Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 4 minor 62 references

Quantized topological invariant of symmetry-projected Gibbs states

T0 review · 3 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-08 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read Projecting a finite-temperature Gibbs state of a three-dimensional cluster model onto its charge-free sector yields two low-temperature phases—thermal SPT and projected paramagnet—plus thermal disorder, with a flux-twisted membrane…

desk verdict Careful, honest paper: exact boundary-line results are solid, interior quantization is properly conditional on unproven Hypothesis (H), and the L=4 direct reconstruction gives the strongest numerical evidence in the paper. read the letter →

arxiv 2608.04350 v1 pith:GKX3FXYQ submitted 2026-08-05 cond-mat.str-el cond-mat.othercond-mat.stat-mechhep-th

Weiguang Cao , Haruki Watanabe This is my paper · ORCID
classification cond-mat.str-elcond-mat.othercond-mat.stat-mechhep-th
keywords symmetry-projectedGibbsstatesone-formsymmetryfinite-temperatureSPTorderclustermodelflux-twistedmembraneinvariantthree-dimensionalIsingdualityquantumMonteCarlo
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This Letter claims that symmetry projection can manufacture finite-temperature phase structure where none exists before projection. In a three-dimensional cluster-model interpolation, the Gibbs state projected onto the contractible one-form symmetric sector has three phases: a symmetry-protected topological phase, a projected paramagnetic phase, and a thermally disordered phase. A flux-twisted membrane expectation value $I$ labels them by the quantized values $-1$, $+1$, and $0$, exact on several boundary lines and conditional in the interior. The projected paramagnetic endpoint is exactly the three-dimensional Ising model, so the transition temperature is known. If correct, this gives a concrete mechanism by which a strongly symmetric mixed state carries a topological label at nonzero temperature.

What carries the argument

The central object is the flux-twisted membrane expectation value $I(s,T)$ and its exact sector decomposition. Thread a flat $\mathbb{Z}_2$ flux along a noncontractible dual loop $\gamma$; the membrane $S^{(1)}_\Sigma$ is the product of $X$ operators on a noncontractible surface $\Sigma$ with $\Sigma\cdot\gamma=1$. In the locally projected ensemble $P_{\mathrm{loc}}$, the identity $I_L=(-1)^{\Sigma\cdot\gamma}(Z_+-Z_-)/(Z_++Z_-)$ reduces the index to the ratio of two sector partition functions. The quantization mechanism is the mod-2 intersection sign of spacetime worldsheets: the sign differs from $+1$ only when a worldsheet has nontrivial spatial homology, so if those sectors are exponentially suppressed (Hypothesis (H)) and line and interface tensions select one sector, the index locks to $\pm1$ or $0$.

What would settle it

At a low-temperature interior point, e.g. $(s,T)=(0.30,0.30)$, compute the exact finite-size sector sum of Eq. (S75) for $L=6,8,10$ without assuming Hypothesis (H). If $I_L$ drifts away from $-1$, or if the combined relative weight of noncontractible spatial-sheet classes $\epsilon_{A,m}+\epsilon_B$ fails to decay exponentially in $L^2$, the quantization mechanism fails there.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper's central discovery is that projection onto the sector of vanishing contractible one-form charge turns the analytically featureless Gibbs family $H(s)=(1-s)H_{\mathrm{SPT}}+sH_{\mathrm{para}}$ into a state with two low-temperature phases separated from disorder. At $s=1$, the locally projected paramagnet maps exactly to two copies of the three-dimensional Ising model, so it has a genuine transition at $T_c^{\mathrm{proj}}\approx1.3133$; reflection symmetry transfers this to $s=0$. The proposed order parameter is the flux-twisted membrane $I_L=\langle S^{(1)}_\Sigma\rangle_{P_{\mathrm{loc}},\mathrm{tw}}$, which equals $(-1)^{\Sigma\cdot\gamma}\tanh(F_\Sigma/2)$ with $F_\Sigma$ the free-energy splitting between two winding sectors. Positive winding-line tension drives $I\to-1$ on the SPT side; reflection gives $+1$ on the projected-paramagnetic side; and positive interface tension gives $0$ above the ordering temperature. The paper proves these values exactly on the endpoints, the self-dual line, and the $T=0,\infty$ lines, and proves them in the interior conditional on Hypothesis (H), an exponential suppression of noncontractible spatial worldsheets.

