The reviewed record of science sign in
Pith

arxiv: 2401.10896 · v1 · pith:FTUOLP4Y · submitted 2023-12-18 · cs.CY

Responsible AI Governance: A Systematic Literature Review

Reviewed by Pith T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 kernel pith:FTUOLP4Yrecord.jsonopen to challenge →

classification cs.CY
keywords governanceliteratureresponsibleframeworksquestionsreviewcomprehensivedevelopment
0
0 comments X
read the original abstract

As artificial intelligence transforms a wide range of sectors and drives innovation, it also introduces complex challenges concerning ethics, transparency, bias, and fairness. The imperative for integrating Responsible AI (RAI) principles within governance frameworks is paramount to mitigate these emerging risks. While there are many solutions for AI governance, significant questions remain about their effectiveness in practice. Addressing this knowledge gap, this paper aims to examine the existing literature on AI Governance. The focus of this study is to analyse the literature to answer key questions: WHO is accountable for AI systems' governance, WHAT elements are being governed, WHEN governance occurs within the AI development life cycle, and HOW it is executed through various mechanisms like frameworks, tools, standards, policies, or models. Employing a systematic literature review methodology, a rigorous search and selection process has been employed. This effort resulted in the identification of 61 relevant articles on the subject of AI Governance. Out of the 61 studies analysed, only 5 provided complete responses to all questions. The findings from this review aid research in formulating more holistic and comprehensive Responsible AI (RAI) governance frameworks. This study highlights important role of AI governance on various levels specially organisational in establishing effective and responsible AI practices. The findings of this study provides a foundational basis for future research and development of comprehensive governance models that align with RAI principles.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Human-aligned AI Model Cards with Weighted Hierarchy Architecture

    cs.SE 2025-10 unverdicted novelty 4.0

    Introduces CRAI-MCF, an eight-module framework distilling 217 parameters from 240 projects into a quantitative sufficiency criterion for cross-model LLM comparison grounded in Value Sensitive Design.