Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 4 minor 64 references

Analyzing Stellar and Interstellar Contributions to Polarization: Modeling Approaches for Hot Stars

T0 review · 2 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-07 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read For hot massive stars, ultraviolet polarization is largely intrinsic: interstellar dust fades where stellar signals rise.

desk verdict Solid, honest methods review, but the headline UV-separation claim is overbroad. read the letter →

arxiv 2505.15028 v1 pith:GBGEBQMN submitted 2025-05-21 astro-ph.SR astro-ph.GA

R Ignace , A G Fullard , G V Panopoulou , D J Hillier , C Erba , P A Scowen This is my paper · ORCID
classification astro-ph.SRastro-ph.GA
keywords interstellarpolarizationSerkowskilawUVspectropolarimetrymassivestarsrotationaldistortionThomsonscatteringWolf-Rayetwindsbinary
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper argues that in the ultraviolet, the polarization of hot massive stars can be interpreted as a stellar signal without first removing the interstellar contribution. The reason is the Serkowski Law: interstellar polarization peaks in the optical and falls toward shorter wavelengths, while polarization produced by rapid rotation or electron scattering in hot-star winds rises steeply in the UV. To make the case, the paper builds 'hybrid' model spectra for four hot-star situations—optically thin Thomson-scattering envelopes, rotationally distorted stars, optically thick Wolf-Rayet winds, and interacting binaries—and shows how the two contributions separate in position-angle rotations, line depolarization, and Q-U diagrams. It also quantifies the interstellar background with a recent catalog of about 60,000 sources, finding a typical polarization near 0.7% within 1 kpc and a flattening with distance. If the paper is right, future UV spectropolarimeters can constrain stellar geometry, rotation, and wind structure without exact knowledge of the interstellar polarization.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing mechanism is the Serkowski Law, $p_\lambda = p_{\max} e^{-K \ln^2(\lambda_{\max}/\lambda)}$, the empirical wavelength dependence of interstellar polarization, which peaks in the optical and declines toward the UV and IR. Combined with the assumption that the interstellar position angle is constant in wavelength and time, the paper constructs hybrid polarized spectra by vector addition of an interstellar Serkowski vector and an intrinsic stellar polarization in the Q-U plane. The four stellar mechanisms modeled—gray Thomson scattering, rotational distortion with gravity darkening, multi-scattering wind radiative transfer, and two-source binaries—supply intrinsic components whose chromatic and temporal behavior separates them from the interstellar vector.

What would settle it

Observe a known near-critical rotator with a UV spectropolarimeter across roughly 1200–1500 Å. If the measured polarization does not rise above the extrapolated optical Serkowski interstellar level, or if the position angle stays at the interstellar value through the wavelength where the models predict a switchover, the claim that rising ultraviolet polarization must be stellar would fail for that star.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper's central claim is that the wavelength behavior of interstellar polarization is known and smooth enough to be separated from the intrinsic polarization of hot massive stars, especially in the ultraviolet. Because the Serkowski Law peaks in the optical and drops toward the UV, any polarization that rises toward shorter wavelengths in a hot star must be intrinsic. For near-critical rotators, model atmospheres with gravity darkening produce a continuum polarization that climbs steeply at far-UV wavelengths while the interstellar component falls, with the transition between the two regimes near 1500 Å offering a handle on both the star and the interstellar parameters. In optically thick winds, UV spectral structure from lines and iron blanketing marks the stellar signal in ways a smooth interstellar curve cannot mimic; in binaries, all time-variable polarization is stellar, and the interstellar component merely translates the pattern in the Q-U plane. These hybrid model spectra are presented as strategies for using ISP-contaminated observations rather than requiring ISP removal.

