Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 4 minor 49 references

Configurations of Lagrangian spheres in $K3$ surfaces

T0 review · 2 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-06 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read On symplectic K3 surfaces, squared Dehn–Seidel twists along homologically distinct Lagrangian spheres are algebraically independent in the abelianised symplectic mapping class group.

desk verdict A serious, well-structured paper whose central algebraic-independence claims rest on one unverified external vanishing result; Theorem A itself looks solid. read the letter →

arxiv 2507.15039 v1 pith:G4SRU33G submitted 2025-07-20 math.GT math.SG

Juan Muñoz-Echániz This is my paper · ORCID
classification math.GTmath.SG MSC 57K4157K4353D35
keywords symplecticK3surfacesLagrangianspheresDehn–SeideltwistsmappingclassgroupsSeiberg–WitteninvariantsbraidgrouprepresentationsinfinitegenerationADEconfigurations
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper proves that the symplectic mapping class group of a symplectic K3 surface contains large free abelian subgroups generated by squares of Dehn–Seidel twists along Lagrangian spheres. For ADE configurations of Lagrangian spheres, the representation of the generalized pure braid group into the smoothly trivial symplectic mapping class group is shown to be injective after abelianising, equivariantly with respect to the Weyl group. More generally, squared twists along homologically distinct Lagrangian spheres are algebraically independent in the abelianisation, so whenever a K3 surface carries infinitely many such spheres, its smoothly trivial symplectic mapping class group is infinitely generated. The arguments use Seiberg–Witten invariants of loops of symplectic forms, an excision property for those invariants, and the classical description of the abelianisation of pure braid groups as the free abelian group on positive roots.

What carries the argument

The main tool is a family of Seiberg–Witten invariants of loops of symplectic forms, viewed as linking numbers with codimension-two discriminant loci in the space of perturbations; the paper assembles these into a homomorphism q from the abelianised smoothly trivial symplectic mapping class group to the free abelian group on positive roots. This map is shown to be W-equivariant and to compose with the braid-group representation to the identity, making q a left inverse. The proof also relies on an excision property for Kronheimer-type invariants, on the Brieskorn–Deligne identification of the abelianised pure braid group with the free abelian group on positive roots, and on a family switching formula that supplies the needed vanishing for classes other than the sphere's own class.

What would settle it

In a K3 surface obtained from a Kummer construction, take a Lagrangian (-2)-sphere L and a homology class e different from ±[L], then compute the family Seiberg–Witten invariant of the generalized Dehn twist loop γ_L by a direct count of solutions to the 2-parameter equations. Proposition 5.1 requires this count to be 0; a single nonzero value would disprove the vanishing step and with it the algebraic-independence theorem.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that for a symplectic K3 surface with an ADE configuration of Lagrangian spheres, the abelianised representation of the generalized pure braid group in the smoothly trivial symplectic mapping class group is W-equivariantly split-injective: the abelianised pure braid group sits as a direct summand, compatibly with the Weyl group action. Equivalently, the squared Dehn–Seidel twists on homologically distinct Lagrangian spheres are linearly independent in the abelianisation, a statement that persists at the level of the fundamental group of the space of symplectic forms through canonical lifts of those twists. The author constructs an explicit left inverse using Kronheimer-type invariants and establishes that compositions of those invariants with the representation give the identity. As corollaries, the paper deduces infinite generation of the smoothly trivial symplectic mapping class group whenever infinitely many homologically distinct Lagrangian spheres exist, and shows that a natural short exact sequence involving loops of symplectic forms does not split in a Weyl-equivariant way.