Load-bearing premise

The interior quantization rests on Hypothesis (H): configurations whose worldsheets wind only in space must be exponentially rare as the system grows, with a rate independent of system size; the paper's numerics test one piece of it but do not prove it.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • The projected paramagnetic endpoint $s=1$ has a genuine finite-temperature transition at $T\approx1.3133$, identical to the three-dimensional Ising critical point, even though the unprojected qubits are free.
  • The same transition temperature appears at the SPT endpoint $s=0$, by the exact mirror reflection $Z_{\mathrm{loc}}(s,T)=Z_{\mathrm{loc}}(1-s,T)$.
  • The self-dual line $s=1/2$ carries a first-order transition whose finite-regulator endpoint is estimated at $T\approx0.43$, with the membrane index exactly zero on that line.
  • A quantized value of $I$ can change only when one of the controlling tensions vanishes; the index is stable against local symmetry-preserving perturbations as long as the sector identity persists.
  • The bulk free-energy density of the locally projected ensemble and the fully charge-fixed ensemble agree up to $O(L^{-2})$, so the transition locus is shared even though the membrane index is nontrivial only in the locally projected state.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • A testable extension the paper does not pursue is to evaluate the full sector sum of Eq. (S75) at several larger sizes without Hypothesis (H), which would convert the conditional interior quantization into an unconditional statement.
  • The exact Ising mapping at $s=1$ suggests that the projected-paramagnetic and SPT phases are two faces of the same Ising duality, so a variant of this membrane index may label phases of other strongly symmetric Gibbs states built from gauging dualities.
  • If Hypothesis (H) fails at some interior point, the membrane index could take non-quantized values there, meaning the three-phase label would be a property of the exact boundary lines rather than a universal interior invariant; the paper's conditional proof does not exclude this.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 4 minor

Summary. The manuscript studies Gibbs states of a three-dimensional cluster-model interpolation projected onto the symmetric sector of contractible one-form symmetries. The authors derive exact endpoint mappings to the three-dimensional Ising model, prove exact identities including a twisted-reflection relation and a two-sector representation of a flux-twisted membrane index, and establish unconditionally that this index takes the values -1, +1, and 0 on the endpoint, self-dual, zero-temperature, and infinite-temperature lines. For the interior of the phase diagram they prove a conditional quantization theorem that relies on Hypothesis (H) (exponential suppression of noncontractible spatial worldsheets) and on positive winding-line and interface tensions. Quantum Monte Carlo results are presented as a finite-regulator phase diagram, a one-copy proxy, and a direct L=4 reconstruction. The paper is careful in many places to label these results as conditional or preasymptotic.

Significance. If the interior quantization were fully established, this would be a valuable demonstration that strong local projection can stabilize finite-temperature SPT and projected-paramagnetic phases and that a nonlocal membrane invariant can distinguish them, despite the unprojected thermal ensemble being analytic. The exact boundary results are clean and significant: the endpoint mapping to the 3D Ising model, the exact twisted-reflection identity, and the Perron-Frobenius argument at T=0 are rigorous and provide a strong skeleton. The conditional theorem with explicitly stated physical assumptions is a useful framework. The main gap is that the central phase-wide claim, especially the interior values I=-1,+1,0, rests on an unproven Hypothesis (H) and on numerical evidence that is either partial or at very small size.