Load-bearing premise

The strategies assume interstellar polarization along a sightline is a single Serkowski-law vector with a position angle that is constant in wavelength and time; if multiple interstellar components with different magnetic field orientations lie in front of the star, the vector-additive separation breaks down.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • UV spectropolarimetry can constrain a star's rotation rate by fitting the sharp rise in polarization shortward of roughly 1500 Å, where the interstellar contribution is negligible.
  • A continuum polarization that rises with decreasing wavelength in a hot massive star cannot be interstellar, so it can be treated as intrinsic without ISP subtraction.
  • Depolarization across strong emission lines in dense winds reveals the interstellar baseline, because the dilution floor approaches the Serkowski level and identifies the interstellar position angle.
  • In binaries, every time-variable component of the polarization is stellar, and the interstellar contribution only translates the periodic loop in the Q-U plane, leaving its shape and orientation intact.
  • The framework is aimed at upcoming UV spectropolarimetric missions such as Polstar and Pollux, giving them an interpretive strategy for ISP-contaminated observations.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Editorial inference: the same separation logic should apply in the infrared, where the Serkowski law also declines; an infrared polarimeter could isolate intrinsic polarization for stars whose UV signals are unavailable, though the stellar mechanisms may differ.
  • Editorial inference: the steep decline of polarization-per-parsec with distance beyond about 1.3 kpc implies that ISP is not simply proportional to distance for distant hot stars; survey planning that assumes otherwise could overestimate the interstellar contamination.
  • Editorial inference: the predicted position-angle rotation near 1500 Å in near-critical rotators is a direct, testable prediction—observing such a rotation with UV spectropolarimetry would simultaneously recover the star's rotation rate and the interstellar Serkowski parameters.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 4 minor

Summary. This manuscript reviews methods for separating intrinsic stellar polarization from interstellar polarization (ISP) for hot massive stars, with emphasis on ultraviolet spectropolarimetry in the context of the Polstar and Pollux mission concepts. It uses the Panopoulou et al. (2025) compilation of optical starlight polarization to characterize ISP as a function of distance, finding a median p of about 0.7% within 1 kpc and a fitted decline of p/d of roughly d^-0.9 beyond 1.3 kpc. It then constructs four synthetic 'hybrid' polarized SEDs by vector-adding a Serkowski-law ISP to models of Thomson scattering, rotational distortion, an optically thick CMFGEN WNh wind, and a Brown et al. (1978) binary. The central conclusion is that intrinsic stellar polarization often rises in the UV while the ISP amplitude declines, so UV spectropolarimetry can constrain stellar geometry even without removing the ISP.

Significance. The paper is a useful synthesis for a community preparing UV spectropolarimetric missions. Its strengths include an explicit statement of the three assumptions underlying ISP removal, use of a public catalog with a defined significance cut, transparent vector addition in Eqs. (9)-(12), and realistic model inputs from CMFGEN and published scattering theory. The four case studies illustrate concrete diagnostics—PA rotations, line dilution, and q-u translations—that observers can apply. The main quantitative claim, that UV-rising polarization is stellar in origin, is plausible for single-component Serkowski sightlines, but the paper's own footnote 2 identifies multi-component sightlines where the claim can fail, so the current phrasing overstates the generality of the UV-only strategy.

major comments (2)
  1. [§5.2, Eq. (1), footnote 2] The statement in §5.2 that 'Any rising polarization cannot be interstellar in nature' is too strong and is in tension with the caveat in footnote 2 that multiple ISM components with different magnetic-field orientations can violate the constant-PA assumption. For two Serkowski components with different position angles, each component's amplitude declines shortward of its optical peak, but the vector sum can rise in the UV if the components largely cancel near the optical peak and align better at shorter wavelengths. Because all hybrid models in §5 add a single Serkowski component with fixed ψI, they never exercise this multi-component regime. Please qualify the claim to sightlines verified to be single-component, or add a multi-component model showing when a UV rise remains diagnostic of stellar polarization.
  2. [§3, Fig. 6] The centroid method for Category III stochastic variability is presented as a way to determine the ISP, but it is valid only if the intrinsic stellar polarization has zero mean and no constant component. The paper itself acknowledges in the WR 40 discussion that 'there could be a time-average intrinsic polarization to the star,' which would bias the centroid estimate of the ISP. Please state this limitation explicitly in the method description and indicate how the constant intrinsic component can be separated, or explain why the bias is negligible for the examples shown.
minor comments (4)
  1. [§2, Fig. 4] The d^-0.9 scaling law for the median p̃ beyond 1.3 kpc is quoted without a fit uncertainty, goodness-of-fit, or a quantitative sensitivity test to binning and catalog cuts; please report the fit range and uncertainty, or present the power law as a descriptive trend.
  2. [§4.3] The mass-loss rate in the WNh model appears as 4.5 × 10^5 M⊙/yr; the exponent is likely missing a negative sign for a Wolf-Rayet wind, so please check that the intended value is 10^-5 M⊙/yr.
  3. [§1, footnote 2] The caveat about multiple ISM components is important enough to be moved into the main text and revisited in §5.2, since it directly limits the central claim of the paper.
  4. [§1] There is a typo in the first paragraph: 'Wisconson' should be 'Wisconsin'.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the synthetic hybrids are explicit vector additions of independent empirical ISP laws and external stellar polarization models.

