BAGEL: Bootstrapping Agents by Guiding Exploration with Language
Reviewed by Pith T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 kernel pith:FVMDBX5Nrecord.jsonopen to challenge →
read the original abstract
Following natural language instructions by executing actions in digital environments (e.g. web-browsers and REST APIs) is a challenging task for language model (LM) agents. Unfortunately, LM agents often fail to generalize to new environments without human demonstrations. This work presents BAGEL, a method for bootstrapping LM agents without human supervision. BAGEL converts a seed set of randomly explored trajectories or synthetic instructions, into demonstrations, via round-trips between two noisy LM components: an LM labeler which converts a trajectory into a synthetic instruction, and a zero-shot LM agent which maps the synthetic instruction into a refined trajectory. By performing these round-trips iteratively, BAGEL quickly converts the initial distribution of trajectories towards those that are well-described by natural language. We use BAGEL demonstrations to adapt a zero shot LM agent at test time via in-context learning over retrieved demonstrations, and find improvements of over 2-13% absolute on ToolQA and MiniWob++, with up to 13x reduction in execution failures.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet.
Forward citations
Cited by 3 Pith papers
-
AndroidWorld: A Dynamic Benchmarking Environment for Autonomous Agents
AndroidWorld is a dynamic, reproducible Android benchmark that generates unlimited natural-language tasks for autonomous agents and shows current agents succeed on only 30.6 percent of them.
-
Agent Workflow Memory
AWM induces reusable workflows from agent experiences and provides them selectively to improve success rates by 24.6% on Mind2Web and 51.1% on WebArena while reducing steps taken.
-
A Comprehensive Survey of Agents for Computer Use: Foundations, Challenges, and Future Directions
A survey of 87 agents for computer use and 33 datasets that introduces a three-dimensional taxonomy across domain, interaction, and agent perspectives and identifies six research gaps.
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.