Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

Boosting of Thoughts: Trial-and-Error Problem Solving with Large Language Models

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2402.11140 v2 pith:FRMDSB2G submitted 2024-02-17 cs.CL cs.AIcs.LG

classification cs.CLcs.AIcs.LG
keywords promptingreasoningproblemthoughtscomplexlargesolvingboosting
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

The reasoning performance of Large Language Models (LLMs) on a wide range of problems critically relies on chain-of-thought prompting, which involves providing a few chain of thought demonstrations as exemplars in prompts. Recent work, e.g., Tree of Thoughts, has pointed out the importance of exploration and self-evaluation in reasoning step selection for complex problem solving. In this paper, we present Boosting of Thoughts (BoT), an automated prompting framework for problem solving with LLMs by iteratively exploring and self-evaluating many trees of thoughts in order to acquire an ensemble of trial-and-error reasoning experiences, which will serve as a new form of prompting to solve the complex problem. Starting from a simple prompt without requiring examples, BoT iteratively explores and evaluates a large collection of reasoning steps, and more importantly, uses error analysis obtained from the LLM on them to explicitly revise prompting, which in turn enhances reasoning step generation, until a final answer is attained. Our experiments with GPT-4 and Llama2 across extensive complex mathematical problems demonstrate that BoT consistently achieves higher or comparable problem-solving rates than other advanced prompting approaches.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. RefCritic: Training Long Chain-of-Thought Critic Models with Refinement Feedback

    cs.CL 2025-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    RefCritic uses reinforcement learning with two rule-based rewards, judgment accuracy and refinement accuracy, to train long-chain-of-thought critic models that improve LLM math reasoning and detect erroneous steps.

  2. Prolonged Reasoning Is Not All You Need: Certainty-Based Adaptive Routing for Efficient LLM/MLLM Reasoning

    cs.CL 2025-05 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    CAR routes each query to either a short answer or full reasoning based on the perplexity of the model's draft answer, improving accuracy and cutting token use on VQA, KIE, and math/common sense benchmarks.

Pith tools