Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

CXR-Agent: Vision-language models for chest X-ray interpretation with uncertainty aware radiology reporting

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2407.08811 v1 pith:GEE4ZUEC submitted 2024-07-11 eess.IV cs.CV

classification eess.IVcs.CV
keywords vision-languagemodelsx-raychestdatasetsevaluateinterpretationreports
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Recently large vision-language models have shown potential when interpreting complex images and generating natural language descriptions using advanced reasoning. Medicine's inherently multimodal nature incorporating scans and text-based medical histories to write reports makes it conducive to benefit from these leaps in AI capabilities. We evaluate the publicly available, state of the art, foundational vision-language models for chest X-ray interpretation across several datasets and benchmarks. We use linear probes to evaluate the performance of various components including CheXagent's vision transformer and Q-former, which outperform the industry-standard Torch X-ray Vision models across many different datasets showing robust generalisation capabilities. Importantly, we find that vision-language models often hallucinate with confident language, which slows down clinical interpretation. Based on these findings, we develop an agent-based vision-language approach for report generation using CheXagent's linear probes and BioViL-T's phrase grounding tools to generate uncertainty-aware radiology reports with pathologies localised and described based on their likelihood. We thoroughly evaluate our vision-language agents using NLP metrics, chest X-ray benchmarks and clinical evaluations by developing an evaluation platform to perform a user study with respiratory specialists. Our results show considerable improvements in accuracy, interpretability and safety of the AI-generated reports. We stress the importance of analysing results for normal and abnormal scans separately. Finally, we emphasise the need for larger paired (scan and report) datasets alongside data augmentation to tackle overfitting seen in these large vision-language models.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. DUCX: Decomposing Unfairness in Tool-Using Chest X-ray Agents

    cs.CV 2026-02 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Tool-using chest X-ray agents show demographic disparities in tool usage, routing, and reasoning that are not visible from end-to-end accuracy alone.

  2. CX-Mind: A Pioneering Multimodal Large Language Model for Interleaved Reasoning in Chest X-ray via Curriculum-Guided Reinforcement Learning

    cs.LG 2025-07 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    CX-Mind combines curriculum reinforcement learning and rule-based process rewards to train a chest X-ray vision-language model that produces interleaved think-answer reasoning and reports state-of-the-art results acro...

Pith tools