Load-bearing premise

The algebraic independence results rest on a cited gluing formula that predicts a certain Seiberg–Witten count is zero in every case except the sphere's own class, and the paper does not prove that vanishing count itself.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • For a single Lagrangian sphere in a symplectic K3 surface, the Dehn–Seidel twist has infinite order in the symplectic mapping class group.
  • Squared Dehn–Seidel twists on pairwise homologically distinct Lagrangian spheres are linearly independent in the abelianisation of the smoothly trivial symplectic mapping class group.
  • If the set of homologically distinct Lagrangian spheres is infinite, then the smoothly trivial symplectic mapping class group is infinitely generated.
  • Analogous split-injectivity holds for the fundamental group of the space of symplectic forms, with the K3 case recovering the mapping-class-group summand.
  • The short exact sequence linking loops of symplectic forms to the smoothly trivial symplectic mapping class group does not split in a natural Weyl-equivariant way, so no orientation-free natural lift of a squared twist exists.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Inference: the same split-injectivity should hold for any closed symplectic Calabi–Yau 4-manifold with b+ greater than one and containing Lagrangian spheres; the paper notes the argument works in principle, while known examples reduce to K3 surfaces.
  • Inference: the Weyl-equivariant non-splitting after localizing away from 2 suggests that the obstruction to a canonical lift of squared twists is 2-torsion, and explicit torsion classes for E8 configurations might be computable.
  • Inference: if the non-abelian lift posed in the paper's Question 1.3 exists, split-injectivity after abelianising would upgrade to faithfulness of the full braid group representation, connecting these Seiberg–Witten methods to the long-standing faithfulness question for braid group actions.
  • Inference: viewing Kronheimer-type invariants as linking numbers with an infinite-dimensional discriminant suggests a direct parallel with linking numbers in the hyperplane-arrangement picture of the pure braid group; this could yield a homological explanation for why the same Weyl-group representation appears on both the symplectic and braid sides.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 4 minor

Summary. The paper studies Dehn--Seidel twists on Lagrangian spheres in closed symplectic 4-manifolds, concentrating on symplectic K3 surfaces. It constructs canonical lifts O_L of squared Dehn--Seidel twists to loops of symplectic forms, relates them to Lin's generalised Dehn twists, and uses Kronheimer's 2-parametric Seiberg--Witten invariant. The main results are: Theorem A, W-equivariant split-injectivity of the abelianised pure braid group representation for ADE configurations; Theorem B, split-injectivity of the free abelian group generated by homologically distinct squared twists into the abelianisation of the smoothly trivial symplectic mapping class group; Theorem C, the analogous statement for canonical lifts in the fundamental group of the space of symplectic forms; and Theorem D, the analogue of Theorem A at the level of loops of symplectic forms. An infinite-generation corollary is derived when the set of Lagrangian sphere classes is infinite.

Significance. If the main results are correct, they are substantial: they provide new structural information on the symplectic mapping class groups of K3 surfaces, including algebraic independence of squared Dehn--Seidel twists and infinite-generation phenomena, and they unify and extend previous work of Seidel, Smirnov, and Lin. The paper's internal contributions are significant: the construction and naturality properties of the canonical lifts, the explicit W-equivariance statements, and the combinatorial core around the Weyl group action are carefully developed, with Lemma 4.18 proved in full. The use of Kronheimer's invariant and the excision principle is well motivated and clearly organised. The main risk to the headline claims is external and localised: the vanishing input in Proposition 5.1 is delegated to a preprint result whose hypotheses are not stated or verified in the present manuscript.

major comments (2)
  1. [§5.1, Proposition 5.1] The proof of the load-bearing vanishing statement Q_e(O_L)=0 for e≠PD([L]) is entirely delegated to [Lin22, Proposition 8.4], with the sentence "our assumptions on S ensure the hypothesis of that result hold" as the only justification. The hypotheses of [Lin22, Proposition 8.4] are not stated, so the reader cannot verify that the application with s=s_ω, S1=-S, S0=L is admissible, especially in the case e·[L]<0. Theorems B and C, and Corollary 1.2, depend on this step in §5.2. The manuscript should either state [Lin22, Proposition 8.4] in full and prove its hypotheses in the present setting, or supply a direct proof of this vanishing. Theorem A is not affected by this issue.
  2. [§3.3, Proposition 3.12] The excision formula is quoted as a consequence of a parametric gluing theorem of Mrowka--Rollin, but the precise theorem and the complete list of hypotheses are not given. This property is used essentially in Propositions 3.17 and 3.18 to reduce calculations to the model disk cotangent bundle and plumbings, and hence is needed for Theorem 4.17 and Theorem A. A precise statement of the gluing theorem and an explicit verification that the present symplectic manifolds with convex contact boundary, the relative classes, and the loops of symplectic forms satisfy its hypotheses should be included.
minor comments (4)
  1. [§1.2] The section heading contains a typo: "Beyong" should be "Beyond".
  2. [§4.2.1, equation (36)] The displayed commutation relation reads τL1τL2 = τL1τL2; it should read τL1τL2 = τL2τL1.
  3. [§4.1.5, Remark 4.9] In the definition of the generators for the conjugate action, the text writes "tei := Tei − Tei", which is evidently meant to be Tei − T−ei.
  4. [§5.2] The notation for the invariant and anti-invariant subgroups under the involution Te ↦ T−e is introduced cleanly, but in the proof of Theorem B the phrase "swapped the signs of the generators" is a little terse; a sentence explaining that this is an automorphism of the free abelian group would improve readability.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: all load-bearing inputs are external benchmarks (Kronheimer, Lin, Smirnov, Brieskorn–Deligne), and no prediction reduces by construction to the paper's own inputs.

