. D , 77(2):027502, January 2008

    2008

  66. [74]

    M. K. Mak and T. Harko. Anisotropic stars in general relativity. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London Series A , 459(2030):393–408, February 2003

    2003

  67. [75]

    Relativistic mod- els for anisotropic compact stars: A review

    Jitendra Kumar and Puja Bharti. Relativistic mod- els for anisotropic compact stars: A review. NAR, 95:101662, December 2022

    2022

  68. [76]

    Cappiello, Melissa Di- amond, J

    Joseph Bramante, Christopher V. Cappiello, Melissa Di- amond, J. Leo Kim, Qinrui Liu, and Aaron C. Vin- cent. Dissipative dark cosmology: From early matter dominance to delayed compact objects. Phys. Rev. D , 110(4):043041, August 2024. 13

    2024

  69. [77]

    Herrera and N

    L. Herrera and N. O. Santos. Local anisotropy in self- gravitating systems. Phys. Rep., 286:53–130, July 1997

    1997

  70. [78]

    L. M. Becerra, E. A. Becerra-Vergara, and F. D. Lora- Clavijo. Realistic anisotropic neutron stars: Pressure effects. Phys. Rev. D , 109(4):043025, February 2024

    2024

  71. [79]

    Sailesh Ranjan Mohanty, Sayantan Ghosh, Pinku Routaray, H. C. Das, and Bharat Kumar. The impact of anisotropy on neutron star properties: insights from I- f-C universal relations. JCAP, 2024(3):054, March 2024

    2024

  72. [80]

    Nelson, Sanjay Reddy, and Dake Zhou

    Ann E. Nelson, Sanjay Reddy, and Dake Zhou. Dark halos around neutron stars and gravitational waves. JCAP, 2019(7):012, July 2019

    2019

  73. [81]

    Smerechynskyi, M

    S. Smerechynskyi, M. Tsizh, and B. Novosyadlyj. Im- pact of dynamical dark energy on the neutron star equi- librium. JCAP, 2021(2):045, February 2021

    2021

  74. [82]

    Yazadjiev and Daniela D

    Stoytcho S. Yazadjiev and Daniela D. Doneva. Pos- sible dark energy imprints in the gravitational wave spectrum of mixed neutron-dark-energy stars. JCAP, 2012(3):037, March 2012

    2012

  75. [83]

    Tsizh, B

    M. Tsizh, B. Novosyadlyj, and Yu. Kulinich. Distribu- tion of dark energy in the vicinity of compact objects. arXiv e-prints , page arXiv:1412.7323, December 2014

    2014 arXiv

  76. [84]

    S. K. Maurya, Ksh Newton Singh, Abdul Aziz, Saibal Ray, and Ghulam Mustafa. Compact stars with dark matter induced anisotropy in complexity-free back- ground and effect of dark matter on GW echoes. MN- RAS, 527(3):5192–5205, January 2024

    2024

  77. [85]

    Richard C. Tolman. Static solutions of Einstein’s field equations for spheres of fluid. Phys. Rev. , 55:364–373, 1939

    1939

  78. [86]

    J. R. Oppenheimer and G. M. Volkoff. On massive neu- tron cores. Phys. Rev., 55:374–381, 1939

    1939

  79. [87]

    Effects of mirror dark matter on neutron stars

    Fredrik Sandin and Paolo Ciarcelluti. Effects of mirror dark matter on neutron stars. Astropart. Phys., 32:278– 284, 2009

    2009

  80. [88]

    Have neutron stars a dark matter core? Phys

    Paolo Ciarcelluti and Fredrik Sandin. Have neutron stars a dark matter core? Phys. Lett. B , 695:19–21, 2011

    2011

  81. [89]

    Chodos, R

    A. Chodos, R. L. Jaffe, K. Johnson, Charles B. Thorn, and V. F. Weisskopf. A New Extended Model of Hadrons. Phys. Rev. D , 9:3471–3495, 1974

    1974

  82. [90]

    Chodos, R

    A. Chodos, R. L. Jaffe, K. Johnson, and Charles B. Thorn. Baryon Structure in the Bag Theory. Phys. Rev. D, 10:2599, 1974

    1974

  83. [91]

    Searching for compact pentaquark state within the bag model framework

    Wen-Nian Liu, Wen-Xuan Zhang, and Fu-Quan Dou. Searching for compact pentaquark state within the bag model framework. arXiv e-prints , page arXiv:2501.12727, January 2025

    2025 arXiv

  84. [92]

    Khlopov, and B

    Abdul Aziz, Saibal Ray, Farook Rahaman, M. Khlopov, and B. K. Guha. Constraining values of bag constant for strange star candidates. Int. J. Mod. Phys. D , 28(13):1941006, 2019

    2019

  85. [93]