full rationale

The paper is a methodology review, not a derivation that reduces to its own inputs. The hybrid polarized SEDs in Section 5 are constructed by explicit vector addition (Eqs. 9-10) of two independently sourced ingredients: the Serkowski Law (Eq. 1), an empirical ISM relation credited to Serkowski et al. 1975, and stellar polarization curves taken from external or separately published treatments (Brown and McLean 1977; Brown et al. 1978; von Zeipel 1924; Espinosa Lara and Rieutord 2011; CMFGEN via Hillier and Miller 1998). The d^-0.9 scaling in Section 2 is presented as a best-fit characterization of the Panopoulou et al. 2025 catalog, not as a fitted parameter later relabeled as a prediction, and it is not used to set any of the hybrid-model constants. The central Section 5.2 statement that rising UV polarization cannot be interstellar follows from the assumed single-component Serkowski form plus the independent model result that rotational gravity darkening raises UV polarization; it is a conditional illustration of model expectations, not an argument whose conclusion is already contained in the fitting procedure. Self-citations (Ignace et al. 2022, 2023; Ignace and Scowen 2024) supply specific models or mission context, but they are not invoked as a uniqueness theorem or as the sole justification for a central premise. The paper explicitly flags the main limitation of its ISP assumptions in footnote 2, conceding that multiple ISM components with different magnetic-field orientations can violate the constant-PA condition, and it cites Mandarakas et al. 2024 for observed departures from the Serkowski relation. That caveat narrows the generality of the UV-only strategy but does not make the hybrid construction circular. Overall, the modeling chain is self-contained: the inputs are stated, the combination law is stated, and no prediction is produced by renaming a fitted parameter.

Assumptions & free parameters 7 free parameters · 6 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The paper's conclusions are not circular: they use the externally empirical Serkowski law and established stellar atmosphere/scattering codes. The free parameters are illustrative choices or fits to public data, not fitted to make the central claim true.

free parameters (7)
  • Typical interstellar peak polarization (pmax) = 0.5%
    Adopted as typical for hybrid SEDs, based on the distribution of p for stars within 1 kpc (Sec. 2).
  • Serkowski lambda_max = 5500 A
    Adopted for illustration; corresponds to K = 0.9 via the Wilking et al (1980) scaling (Sec. 2).
  • Interstellar position angle psi_I = 30 deg
    Chosen for all hybrid SED examples (Table 1).
  • Intrinsic stellar polarization p* (Thomson case) = 0.5%
    Chosen for the flat electron-scattering example (Sec. 5.1).
  • Power-law exponent for p-tilde vs distance = -0.9
    Best-fit to Panopoulou et al (2025) catalog data for bins beyond 1.3 kpc; no uncertainty quoted (Sec. 2).
  • Binary model sign change at 2000 A = PA rotation by 90 deg and 50% reduction
    Artificially imposed to simulate iron-line blanketing in the binary example (Sec. 5.4).
  • WNh wind equatorial-to-polar density ratio = 3.3
    Model input for the axisymmetric CMFGEN wind calculation (Sec. 4.3).
assumptions (6)
  • domain assumption Serkowski Law describes the wavelength dependence of ISP
    Invoked in Sec. 2, eq. (1), and used as the ISP template in all hybrid SEDs.
  • domain assumption ISP position angle is constant with wavelength and time
    Stated in Sec. 1 as a key assumption; footnote 2 acknowledges multi-component ISM can violate it.
  • domain assumption Thomson scattering is gray and the only polarigenic opacity in the UV-optical
    Used in Secs. 4.1 and 5.1 to justify flat intrinsic polarization.
  • domain assumption Brown et al (1978) optically thin scattering model for binary polarization
    Used in Secs. 4.4 and 5.4 to compute time-variable polarization.
  • domain assumption Cross-terms in Stokes addition are negligible
    Stated in Sec. 5: cross-terms ignored because both polarizations are small.
  • domain assumption von Zeipel gravity darkening law (T_eff^4 proportional to g_eff)
    Used for rotating star models in Secs. 4.2 and 5.2.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Analyzing Stellar and Interstellar Contributions to Polarization: Modeling Approaches for Hot Stars." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/GBGEBQMN

@misc{pith2026250515028,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Analyzing Stellar and Interstellar Contributions to Polarization: Modeling Approaches for Hot Stars},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/GBGEBQMN}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2505.15028}
}
read the original abstract