full rationale

The paper's derivation chain is not circular. The main algebraic-independence results (Theorems B and C) reduce to the vanishing statement Q_e(O_L)=0 for e≠[L], which is imported from [Lin22, Proposition 8.4] and the Family Switching Formula ([Lin22, Theorem 5.3], [Liu03]); this is an external, non-self-cited result, not a restatement of the paper's own conclusions. The 0/±1 normalization Q_[L](O_L)=±1 is similarly drawn from Kronheimer's calculation and the paper's excision argument, not fitted to the target theorem. The identification P^ab ≅ ⊕_{α∈Φ+} Z and the W-action are standard external results of Brieskorn–Deligne, and the W-action is fixed by the root system rather than chosen to force the splitting. The only self-citation, [MnE24], occurs in §3.1.2 for a technical orientation datum (the determinant line Λ(Y,ξ)) and is not load-bearing for Theorems A–D. The external dependence on [Lin22, Proposition 8.4] is a genuine correctness risk if its hypotheses are not verified, but it is not a circularity: the cited result is not equivalent to the paper's input by construction, and no fitted parameter is renamed as a prediction. Hence the appropriate circularity score is 0.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 6 assumptions · 0 invented entities

All assumptions are either standard results in the literature or explicit deep external theorems. No numbers are fitted to data and no new physical entities are postulated; the canonical lift O_L is a construction, not an invented entity.

assumptions (6)
  • standard math Brieskorn-Deligne theorem: the generalized braid group B(Γ) is the fundamental group of the complement of the complexified hyperplane arrangement, with pure braid group P as the covering group.
    Used in Section 4.1.2 to identify P^ab with the direct sum over positive roots as a W-representation, which is the target of the splitting map q.
  • standard math Kronheimer's Seiberg-Witten invariant Q_e: π1 S0(X,ω)^ab → Z is well-defined as a linking number with the discriminant locus for loops satisfying condition (16).
    Defined in Section 3.1; the paper relies on its homomorphism property and naturality (Corollary 3.4).
  • domain assumption Excision property of Kronheimer's invariant (Proposition 3.12) holds as stated, including the parametric gluing 'straightforwardly generalised' from Mrowka-Rollin [MR06, Theorem E].
    This is the key computational tool making Q_e(O_L) independent of the ambient manifold; a detailed proof is not given in this preprint.
  • standard math Taubes' theorem that the canonical class of a symplectic K3 surface is trivial.
    Invoked in Section 1 and used throughout to have K_ω = 0, so that q_e descends to the smoothly trivial mapping class group.
  • domain assumption Lin's Family Switching Formula ([Lin22, Theorem 5.3], [Liu03]), as applied in [Lin22, Proposition 8.4], yields F SW_e(γ_L)=0 for e ≠ [L].
    Used in the proof of Proposition 5.1 to establish the vanishing that drives Theorems B and C.
  • standard math Smale's theorem Diff(S^2) ≃ O(3), used for the well-definedness of Dehn-Seidel twists and canonical lifts.
    Invoked in Section 2.2 and 2.3 to remove choices of identification of the Lagrangian sphere with S^2.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Configurations of Lagrangian spheres in $K3$ surfaces." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/G4SRU33G

