pith. sign in

arxiv: 2606.18493 · v1 · pith:G2PTUXIPnew · submitted 2026-06-16 · ❄️ cond-mat.other

Dynamical axion quasiparticles: an open quantum system

Daniel Boyanovsky This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-06-26 21:17 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ❄️ cond-mat.other
keywords dynamical axion quasiparticlesquantum master equationopen quantum systemsChern-Simons couplingtopological susceptibilitynon-Markovian dynamicslinear response
0
0 comments X

The pith

The open quantum system description of dynamical axion quasiparticles yields the same equation of motion for condensates as quantum many-body linear response.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

This paper studies how dynamical axion quasiparticles, which emerge in certain materials, behave when coupled to a bath of photons through a Chern-Simons interaction, treating the system as an open quantum system. A quantum master equation is derived to second order in the coupling strength, keeping a partial Markov approximation that allows the rates to depend on time. This setup captures short-time transient behavior, including enhanced decay known as anti-Zeno dynamics and time-dependent population growth that violates standard detailed balance. The central result is that the motion of coherent condensates of these quasiparticles agrees exactly between this master equation and traditional many-body linear response calculations, implying that the topological susceptibility is directly proportional to the quasiparticle self-energy.

Core claim

The equation of motion for coherent dynamical axion quasiparticle condensates obtained from the quantum master equation matches that derived from quantum many-body linear response. As a result, the expectation value of the Chern-Simons density induced by such a condensate in linear response shows that the topological susceptibility is proportional to the many-body self-energy of the DAQ.

What carries the argument

Quantum master equation for the DAQ-photon system derived to second order in the Chern-Simons coupling, with time-dependent rates set by the equilibrium correlation functions of the Chern-Simons density under a partial Markov approximation.

If this is right

  • The early-time evolution exhibits quantum anti-Zeno dynamics with enhanced quasiparticle decay and population growth.
  • Population build-up occurs at an effective time-dependent rate, leading to transient violations of Fermi's golden rule and detailed balance.
  • The Chern-Simons density expectation value induced by a DAQ condensate is obtained directly in linear response.
  • Approximations in the master equation receive a Feynman diagram interpretation in terms of system-bath correlations.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The matching of methods suggests open-system techniques can be used to study non-equilibrium dynamics in other topological systems where full many-body calculations are difficult.
  • Time-dependent rates from the partial Markov approximation could model similar transient effects in condensed matter systems coupled to baths.
  • Corrections from higher-order system-bath correlations might be testable in materials where axion quasiparticles are realized.

Load-bearing premise

The coupling between the dynamical axion quasiparticles and the photon bath must be weak enough that the second-order perturbative quantum master equation with partial Markov approximation accurately describes the dynamics.