Linear polarimetry of unresolved stars is a powerful method for discerning or constraining the geometry of a source and its environment, since spherical sources produce no net polarization. However, a general challenge to interpreting intrinsic stellar polarization is the contribution to the signal by interstellar polarization (ISP). Here, we review methodologies for distinguishing the stellar signal from the interstellar contribution in the context of massive stars. We first characterize ISP with distance using a recent compilation of starlight polarization catalogs. Several scenarios involving Thomson scattering, rapidly rotating stars, optically thick winds, and interacting binaries are considered specifically to contrast the wavelength-dependent effects of ISP in the ultraviolet versus optical bands. ISP is recognizable in the stellar polarization from Thomson scattering in the polarization position angle rotations. For hot stars with near-critical rotation rates, the ISP declines whereas the stellar continuum polarization sharply increases. In the case of quite dense winds, strong ultraviolet lines trace the ISP, which is not always the case in the optical. In the binary case, temporal and chromatic effects illustrate how the ISP displaces variable polarization with wavelength. This study clarifies the impacts of ISP in relation to new ultraviolet spectropolarimetry efforts such as Polstar and Pollux.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

64 extracted references · 31 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    720(2):1045--1054

    Andersson BG, Potter SB (2010) Observations of Enhanced Radiative Grain Alignment Near HD 97300 . 720(2):1045--1054. doi:10.1088/0004-637X/720/2/1045

    work page doi:10.1088/0004-637x/720/2/1045 2010

  2. [2]

    53:501--539

    Andersson BG, Lazarian A, Vaillancourt JE (2015) Interstellar Dust Grain Alignment . 53:501--539. doi:10.1146/annurev-astro-082214-122414

    doi:10.1146/annurev-astro-082214-122414 2015

  3. [3]

    Angarita Y, Versteeg MJF, Haverkorn M, et al (2023) Interstellar Polarization Survey. III. Relation between Optical Polarization and Reddening in the General Interstellar Medium . 166(1):34. doi:10.3847/1538-3881/acdc1e, https://arxiv.org/abs/2306.07016 arXiv:2306.07016 [astro-ph.GA]

    work page Pith review arXiv 2023

  4. [4]

    Berdyugin A, Piirola V, Teerikorpi P (2014) Interstellar polarization at high galactic latitudes from distant stars. VIII. Patterns related to the local dust and gas shells from observations of -0.5ex 3600 stars . 561:A24. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201322604

    doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201322604 2014

  5. [5]

    Bjorkman KS, Nordsieck KH, Code AD, et al (1991) First Ultraviolet Spectropolarimetry of Be Stars from the Wisconsin Ultraviolet Photo-Polarimeter Experiment . 383:L67. doi:10.1086/186243

    work page doi:10.1086/186243 1991

  6. [6]

    Brown JC, McLean IS (1977) Polarisation by Thomson Scattering in Optically Thin Stellar Envelopes. I. Source Star at Centre of Axisymmetric Envelope . 57:141

    work page 1977

  7. [7]

    Brown JC, McLean IS, Emslie AG (1978) Polarisation by Thomson scattering in optically thin stellar envelopes. II. Binary and multiple star envelopes and the determination of binary inclinations. 68:415--427

    work page 1978

  8. [8]

    The non-conservative case and linearly polarized radiation

    Cassinelli JP, Hummer DG (1971) Radiative transfer in spherically symmetricsystems-II. The non-conservative case and linearly polarized radiation . 154:9. doi:10.1093/mnras/154.1.9

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/154.1.9 1971

Show all 64 references
  1. [9]

    Wiley‐VCH Verlag GmbH & Co

    Clarke D (2010) Stellar Polarimetry . Wiley‐VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA

    2010

  2. [10]

    Collins IGeorge W., Truax RJ, Cranmer SR (1991) Model Atmospheres for Rotating B Stars . 77:541. doi:10.1086/191616

    1991 doi

  3. [11]

    Nature Astronomy 1:690--696

    Cotton DV, Bailey J, Howarth ID, et al (2017) Polarization due to rotational distortion in the bright star Regulus . Nature Astronomy 1:690--696. doi:10.1038/s41550-017-0238-6, https://arxiv.org/abs/1804.06576 arXiv:1804.06576 [astro-ph.SR]

    2017 arXiv

  4. [12]

