pith. sign in

arxiv: 2606.31910 · v1 · pith:FU3K2UKAnew · submitted 2026-06-30 · 🪐 quant-ph

Electrons on Helium and Entangled Quantum Sensors for Particle Physics

Maria Elena Perruzza , Niyaz R. Beysengulov , Stian D. Bilek , Antoine Y. M. C. Camper , Jonas B. Flaten , Morten Hjorth-Jensen , Gunnar F. Lange , Oskar Leinonen
show 7 more authors
Jan Malamant Francesco P. Massel Johannes Pollanen Heidi Sandaker Zachary J. Stewart Viktor Svensson Jared D. Weidman
This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-07-01 05:05 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🪐 quant-ph
keywords quantum sensorselectrons on heliumquantum entanglementparticle physicsdouble-well trapsuperfluid heliumquantum-enhanced detection
0
0 comments X

The pith

An entangled pair of electrons trapped on superfluid helium can serve as a quantum sensor for rare particle events with sensitivity beyond classical limits.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper proposes a sensor that uses two electrons confined in a double-well trap on liquid helium, with their spins and positions entangled. It develops the theoretical description of this system and argues that the entanglement allows detection of high-energy particle signals that classical detectors cannot reach. The work is motivated by the need for new quantum-enhanced tools in particle physics experiments and builds on existing demonstrations of single-electron control on helium.

Core claim

An entangled pair of electron qubits on superfluid helium, confined in a helium-based double-well trap, can provide quantum-enhanced sensitivity for detecting rare high-energy events in particle physics by surpassing classical detection limits through exploitation of quantum entanglement between the trapped electrons.

What carries the argument

The helium-based double-well trap for two electrons and their spins and spatial degrees of freedom, which enables the creation and control of entanglement analogous to a double quantum dot.

If this is right

  • Rare high-energy particle events become detectable with fewer false negatives than classical sensors allow.
  • The platform supports scalable arrays of such entangled sensors for larger experiments.
  • Spin and spatial entanglement can be tuned separately to optimize for different particle signatures.
  • The same trap architecture used for quantum computing qubits can be repurposed for sensing without major redesign.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Similar entanglement-enhanced sensing could be explored in other clean electron systems such as quantum dots or trapped ions if coherence times prove comparable.
  • The approach might extend to detecting lower-energy events if trap parameters are adjusted to match the interaction strength.
  • Integration with existing liquid-helium cryogenics in particle detectors could reduce the need for new infrastructure.

Load-bearing premise

The theoretical description of the two-electron system will translate into a real device that keeps quantum coherence long enough to register actual particle events.

What would settle it

An experiment that measures whether coherence time in the double-well trap is shorter than the time needed to detect a particle-induced signal, or whether the entangled configuration shows no sensitivity gain over two independent electrons.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2606.31910 by Antoine Y. M. C. Camper, Francesco P. Massel, Gunnar F. Lange, Heidi Sandaker, Jan Malamant, Jared D. Weidman, Johannes Pollanen, Jonas B. Flaten, Maria Elena Perruzza, Morten Hjorth-Jensen, Niyaz R. Beysengulov, Oskar Leinonen, Stian D. Bilek, Viktor Svensson, Zachary J. Stewart.

Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1. Schematic layout of the electrons-on-helium device. Two electrons (e [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2. Profile of the double-well obtained with the RL optimization technique having reward Eq. (37). [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3. Top: One-body probabilities for the first three leftmost localized orbitals L0,L1,L2 (left to right). Bottom: One-body probabilities for [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. Occupation probability of states [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: FIG. 6. Same as Fig. 5, but now for the Ramsey setup. Note that, in this case, the Fisher information has a value which is half the value for the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_6.png] view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: FIG. 7. Absolute ( [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p013_7.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Quantum sensors that harness quantum coherence and entanglement are emerging as powerful tools in many fields, including particle physics, promising unprecedented sensitivity beyond classical detection methods. At the same time, electrons trapped on the surface of liquid helium have emerged as a promising quantum computing, and possibly sensing, platform owing to a nearly impurity-free environment and large predicted coherence times. In this context, single-electron confinement and control using microfabricated traps on helium has been experimentally demonstrated, highlighting the feasibility of scalable qubit architectures on this platform. In line with the DRD5 initiative at CERN, we propose here a sensor concept that uses an entangled pair of electron qubits on superfluid helium for particle physics experiments. We outline the motivation for such spatially and spin-entangled sensors, develop the theoretical formalism for two electrons and their spins and spatial degrees of freedom in a helium-based double-well trap (analogous to a double quantum dot in semiconductor systems), and discuss the potential advantages for detecting rare high-energy events with quantum-enhanced sensitivity. By exploiting quantum entanglement between the two trapped electrons, this sensor concept can surpass classical sensitivity limits, potentially enabling the detection of signals beyond the reach of classical detectors.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

1 major / 0 minor

Summary. The manuscript proposes a quantum sensor concept based on an entangled pair of electrons confined in a double-well trap on superfluid helium for detecting rare high-energy particle events. It motivates the approach in the context of the DRD5 initiative, develops a theoretical formalism for the combined spin and spatial degrees of freedom of the two-electron system (analogous to a semiconductor double quantum dot), and asserts that entanglement enables sensitivity beyond classical limits.