    Jos´ e D. V. Arba˜ nil and Grigoris Panotopoulos. Tidal deformability and radial oscillations of anisotropic poly- tropic spheres. Phys. Rev. D , 105(2):024008, 2022

    2022

  86. [94]

    C. G. Boehmer and T. Harko. Can dark matter be a Bose-Einstein condensate? JCAP, 06:025, 2007

    2007

  87. [95]

    M. O. C. Pires and J. C. C. de Souza. Galactic cold dark matter as a Bose-Einstein condensate of WISPs. JCAP, 11:024, 2012. [Erratum: JCAP 11, E01 (2013)]

    2013

  88. [96]

    J. C. C. Souza and M. Ujevic. Constraining conden- sate dark matter in galaxy clusters. Gen. Rel. Grav. , 47(9):100, 2015

    2015

  89. [97]

    T. Harko. Bose-Einstein condensation of dark matter solves the core/cusp problem. JCAP, 05:022, 2011

    2011

  90. [98]

    Plancks gesetz und lichtquantenhypothese

    Bose. Plancks gesetz und lichtquantenhypothese. Zeitschrift f¨ ur Physik, 26(1):178–181, 1924

    1924

  91. [99]

    Einstein

    A. Einstein. Sitzungsberichte der K¨ oniglich Preußischen Akademie der Wissenschaften , page 261, 1924

    1924

  92. [100]

    Einstein

    A. Einstein. Sitzungsberichte der K¨ oniglich Preußischen Akademie der Wissenschaften , 3, 1925

    1925

  93. [101]

    Pitaevskii, and Sandro Stringari

    Franco Dalfovo, Stefano Giorgini, Lev P. Pitaevskii, and Sandro Stringari. Theory of Bose-Einstein condensa- tion in trapped gases. Reviews of Modern Physics , 71(3):463–512, April 1999

    1999

  94. [102]

    Pethick and H

    C. Pethick and H. Smith. Bose-Einstein condensation in dilute gases . Cambridge University Press, 2002

    2002

  95. [103]

    X. Y. Li, T. Harko, and K. S. Cheng. Condensate dark matter stars. JCAP, 06:001, 2012

    2012

  96. [104]

    Phase transitions between dilute and dense axion stars

    Pierre-Henri Chavanis. Phase transitions between dilute and dense axion stars. Phys. Rev. D, 98(2):023009, 2018

    2018

  97. [105]

    Colpi, S

    M. Colpi, S. L. Shapiro, and I. Wasserman. Boson Stars: Gravitational Equilibria of Selfinteracting Scalar Fields. Phys. Rev. Lett. , 57:2485–2488, 1986

    1986

  98. [106]

    Kokkotas

    Andrea Maselli, Pantelis Pnigouras, Niklas Grønlund Nielsen, Chris Kouvaris, and Kostas D. Kokkotas. Dark stars: gravitational and electromagnetic observables. Phys. Rev. D , 96(2):023005, 2017

    2017

  99. [107]

    P. H. R. S. Moraes, G. Panotopoulos, and I. Lopes. Anisotropic Dark Matter Stars. Phys. Rev. D , 103(8):084023, 2021

    2021

  100. [108]

    Gauge singlet scalar as inflaton and thermal relic dark matter

    Rose Natalie Lerner and John McDonald. Gauge singlet scalar as inflaton and thermal relic dark matter. Phys. Rev. D, 80:123507, 2009

    2009

  101. [109]

    The Real Gauge Singlet Scalar Extension of Standard Model: A Possible Candidate of Cold Dark Matter

    Anirban Biswas and Debasish Majumdar. The Real Gauge Singlet Scalar Extension of Standard Model: A Possible Candidate of Cold Dark Matter. Pramana, 80:539–557, 2013

    2013

  102. [110]

    Sarah Andreas, Thomas Hambye, and Michel H. G. Tyt- gat. WIMP dark matter, Higgs exchange and DAMA. JCAP, 10:034, 2008

    2008

  103. [111]

    Direct and Indirect Capture of Wimps by the Earth

    Andrew Gould. Direct and Indirect Capture of Wimps by the Earth. Astrophys. J., 328:919–939, 1988

    1988

  104. [112]

    Can Neutron stars constrain Dark Matter? Phys

    Chris Kouvaris and Peter Tinyakov. Can Neutron stars constrain Dark Matter? Phys. Rev. D, 82:063531, 2010

    2010

  105. [113]

    Probing Light Dark Matter via Evapo- ration from the Sun

    Chris Kouvaris. Probing Light Dark Matter via Evapo- ration from the Sun. Phys. Rev. D , 92(7):075001, 2015

    2015

  106. [114]