    483(3):3636--3646

    Cotton DV, Marshall JP, Frisch PC, et al (2019) The wavelength dependence of interstellar polarization in the Local Hot Bubble . 483(3):3636--3646. doi:10.1093/mnras/sty3318, https://arxiv.org/abs/1812.00294 arXiv:1812.00294 [astro-ph.SR]

    2019 arXiv

  5. [13]

    Journal of Astronomical Instrumentation 3:1450009

    Davidson JW, Bjorkman KS, Hoffman JL, et al (2014) The HPOL Spectropolarimeter at Ritter Observatory . Journal of Astronomical Instrumentation 3:1450009. doi:10.1142/S2251171714500093

    2014 doi

  6. [14]

    In: Kraus M, Miroshnichenko AS (eds) Stars with the B[e] Phenomenon, p 173, doi:10.48550/arXiv.astro-ph/0510481, astro-ph/0510481

    Davies B, Oudmaijer RD, Vink JS (2006) The Clumpiness of LBV Winds . In: Kraus M, Miroshnichenko AS (eds) Stars with the B[e] Phenomenon, p 173, doi:10.48550/arXiv.astro-ph/0510481, astro-ph/0510481

    2006 doi arXiv

  7. [15]

    Davis JLeverett, Greenstein JL (1951) The Polarization of Starlight by Aligned Dust Grains. 114:206. doi:10.1086/145464

    1951 doi

  8. [16]

    51(1):269--310

    Duch \^e ne G, Kraus A (2013) Stellar Multiplicity . 51(1):269--310. doi:10.1146/annurev-astro-081710-102602, https://arxiv.org/abs/1303.3028 arXiv:1303.3028 [astro-ph.SR]

    2013 arXiv

  9. [17]

    Espinosa Lara F, Rieutord M (2011) Gravity darkening in rotating stars . 533:A43. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201117252, https://arxiv.org/abs/1109.3038 arXiv:1109.3038 [astro-ph.SR]

    2011 arXiv

  10. [18]

    564(2):762--772

    Fosalba P, Lazarian A, Prunet S, et al (2002) Statistical Properties of Galactic Starlight Polarization . 564(2):762--772. doi:10.1086/324297, https://arxiv.org/abs/astro-ph/0105023 arXiv:astro-ph/0105023 [astro-ph]

    2002 arXiv

  11. [19]

    900(2):162

    Gootkin K, Dorn-Wallenstein T, Lomax JR, et al (2020) 13 yr of P Cygni Spectropolarimetry: Investigating Mass Loss through H , Periodicity, and Ellipticity . 900(2):162. doi:10.3847/1538-4357/abad32, https://arxiv.org/abs/2008.03777 arXiv:2008.03777 [astro-ph.SR]

    2020 arXiv

  12. [20]

    119(2):923--927

    Heiles C (2000) 9286 Stars: An Agglomeration of Stellar Polarization Catalogs . 119(2):923--927. doi:10.1086/301236, https://arxiv.org/abs/astro-ph/9910303 arXiv:astro-ph/9910303 [astro-ph]

    2000 arXiv

  13. [21]

    Galaxies 8(3):60

    Hillier DJ (2020) UV Spectroscopy of Massive Stars . Galaxies 8(3):60. doi:10.3390/galaxies8030060

    2020 doi

  14. [22]

    496(1):407--427

    Hillier DJ, Miller DL (1998) The Treatment of Non-LTE Line Blanketing in Spherically Expanding Outflows . 496(1):407--427. doi:10.1086/305350

    1998 doi

  15. [23]

    115(4):1576--1591

    Hoffman JL, Nordsieck KH, Fox GK (1998) Spectropolarimetric Evidence for a Bipolar Flow in beta Lyrae . 115(4):1576--1591. doi:10.1086/300274

    1998 doi

  16. [24]

    Astronomy and Geophysics 47(3):3.31--3.35

    Hough J (2006) Polarimetry: a powerful diagnostic tool in astronomy . Astronomy and Geophysics 47(3):3.31--3.35. doi:10.1111/j.1468-4004.2006.47331.x

    2006

  17. [25]

    arXiv e-prints arXiv:2409.15714

    Ignace R, Scowen P (2024) The Polstar UV Spectropolarimetry Mission . arXiv e-prints arXiv:2409.15714. doi:10.48550/arXiv.2409.15714, https://arxiv.org/abs/2409.15714 arXiv:2409.15714 [astro-ph.IM]

    2024 doi arXiv

  18. [26]