@misc{pith2026250715039,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Configurations of Lagrangian spheres in $K3$ surfaces},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/G4SRU33G}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2507.15039}
}
abstract

We study Dehn--Seidel twists on configurations of Lagrangian spheres in symplectic $K3$ surfaces, using tools from Seiberg--Witten theory. In the case of $ADE$ configurations of Lagrangian spheres, we prove that a naturally associated representation of the generalised Braid group in the symplectic mapping class group is always faithful after abelianising, in a suitable sense. More generally, we prove that squared Dehn--Seidel twists on homologically-distinct Lagrangian spheres are algebraically independent in the abelianisation of the smoothly-trivial symplectic mapping class group, and deduce from this new infinite-generation results. Beyond symplectic $K3$ surfaces, we also establish analogues of these results at the level of the fundamental group of the space of symplectic forms.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

49 extracted references · 41 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    M. F. Atiyah. On analytic surfaces with double points. Proc. Roy. Soc. London Ser. A , 247:237--244, 1958

    work page 1958

  2. [2]

    Bamler and Bruce Kleiner

    Richard H. Bamler and Bruce Kleiner. Diffeomorphism groups of prime 3-manifolds. J. Reine Angew. Math. , 806:23--35, 2024

    work page 2024

  3. [3]

    Brieskorn

    E. Brieskorn. Die F undamentalgruppe des R aumes der regul\"aren O rbits einer endlichen komplexen S piegelungsgruppe. Invent. Math. , 12:57--61, 1971

    work page 1971

  4. [4]

    Sur les groupes de tresses

    Egbert Brieskorn. Sur les groupes de tresses. In S\'eminaire B ourbaki, 24\`eme ann\'ee (1971/1972) , volume Vol. 317 of Lecture Notes in Math. , pages Exp. No. 401, pp. 21--44. Springer, Berlin-New York, 1973

    work page 1971

  5. [5]

    Braid groups and K leinian singularities

    Christopher Brav and Hugh Thomas. Braid groups and K leinian singularities. Math. Ann. , 351(4):1005--1017, 2011

    work page 2011

  6. [6]

    D. M. Burns, Jr. and Jonathan M. Wahl. Local contributions to global deformations of surfaces. Invent. Math. , 26:67--88, 1974

    work page 1974

  7. [7]

    Les immeubles des groupes de tresses g\'en\'eralis\'es

    Pierre Deligne. Les immeubles des groupes de tresses g\'en\'eralis\'es. Invent. Math. , 17:273--302, 1972

    work page 1972

  8. [8]

    Digne and Y

    F. Digne and Y. Gomi. Presentation of pure braid groups. J. Knot Theory Ramifications , 10(4):609--623, 2001

    work page 2001

Show all 49 references
  1. [9]

    Fifteen characterizations of rational double points and simple critical points

    Alan Durfee. Fifteen characterizations of rational double points and simple critical points. Enseign. Math , 25(1-2):131--163, 1979

    1979

  2. [10]

    Naturality of the contact invariant in monopole F loer homology under strong symplectic cobordisms

    Mariano Echeverria. Naturality of the contact invariant in monopole F loer homology under strong symplectic cobordisms. Algebr. Geom. Topol. , 20(4):1795--1875, 2020

    2020

  3. [11]

    A primer on mapping class groups , volume 49

    Benson Farb and Dan Margalit. A primer on mapping class groups , volume 49. Princeton university press, 2011

    2011

  4. [12]

    A. M. Gabri\`elov. Intersection matrices for certain singularities. Funkcional. Anal. i Prilo zen. , 7(3):18--32, 1973

    1973

  5. [13]

    Symplectic structures on t2-bundles over t2

    Hansjörg Geiges. Symplectic structures on t2-bundles over t2. Duke Math. J. , 67(3):539--555, 1992

    1992

  6. [14]

    An introduction to contact topology , volume 109 of Cambridge Studies in Advanced Mathematics

    Hansj\"org Geiges. An introduction to contact topology , volume 109 of Cambridge Studies in Advanced Mathematics . Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2008

