Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

Discretization-invariant Bayesian inversion and Besov space priors

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 0901.4220 v1 pith:FYQ7XXDS submitted 2009-01-27 math.PR stat.ME

classification math.PRstat.ME
keywords priormathcalbayesianinversionmeasurementpriorsbesovconsidered
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
abstract

Bayesian solution of an inverse problem for indirect measurement $M = AU + {\mathcal{E}}$ is considered, where $U$ is a function on a domain of $R^d$. Here $A$ is a smoothing linear operator and $ {\mathcal{E}}$ is Gaussian white noise. The data is a realization $m_k$ of the random variable $M_k = P_kA U+P_k {\mathcal{E}}$, where $P_k$ is a linear, finite dimensional operator related to measurement device. To allow computerized inversion, the unknown is discretized as $U_n=T_nU$, where $T_n$ is a finite dimensional projection, leading to the computational measurement model $M_{kn}=P_k A U_n + P_k {\mathcal{E}}$. Bayes formula gives then the posterior distribution $\pi_{kn}(u_n | m_{kn})\sim\pi_n(u_n) \exp(-{1/2}\|m_{kn} - P_kA u_n\|_2^2)$ in $R^d$, and the mean $U^{CM}_{kn}:=\int u_n \pi_{kn}(u_n | m_k) du_n$ is considered as the reconstruction of $U$. We discuss a systematic way of choosing prior distributions $\prior_n$ for all $n\geq n_0>0$ by achieving them as projections of a distribution in a infinite-dimensional limit case. Such choice of prior distributions is {\em discretization-invariant} in the sense that $\prior_n$ represent the same {\em a priori} information for all $n$ and that the mean $U^{CM}_{kn}$ converges to a limit estimate as $k,n\to\infty$. Gaussian smoothness priors and wavelet-based Besov space priors are shown to be discretization invariant. In particular, Bayesian inversion in dimension two with $B^1_{11}$ prior is related to penalizing the $\ell^1$ norm of the wavelet coefficients of $U$.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Can neural operators always be continuously discretized?

    cs.LG 2024-12 conditional novelty 7.0 of 10

    Neural operators that are diffeomorphisms generally cannot be continuously discretized, but strongly monotone neural operators can, and bilipschitz neural operators decompose into strongly monotone layers plus a singl...

  2. Data-driven approaches to inverse problems

    math.NA 2025-06 unverdicted

    A review lecture-note series that surveys classical and data-driven methods for inverse problems, focusing on adversarial regularization and provably convergent plug-and-play denoisers.

Pith tools