What would settle it

Direct measurement of the time-dependent rates in DAQ decay and population dynamics that follow the predicted form from the Chern-Simons density correlation functions at early times.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2606.18493 by Daniel Boyanovsky.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Ip(t) for ~q = 0; β = 1;t ∈ [0, 20] with three upper cutoffs. (a) Λp = 1.5; (b) Λp = 2; (c) Λp = 3, all in units where m = 1. Dotted line: Ip = 0. The early rise is followed by oscillatory behavior that depends on the cutoff Λp and is eventually followed by the linear time behavior from Fermi’s Golden Rule. In contrast, the contribution Ic(t) does not contain the singular denominator as q0 → Eφ(~q), howeve… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Ic(t) (red) and Iz (green dashed) for ~q = 0; β = 1 and the four cutoff combinations: (a) [Λp,Λmax] = [2, 50]; (b) [2, 100]; (c) [3, 100]; (d) [1.5, 100], in units where m = 1 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p019_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: I+(t) with Eφ(~q) ≡ p q 2 + 1, for q = 1, 2; β = 1, 2 in units where m = 1 for Λp = 3Eφ(q) (left panel) and Λp = 5Eφ(q) (right panel). The dashed lines are asymptotes z0 + ρ(Eφ(q)) 2Eφ(q) t, their intercepts z0 contribute to the quasiparticle residue. The intersects and oscillation frequencies depend on Λp. Early time transient is characterized by quantum anti-Zeno enhancement. and zero intercept correspon… view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Np(t) with Eφ(~q) ≡ p q 2 + 1, for q = 1, 2; β = 1, 2 in units where m = 1 for Λp = 3Eφ(q); Λmax = 50, g 2 = 0.1 with and without (N p(t)) the oscillatory contribution to the damping factor γ(t). The curves are indistinguishable after a time scale t ≃ 1/Eφ(~q) [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p025_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Np(t) with Eφ(~q) ≡ p q 2 + 1, for q = 1; β = 1 in units where m = 1 for Λp = 3Eφ(q); Λmax = 50; G = g 2 = 0.1 and n [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p026_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Nosc(t) with Eφ(~q) ≡ p q 2 + 1, for q = 1, 2; β = 1, 2 in units where m = 1 for Λp = 3Eφ(q); Λmax = 50 ; G = g 2 = 0.1 . On longer time scales, we can implement the simplification (III.34) and the time integrals can be done straightforwardly, with the result Nosc(~q, t) −−−→ t≫tqp e −Γ(~q,∞)t g 2 Eφ(~q) Z Λmax 0 ρ(q0; ~q) " n(q0) Θ(q0 − Λp) (Eφ(~q) − q0) 2 + Γ2(~q,∞) + [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p… view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Nosc(t) with Eφ(~q) ≡ p q 2 + 1, for q = 1, 2; β = 1, 2 in units where m = 1 for Λp = 3Eφ(q); Λmax = 50 ; G = g 2 = 0.1 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p027_7.png] view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: Ratios R<(t) = Γ >(~q,t) Γ(~q,∞)n(Eφ(~q) , and R>(t) = Γ >(~q,t) Γ(~q,∞)(1+n(Eφ(~q)) for q = 1; β = 1 in units where m = 1 for Λp = 3Eφ(q) neglecting the oscillatory contribution Nosc(t). particle from an impurity in a Fermi sea has been studied with ultrafast interferometry[46, 47]. Perhaps similar experimental techniques with ultra-fast spectroscopy and femtosecond time resolu￾tions may be harnessed to p… view at source ↗
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: φ one photon loop self energy. 3 The Θ(t − t ′ ) in the retarded proper self-energy is accounted for by the upper limit in the time integral in (IV.4) [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p030_9.png] view at source ↗
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: Expectation value of E~ · B~ (black dot) induced by the (DAC) condensate φ (dashed line). The photon loop is − 1 gΣ. The linear response equation (IV.46) can be translated to frequency and momentum space (ω; ~q), by first taking the Laplace transform and then analytically continuing the Laplace transform variable into the complex frequency plane s = i(ω −iε) as in the analysis of the equation of motion (I… view at source ↗
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: Correlation corrections to order g 4 . These diagrams yield a contribution of O(g 4 ) to the equation of motion of the coherent (DAQ) condensate. Multi time correlation functions: Quantum regression. Our analysis of the equation of motion, coherence and population dynamics only focused on single time expectation values or correlation functions. In order to obtain multi-time correlations, the (QME) must be… view at source ↗
read the original abstract