    2008

  7. [15]

    Symplectomorphisms of some weinstein 4-manifolds, 2025

    Paul Hacking and Ailsa Keating. Symplectomorphisms of some weinstein 4-manifolds, 2025

    2025

  8. [16]

    Humphreys

    James E. Humphreys. Introduction to L ie algebras and representation theory , volume 9 of Graduate Texts in Mathematics . Springer-Verlag, New York-Berlin, 1978. Second printing, revised

    1978

  9. [17]

    Humphreys

    James E. Humphreys. Reflection groups and C oxeter groups , volume 29 of Cambridge Studies in Advanced Mathematics . Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1990

    1990

  10. [18]

    Ailsa M. Keating. Dehn twists and free subgroups of symplectic mapping class groups. J. Topol. , 7(2):436--474, 2014

    2014

  11. [19]

    Lagrangian tori in four-dimensional milnor fibres

    Ailsa Keating. Lagrangian tori in four-dimensional milnor fibres. Geometric and Functional Analysis , 25(6):1822--1901, 2015

    1901

  12. [20]

    P. B. Kronheimer and T. S. Mrowka. Monopoles and contact structures. Invent. Math. , 130(2):209--255, 1997

    1997

  13. [21]

    Monopoles and Three-Manifolds

    Peter Kronheimer and Tomasz Mrowka. Monopoles and Three-Manifolds . New Mathematical Monographs. Cambridge University Press, 2007

    2007

  14. [22]

    Kronheimer

    P.B. Kronheimer. Some non-trivial families of symplectic structures, 1998

    1998

  15. [23]

    On the order of D ehn twists

    Ailsa Keating and Oscar Randal-Williams. On the order of D ehn twists. New York J. Math. , 29:203--212, 2023

    2023

  16. [24]

    Quivers, F loer cohomology, and braid group actions

    Mikhail Khovanov and Paul Seidel. Quivers, F loer cohomology, and braid group actions. J. Amer. Math. Soc. , 15(1):203--271, 2002

    2002

  17. [25]

    Symplectic C alabi- Y au surfaces

    Tian-Jun Li. Symplectic C alabi- Y au surfaces. In Handbook of geometric analysis, N o. 3 , volume 14 of Adv. Lect. Math. (ALM) , pages 231--356. Int. Press, Somerville, MA, 2010

    2010

  18. [26]

    The family seiberg-witten invariant and nonsymplectic loops of diffeomorphisms

    Jianfeng Lin. The family seiberg-witten invariant and nonsymplectic loops of diffeomorphisms. arXiv preprint arXiv:2208.12082 , 2022

    2022 arXiv

  19. [27]

    Family switching formula and the -n exceptional rational curves, 2003

    Ai-Ko Liu. Family switching formula and the -n exceptional rational curves, 2003

    2003

  20. [28]

    Family S eiberg- W itten invariants and wall crossing formulas

    Tian-Jun Li and Ai-Ko Liu. Family S eiberg- W itten invariants and wall crossing formulas. Comm. Anal. Geom. , 9(4):777--823, 2001

    2001

  21. [29]

    Symplectic (-2) -spheres and the symplectomorphism group of small rational 4-manifolds

    Jun Li and Tian-Jun Li. Symplectic (-2) -spheres and the symplectomorphism group of small rational 4-manifolds. Pacific J. Math. , 304(2):561--606, 2020

    2020

  22. [30]

    Symplectic (-2) -spheres and the symplectomorphism group of small rational 4-manifolds II

    Jun Li, Tian-Jun Li, and Weiwei Wu. Symplectic (-2) -spheres and the symplectomorphism group of small rational 4-manifolds II . Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. , 375(2):1357--1410, 2022

    2022

  23. [31]

    Symplectic torelli groups of rational surfaces, 2022

    Jun Li, Tian-Jun Li, and Weiwei Wu. Symplectic torelli groups of rational surfaces, 2022

    2022

  24. [32]

    On the monopole lefschetz number of finite-order diffeomorphisms

    Jianfeng Lin, Daniel Ruberman, and Nikolai Saveliev. On the monopole lefschetz number of finite-order diffeomorphisms. Geometry & topology , 25(7):3591--3628, 2022