major comments (3)
  1. [Sec. S5 / Eq. (S57)] Hypothesis (H) is load-bearing for the interior quantization theorem, but it is not established. The SM's own numerical test in Sec. S6A measures only the Hamming-weight-one spatial-sheet class in the even sector, at fixed Delta-tau, for L=6-12, and does not cover odd-sector classes, the (1,1,0)/(1,1,1) classes, copy B, or provide a continuum or large-L extrapolation. The text explicitly states that the data support one constituent of (H), but not the full hypothesis. Therefore the claimed phase values I=-1,+1,0 in the interior remain conditional rather than proven, and the discussion sentence referring to 'the predicted membrane-index values' should be qualified accordingly.
  2. [SM Sec. S6B / Table I] The hypothesis-independent direct reconstruction is limited to L=4 and does not by itself establish thermodynamic quantization. At the representative high-temperature point (0.30,1.20), the f=1 and f=2 estimates are -0.00475 and +0.00298, respectively, with 95% intervals that straddle zero, and the f=4 cell was rejected due to calibration failures. With no multi-size scaling and no continuum extrapolation, this is at best a weak consistency check for I=0, not evidence for phase-wide quantization. The low-temperature L=4 values are extremely close to -1, but a single small size cannot distinguish a true phase value from a finite-size artifact.
  3. [SM Sec. S3A / Fig. 1(a)] The numerical phase diagram in Fig. 1(a) is computed at fixed beta*mu=4 with no mu->infinity extrapolation. As the SM notes, the residual Ising field is h ~ 3.4e-4, giving hL^{y_h} ~ 0.16 at L=12 and ~0.33 at L=16, so the reported continuous arms and wall endpoint are preasymptotic estimates of the exact projected phase diagram rather than established boundaries. The exact endpoint anchoring and mirror symmetry fix only the endpoints and the s=1/2 wall position; the interior arm locations and the wall endpoint T*_proj=0.43(1) are finite-regulator results. This should be stated more prominently wherever the phase diagram is used to support the paper's central claims.
minor comments (4)
  1. [Abstract] The abstract states the phase values before the conditional clause; consider making the conditional status of the interior quantization explicit in the first or second sentence so that readers do not mistake the conditional theorem for an unconditional result.
  2. [Table I] The missing f=4 entry at (0.30,1.20) should be explained in the table caption or in the main text, not only in the SM, since the table as displayed may suggest a data point was omitted without reason.
  3. [Sec. S6A] The text reports tau values at (0.30,0.30) and (0.48,0.30) without error bars or a discussion of whether the roughly factor-two decrease is consistent with the uniformity requirement in L and m stated in Eq. (28).
  4. [Eq. (19)] The derivation of Eq. (19) invokes a regular expansion of the critical temperature in h_x without proof; since this is an input for the sketched phase-boundary slopes, it should be labeled as an assumption or deferred to the SM with a brief justification.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the invariant is independently defined, endpoint values are exact derivations, and interior quantization is an explicit conditional theorem.

full rationale

The paper's derivation chain is not circular. The membrane index I is defined independently in Eq. (22) as a flux-twisted thermal expectation value, and the exact sector identity Eq. (25) (SM Eq. (S28)) rewrites it as tanh(F_Sigma/2) using the unitary W and cyclicity; the claimed phase values are not inserted into the definition or sector decomposition. The endpoint values -1, +1, and 0 are derived, not assumed: the s=0 and s=1 results follow from exact Ising loop-gas mappings and the antiperiodic/periodic ratio (SM S2C, S4A); the self-dual zero follows from the exact reflection identity; the T=0 values follow from Perron-Frobenius positivity; and the T=infinity value follows from a Pauli trace argument. None of these steps uses the target phase values as inputs. Interior quantization is explicitly conditional: SM Sec. S5 labels Hypothesis (H), Eq. (S57), as 'an independent physical input, not an automatic consequence', and the quantization theorem additionally assumes positive winding-line and interface tensions in Eqs. (S61)-(S62). A theorem of the form 'if these tensions are positive and H holds, then I is quantized' is a genuine conditional statement, not a reduction of the conclusion to its premises; the unproven status of H is a rigor or correctness risk, not circularity. The numerical one-copy proxy in Fig. 1(b) is explicitly labeled as conditional on H, and the direct L=4 reconstruction in SM S6B does not assume Hypothesis (H): it retains all spatial-sheet and temporal-winding classes and performs the signed sum exactly at finite L. No fitted parameter is renamed as a prediction, and no known Ising result is repackaged as a new derivation. The only self-citation, Ref. [18] for the Kennedy-Tasaki fusion identity, is not load-bearing because SM S2A derives the identity from the bilinear phase-map representation without relying on the companion paper's conclusions. The paper is therefore self-contained against the exact endpoint benchmarks and presents its interior claims with clear assumptions; no circular step is exhibited.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on standard statistical-mechanical results (3D Ising critical data, Wegner duality, Perron-Frobenius) plus the paper-specific Hypothesis (H) and the assumed positivity of winding-line and interface tensions in the interior. These are explicit and are tested only partially by the numerics.