We study the non-equilibrium dynamics of emergent dynamical axion quasiparticles (DAQ) coupled to a photon bath in equilibrium via a Chern-Simons term as a quantum open system. A quantum master equation (QME) is derived up to second order in this coupling implementing only a \emph{partial} Markov approximation, allowing time dependent rates in the Lindblad (QME). These are determined by the equilibrium correlation functions of the Chern-Simons density, and their time dependence allows us to explore transient dynamics in coherences and population: the formation of the quasiparticle on short time scales and its decay, and the build-up of population with an effective time dependent rate. Early time evolution features quantum \emph{anti} Zeno dynamics with enhanced quasiparticle decay and population growth. These phenomena describe transient violations of Fermi's Golden rule and of \emph{detailed balance}, and are distinct \emph{non-Markovian} effects directly related to the spectral density of the Chern-Simons correlators. We obtain the equation of motion of coherent (DAQ) condensates both with the (QME) and with quantum many body linear response establishing a direct bridge between both methods. As a corollary we obtain the expectation value of the Chern-Simons density \emph{induced} by a (DAQ) condensate in linear response, the topological susceptibility is shown to be proportional to the (DAQ) many body self-energy. We provide a Feynman diagram-based interpretation of approximations invoked in the (QME) and corrections from system-bath correlations in higher order.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript studies dynamical axion quasiparticles (DAQ) coupled to an equilibrium photon bath via a Chern-Simons term, treating the system as an open quantum system. It derives a second-order quantum master equation (QME) with only a partial Markov approximation, yielding time-dependent rates determined by equilibrium Chern-Simons density correlators. The work examines transient dynamics including quasiparticle formation, decay, and early-time anti-Zeno enhancement of decay and population growth, which violate Fermi's golden rule and detailed balance. It derives the equation of motion for coherent DAQ condensates both from the QME and from quantum many-body linear response, establishing their equivalence, and shows as a corollary that the topological susceptibility is proportional to the DAQ many-body self-energy. A Feynman-diagram interpretation of the approximations and higher-order corrections is provided.

Significance. If the central equivalence between the QME and linear-response EOM holds under the stated approximations, the paper supplies a concrete bridge between open-system master-equation techniques and many-body response theory for topological quasiparticles. The explicit treatment of time-dependent rates and the anti-Zeno transients, together with the Feynman-diagram accounting of corrections, offers a useful framework for analyzing non-equilibrium Chern-Simons physics. The absence of free parameters in the central claims and the provision of a diagrammatic interpretation are strengths.

major comments (2)
  1. [Sec. III (QME derivation) and Sec. V (EOM equivalence)] The central claim that the QME-derived EOM for coherent condensates exactly matches the many-body linear-response result (and that topological susceptibility ∝ DAQ self-energy) rests on the second-order perturbative QME with partial Markov approximation remaining accurate in the short-time transient regime. No explicit bound relating the Chern-Simons coupling strength to the bath correlation time is supplied to guarantee that higher-order system-bath correlations (explicitly acknowledged as corrections) do not alter the early-time anti-Zeno dynamics or the induced condensate evolution before the partial-Markov form becomes reliable.
  2. [Sec. IV (transient dynamics) and the discussion of higher-order corrections] The anti-Zeno enhancement and time-dependent rates are presented as direct consequences of the spectral density of the Chern-Simons correlators. However, the manuscript does not provide a quantitative error estimate or numerical benchmark showing that these features survive when the weak-coupling assumption is relaxed, leaving the load-bearing assertion that the QME faithfully reproduces the short-time dynamics vulnerable.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Sec. II and abstract] Notation for the partial Markov approximation and the distinction between full and partial Markovianity is introduced without a concise definition or reference to standard literature on time-dependent rates in the Lindblad form.
  2. [Figs. 3 and 4] Figure captions for the time-dependent rate plots and the Feynman diagrams do not explicitly label which lines correspond to the system-bath interaction vertices versus the free propagators, reducing clarity when interpreting the diagrammatic accounting of approximations.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the careful reading of the manuscript and the positive assessment of its contributions. We respond point by point to the major comments below.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Sec. III (QME derivation) and Sec. V (EOM equivalence)] The central claim that the QME-derived EOM for coherent condensates exactly matches the many-body linear-response result (and that topological susceptibility ∝ DAQ self-energy) rests on the second-order perturbative QME with partial Markov approximation remaining accurate in the short-time transient regime. No explicit bound relating the Chern-Simons coupling strength to the bath correlation time is supplied to guarantee that higher-order system-bath correlations (explicitly acknowledged as corrections) do not alter the early-time anti-Zeno dynamics or the induced condensate evolution before the partial-Markov form becomes reliable.

