Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

Large language models can segment narrative events similarly to humans

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2301.10297 v1 pith:GDFK5FBK submitted 2023-01-24 cs.CL q-bio.NC

classification cs.CLq-bio.NC
keywords humanannotationseventgpt-3eventsboundarieslanguagelarge
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Humans perceive discrete events such as "restaurant visits" and "train rides" in their continuous experience. One important prerequisite for studying human event perception is the ability of researchers to quantify when one event ends and another begins. Typically, this information is derived by aggregating behavioral annotations from several observers. Here we present an alternative computational approach where event boundaries are derived using a large language model, GPT-3, instead of using human annotations. We demonstrate that GPT-3 can segment continuous narrative text into events. GPT-3-annotated events are significantly correlated with human event annotations. Furthermore, these GPT-derived annotations achieve a good approximation of the "consensus" solution (obtained by averaging across human annotations); the boundaries identified by GPT-3 are closer to the consensus, on average, than boundaries identified by individual human annotators. This finding suggests that GPT-3 provides a feasible solution for automated event annotations, and it demonstrates a further parallel between human cognition and prediction in large language models. In the future, GPT-3 may thereby help to elucidate the principles underlying human event perception.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. OpenAlex reports about 10 citations worldwide. Full citation record

  1. A clinically validated framework for auditing AI chatbot behavior in mental health interactions

    q-bio.NC 2026-02 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Using simulated psychiatric user profiles, the authors show that AI chatbots frequently produce 'concerning behavior' that accumulates over turns, and that superficially supportive responses can amplify vulnerability—...

  2. Position: Episodic Memory is the Missing Piece for Long-Term LLM Agents

    cs.AI 2025-02 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    The authors propose episodic memory, with five defining properties, as the unifying framework needed for LLM agents to learn and remember over long time horizons.

Pith tools