assumptions (5)
  • domain assumption The 3D Ising model on the cubic lattice has a phase transition at K_c about 0.2216 with correlation-length exponent nu about 0.630 and magnetic exponent y_h about 2.48185.
    Used in Secs. S2B and S3 to locate the projected transition T_proj_c about 1.3133 and in finite-size scaling fits; taken from Refs [15,20] rather than derived.
  • standard math Wegner duality between the Z2 gauge model and the 3D Ising model, including interface and winding-line tension relations.
    Used in Secs. S2C and S4 to map loop gases to Ising and to identify positive tensions; standard result [14].
  • ad hoc to paper Hypothesis (H): epsilon_{A,m}+epsilon_B <= C e^{-tau_sp L^2} with tau_sp > 0 uniform in L and m.
    Sec. S5, Eq. (S57). This spatial-sheet suppression is required for interior quantization and is not proven; QMC tests only one spatial-class ratio.
  • ad hoc to paper Positive winding-line tension kappa(s,T) > 0 in the s < 1/2 low-temperature phase and positive interface tension sigma(s,T) > 0 above the arm.
    Eqs. (S61) and (S62). These are the remaining inputs of the conditional quantization theorem; they are argued near T=0 and at the Ising transition but not established throughout the interior.
  • standard math Perron-Frobenius theorem for the T=0 ground state positivity argument.
    Unproved background theorem used in Sec. S4A.5 to establish the T=0 line values.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Quantized topological invariant of symmetry-projected Gibbs states." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/GKX3FXYQ

@misc{pith2026260804350,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Quantized topological invariant of symmetry-projected Gibbs states},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/GKX3FXYQ}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2608.04350}
}
abstract

We study Gibbs states projected onto the symmetric sector of contractible one-form symmetries. In a three-dimensional cluster-model interpolation, this projection stabilizes symmetry-protected topological and projected-paramagnetic phases, both sharply distinct from thermal disorder. A flux-twisted membrane invariant distinguishes these three phases by the values $-1,+1,0$, respectively. These values are exact on the endpoint, self-dual, zero-temperature, and infinite-temperature lines; elsewhere their quantization requires positive spatial-sheet, winding-line, and interface tensions. Quantum Monte Carlo supports the quantization through tension diagnostics and direct finite-size estimates.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2608.04350 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. FIG. 1. (a) Finite-regulator estimates of the projected phase [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. FIG. 2. Twisted-membrane geometry. The flat cocycle lies [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_2.png] view at source ↗

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

62 extracted references · 34 canonical work pages

  1. [7]

    Symmetry protected topological order at nonzero temperature

    S. Roberts, B. Yoshida, A. Kubica, and S. D. Bartlett, Symmetry-protected topological order at nonzero temperature, Phys. Rev. A96, 022306 (2017), arXiv:1611.05450

    work page Pith review arXiv 2017

  2. [18]

    Distinct finite-temperature phase diagrams of non-invertible Kennedy--Tasaki duals

    W. Cao and H. Watanabe, Distinct finite-temperature phase diagrams of non-invertible Kennedy–Tasaki duals (2026), arXiv:2607.24231 [cond-mat.str-el]

    work page Pith review arXiv 2026

  3. [1]

    Gu and X.-G

    Z.-C. Gu and X.-G. Wen, Tensor-entanglement-filtering renormalization approach and symmetry-protected topo- logical order, Phys. Rev. B80, 155131 (2009)

    2009

  4. [2]

    Pollmann, A

    F. Pollmann, A. M. Turner, E. Berg, and M. Os- hikawa, Entanglement spectrum of a topological phase in one dimension, Phys. Rev. B81, 064439 (2010), arXiv:0910.1811 [cond-mat.str-el]

    arXiv 2010

  5. [3]

    Pollmann, E

    F. Pollmann, E. Berg, A. M. Turner, and M. Os- hikawa, Symmetry protection of topological phases in one-dimensional quantum spin systems, Phys. Rev. B85, 075125 (2012), arXiv:0909.4059 [cond-mat.str-el]

    arXiv 2012

  6. [4]

    Chen, Z.-C

    X. Chen, Z.-C. Gu, and X.-G. Wen, Classification of gapped symmetric phases in one-dimensional spin sys- tems, Phys. Rev. B83, 035107 (2011), arXiv:1008.3745 [cond-mat.str-el]. 6

    arXiv 2011

  7. [5]

    Chen, Z.-C

    X. Chen, Z.-C. Gu, and X.-G. Wen, Complete classifica- tion of one-dimensional gapped quantum phases in inter- acting spin systems, Phys. Rev. B84, 235128 (2011)

    work page 2011

  8. [6]