    Constraints on light dark matter particles using white dwarf stars

    Grigoris Panotopoulos and Il ´ ıdio Lopes. Constraints on light dark matter particles using white dwarf stars. Int. J. Mod. Phys. D , 29(08):2050058, 2020

    2020

  107. [115]

    Ch. C. Moustakidis. The stability of relativistic stars and the role of the adiabatic index. Gen. Rel. Grav. , 49(5):68, 2017

    2017

  108. [116]

    Quark stars in Rastall gravity with recent astrophysical observations

    Takol Tangphati, Ayan Banerjee, ˙Izzet Sakallı, and Anirudh Pradhan. Quark stars in Rastall gravity with recent astrophysical observations. Chinese Journal of Physics, 90:422–433, August 2024

    2024

  109. [117]

    Properties of interacting quark star in light of Rastall gravity.Classical and Quantum Gravity, 42(2):025008, January 2025

    Ayan Banerjee, Anirudh Pradhan, ˙Izzet Sakallı, and Archana Dixit. Properties of interacting quark star in light of Rastall gravity.Classical and Quantum Gravity, 42(2):025008, January 2025

    2025

  110. [118]

    Rather, Grigoris Panotopoulos, and Il ´ ıdio Lopes

    Ishfaq A. Rather, Grigoris Panotopoulos, and Il ´ ıdio Lopes. Quark models and radial oscillations: decoding the HESS J1731-347 compact object’s equation of state. European Physical Journal C , 83(11):1065, November 2023

    2023

  111. [119]

    Shapiro Delay Measure- ment of A Two Solar Mass Neutron Star

    Paul Demorest, Tim Pennucci, Scott Ransom, Mallory Roberts, and Jason Hessels. Shapiro Delay Measure- ment of A Two Solar Mass Neutron Star. Nature, 467:1081–1083, 2010

    2010

  112. [120]

    A Massive Pulsar in a Compact Relativistic Binary

    John Antoniadis et al. A Massive Pulsar in a Compact Relativistic Binary. Science, 340:6131, 2013. 14

    2013

  113. [121]

    M. C. Miller et al. PSR J0030+0451 Mass and Radius from N ICERData and Implications for the Properties of Neutron Star Matter. Astrophys. J. Lett., 887(1):L24, 2019

    2019

  114. [122]

    Riley et al

    Thomas E. Riley et al. A NICER View of the Mas- sive Pulsar PSR J0740+6620 Informed by Radio Timing and XMM-Newton Spectroscopy. Astrophys. J. Lett. , 918(2):L27, 2021

    2021

  115. [123]

    T. E. Riley, A. L. Watts, S. Bogdanov, P. S. Ray, R. M. Ludlam, S. Guillot, Z. Arzoumanian, C. L. Baker, A. V. Bilous, D. Chakrabarty, K. C. Gendreau, A. K. Harding, W. C. G. Ho, J. M. Lattimer, S. M. Morsink, and T. E. Strohmayer. A NICER View of PSR J0030+0451: Mil- lisecond...

    2019

  116. [124]

    M. C. Miller et al. The Radius of PSR J0740+6620 from NICER and XMM-Newton Data. Astrophys. J. Lett. , 918(2):L28, 2021

    2021

  117. [125]

    Prashanth Jaikumar, Sanjay Reddy, and Andrew W. Steiner. Quark Matter in Neutron Stars:. AN APERC ¸ U. Modern Physics Letters A , 21(26):1965–1979, January 2006

    1965

  118. [126]

    Dark mat- ter effects on neutron star properties

    John Ellis, Gert H¨ utsi, Kristjan Kannike, Luca Mar- zola, Martti Raidal, and Ville Vaskonen. Dark mat- ter effects on neutron star properties. Phys. Rev. D , 97(12):123007, June 2018

    2018

  119. [127]

    B. P. et al. Abbott, The LIGO Scientific Collabora- tion, and the Virgo Collaboration. GW170817: Mea- surements of Neutron Star Radii and Equation of State. Phys. Rev. Lett. , 121(16):161101, October 2018

    2018

  120. [128]

    Bastian, David B

    Andreas Bauswein, Niels-Uwe F. Bastian, David B. Blaschke, Katerina Chatziioannou, James A. Clark, Tobias Fischer, and Micaela Oertel. Identifying a First-Order Phase Transition in Neutron-Star Merg- ers through Gravitational Waves. Phys. Rev. Lett. , 122(6):061102, February 2019

    2019

  121. [129]

    Disformal transformation of sta- tionary and axisymmetric solutions in modified gravity

    Masato Minamitsuji. Disformal transformation of sta- tionary and axisymmetric solutions in modified gravity. Phys. Rev. D , 102(12):124017, December 2020

    2020

  122. [130]

    GW170817: Joint Constraint on the Neutron Star Equation of State from Multimessenger Observations