Significance. If the central claim holds, the work could contribute to quantum-enhanced detectors for particle physics by leveraging the helium platform's predicted long coherence times and impurity-free environment. The proposal is forward-looking and aligns with emerging quantum-sensing applications, though its immediate significance is limited by the absence of explicit metrological calculations.

major comments (1)
  1. Abstract: the claim that 'by exploiting quantum entanglement between the two trapped electrons, this sensor concept can surpass classical sensitivity limits' is load-bearing for the paper's central assertion yet is presented without derivation; the manuscript develops the isolated two-electron formalism but supplies neither an explicit coupling Hamiltonian between a passing particle (charge, field, or ionization) and the electrons nor a calculation of quantum Fisher information or signal-to-noise ratio comparing entangled versus product states.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

1 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the careful reading and constructive feedback. We address the major comment below.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: Abstract: the claim that 'by exploiting quantum entanglement between the two trapped electrons, this sensor concept can surpass classical sensitivity limits' is load-bearing for the paper's central assertion yet is presented without derivation; the manuscript develops the isolated two-electron formalism but supplies neither an explicit coupling Hamiltonian between a passing particle (charge, field, or ionization) and the electrons nor a calculation of quantum Fisher information or signal-to-noise ratio comparing entangled versus product states.

    Authors: We agree that the manuscript does not contain an explicit coupling Hamiltonian to a passing particle or the associated metrological analysis (quantum Fisher information or SNR comparison). The present work concentrates on the isolated two-electron formalism in the helium double-well potential. In the revised manuscript we will add a model for the particle-electron interaction (e.g., via charge or field coupling) together with a calculation of the quantum Fisher information for the entangled versus product states to substantiate the sensitivity claim. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity; proposal develops independent formalism without reducing claims to inputs or self-citations

full rationale

The manuscript is a forward-looking sensor proposal. It motivates the platform, develops the spin-spatial formalism for two electrons in a helium double-well trap (analogous to a double quantum dot), and asserts a general quantum-sensing entanglement advantage. No equations, parameters, or central claims are shown to reduce by construction to fitted data, self-definitions, or load-bearing self-citations. The derivation chain remains self-contained against external benchmarks and does not invoke uniqueness theorems or ansatzes from prior author work.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

The proposal rests on standard quantum mechanics for trapped electrons and the unproven assumption that entanglement can be maintained and exploited for particle detection in this platform.

axioms (1)
  • domain assumption Standard quantum mechanics applies to electrons confined on superfluid helium in microfabricated traps
    The two-electron formalism and entanglement discussion presuppose this background framework.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.1-grok · 5811 in / 1096 out tokens · 46726 ms · 2026-07-01T05:05:14.663199+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

49 extracted references · 14 canonical work pages · 9 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    C. L. Degen, F. Reinhard, and P. Cappellaro, Rev. Mod. Phys.89, 035002 (2017)

    2017

  2. [2]

    T. Esat, D. Borodin, J. Oh, A. J. Heinrich, F. S. Tautz, Y . Bae, and R. Temirov, Nat. Nanotechnol.19, 1466 (2024)

    2024

  3. [3]

    H. Li, Q. Peng, X. Xu, and J. Wang, Adv. Photonics5, 060503 (2023)

    2023

  4. [4]

    F. P. García de Arquer, D. V . Talapin, V . I. Klimov, Y . Arakawa, M. Bayer, and E. H. Sargent, Science373, eaaz8541 (2021)

    2021

  5. [5]

    Dropiewski, A

    K. Dropiewski, A. Minns, M. Yakimov, V . Tokranov, P. Murat, and S. Oktyabrsky, Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res. A954, 161472 (2020)

    2020

  6. [6]

    Z. Kang, Y . Zhang, H. Menkara, B. K. Wagner, C. J. Summers, W. Lawrence, and V . Nagarkar, Appl. Phys. Lett.98(2011)

    2011

  7. [7]