    Chen, Z.-C

    X. Chen, Z.-C. Gu, Z.-X. Liu, and X.-G. Wen, Symmetry protected topological orders and the group cohomology of their symmetry group, Phys. Rev. B87, 155114 (2013), arXiv:1106.4772 [cond-mat.str-el]

    arXiv 2013

Show all 62 references
  1. [8]

    Ma and C

    R. Ma and C. Wang, Average Symmetry-Protected Topological Phases, Phys. Rev. X13, 031016 (2023), arXiv:2209.02723 [cond-mat.str-el]

    2023 arXiv

  2. [9]

    de Groot, A

    C. de Groot, A. Turzillo, and N. Schuch, Symmetry Pro- tected Topological Order in Open Quantum Systems, Quantum6, 856 (2022), arXiv:2112.04483 [quant-ph]

    2022 arXiv

  3. [10]

    L. A. Lessa, R. Ma, J.-H. Zhang, Z. Bi, M. Cheng, and C. Wang, Strong-to-Weak Spontaneous Symmetry Breaking in Mixed Quantum States, PRX Quantum6, 010344 (2025), arXiv:2405.03639 [quant-ph]

    2025 arXiv

  4. [11]

    L. Li, Z. Bi, and W. Cao, Generalized symmetry- protected topological phases in mixed states from gaug- ing dualities, arXiv preprint (2026), arXiv:2603.17282

    2026

  5. [12]

    Negari, L

    A.-R. Negari, L. A. Lessa, and S. Sahu, Symmetry enforces entanglement at high temperatures (2025), arXiv:2508.20166 [quant-ph]

    2025

  6. [13]

    Raussendorf, S

    R. Raussendorf, S. Bravyi, and J. Harrington, Long- range quantum entanglement in noisy cluster states, Phys. Rev. A71, 062313 (2005)

    2005

  7. [14]

    F. J. Wegner, Duality in generalized Ising models and phase transitions without local order parameters, J. Math. Phys.12, 2259 (1971)

    1971

  8. [15]

    A. M. Ferrenberg, J. Xu, and D. P. Landau, Push- ing the limits of monte carlo simulations for the three- dimensional ising model, Phys. Rev. E97, 043301 (2018), arXiv:1806.03558

    2018 arXiv

  9. [16]

    M. B. Hastings, Topological Order at Nonzero Tem- perature, Phys. Rev. Lett.107, 210501 (2011), arXiv:1106.6026 [quant-ph]

    2011 arXiv

  10. [17]

    Castelnovo and C

    C. Castelnovo and C. Chamon, Topological order in a three-dimensional toric code at finite temperature, Phys. Rev. B78, 155120 (2008), arXiv:0804.3591 [cond- mat.str-el]

    2008 arXiv

  11. [19]

    D. A. Reiss and K. P. Schmidt, Quantum robustness and phase transitions of the 3D toric code in a field, SciPost Phys.6, 078 (2019)

    2019

  12. [20]

    F. Kos, D. Poland, D. Simmons-Duffin, and A. Vichi, Precision islands in the ising ando(n) models, JHEP 2016(08), 036, arXiv:1603.04436

    2016 arXiv

  13. [21]

    Pollmann and A

    F. Pollmann and A. M. Turner, Detection of symmetry- protected topological phases in one dimension, Phys. Rev. B86, 125441 (2012), arXiv:1204.0704

    2012 arXiv

  14. [22]

    Kennedy and H

    T. Kennedy and H. Tasaki, HiddenZ 2 ×Z 2 symmetry breaking in Haldane-gap antiferromagnets, Phys. Rev. B 45, 304 (1992)

    1992

  15. [23]

    L. Li, M. Oshikawa, and Y. Zheng, Noninvertible duality transformation between symmetry-protected topological and spontaneously symmetry-broken phases, Phys. Rev. B108, 214429 (2023), arXiv:2301.07899

    2023 arXiv

  16. [24]

    W. Cao, L. Li, and M. Yamazaki, Generating lattice non-invertible symmetries, SciPost Phys.17, 104 (2024), arXiv:2406.05454

    2024 arXiv

  17. [25]

    L. Li, M. Oshikawa, and H. Yan, Generalized Kramers- Wanier Duality from Bilinear Phase Map, Phys. Rev. Lett.136, 240403 (2026), arXiv:2403.16017 [cond- mat.str-el]

