pith. sign in

arxiv: 2606.07072 · v1 · pith:FZSHD4Q5new · submitted 2026-06-05 · 🌌 astro-ph.HE

Infrared Echoes of Precessing Tidal Disruption Events

Hong-Zhou Wu , Shao-Yu Fu , Wen-Long Xu , Chang Zhou , Wei-Hua Lei This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-06-27 21:15 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🌌 astro-ph.HE
keywords tidal disruption eventsinfrared echoesprecessing accretion disksdust echoeslight curve variabilitysupermassive black holesrelativistic precession
0
0 comments X

The pith

Precessing tidal disruption event disks create highly variable infrared echoes from surrounding dust.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

This paper presents a theoretical framework showing that relativistic precession of a misaligned accretion disk in a tidal disruption event causes the infrared echoes from parsec-scale dust to vary strongly over time. The variability comes from the changing illumination pattern as the disk precesses. If true, high-cadence observations could detect these variations and track transitions in the light curve shape from double-peaked to single-peaked. This matters because it turns the echoes into dynamic probes of the central engine's evolution rather than static snapshots.

Core claim

The precession will lead to highly variable infrared light curves, which can be revealed by high-cadence observations. The overall profile of the infrared light curves shows double-peaked to single-peaked pattern transitions as a result of the changes in the viewing angle or precession angle. The results indicate that infrared echoes are dynamic tracers of the evolving lighting patterns of the central engine.

What carries the argument

A theoretical framework for infrared dust echoes from a precessing TDE disk, which models how precession modulates the illumination pattern on parsec-scale dust.

If this is right

  • High-cadence infrared observations can detect the high variability in the light curves.
  • The light curve profiles transition from double-peaked to single-peaked with changes in viewing angle or precession angle.
  • Infrared echoes serve as dynamic tracers of the central engine's lighting patterns.
  • These echoes provide calorimetric probes that account for the evolving geometry due to precession.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the model holds, repeated infrared monitoring of known TDEs could measure precession periods and misalignment angles directly from the echo variability.
  • Such signatures might appear in multi-wavelength data if precession also affects the emitted radiation reaching the dust.
  • Future infrared surveys could use the double-to-single peak transitions to flag precessing systems among other transients.

Load-bearing premise

The accretion disk in a tidal disruption event is misaligned and undergoes relativistic precession instead of remaining static and axisymmetric.

What would settle it

A high-cadence infrared monitoring campaign of a tidal disruption event showing constant light curve shapes with no variability or peak pattern transitions over years would falsify the central claim.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2606.07072 by Chang Zhou, Hong-Zhou Wu, Shao-Yu Fu, Wei-Hua Lei, Wen-Long Xu.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: The absolute magnitude of different geometric shapes of dust on the echo light curve. For demonstration purposes, the distance from the dusty torus is fixed at R=0.1 pc. The reference shell model is displayed in cyan (solid). The echo light curve from the circular dusty torus distribution is represented by a red curve, which represents the observer at the edge (dotted line) and the observer at the pole (da… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Schematic geometry of the precessing TDE dust-echo model. The black-hole spin axis defines the Z-direction. The accretion disk’s spin axis (a) is tilted by a constant precession angle θpre and precesses around Z with angular frequency Ω, causing the TDE’s UV/optical illumination beam to sweep across the circumnuclear dusty torus. The torus has a finite opening angle θ0 and is approximated as an infinitesim… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: The light curve of infrared echoes under the same precession angle and different observation angles. The insert panel in the upper-right corner shows details of the light variation curve from 500 to 506 days [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Same as [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Horizontal dashed lines indicate the point-source limiting magnitudes of near-infrared surveys: Euclid J-band (JE, 24.0 AB mag, wide survey, 4500 s total exposure, see ESA 2026), Roman F129 (J-band equivalent, 28.2 AB mag for Ultra-Deep HLWAS tiers with ∼ 2.4 hr total exposure, see R. O. T. A. Committee & C. C. S. D. Committees 2025), and JWST F115W (29.98 AB mag for JADES Deepest tiers with ∼ 34 hr total … view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Mid-infrared dust echo light curves of AT 2022agi in the W1 (3.4 µm, orange circles) and W2 (4.6 µm, green squares) bands. The data points represent epoch-binned WISE/NEOWISE photometry after host-galaxy baseline subtraction. The thin solid cyan curve shows the theoretical precessing-disk model with θobs = 0◦ and θpre = 47◦ at R = 2.0 pc. The thick dashed blue curve denotes the upper envelope of the model,… view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Same as [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_7.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