    Loskutova, A

    A. Loskutova, A. Seitkali, D. Aliyev, and R. Bukasov, Int. J. Mol. Sci.26, 6674 (2025)

    2025

  8. [8]

    W. C. Chan and S. Nie, Science281, 2016 (1998)

    2016

  9. [9]

    Choudhury, Y

    T. Choudhury, Y . Haddad, and M. Doser, Infrared narrow band emitting quantum dots for high energy physics, medicine and space applications (2025), arXiv:2510.25667 [hep-ex]

    work page arXiv 2025

  10. [10]

    M. I. Dykman and J. Pollanen, Entropy27, 10.3390/e27080787 (2025)

    work page doi:10.3390/e27080787 2025

  11. [11]

    Monarkha and K

    Y . Monarkha and K. Kono,Two-dimensional Coulomb liquids and solids, V ol. 142 (Springer Science & Business Media, 2013)

    2013

  12. [12]

    P. M. Platzman and M. I. Dykman, Science284, 1967 (1999)

    1967

  13. [13]

    Lyon, Phys

    SA. Lyon, Phys. Rev. A74, 052338 (2006)

    2006

  14. [14]

    D. I. Schuster, A. Fragner, M. I. Dykman, S. A. Lyon, and R. J. Schoelkopf, Phys. Rev. Lett.105, 040503 (2010)

    2010

  15. [15]

    K. E. Castoria, N. R. Beysengulov, G. Koolstra, H. Byeon, E. O. Glen, M. Sammon, S. A. Lyon, J. Pollanen, and D. G. Rees, Phys. Rev. X15, 041002 (2025)

    2025

  16. [16]

    Koolstra, E

    G. Koolstra, E. O. Glen, N. R. Beysengulov, H. Byeon, K. E. Castoria, M. Sammon, S. A. Lyon, D. G. Rees, and J. Pollanen, Nat. Phys. , 1 (2026)

    2026

  17. [17]

    F. R. Bradbury, M. Takita, T. M. Gurrieri, K. J. Wilkel, K. Eng, M. S. Carroll, and S. A. Lyon, Phys. Rev. Lett.107, 266803 (2011)

    2011

  18. [18]

    K. E. Castoria, H. Byeon, N. R. Beysengulov, E. O. Glen, M. Sammon, J. Pollanen, D. G. Rees, and S. A. Lyon, Phys. Rev. Appl. (2026)

    2026

  19. [19]

    N. R. Beysengulov, Ø. S. Schøyen, S. D. Bilek, J. B. Flaten, O. Leinonen, M. Hjorth-Jensen, J. Pollanen, H. E. Kristiansen, Z. J. Stewart, J. D. Weidman, and A. K. Wilson, PRX Quantum5, 030324 (2024)

    2024

  20. [20]

    Leinonen, J

    O. Leinonen, J. B. Flaten, S. D. Bilek, Øyvind S. Schøyen, M. Hjorth-Jensen, N. R. Beysengulov, Z. J. Stewart, J. D. Weidman, and A. K. Wilson, Phys. Rev. A113, 032624 (2026)

    2026

  21. [21]

    Giovannetti, S

    V . Giovannetti, S. Lloyd, and L. Maccone, Science306, 1330 (2004)

    2004

  22. [22]

    Giovannetti, S

    V . Giovannetti, S. Lloyd, and L. Maccone, Phys. Rev. Lett.96, 010401 (2006)

    2006

  23. [23]

    Direct Detection of sub-GeV Dark Matter with Semiconductor Targets

    R. Essig, M. Fernández-Serra, J. Mardon, A. Soto, T. V olansky, and T.-T. Yu, J. High Energy Phys.2016(5), 046, arXiv:1509.01598

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  24. [24]

    On the Detectability of Light Dark Matter with Superfluid Helium

    K. Schutz and K. M. Zurek, Phys. Rev. Lett.117, 121302 (2016), arXiv:1604.08206

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  25. [25]

    P. W. Graham and S. Rajendran, Phys. Rev. D88, 035023 (2013), arXiv:1306.6088

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

  26. [26]

    Search for axion-like dark matter through nuclear spin precession in electric and magnetic fields

    C. Abelet al., Phys. Rev. X7, 041034 (2017), arXiv:1708.06367

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  27. [27]

    Cosmic Axion Spin Precession Experiment (CASPEr)

    D. Budker, P. W. Graham, M. Ledbetter, S. Rajendran, and A. O. Sushkov, Phys. Rev. X4, 021030 (2014), arXiv:1306.6089

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  28. [28]