    David Radice, Albino Perego, Francesco Zappa, and Se- bastiano Bernuzzi. GW170817: Joint Constraint on the Neutron Star Equation of State from Multimessenger Observations. ApJ, 852(2):L29, January 2018

    2018

  123. [131]

    B. P. Abbott, R. Abbott, T. D. Abbott, F. Acernese, K. Ackley, C. Adams, T. Adams, P. Addesso, R. X. Ad- hikari, V. B. Adya, and et al. GW170817: Observation of Gravitational Waves from a Binary Neutron Star In- spiral. Phys. Rev. Lett. , 119(16):161101, October 2017

    2017

  124. [132]

    P. Jetzer. Stability of Combined Boson - Fermion Stars. Phys. Lett. B , 243:36–40, 1990

    1990

  125. [133]

    Chandrasekhar

    S. Chandrasekhar. Dynamical Instability of Gaseous Masses Approaching the Schwarzschild Limit in General Relativity. Phys. Rev. Lett. , 12:114–116, 1964

    1964

  126. [134]

    Chandrasekhar

    S. Chandrasekhar. The Dynamical Instability of Gaseous Masses Approaching the Schwarzschild Limit in General Relativity. Astrophys. J., 140:417–433, 1964. [Erratum: Astrophys.J. 140, 1342 (1964)]

    1964

  127. [135]

    Radial oscillations and stability of multiple- fluid compact stars

    Ben Kain. Radial oscillations and stability of multiple- fluid compact stars. Phys. Rev. D, 102(2):023001, 2020

    2020

  128. [136]

    Caballero, Justin L

    Daniel A. Caballero, Justin L. Ripley, and Nicol´ as Yunes. Radial mode stability of two-fluid neutron stars. Phys. Rev. D , 110(10):103038, 2024

    2024

  129. [137]

    Pereira, C´ esar V

    Jonas P. Pereira, C´ esar V. Flores, and Germ´ an Lugones. Phase transition effects on the dynamical stability of hybrid neutron stars. Astrophys. J., 860(1):12, 2018

    2018

  130. [138]

    Stellar stability in the presence of reacting interfaces: consequences for hybrid stars

    Germ´ an Lugones. Stellar stability in the presence of reacting interfaces: consequences for hybrid stars. J. Phys. Conf. Ser. , 2536(1):012008, 2023

    2023

  131. [139]

    B. P. Abbott et al. GW170817: Observation of Grav- itational Waves from a Binary Neutron Star Inspiral. Phys. Rev. Lett. , 119(16):161101, 2017

    2017

  132. [140]

    B. P. Abbott et al. GW190425: Observation of a Com- pact Binary Coalescence with Total Mass∼ 3.4M⊙. As- trophys. J. Lett. , 892(1):L3, 2020

    2020

  133. [141]

    Tidal deforma- bility of an anisotropic compact star: Implications of GW170817

    Bhaskar Biswas and Sukanta Bose. Tidal deforma- bility of an anisotropic compact star: Implications of GW170817. Phys. Rev. D , 99(10):104002, 2019. [Erra- tum: Phys.Rev.D 111, 029903 (2025)]

    2025

  134. [142]

    Shyam Das, Saibal Ray, Maxim Khlopov, K. K. Nandi, and B. K. Parida. Anisotropic compact stars: Constrain- ing model parameters to account for physical features of tidal Love numbers. Annals Phys., 433:168597, 2021

    2021

  135. [143]

    Tidal deforma- bilities and radii of strange quark stars

    Bo-Lin Li, Yan Yan, and Jia-Lun Ping. Tidal deforma- bilities and radii of strange quark stars. Phys. Rev. D , 104(4):043002, 2021

    2021

  136. [144]

    Banerjee A

    A. Banerjee A. Pradhan T. Tangphati, G. Panotopou- los. Dark matter admixed strange quark stars: Struc- tural properties and tidal Love numbers. work in progress

  137. [145]

    Xinyu Li, Fayin Wang, and K. S. Cheng. Gravitational effects of condensate dark matter on compact stellar ob- jects. JCAP, 10:031, 2012

    2012

  138. [146]

    A strangely light neutron star within a supernova remnant

    Victor Doroshenko, Valery Suleimanov, Gerd P¨ uhlhofer, and Andrea Santangelo. A strangely light neutron star within a supernova remnant. Nature Astron. , 6(12):1444–1451, 2022

    2022

  139. [147]

    A NICER View of the Near- est and Brightest Millisecond Pulsar: PSR J0437–4715

    Devarshi Choudhury et al. A NICER View of the Near- est and Brightest Millisecond Pulsar: PSR J0437–4715. Astrophys. J. Lett. , 971(1):L20, 2024

    2024

Pith tools

Reviewed August 7, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.