    Authors: The equivalence is derived and holds strictly within the second-order perturbative QME employing the partial Markov approximation, as stated in Sections III and V. The partial Markov form is introduced precisely to retain time-dependent rates that describe the short-time transient regime, including anti-Zeno effects, prior to full Markovianization. While the manuscript does not supply an explicit inequality bounding the Chern-Simons coupling strength against the bath correlation time, the perturbative ordering controls the validity, and higher-order system-bath correlations are explicitly identified as corrections via the Feynman-diagram analysis. We will insert a short clarifying paragraph on the expected regime of validity in the revised version. revision: partial

  2. Referee: [Sec. IV (transient dynamics) and the discussion of higher-order corrections] The anti-Zeno enhancement and time-dependent rates are presented as direct consequences of the spectral density of the Chern-Simons correlators. However, the manuscript does not provide a quantitative error estimate or numerical benchmark showing that these features survive when the weak-coupling assumption is relaxed, leaving the load-bearing assertion that the QME faithfully reproduces the short-time dynamics vulnerable.

    Authors: The anti-Zeno enhancement and the explicit time dependence of the rates follow directly from the spectral content of the equilibrium Chern-Simons correlators evaluated at second order in the system-bath coupling. As an analytical derivation, the work does not contain numerical benchmarks that relax the weak-coupling assumption. The diagrammatic accounting of higher-order corrections already indicates how such terms would enter the dynamics. The claims remain qualified by the perturbative framework employed; we do not intend to add numerical benchmarks in a revision. revision: no

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: derivations bridge QME and linear response without reduction to inputs

full rationale

The paper derives the second-order QME with partial Markov approximation from the Chern-Simons coupling, obtains time-dependent rates from equilibrium correlators, and shows that the resulting EOM for DAQ condensates matches the one obtained independently via quantum many-body linear response; the topological susceptibility proportionality to the DAQ self-energy is presented as a corollary of that matching. These steps are explicit derivations from standard open-system and response-function methods rather than self-definitional, fitted-input, or self-citation reductions. No equations or claims in the provided text reduce a prediction to a quantity defined by the authors' own fit or prior ansatz; the equivalence is a non-trivial bridge between frameworks and remains self-contained against external benchmarks.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 0 axioms · 0 invented entities

Review based solely on the abstract; no explicit free parameters, axioms, or invented entities are stated. Standard open-quantum-system assumptions (weak coupling, bath in equilibrium) are implicitly required but not enumerated.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.1-grok · 5811 in / 1188 out tokens · 19107 ms · 2026-06-26T21:17:18.716433+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

57 extracted references · 2 canonical work pages · 1 internal anchor

  1. [1]

    in the term n(k)n(p): ⃗k → − ⃗k, ⃗ p→ − ⃗ p; 45

  2. [2]

    in the term with (1 + n(k))n(p): ⃗ p→ − ⃗ p

  3. [3]

    in the term with n(k)(1 + n(p)): ⃗k → − ⃗k. Taking the infinite volume limit with (1 /V ) ∑ ⃗ q→ ∫ d3q/ (2π )3 we obtain G>(x − y) = ∫ dq0 2π ∫ d3q (2π )3 ρ>(q0, q ) e− iq0(t− t′) ei⃗ q·(⃗ x− ⃗ y) , (B.8) where ρ>(q0, q ) = π 2 ∫ d3k (2π )3 k|⃗ q− ⃗k| { ( 1 − ⃗k k · ⃗ q− ⃗k |⃗ q− ⃗k| )2 [ (1 + n(k))(1 + n(|⃗ q− ⃗k|))δ(q0 − k − |⃗ q− ⃗k|) + n(k)n(|⃗ q− ⃗k|)...