A tidal disruption event (TDE) occurs when a star is torn apart by a supermassive black hole. The resulting UV/optical flare irradiates parsec-scale dust, producing delayed mid-infrared echoes that persist for years. These echoes provide unique calorimetric probes of the total radiated energy and dust geometry.Existing models usually assume static axisymmetric illumination patterns. However, the TDE accretion disk is likely misaligned and undergoes relativistic precession.In this work, we present a theoretical framework for infrared dust echoes from a precessing TDE disk. The precession will lead to highly variable infrared light curves, which can be revealed by high-cadence observations. The overall profile of the infrared light curves shows double-peaked to single-peaked pattern transitions as a result of the changes in the viewing angle or precession angle.The results indicate that infrared echoes are dynamic tracers of the evolving lighting patterns of the central engine.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript develops a theoretical framework for mid-infrared dust echoes produced by a precessing, misaligned TDE accretion disk. It claims that relativistic precession generates highly variable IR light curves whose overall profile transitions between double-peaked and single-peaked shapes as a function of viewing angle or precession angle; these echoes are presented as dynamic tracers of the evolving illumination pattern of the central engine, observable with high-cadence monitoring.

Significance. If the central claim holds after proper treatment of light-travel effects, the work would extend static axisymmetric echo models to include precession and thereby offer a new route to constrain TDE disk misalignment and precession parameters from IR observations.

major comments (2)
  1. [theoretical framework] The central claim that precession produces observable highly variable IR light curves with double-to-single peaked transitions is load-bearing on whether the model computes the echo as the source light curve convolved with the parsec-scale dust delay distribution. The abstract and framework description give no indication that this convolution is performed or that the regime precession period ≳ dust light-crossing time (~years) is explored; if the precession timescale is shorter, the convolution will average over multiple phases and can suppress both amplitude and the reported peak-structure transitions.
  2. [theoretical framework] §3 (or equivalent model section): the forward model is described as driven by precession geometry, yet no explicit statement is given on how the dust response is integrated over the radial and angular extent of the torus; without this, it is impossible to verify whether the claimed light-curve transitions survive the delay spread.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] The abstract states that 'the TDE accretion disk is likely misaligned' without a supporting reference or brief justification; a short sentence citing the relevant TDE misalignment literature would improve clarity.
  2. Notation for viewing angle and precession angle should be defined at first use and kept consistent between text and any figures showing light-curve profiles.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their constructive comments, which highlight important aspects of the light-travel time treatment in our theoretical framework. We address each major comment below.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [theoretical framework] The central claim that precession produces observable highly variable IR light curves with double-to-single peaked transitions is load-bearing on whether the model computes the echo as the source light curve convolved with the parsec-scale dust delay distribution. The abstract and framework description give no indication that this convolution is performed or that the regime precession period ≳ dust light-crossing time (~years) is explored; if the precession timescale is shorter, the convolution will average over multiple phases and can suppress both amplitude and the reported peak-structure transitions.

    Authors: We agree that the convolution with the dust delay distribution is central to validating the variability and peak-structure transitions. Our forward model does perform this convolution between the time-dependent illumination from the precessing disk and the delay distribution of the parsec-scale torus, and we restrict the presented results to the regime where the precession period is comparable to or longer than the light-crossing time so that phase-dependent features are not averaged away. We acknowledge that neither the abstract nor the initial framework description made this explicit. We will revise the manuscript to state the convolution procedure and the explored timescale regime clearly. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [theoretical framework] §3 (or equivalent model section): the forward model is described as driven by precession geometry, yet no explicit statement is given on how the dust response is integrated over the radial and angular extent of the torus; without this, it is impossible to verify whether the claimed light-curve transitions survive the delay spread.