    2026 arXiv

  18. [26]

    J. Kim, Y. You, and J. H. Han, Noninvertible symmetry and topological holography for modulated SPT in one di- mension, SciPost Phys.19, 110 (2025), arXiv:2507.02324

    2025

  19. [27]

    Li and Y

    L. Li and Y. Yao, Mixed-state topological phase: Quantized topological order parameter and Lieb– Schultz–Mattis theorem, arXiv preprint (2026), arXiv:2603.24031

    2026

  20. [28]

    Watanabe, Phase distinction of Gibbs states without symmetry breaking: topological invariants of the 3D toric code, arXiv preprint (2026), arXiv:2607.00134

    H. Watanabe, Phase distinction of Gibbs states without symmetry breaking: topological invariants of the 3D toric code, arXiv preprint (2026), arXiv:2607.00134

    2026 arXiv

  21. [29]

    Z. Wang, Z. Wu, and Z. Wang, Intrinsic Mixed-State Topological Order, PRX Quantum6, 010314 (2025), arXiv:2307.13758 [quant-ph]

    2025 arXiv

  22. [30]

    T. D. Ellison and M. Cheng, Toward a Classifica- tion of Mixed-State Topological Orders in Two Dimen- sions, PRX Quantum6, 010315 (2025), arXiv:2405.02390 [cond-mat.str-el]

    2025 arXiv

  23. [31]

    Guo, J.-H

    Y. Guo, J.-H. Zhang, H.-R. Zhang, S. Yang, and Z. Bi, Locally Purified Density Operators for Symmetry- Protected Topological Phases in Mixed States, Phys. Rev. X15, 021060 (2025), arXiv:2403.16978 [cond- mat.str-el]

    2025 arXiv

  24. [32]

    Sohal and A

    R. Sohal and A. Prem, Noisy Approach to Intrinsi- cally Mixed-State Topological Order, PRX Quantum6, 010313 (2025), arXiv:2403.13879 [cond-mat.str-el]

    2025 arXiv

  25. [33]

    Sun, J.-H

    S. Sun, J.-H. Zhang, Z. Bi, and Y. You, Holographic View of Mixed-State Symmetry-Protected Topological Phases in Open Quantum Systems, PRX Quantum6, 020333 (2025), arXiv:2410.08205 [quant-ph]

    2025 arXiv

  26. [34]

    T.-H. Yang, B. Shi, and J. Y. Lee, Topological Mixed States: Phases of Matter from Axiomatic Approaches (2025), arXiv:2506.04221 [cond-mat.str-el]

    2025

  27. [35]

    Luo, Y.-N

    R. Luo, Y.-N. Wang, and Z. Bi, Topological Hologra- phy for Mixed-State Phases and Phase Transitions, PRX Quantum6, 040358 (2025), arXiv:2507.06218 [cond- mat.str-el]

    2025 arXiv

  28. [36]

    Schafer-Nameki, A

    S. Schafer-Nameki, A. Tiwari, A. Warman, and C. Zhang, SymTFT Approach for Mixed States with Non-Invertible Symmetries (2025), arXiv:2507.05350 [quant-ph]

    2025 arXiv

  29. [37]

    M. Qi, R. Sohal, X. Chen, D. T. Stephen, and A. Prem, The Symmetry Taco: Equivalences be- tween Gapped, Gapless, and Mixed-State SPTs (2025), arXiv:2507.05335 [cond-mat.str-el]

    2025

  30. [38]

    S. Sang, Y. Zou, and T. H. Hsieh, Mixed-State Quantum Phases: Renormalization and Quantum Error Correc- tion, Phys. Rev. X14, 031044 (2024), arXiv:2310.08639 [quant-ph]

    2024

  31. [39]

    S. Sang, L. A. Lessa, R. S. K. Mong, T. Grover, C. Wang, and T. H. Hsieh, Mixed-state phases from local reversibil- ity (2025), arXiv:2507.02292 [quant-ph]

    2025 arXiv

  32. [40]

    S. M. Linsel and L. Pollet, ParaToric 1.0: Continuous- time quantum Monte Carlo for the toric code in a parallel field (2025), arXiv:2510.14781

    2025 arXiv

  33. [41]

    Aizenman, D

    M. Aizenman, D. J. Barsky, and R. Fern´ andez, The phase transition in a general class of Ising-type models is sharp, J. Stat. Phys.47, 343 (1987)

    1987

  34. [42]

    strongly symmetric

    J. L. Lebowitz and C.-E. Pfister, Surface tension and phase coexistence, Phys. Rev. Lett.46, 1031 (1981). 7 Supplemental Material Quantized topological invariant of symmetry-projected Gibbs states Weiguang Cao and Haruki Watanabe This Supplemental Material follows the order of...