    933(1):5

    Ignace R, Fullard A, Shrestha M, et al (2022) Modeling the Optical to Ultraviolet Polarimetric Variability from Thomson Scattering in Colliding-wind Binaries . 933(1):5. doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ac6fce, https://arxiv.org/abs/2205.07612 arXiv:2205.07612 [astro-ph.SR]

    2022 arXiv

  19. [27]

    519(3):3271--3280

    Ignace R, Moffat AFJ, Robert C, et al (2023) Constraints on clumps in the representative wind of the WN8 Wolf-Rayet star HD 96548 = WR 40 with simultaneous broad-band light and linear-polarization variability . 519(3):3271--3280. doi:10.1093/mnras/stac3772, https://arxiv.org/a...

    2023 arXiv

  20. [28]

    Kostogryz NM, Milic I, Berdyugina SV, et al (2016) Center-to-limb variation of intensity and polarization in continuum spectra of FGK stars for spherical atmospheres . 586:A87. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201527598, https://arxiv.org/abs/1511.07213 arXiv:1511.07213 [astro-ph.SR]

    2016 arXiv

  21. [29]

    50:107--164

    Langer N (2012) Presupernova Evolution of Massive Single and Binary Stars . 50:107--164. doi:10.1146/annurev-astro-081811-125534, https://arxiv.org/abs/1206.5443 arXiv:1206.5443 [astro-ph.SR]

    2012 arXiv

  22. [30]

    378(3):910--946

    Lazarian A, Hoang T (2007) Radiative torques: analytical model and basic properties . 378(3):910--946. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2007.11817.x, https://arxiv.org/abs/0707.0886 arXiv:0707.0886 [astro-ph]

    2007

  23. [31]

    arXiv e-prints arXiv:2409.10317

    Mandarakas N, Tassis K, Skalidis R (2024) 3D ISM structure challenges the Serkowski relation . arXiv e-prints arXiv:2409.10317. doi:10.48550/arXiv.2409.10317, https://arxiv.org/abs/2409.10317 arXiv:2409.10317 [astro-ph.GA]

    2024 doi arXiv

  24. [32]

    187:461--472

    Martin PG (1974) Interstellar polarization from a medium with changing grain alignment. 187:461--472. doi:10.1086/152655

    1974 doi

  25. [33]

    In: Hoffman JL, Bjorkman J, Whitney B (eds) Stellar Polarimetry: from Birth to Death, American Institute of Physics Conference Series, vol 1429

    Meade MR, Whitney BA, Babler BL, et al (2012) HPOL: World's largest database of optical spectropolarimetry . In: Hoffman JL, Bjorkman J, Whitney B (eds) Stellar Polarimetry: from Birth to Death, American Institute of Physics Conference Series, vol 1429. AIP, pp 226--229, doi:1...

    2012 doi

  26. [34]

    873(1):87

    Medan I, Andersson BG (2019) Magnetic Field Strengths and Variations in Grain Alignment in the Local Bubble Wall . 873(1):87. doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ab063c, https://arxiv.org/abs/1901.07692 arXiv:1901.07692 [astro-ph.GA]

    2019 arXiv

  27. [35]

    arXiv e-prints arXiv:2410.01491

    Muslimov E, Neiner C, Bouret JC (2024) Optical design options for Pollux: UV spectropolarimeter project for the Habitable Worlds Observatory . arXiv e-prints arXiv:2410.01491. doi:10.48550/arXiv.2410.01491, https://arxiv.org/abs/2410.01491 arXiv:2410.01491 [astro-ph.IM]

    2024 doi arXiv

  28. [36]

    In: Fineschi S (ed) X-Ray and Ultraviolet Polarimetry, pp 2--11, doi:10.1117/12.168568

    Nordsieck KH, Code AD, Anderson CM, et al (1994) Exploring ultraviolet astronomical polarimetry: results from the Wisconsin Ultraviolet Photo-Polarimeter Experiment (WUPPE) . In: Fineschi S (ed) X-Ray and Ultraviolet Polarimetry, pp 2--11, doi:10.1117/12.168568

    1994 doi

  29. [37]

    276(1):15

    Panopoulou GV, Markopoulioti L, Bouzelou F, et al (2025) A Compilation of Optical Starlight Polarization Catalogs . 276(1):15. doi:10.3847/1538-4365/ad8b21, https://arxiv.org/abs/2307.05752 arXiv:2307.05752 [astro-ph.GA]