    Authors: We will add an explicit subsection in the model description (revised §3) that details the integration of the dust response over the radial and angular coordinates of the torus. This will include the mathematical expression for summing the delayed contributions from each dust element, confirming that the full delay spread is incorporated when generating the light curves. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

Forward physical model of precessing TDE IR echoes shows no circularity

full rationale

The provided abstract and context describe a theoretical framework deriving IR light-curve variability and double-to-single peaked transitions directly from precession geometry, viewing angle, and dust illumination. No equations or steps are shown that reduce predictions to fitted parameters, self-definitions, or load-bearing self-citations. The derivation is presented as a forward model from relativistic precession assumptions, remaining self-contained without the specific reductions required for circularity flags.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

Abstract-only review yields minimal ledger entries; the central modeling step rests on one domain assumption about disk misalignment.

axioms (1)
  • domain assumption The TDE accretion disk is likely misaligned and undergoes relativistic precession
    Explicitly invoked in the abstract as the reason for extending beyond static axisymmetric illumination.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.1-grok · 5694 in / 1260 out tokens · 26880 ms · 2026-06-27T21:15:13.341155+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

62 extracted references · 49 canonical work pages · 1 internal anchor

  1. [1]

    , keywords =

    Alexander, K. D., van Velzen, S., Horesh, A., & Zauderer, B. A. 2020, SSRv, 216, 81, doi: 10.1007/s11214-020-00702-w

    work page doi:10.1007/s11214-020-00702-w 2020

  2. [2]

    2026, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2603.07161, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2603.07161

    An, T., Wang, A., Zhang, Y., et al. 2026, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2603.07161, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2603.07161

    work page doi:10.48550/arxiv.2603.07161 2026

  3. [3]

    , keywords =

    Arcodia, R., Merloni, A., Nandra, K., et al. 2021, Nature, 592, 704, doi: 10.1038/s41586-021-03394-6

    work page doi:10.1038/s41586-021-03394-6 2021

  4. [4]

    , keywords =

    Arcodia, R., Liu, Z., Merloni, A., et al. 2024, A&A, 684, A64, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202348881

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202348881 2024

  5. [5]

    , keywords =

    Bu, D.-F., Chen, L., Mou, G., Qiao, E., & Yang, X.-H. 2023, MNRAS, 521, 4180, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stad804

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stad804 2023

  6. [6]

    arXiv , author =:2110.10786 , journal =

    Chakraborty, J., Kara, E., Masterson, M., et al. 2021, ApJL, 921, L40, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/ac313b

    work page doi:10.3847/2041-8213/ac313b 2021

  7. [7]

    K., Kwan, T

    Chen, J.-H., Dai, L., Kan, C. K., Kwan, T. M., & Zhang, Z. 2026, ApJ, 1000, 9, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ae434e

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ae434e 2026

  8. [8]

    Committee, R. O. T. A., & Committees, C. C. S. D. 2025, Roman Observations Time Allocation Committee: Final Report and Recommendations, https://arxiv.org/abs/2505.10574

    arXiv 2025

  9. [9]

    2025, The First Photometric Evidence of a Transient/Variable Source at z >5 with JWST, https://arxiv.org/abs/2504.17007

    DeCoursey, C., Egami, E., Sun, F., et al. 2025, The First Photometric Evidence of a Transient/Variable Source at z >5 with JWST, https://arxiv.org/abs/2504.17007

    arXiv 2025

  10. [10]

    2017, The Astrophysical Journal Letters, 841, L8, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/aa7130

    Dou, L., Wang, T., Yan, L., et al. 2017, The Astrophysical Journal Letters, 841, L8, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/aa7130

    work page doi:10.3847/2041-8213/aa7130 2017

  11. [11]

    2016, The Astrophysical Journal, 832, 188, doi: 10.3847/0004-637x/832/2/188

    Dou, L., Wang, T.-g., Jiang, N., et al. 2016, The Astrophysical Journal, 832, 188, doi: 10.3847/0004-637x/832/2/188

    work page doi:10.3847/0004-637x/832/2/188 2016

  12. [12]

    1983, ApJ, 274, 175, doi: 10.1086/161435

    Dwek, E. 1983, ApJ, 274, 175, doi: 10.1086/161435

    work page doi:10.1086/161435 1983

  13. [13]

    1985, ApJ, 297, 719, doi: 10.1086/163571

    Dwek, E. 1985, ApJ, 297, 719, doi: 10.1086/163571

    work page doi:10.1086/163571 1985

  14. [14]