    2022

  25. [33]

    A monopole invariant for families of contact structures

    Juan Mu\ n oz Ech\' a niz. A monopole invariant for families of contact structures. Adv. Math. , 439:Paper No. 109483, 2024

    2024

  26. [34]

    John W. Morgan. The S eiberg- W itten equations and applications to the topology of smooth four-manifolds , volume 44 of Mathematical Notes . Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ, 1996

    1996

  27. [35]

    Legendrian knots and monopoles

    Tomasz Mrowka and Yann Rollin. Legendrian knots and monopoles. Algebr. Geom. Topol. , 6:1--69, 2006

    2006

  28. [36]

    Contractible stability spaces and faithful braid group actions

    Yu Qiu and Jon Woolf. Contractible stability spaces and faithful braid group actions. Geom. Topol. , 22(6):3701--3760, 2018

    2018

  29. [37]

    Lagrangian two-spheres can be symplectically knotted

    Paul Seidel. Lagrangian two-spheres can be symplectically knotted. J. Differential Geom. , 52(1):145--171, 1999

    1999

  30. [38]

    A long exact sequence for symplectic F loer cohomology

    Paul Seidel. A long exact sequence for symplectic F loer cohomology. Topology , 42(5):1003--1063, 2003

    2003

  31. [39]

    Lectures on four-dimensional D ehn twists

    Paul Seidel. Lectures on four-dimensional D ehn twists. In Symplectic 4-manifolds and algebraic surfaces , volume 1938 of Lecture Notes in Math. , pages 231--267. Springer, Berlin, 2008

    1938

  32. [40]

    Diffeomorphisms of the 2 -sphere

    Stephen Smale. Diffeomorphisms of the 2 -sphere. Proc. Amer. Math. Soc. , 10:621--626, 1959

    1959

  33. [41]

    Symplectic mapping class groups of k3 surfaces and seiberg--witten invariants

    Gleb Smirnov. Symplectic mapping class groups of k3 surfaces and seiberg--witten invariants. Geometric and Functional Analysis , 32(2):280--301, 2022

    2022

  34. [42]

    Symplectic mapping class groups of blowups of tori

    Gleb Smirnov. Symplectic mapping class groups of blowups of tori. J. Topol. , 16(3):877--898, 2023

    2023

  35. [43]

    Symplectic topology of K3 surfaces via mirror symmetry

    Nick Sheridan and Ivan Smith. Symplectic topology of K3 surfaces via mirror symmetry. J. Amer. Math. Soc. , 33(3):875--915, 2020

    2020

  36. [44]

    Braid group actions on derived categories of coherent sheaves

    Paul Seidel and Richard Thomas. Braid group actions on derived categories of coherent sheaves. Duke Math. J. , 108(1):37--108, 2001

    2001

  37. [45]

    Richard P. Stanley. Enumerative combinatorics. V ol. 2 , volume 62 of Cambridge Studies in Advanced Mathematics . Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1999. With a foreword by Gian-Carlo Rota and appendix 1 by Sergey Fomin

    1999

  38. [46]

    The S eiberg- W itten invariants and symplectic forms

    Clifford Henry Taubes. The S eiberg- W itten invariants and symplectic forms. Math. Res. Lett. , 1(6):809--822, 1994

    1994

  39. [47]

    More constraints on symplectic forms from S eiberg- W itten invariants

    Clifford Henry Taubes. More constraints on symplectic forms from S eiberg- W itten invariants. Math. Res. Lett. , 2(1):9--13, 1995

    1995

  40. [48]

    Clifford H. Taubes. SW Gr : from the S eiberg- W itten equations to pseudo-holomorphic curves. J. Amer. Math. Soc. , 9(3):845--918, 1996

    1996

  41. [49]

    Commuting symplectomorphisms and D ehn twists in divisors

    Dmitry Tonkonog. Commuting symplectomorphisms and D ehn twists in divisors. Geom. Topol. , 19(6):3345--3403, 2015

    2015

Pith tools

Reviewed August 6, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.