  4. [4]

    X.-Liang Qi, T. L. Hughes, S.-Cheng Zhang, Topological field theor y of time-reversal invariant insula- tors, Phys. Rev. B78, 195424 (2008)

    2008

  5. [5]

    R. Li, J. Wang, X-L Qi, S-C. Zhang, Dynamical axion field in topologic al magnetic insulators, Nature Physics 6, 284 (2010)

    2010

  6. [6]

    J. Wang, B. Lian, S-C. Zhang, Dynamical axion field in a magnetic to pological insulator superlattice, Phys. Rev B 93, 045115 (2016)

    2016

  7. [7]

    Sekine, K

    A. Sekine, K. Nomura, Axion electrodynamics in topological mater ials, Jour. of Applied Physics, 129, 141101 (2021)

    2021

  8. [8]

    D. M. Nenno, C. A. C. Garcia, J. Gooth, C. Felser, P. Narang, Ax ion physics in condensed-matter systems, Nature Reviews Physics 2, 682 (2020)

    2020

  9. [9]

    Gooth, B

    J. Gooth, B. Bradlyn, S. Honnali, C. Schindler, N. Kumar, J. Noky , Y. Qi, C. Shekhar, Y. Sun, Z. Wang, B. A. Bernevig, C. Felser, Axionic charge-density wave in the Weyl semimetal (TaSe4)2I, Nature 575, 315 (2019)

    2019

  10. [10]

    Goswami, S

    P. Goswami, S. Tewari, Axionic field theory of (3+1)-dimensional W eyl semi-metals, Phys. Rev. B 88, 245107 (2013)

    2013

  11. [11]

    J. Yu, B. J. Wieder, C.-X. Liu, Dynamical piezomagnetic effect in tim e-reversal-invariant Weyl semimet- als with axionic charge density waves, Phys. Rev. B104, 174406 (20 21). 47

  12. [12]

    Mottola, A

    E. Mottola, A. V. Sadofyev, A. Stergiou, Axions and superfluidit y in Weyl semimetals, Phys. Rev. B 109, 134512 (2024)

    2024

  13. [13]

    Shaposhnikov, M

    L. Shaposhnikov, M. Mazanov, D. A. Bobylev, F. Wilczek, M. A. G orlach, Emergent axion response in multilayered metamaterials, Phys. Rev. B 108, 115101 (2023)

    2023

  14. [14]

    R. D. Peccei and H. R. Quinn, CP Conservation in the Presence o f Pseudoparticles, Phys. Rev. Lett. 38, 1440 (1977), Constraints imposed by CP conservation in the pr esence of pseudoparticles, Phys. Rev. D 16, 1791 (1977)

    1977

  15. [15]

    Weinberg, A New Light Boson?, Phys

    S. Weinberg, A New Light Boson?, Phys. Rev. Lett. 40, 223 (19 78)

  16. [16]

    Wilczek, Problem of Strong P and T Invariance in the Presence of Instantons, Phys

    F. Wilczek, Problem of Strong P and T Invariance in the Presence of Instantons, Phys. Rev. Lett. 40, 279 (1978)

    1978

  17. [17]

    Marsh, Axion Cosmology , Phys

    D.J.E. Marsh, Axion Cosmology , Phys. Rept., 643, 1 (2016); F. C hadha-Day, J. Ellis, D. J. E. Marsh, Axion Dark Matter: What is it and Why Now?, Sci. Adv. 8 eabj3618 (20 22)

    2016

  18. [18]

    Sikivie, Invisible axion search methods, Rev

    P. Sikivie, Invisible axion search methods, Rev. Mod. Phys. 93, 0 15004 (2021)

    2021

  19. [19]

    Preskill, M

    J. Preskill, M. B. Wise, F. Wilczek, Cosmology of the Invisible Axion P hys.Lett. 120B, 127 (1983)

    1983

  20. [20]

    Abbott, P

    L.F. Abbott, P. Sikivie, A Cosmological Bound on the Invisible Axion Phys.Lett. B120 133 (1983)

    1983

  21. [21]

    M. Dine, W. Fischler, The Not So Harmless Axion, Phys.Lett. B120 , 137 (1983)

    1983

  22. [22]

    Wilczek, Two applications of axion electrodynamics, Phys

    F. Wilczek, Two applications of axion electrodynamics, Phys. Rev . Lett. 58, 1799 (1987)

    1987

  23. [23]