    E., Glaccum, W., et al

    Dwek, E., Felten, J. E., Glaccum, W., et al. 1989, in Bulletin of the American Astronomical Society, Vol. 21, 1215

    1989

  15. [15]

    J., Willott, C., Alberts, S., et al

    Eisenstein, D. J., Willott, C., Alberts, S., et al. 2025, Overview of the JWST Advanced Deep Extragalactic Survey (JADES), https://arxiv.org/abs/2306.02465 ESA. 2026, Euclid„ ESA Earth Observation Portal https://www.eoportal.org/satellite-missions/euclid

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  16. [16]

    E., & Dwek, E

    Felten, J. E., & Dwek, E. 1989, Nature, 339, 123, doi: 10.1038/339123a0

    work page doi:10.1038/339123a0 1989

  17. [17]

    doi:10.1086/521092 , eprint =

    Fragile, P. C., Blaes, O. M., Anninos, P., & Salmonson, J. D. 2007, ApJ, 668, 417, doi: 10.1086/521092

    work page doi:10.1086/521092 2007

  18. [18]

    Y., He, L

    Fu, S. Y., He, L. B., Zhu, A. D., et al. 2025, GRB Coordinates Network, 42990, 1

    2025

  19. [19]

    L., Fesen, R

    Gerardy, C. L., Fesen, R. A., Nomoto, K., et al. 2002, The Astrophysical Journal, 575, 1007–1017, doi: 10.1086/341430

    work page doi:10.1086/341430 2002

  20. [20]

    , keywords =

    Gezari, S. 2021, Annual Review of Astronomy and Astrophysics, 59, 21–58, doi: 10.1146/annurev-astro-111720-030029

    work page doi:10.1146/annurev-astro-111720-030029 2021

  21. [21]

    Giustini, M., Miniutti, G., & Saxton, R. D. 2020, A&A, 636, L2, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202037610

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202037610 2020

  22. [22]

    Guolo, M., Gezari, S., Yao, Y., et al. 2024, A systematic analysis of the X-ray emission in optically selected tidal disruption events: observational evidence for the unification of the optically and X-ray selected populations, https://arxiv.org/abs/2308.13019

    arXiv 2024

  23. [23]

    , keywords =

    Hammerstein, E., Gezari, S., van Velzen, S., et al. 2021, The Astrophysical Journal Letters, 908, L20, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/abdcb4 14

    work page doi:10.3847/2041-8213/abdcb4 2021

  24. [24]

    Nature Astronomy , keywords =

    Hammerstein, E., Cenko, S. B., Gezari, S., et al. 2023, Integral Field Spectroscopy of 13 Tidal Disruption Event Hosts from the ZTF Survey, https://arxiv.org/abs/2307.15705 Hern´ andez-Garc´ ıa, L., Chakraborty, J., S´ anchez-S´ aez, P., et al. 2025, Nature Astronomy, doi: 10.1038/s41550-025-02523-9

    work page doi:10.1038/s41550-025-02523-9 2023

  25. [25]

    The Astrophysical Journal , author =

    Jiang, N., Wang, T., Hu, X., et al. 2021, The Astrophysical Journal, 911, 31, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/abe772

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/abe772 2021

  26. [26]

    2017, The Astrophysical Journal, 850, 63, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/aa93f5

    Jiang, N., Wang, T., Yan, L., et al. 2017, The Astrophysical Journal, 850, 63, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/aa93f5

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/aa93f5 2017

  27. [27]

    A., Liodakis, I., Koljonen, K

    Langis, D. A., Liodakis, I., Koljonen, K. I. I., et al. 2026, Astronomy & Astrophysics, 707, A171, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202554882

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202554882 2026

  28. [28]

    2013, ApJ, 762, 98, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/762/2/98

    Lei, W.-H., Zhang, B., & Gao, H. 2013, ApJ, 762, 98, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/762/2/98

    work page doi:10.1088/0004-637x/762/2/98 2013

  29. [29]

    , keywords =

    Lei, X., Wu, Q., Li, H., et al. 2024, ApJ, 977, 63, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ad8ba5

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ad8ba5 2024

  30. [30]

    1918, Physikalische Zeitschrift, 19, 156

    Lense, J., & Thirring, H. 1918, Physikalische Zeitschrift, 19, 156

    1918

  31. [31]

    2025, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2506.04196, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2506.04196