    A. J. Brady, C. Gao, R. Harnik, Z. Liu, Z. Zhang, and Q. Zhuang, PRX Quantum3, 030333 (2022), arXiv:2203.05375

    work page arXiv 2022

  29. [29]

    Detecting dark matter waves with precision measurement tools

    A. Derevianko, Phys. Rev. A97, 042506 (2018), arXiv:1605.09717

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  30. [30]

    Aasiet al., Nat

    J. Aasiet al., Nat. Photonics7, 613 (2013)

    2013

  31. [31]

    Wasilewski, K

    W. Wasilewski, K. Jensen, H. Krauter, J. J. Renema, M. V . Balabas, and E. S. Polzik, Phys. Rev. Lett.104, 133601 (2010)

    2010

  32. [32]

    Quantum metrology with nonclassical states of atomic ensembles

    L. Pezzè, A. Smerzi, M. K. Oberthaler, R. Schmied, and P. Treutlein, Rev. Mod. Phys.90, 035005 (2018), arXiv:1609.01609

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  33. [33]

    Neumann, N

    P. Neumann, N. Mizuochi, F. Rempp, P. Hemmer, H. Watanabe, S. Yamasaki, V . Jacques, T. Gaebel, F. Jelezko, and J. Wrachtrup, Science 320, 1326 (2008). 17

    2008

  34. [34]

    W. Wu, E. J. Davis, L. B. Hughes, B. Ye, Z. Wang, D. Kufel, T. Ono, S. A. Meynell, M. Block, C. Liu,et al., Nature646, 74 (2025)

    2025

  35. [35]

    X. Zhou, M. Wang, X. Ye, H. Sun, Y . Guo, S. Han, Z. Chai, W. Ji, K. Xia, F. Shi,et al., Nature647, 883 (2025)

    2025

  36. [36]

    Sekiguchi, M

    N. Sekiguchi, M. Fushimi, A. Yoshimura, C. Shinei, M. Miyakawa, T. Taniguchi, T. Teraji, H. Abe, S. Onoda, T. Ohshima, M. Hatano, M. Sekino, and T. Iwasaki, Phys. Rev. Appl.21, 10.1103/PhysRevApplied.21.064010 (2024)

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevapplied.21.064010 2024

  37. [37]

    Mostame and R

    S. Mostame and R. Schützhold, Phys. Rev. Lett.101, 220501 (2008)

    2008

  38. [38]

    Zhang, H

    M. Zhang, H. Y . Jia, and L. F. Wei, Phys. Rev. A80, 055801 (2009)

    2009

  39. [39]

    J. R. Petta, A. C. Johnson, J. M. Taylor, E. A. Laird, A. Yacoby, M. D. Lukin, C. M. Marcus, M. P. Hanson, and A. C. Gossard, Science 309, 2180 (2005)

    2005

  40. [40]

    Burkard, T

    G. Burkard, T. D. Ladd, A. Pan, J. M. Nichol, and J. R. Petta, Rev. Mod. Phys.95, 025003 (2023)

    2023

  41. [41]

    J. C. Light, I. P. Hamilton, and J. V . Lill, J. Chem. Phys.82, 1400 (1985)

    1985

  42. [42]

    Szabo and N

    A. Szabo and N. S. Ostlund,Modern Quantum Chemistry: Introduction to Advanced Electronic Structure Theory(Dover Publications, Mineola, NY , 1996)

    1996

  43. [43]

    H. M. Wiseman and G. J. Milburn,Quantum Measurement and Control, Cambridge University Press (Cambridge University Press, 2010)

    2010

  44. [44]

    S. L. Braunstein and C. M. Caves, Phys. Rev. Lett.72, 3439 (1994)

    1994

  45. [45]

    M. G. A. Paris, Int. J. Quantum Inf.7, 125 (2009), arXiv:0804.2981

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2009

  46. [46]

    Bukov and F

    M. Bukov and F. Marquardt, arXiv preprint arXiv:2601.18953 (2026)

    work page arXiv 2026

  47. [47]

    Belliardo, F

    F. Belliardo, F. Zoratti, F. Marquardt, and V . Giovannetti, Quantum8, 1555 (2024)

    2024

  48. [48]

    Proximal Policy Optimization Algorithms

    J. Schulman, F. Wolski, P. Dhariwal, A. Radford, and O. Klimov, arXiv preprint arXiv:1707.06347 (2017)

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  49. [49]

    Castoria, H

    K. Castoria, H. Byeon, J. Theis, N. Beysengulov, E. Glen, G. Koolstra, M. Sammon, S. Lyon, J. Pollanen, and D. Rees, Rev. Sci. Instrum. 95(2024)

    2024