    L. Wu, M. Salehi, N. Koirala, J. Moon, S. Oh, N. P. Armitage, Quan tized Faraday and Kerr rotation and axion electrodynamics of a 3D topological insulator, Science 354 , 1124 (2016)

    2016

  24. [24]

    W. K. Tse, A. H. MacDonald, Giant Magneto-Optical Kerr Effect and Universal Faraday Effect in Thin-Film Topological Insulators, Phys. Rev. Lett. 105, 057401 (2 010)

  25. [25]

    Ahn, S.-Y

    J. Ahn, S.-Y. Xu, A. Vishwanath, Theory of optical axion electr odynamics and application to the Kerr effect in topological antiferromagnets, Nature Communications 13 , 7615 (2022)

    2022

  26. [26]

    T. Zhu, H. Wang1, D. Xing, H. Zhang, Axionic surface wave in dyn amical axion insulators, Phys. Rev. B 106, 075103 (2022)

    2022

  27. [27]

    Shiozaki, S

    E. Shiozaki, S. Fujimoto, Dynamical axion in topological superco nductors and superfluids. Phys. Rev. B 89, 054506 (2014)

    2014

  28. [28]

    Boyanovsky, Synthetic and cosmological axion hybridization : entangled photons, (HBT) and quan- tum beats., Phys

    D. Boyanovsky, Synthetic and cosmological axion hybridization : entangled photons, (HBT) and quan- tum beats., Phys. Rev. Research 7, 033164 (2025)

    2025

  29. [29]

    D. J. Marsh, K. C. Fong, E. W. Lentz, L. Smejkal, M. N. Ali, Prop osal to detect dark matter using axionic topological antiferromagnets., Phys. Rev. Lett. 123, 121 601 (2019)

    2019

  30. [30]

    Chigusa, T

    S. Chigusa, T. Moroi, K. Nakayama, Axion-hidden-photon dark matter conversion into condensed matter axion. J. High Energy Phys. 2021, 1 (2021)

    2021

  31. [31]

    Observation of the axion quasiparticle in 2D MnBi2Te4, Nature 641, 6 2 (2025)

    Jian-Xian Qiu, et.al. Observation of the axion quasiparticle in 2D MnBi2Te4, Nature 641, 6 2 (2025)

    2025

  32. [32]

    Z.-Q. Gao, T. Wang, M. P. Zaletel, D.-H. Lee, Detecting axion dyn amics on the surface of magnetic topological insulators, Phys. Rev. B 111, 214407 (2025)

    2025

  33. [33]

    Liebman, J

    O. Liebman, J. Curtis, I. Petrides, P. Narang, Multiphoton Spe ctroscopy of a Dynamical Axion Insu- 48 lator, Phys. Rev. Lett. 135, 196601 (2025)

    2025

  34. [34]

    Boyanovsky, Probing dynamical axion quasiparticles with two -photon correlations , Phys

    D. Boyanovsky, Probing dynamical axion quasiparticles with two -photon correlations , Phys. Rev. B 112, 174301 (2025)

    2025

  35. [35]

    N. P. Breuer, F. Petruccione, The theory of open quantum sy stems, (Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2007)

    2007

  36. [36]

    Gardiner, P

    C. Gardiner, P. Zoeller, Quantum Noise Springer-Verlag, Berlin ( 2010)

    2010

  37. [37]

    Carmichael, An Open Systems Approach to Quantum Optics, L ecture Notes in Physics Monographs, Vol

    H. Carmichael, An Open Systems Approach to Quantum Optics, L ecture Notes in Physics Monographs, Vol. 18, (Springer-Verlag, Berlin Heidelberg, 1993)

    1993

  38. [38]

    Lindblad, On the Generators of Quantum Dynamical Semigrou ps, Comm

    G. Lindblad, On the Generators of Quantum Dynamical Semigrou ps, Comm. Math. Phys. 48, 119 (1976)

    1976

  39. [39]

    Gorini, A

    V. Gorini, A. Kossakowski, E.C.D. Sudarshan, Completely Positive Dynamical Semigroups of N-Level Systems, J. Math. Phys. 17, 821, (1976)

    1976

  40. [40]

    Pearle, Simple Derivation of the Lindblad Equation , Eur

    P. Pearle, Simple Derivation of the Lindblad Equation , Eur. J. Phy s. 33 805 (2012)

    2012

  41. [41]

    Is Lindblad for me?