    Li, Y.-Z., Xu, W.-L., Chen, Y.-G., & Lei, W.-H. 2025, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2506.04196, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2506.04196

    work page doi:10.48550/arxiv.2506.04196 2025

  32. [32]

    , keywords =

    Lin, Z., Jiang, N., Wang, T., et al. 2024, The Astrophysical Journal Letters, 971, L26, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/ad638e

    work page doi:10.3847/2041-8213/ad638e 2024

  33. [33]

    Liu, C., & Miller, A. A. 2026, Publications of the Astronomical Society of the Pacific, 138, 024503, doi: 10.1088/1538-3873/ae3cc1

    work page doi:10.1088/1538-3873/ae3cc1 2026

  34. [34]

    Lu, W., Kumar, P., & Evans, N. J. 2016, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 458, 575–581, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stw307

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stw307 2016

  35. [35]

    Lu, W., Matsumoto, T., & Matzner, C. D. 2024, MNRAS, 533, 979, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stae1770

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stae1770 2024

  36. [36]

    2015, Constraining the Amount of Circumstellar Matter and Dust around Type Ia Supernovae through Near-Infrared Echoes, https://arxiv.org/abs/1411.3778

    Maeda, K., Nozawa, T., Nagao, T., & Motohara, K. 2015, Constraining the Amount of Circumstellar Matter and Dust around Type Ia Supernovae through Near-Infrared Echoes, https://arxiv.org/abs/1411.3778

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  37. [37]

    2024, A New Population of Mid-Infrared-Selected Tidal Disruption Events: Implications for Tidal Disruption Event Rates and Host Galaxy Properties, https://arxiv.org/abs/2401.01403

    Masterson, M., De, K., Panagiotou, C., et al. 2024, A New Population of Mid-Infrared-Selected Tidal Disruption Events: Implications for Tidal Disruption Event Rates and Host Galaxy Properties, https://arxiv.org/abs/2401.01403

    arXiv 2024

  38. [39]

    Nature , author =

    Miniutti, G., Saxton, R. D., Giustini, M., et al. 2019b, Nature, 573, 381, doi: 10.1038/s41586-019-1556-x

    work page doi:10.1038/s41586-019-1556-x

  39. [40]

    , keywords =

    Mou, G., Wang, T., Wang, W., & Yang, J. 2022, MNRAS, 510, 3650, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stab3742

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stab3742 2022

  40. [41]

    2025, Astronomy & Astrophysics, 695, A228, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202451340

    Necker, J., Graikou, E., Kowalski, M., et al. 2025, Astronomy & Astrophysics, 695, A228, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202451340

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202451340 2025

  41. [42]

    , keywords =

    Nicholl, M., Pasham, D. R., Mummery, A., et al. 2024, Nature, 634, 804, doi: 10.1038/s41586-024-08023-6

    work page doi:10.1038/s41586-024-08023-6 2024

  42. [43]

    R., Coughlin, E., van Velzen, S., & Hinkle, J

    Pasham, D. R., Coughlin, E., van Velzen, S., & Hinkle, J. 2025, Using Infrared Dust Echoes to Identify Bright Quasi-periodic Eruption Sources, https://arxiv.org/abs/2502.12078

    arXiv 2025

  43. [44]

    Phinney, E. S. 1989, in IAU Symposium, Vol. 136, The Center of the Galaxy, ed. M. Morris, 543

    1989

  44. [45]

    Rees, M. J. 1988, Nature, 333, 523, doi: 10.1038/333523a0

    work page doi:10.1038/333523a0 1988

  45. [46]

    M., Mattila, S., Efstathiou, A., et al

    Reynolds, T. M., Mattila, S., Efstathiou, A., et al. 2022, Astronomy & Astrophysics, 664, A158, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202243289

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202243289 2022

  46. [47]

    Rieke, G. H. 1978, ApJ, 226, 550, doi: 10.1086/156639

    work page doi:10.1086/156639 1978

  47. [48]

    W., Wang, S

    Shu, X. W., Wang, S. S., Dou, L. M., et al. 2018, ApJL, 857, L16, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/aaba17

    work page doi:10.3847/2041-8213/aaba17 2018

  48. [49]

    Mid-Infrared Selection of AGN with the Wide-Field Infrared Survey Explorer. I. Characterizing WISE-Selected AGN in COSMOS