    1981

  35. [43]

    contractible

    Finite-µregularization A soft local projection through the star term −µ P v S(1) v , as in our QMC, merely inserts tanh(βµ) |S| into the expansion above [usee βµS (1) v = cosh(βµ)[1 + tanh(βµ)S (1) v ]], i.e. a uniform magnetic fieldh := − 1 2 ln tanh(βµ) acting on the Ising s...

  36. [44]

    Weighting configurations by (−1) wi(C) is, in the Ising dictionary, an antiperiodic twist of the spin model, as follows

    Winding sectors, interface tension, and degeneracy LetZ w denote the loop-gas partition function re- stricted to winding classw; thenZ= P w∈Z3 2 Zw. Weighting configurations by (−1) wi(C) is, in the Ising dictionary, an antiperiodic twist of the spin model, as follows. Fix a p...

  37. [45]

    Along every scan B :=βµ= 4 is fixed, and the sampled exponent is −βH(s) +BG

    Continuous-transition arms LetG := P v S(1) v + P c S(1) c . Along every scan B :=βµ= 4 is fixed, and the sampled exponent is −βH(s) +BG. The energy conjugate toβon this path is therefore the physical energyE phys :=⟨H(s)⟩, not the energyE µ :=⟨H(s)−µG⟩of a fixed-µHamiltonian....

  38. [46]

    First-order wall Across the self-dual line we scansat fixed tempera- ture on the fine grid ∆s= 0.01 for 0.02≤T≤0.44, initializing each run in deconfined- and confined-favored configurations. The order parameterM :=∂ sHof the Letter is measured, in the gauge frame of the simu- ...

  39. [47]

    Critical endpoint Two finite-regulator indicators bracket the wall top. First, the hysteresis strips show a resolved two-branch splitting throughT= 0.42; anL= 16 control re- mains two-branched atT= 0.43, while no stable two- branch run is found atT= 0.44. The measured splittin...

  40. [48]

    Twisted reflection throughout the interpolation The fixed-point argument extends to the whole inter- polation. Conjugating the flux-threaded interpolation Htw(s) byUmoves the cocycle from theX pBp terms onto theX p terms; the further conjugation byW :=Q p:η p=−1 Zp—which commu...

  41. [49]

    Sector free-energy representation ofF Σ A single conjugation turns the twisted membrane into an ordinary two-sector free-energy difference, which at the fixed points reduces to standard Ising line and inter- face free energies. The operatorWdefined above com- mutes withP loc (...

  42. [50]

    Unconditional fixed-point lines WriteI L(s, T) :=⟨S (1) Σ ⟩Ploc tw as in the Letter, and, whenever the thermodynamic limit exists, define I(s, T):= lim L→∞ IL(s, T). ForT < Tproj c (0)≈1.3133 the fixed-point loop gas is dilute, winding loops are sup- pressed by a line tensionκ...

  43. [51]

    (S27) gives IL( 1 2 , T) =−IL( 1 2 , T) = 0.(S33) This holds at every temperature and finiteL, without a thermodynamic limit or Hypothesis (H)

    Unconditional result on the self-duals= 1 2 line For the defining odd intersection (−1) Σ·γ =−1, the finite-volume reflection identity Eq. (S27) gives IL( 1 2 , T) =−IL( 1 2 , T) = 0.(S33) This holds at every temperature and finiteL, without a thermodynamic limit or Hypothesis...

  44. [52]

    We first considers ′ > 1 2 at finiteL

    Unconditional result on theT= 0line At zero temperature the whole interpolation can be treated without Hypothesis (H). We first considers ′ > 1 2 at finiteL. Let|z⟩be a computational-basis state and z(i) the configuration obtained by flipping qubiti. The only two terms that co...