    2025 arXiv

  30. [38]

    Evidence of asymmetry in the circumstellar dust

    Patat F, Maund JR, Benetti S, et al (2010) VLT spectropolarimetry of the optical transient in NGC 300. Evidence of asymmetry in the circumstellar dust . 510:A108. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/200913083, https://arxiv.org/abs/0908.0942 arXiv:0908.0942 [astro-ph.SR]

    2010 arXiv

  31. [39]

    In: American Astronomical Society Meeting Abstracts, p 207.19

    Pruitt S, Erba C, Ignace R (2024) A time-resolved linear spectropolarimetric study of the pulsating variable star Mira . In: American Astronomical Society Meeting Abstracts, p 207.19

    2024

  32. [40]

    Puls J, Markova N, Scuderi S, et al (2006) Bright OB stars in the Galaxy. III. Constraints on the radial stratification of the clumping factor in hot star winds from a combined H _ , IR and radio analysis . 454(2):625--651. doi:10.1051/0004-6361:20065073, https://arxiv.org/abs...

    2006 arXiv

  33. [41]

    Rapidly rotating B stars with viscous Keplerian decretion disks

    Rivinius T, Carciofi AC, Martayan C (2013) Classical Be stars. Rapidly rotating B stars with viscous Keplerian decretion disks . 21:69. doi:10.1007/s00159-013-0069-0, https://arxiv.org/abs/1310.3962 arXiv:1310.3962 [astro-ph.SR]

    2013 arXiv

  34. [42]

    In: Neiner C, Wade G, Meynet G, et al (eds) Active OB Stars: Structure, Evolution, Mass Loss, and Critical Limits, pp 474--485, doi:10.1017/S1743921311011124, 1009.4197

    Sana H, Evans CJ (2011) The multiplicity of massive stars . In: Neiner C, Wade G, Meynet G, et al (eds) Active OB Stars: Structure, Evolution, Mass Loss, and Critical Limits, pp 474--485, doi:10.1017/S1743921311011124, 1009.4197

    2011 arXiv

  35. [43]

    Science 337(6093):444

    Sana H, de Mink SE, de Koter A, et al (2012) Binary Interaction Dominates the Evolution of Massive Stars . Science 337(6093):444. doi:10.1126/science.1223344, https://arxiv.org/abs/1207.6397 arXiv:1207.6397 [astro-ph.SR]

    2012 arXiv

  36. [44]

    doi:10.1086/185878

    Schulte-Ladbeck RE, Nordsieck KH, Nook MA, et al (1990) A Rotating, Expanding Disk in the Wolf-Rayet Star EZ Canis Majoris? 365:L19. doi:10.1086/185878

    1990 doi

  37. [45]

    Schulte-Ladbeck RF, Nordsieck KH, Taylor M, et al (1992) The Wind Geometry of the Wolf-Rayet Star HD 191765 . 387:347. doi:10.1086/171087

    1992 doi

  38. [46]

    367(12):126

    Scowen PA, Jones CE, Oudmaijer RD (2022) UV spectropolarimetry for stellar, interstellar, and exoplanetary astrophysics with Polstar . 367(12):126. doi:10.1007/s10509-022-04143-5

    2022 doi

  39. [47]

    196:261--290

    Serkowski K, Mathewson DS, Ford VL (1975) Wavelength dependence of interstellar polarization and ratio of total to selective extinction. 196:261--290. doi:10.1086/153410

    1975 doi

  40. [48]

    Siebenmorgen R, Voshchinnikov NV, Bagnulo S, et al (2018) Large Interstellar Polarisation Survey. II. UV/optical study of cloud-to-cloud variations of dust in the diffuse ISM . 611:A5. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201731814, https://arxiv.org/abs/1711.08672 arXiv:1711.08672 [astro-ph.GA]

    2018 arXiv

  41. [49]

    293:L46--L48

    Simmons JFL, Willis JP, Newsam AM (1995) Polarisation as a tool for gravitational microlensing surveys. 293:L46--L48. doi:10.48550/arXiv.astro-ph/9410098, https://arxiv.org/abs/astro-ph/9410098 arXiv:astro-ph/9410098 [astro-ph]

    1995 doi arXiv

  42. [50]

    336(2):501--510

    Simmons JFL, Bjorkman JE, Ignace R, et al (2002) Polarization from microlensing of spherical circumstellar envelopes by a point lens . 336(2):501--510. doi:10.1046/j.1365-8711.2002.05766.x