    Stern, D., Assef, R. J., Benford, D. J., et al. 2012, The Astrophysical Journal, 753, 30, doi: 10.1088/0004-637x/753/1/30

    work page internal anchor Pith review doi:10.1088/0004-637x/753/1/30 2012

  49. [50]

    2012, PhRvL, 108, 061302, doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.108.061302 STScI

    Stone, N., & Loeb, A. 2012, PhRvL, 108, 061302, doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.108.061302 STScI. 2025, NIRCam Time-Series Imaging„ JWST User Documentation https://jwst-docs.stsci.edu/jwst-near- infrared-camera/nircam-observing-modes/nircam-time- series-observations/nircam-time-series-imaging

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.108.061302 2012

  50. [51]

    2013, ApJ, 768, 167, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/768/2/167

    Sun, L., Shu, X., & Wang, T. 2013, ApJ, 768, 167, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/768/2/167

    work page doi:10.1088/0004-637x/768/2/167 2013

  51. [52]

    , keywords =

    Sun, L., Jiang, N., Dou, L., et al. 2024, Astronomy & Astrophysics, 692, A262, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202452380

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202452380 2024

  52. [53]

    2017, A tidal disruption event in the nearby ultra-luminous infrared galaxy F01004-2237, https://arxiv.org/abs/1702.02573

    Crowther, P. 2017, A tidal disruption event in the nearby ultra-luminous infrared galaxy F01004-2237, https://arxiv.org/abs/1702.02573

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  53. [54]

    Teboul, O., & Metzger, B. D. 2023, ApJL, 957, L9, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/ad0037 van Velzen, S., Mendez, A. J., Krolik, J. H., & Gorjian, V. 2016, The Astrophysical Journal, 829, 19, doi: 10.3847/0004-637x/829/1/19 van Velzen, S., Pasham, D. R., Komossa, S., Yan, L., &

    work page doi:10.3847/2041-8213/ad0037 2023

  54. [55]

    Kara, E. A. 2021, Space Science Reviews, 217, doi: 10.1007/s11214-021-00835-6

    work page doi:10.1007/s11214-021-00835-6 2021

  55. [56]

    2018, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 477, 2943–2965, doi: 10.1093/mnras/sty465

    Wang, T., Yan, L., Dou, L., et al. 2018, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 477, 2943–2965, doi: 10.1093/mnras/sty465

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/sty465 2018

  56. [57]

    Science Advances , keywords =

    Wang, Y., Lin, Z., Wu, L., et al. 2025, Science Advances, 11, 25.9068, doi: 10.1126/sciadv.ady9068 15

    work page doi:10.1126/sciadv.ady9068 2025

  57. [58]

    2023, The Astrophysical Journal, 948, 42, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/acbe9e

    Winter, W., & Lunardini, C. 2023, The Astrophysical Journal, 948, 42, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/acbe9e

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/acbe9e 2023

  58. [59]

    2025, The Astrophysical Journal Letters, 988, L77, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/adf229

    Wu, M., Jiang, N., Zhu, J., et al. 2025, The Astrophysical Journal Letters, 988, L77, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/adf229

    work page doi:10.3847/2041-8213/adf229 2025

  59. [60]

    2025, Distinguishing Tidal Disruption Events and Changing-look Active Galactic Nuclei via Variation of Mid-infrared Color, https://arxiv.org/abs/2503.10053

    Yao, Y., Ye, J., Sun, L., et al. 2025, Distinguishing Tidal Disruption Events and Changing-look Active Galactic Nuclei via Variation of Mid-infrared Color, https://arxiv.org/abs/2503.10053

    arXiv 2025

  60. [61]

    , keywords =

    Yuan, H.-Y., Wu, H.-Z., & Lei, W.-H. 2026, ApJ, 996, 42, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ae1eed

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ae1eed 2026

  61. [62]

    arXiv e-prints , keywords =

    Zhou, C., Lei, W.-H., Lei, X., et al. 2026, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2603.06056, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2603.06056

    work page doi:10.48550/arxiv.2603.06056 2026

  62. [63]

    , keywords =

    Zhuang, J., Shen, R.-F., Mou, G., & Lu, W. 2025, ApJ, 979, 109, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ad9b98

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ad9b98 2025