    M. Stefanini et.al., Is Lindblad for me? arXiv:2506.22436

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv

  42. [42]

    Breuer, E.-Mari Laine, J

    H.-P. Breuer, E.-Mari Laine, J. Piilo, B. Vacchini, Colloquium: Non- Markovian dynamics in open quantum systems, Rev. Mod. Phys. 88, 021002 (2016)

    2016

  43. [43]

    de Vega, D

    I. de Vega, D. Alonso, Dynamics of non-Markovian open quantu m systems, Rev. Mod. Phys. 89, 015001 (2017)

    2017

  44. [44]

    L Fonda, G C Ghirardi and A Rimini Decay theory of unstable quan tum systems, Rep. Prog. Phys. 41 587 (1978)

    1978

  45. [45]

    Misra, E

    B. Misra, E. C. G. Sudarshan, The Zeno’s paradox in quantum th eory. Jour. of Mathe. Phys., 18(4), 756 (1977); C. B. Chiu, E. C. G. Sudarshan, B Misra Time evolution of unstable quantum states and a resolution of Zeno’s paradox Phys. Rev. D. 16, 520 (1977); C. B. Chiu, B. Misra, E. C. G. Sudarshan The time scale for the quantum Zeno paradox and proton dec...

    1977

  46. [46]

    Koshino, A

    K. Koshino, A. Shimizu Quantum Zeno effect by general measure ments Phys. Rept. 412, 191 (2005)

    2005

  47. [47]

    A. G. Kofman, G. Kurizki, Acceleration of quantum decay proce sses by frequent observations, Nature, 405, 546 (2000)

    2000

  48. [48]

    W. M. Itano, W. M., D. J. Heinzen, J. J. Bollinger, D. J. Wineland Qu antum Zeno effect. Physical Review A, 41(5), 2295 (1990)

    1990

  49. [49]

    Cetina, et.al

    M. Cetina, et.al. Ultrafast many-body interferometry of impurities coupled to a Fer mi sea, Science, 354, 96 (2016)

    2016

  50. [50]

    F. J. Vivanco et.al. The strongly driven Fermi polaron, Nat. Phys. 21, 564 (2025)

    2025

  51. [51]

    A. L. Fetter, J. D. Walecka, Quantum Theory of Many-Particle Systems (McGraw-Hill, San Francisco, 1971)

    1971

  52. [52]

    G. D. Mahan, Many Particle Physics, (Plenum Press, N.Y. 1981)

    1981

  53. [53]

    Kubo, Statistical-Mechanical Theory of Irreversible Proce sses

    R. Kubo, Statistical-Mechanical Theory of Irreversible Proce sses. I. General Theory and Simple Appli- cations to Magnetic and Conduction Problems J. Phys. Soc. Jpn, 12 , 570 (1957) ; P. C. Martin and J. 49 Schwinger, Theory of Many-Particle Systems. I Phys. Rev. 115, 1 342 (1959)

    1957

  54. [54]

    Crespi et.al

    A. Crespi et.al. Experimental investigation of quantum decay at short, intermedia te and long times via integrated photonics, Phys. Rev. Lett. 122 130401 (2019)

    2019

  55. [55]

    Chen et.al

    J. Chen et.al. Emergence of Fermi’s Golden Rule in the Probing of a Quantum Many-Bo dy System, arXiv 2502.14867

    work page arXiv

  56. [56]

    S. R. Wilkinson et al., Experimental evidence for non-exponentia l decay in quantum tunnelling, Nature 387, 575 (1997)

    1997

  57. [57]

    M. C. Fischer, B. Gutierrez-Medina, and M. G. Raizen, Observa tion of the Quantum Zeno and Anti- Zeno effects in an unstable system Nature 405, 546–550 (2000)

    2000