  45. [53]

    Conjugation byW, which preservesP loc, supplies the same (−1)Σ·γ prefactor as in Eq

    Unconditional result on theT=∞line Atβ= 0 the Hamiltonian and its twist drop out before any thermodynamic limit is taken. Conjugation byW, which preservesP loc, supplies the same (−1)Σ·γ prefactor as in Eq. (S28). Using the group-average representation in Eq. (S3), IL(s,∞) = (...

  46. [54]

    Representation and membrane-sector measurement TheAcopy is simulated in its electric (worldsheet) representation, with spatial-link variablesx l(τ) onN τ imaginary-time slices. For the base step ∆τ 0 := 0.2, we choose Nτ := max{4,round( ˜β/∆τ0)},∆τ eff := ˜β/Nτ , (S63) where ˜...

  47. [55]

    The two winding sectorsm= + (even) andm=−(odd) are simulated independently, the latter seeded with a single winding line

    class used for the map, they are ergodic. The two winding sectorsm= + (even) andm=−(odd) are simulated independently, the latter seeded with a single winding line. Thermodynamic integration in a field strengthλde- forms the link-slice weight toe +λ∆τeff hx Axl(τ) and mea- sure...

  48. [56]

    Fora̸= 0, define F A,m sp (a;L) :=−ln[Z (as=a) A,m /Z(as=0) A,m ], τA,m(a;L) :=L −2F A,m sp (a;L)

    Direct spatial-sheet sector ratio We test the omitted step with a second calculation that forces one spatial event sheet. Fora̸= 0, define F A,m sp (a;L) :=−ln[Z (as=a) A,m /Z(as=0) A,m ], τA,m(a;L) :=L −2F A,m sp (a;L). (S67) LetSbe a noncontractible plane ofL 2 plaquette eve...

  49. [57]

    S2 B–S4 A, where the same observable is com- puted independently by extended-ensemble Ising Monte Carlo

    Validation and domain The estimator passes the exacts→0 loop-gas anchor of Secs. S2 B–S4 A, where the same observable is com- puted independently by extended-ensemble Ising Monte Carlo. Low-temperature interior points approach the ex- pected quantized values, while points abov...

  50. [58]

    S5, not replicas of the density matrix

    Sector tables and exact reconstruction Here copiesAandBare the two positive worldsheet species introduced in Sec. S5, not replicas of the density matrix. CopyAcarries the membrane-sector constraint, while copyBis its cell-dual partner. ForC=A, B, letc s ∈H 2(T 3;Z 2) be the ho...

  51. [59]

    For eachC∈ {A, B}, letx C,l(τ) =±1 be its directed-link worldline variable and letn C,p(τ)∈ {0,1} record a plaquette-flip event between adjacent slices

    Worldsheet variables and updates The positive tables are sampled on anL 3 ×N τ space- time lattice, whereN τ is the number of imaginary-time slices. For eachC∈ {A, B}, letx C,l(τ) =±1 be its directed-link worldline variable and letn C,p(τ)∈ {0,1} record a plaquette-flip event ...

  52. [60]

    ThusN τ and ∆τ eff are fixed before a chain is run

    Trotter refinement and sampling inventory The time discretization is chosen by N (0) τ := max 4,round s/T ∆τtarget , Nτ :=f N(0) τ ,∆τ eff := s/T Nτ , (S85) with ∆τ target = 0.2 andf= 1,2,4. ThusN τ and ∆τ eff are fixed before a chain is run. The refinement factor fis not a ph...

  53. [61]

    In round 0 the offsetsb j learned dur- ing adaptation are frozen, and the round passes only if every bin is visited

    Calibration, acceptance, and uncertainty Calibration uses only bridge-bin counts, not a physical free energy orI L. In round 0 the offsetsb j learned dur- ing adaptation are frozen, and the round passes only if every bin is visited. If its counts areH j, it proposes the prescr...

  54. [62]

    At (s, T) = (0.30,0.30), the three refinement factors give I (f=1) 4 =−0.9999995712, I (f=2) 4 =−0.9999994446, I (f=4) 4 =−0.9999994161

    Representative results and limitations The five accepted central estimates are those in Ta- ble I of the Letter. At (s, T) = (0.30,0.30), the three refinement factors give I (f=1) 4 =−0.9999995712, I (f=2) 4 =−0.9999994446, I (f=4) 4 =−0.9999994161. (S91) Their 95% interval ha...

Pith tools

Reviewed August 8, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.