    2002

  43. [51]

    513(4):4899--4912

    Singh S, Pandey JC, Hoang T (2022) Polarization, polarizing efficiency, and grain alignment towards the direction of the cluster NGC 2345 . 513(4):4899--4912. doi:10.1093/mnras/stac1211, https://arxiv.org/abs/2204.12864 arXiv:2204.12864 [astro-ph.GA]

    2022 arXiv

  44. [52]

    281(1):163--191

    Smith LF, Shara MM, Moffat AFJ (1996) A three-dimensional classification for WN stars . 281(1):163--191. doi:10.1093/mnras/281.1.163

    1996 doi

  45. [53]

    479(4):4535--4543

    Stevance HF, Ignace R, Crowther PA, et al (2018) Probing the rotational velocity of Galactic WO stars with spectropolarimetry . 479(4):4535--4543. doi:10.1093/mnras/sty1827, https://arxiv.org/abs/1807.02117 arXiv:1807.02117 [astro-ph.SR]

    2018 arXiv

  46. [54]

    Frontiers in Astronomy and Space Sciences 9:923927

    Tram LN, Hoang T (2022) Recent progress in theory and observational study of dust grain alignment and rotational disruption in star-forming regions . Frontiers in Astronomy and Space Sciences 9:923927. doi:10.3389/fspas.2022.923927, https://arxiv.org/abs/2208.13195 arXiv:2208....

    2022

  47. [55]

    Versteeg MJF, Magalh \ a es AM, Haverkorn M, et al (2023) Interstellar Polarization Survey. II. General Interstellar Medium . 165(3):87. doi:10.3847/1538-3881/aca8fd, https://arxiv.org/abs/2212.05985 arXiv:2212.05985 [astro-ph.GA]

    2023 arXiv

  48. [56]

    84:665--683

    von Zeipel H (1924) The radiative equilibrium of a rotating system of gaseous masses . 84:665--683. doi:10.1093/mnras/84.9.665

    1924 doi

  49. [57]

    462(3):2343--2354

    Voshchinnikov NV, Il'in VB, Das HK (2016) Polarizing efficiency as a guide of grain growth and interstellar magnetic field properties . 462(3):2343--2354. doi:10.1093/mnras/stw1751, https://arxiv.org/abs/1509.06000 arXiv:1509.06000 [astro-ph.GA]

    2016 arXiv

  50. [58]

    Journal of Astronomical Telescopes, Instruments, and Systems 8(2):026002

    Weisskopf MC, Soffitta P, Baldini L, et al (2022) The Imaging X-Ray Polarimetry Explorer (IXPE): Pre-Launch . Journal of Astronomical Telescopes, Instruments, and Systems 8(2):026002. doi:10.1117/1.JATIS.8.2.026002, https://arxiv.org/abs/2112.01269 arXiv:2112.01269 [astro-ph.IM]

    2022 arXiv

  51. [59]

    Whittet DCB, Martin PG, Hough JH, et al (1992) Systematic Variations in the Wavelength Dependence of Interstellar Linear Polarization . 386:562. doi:10.1086/171039

    1992 doi

  52. [60]

    235:905--910

    Wilking BA, Lebofsky MJ, Martin PG, et al (1980) The wavelength dependence of interstellar linear polarization. 235:905--910. doi:10.1086/157694

    1980 doi

  53. [61]

    Wolff MJ, Clayton GC, Kim SH, et al (1997) Ultraviolet Interstellar Linear Polarization. III. Features . 478(1):395--402. doi:10.1086/303789

    1997 doi

  54. [62]

    Woosley SE, Weaver TA (1995) The Evolution and Explosion of Massive Stars. II. Explosive Hydrodynamics and Nucleosynthesis . 101:181. doi:10.1086/192237

    1995 doi

  55. [63]

    , " * write output.state after.block = add.period write newline

    ENTRY address archive author booktitle chapter doi edition editor eid eprint howpublished institution journal key keywords month note number organization pages publisher school series title type url volume year archivePrefix primaryClass adsurl adsnote version label extra.labe...

  56. [64]

    write newline

    " write newline "" before.all 'output.state := FUNCTION add.period duplicate empty 'skip "." * add.blank if FUNCTION if.digit duplicate "0" = swap duplicate "1" = swap duplicate "2" = swap duplicate "3" = swap duplicate "4" = swap duplicate "5" = swap duplicate "6" = swap dupl...

Pith tools

Reviewed August 7, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.