Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 5 minor 47 references

Spherical to Cartesian Coordinates Transformation for Solid Harmonics Revisited

T0 review · 3 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-11 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read This paper derives a closed-form formula for the coefficients that convert solid-harmonic Gaussian and Slater orbitals into Cartesian monomials, and demonstrates it by building an arbitrary-order multipole Hartree potential for the La$_2$…

desk verdict Solid closed-form formula for solid-harmonic coefficients; the Hartree application section is a sketch, not a full benchmark. read the letter →

arxiv 2412.16733 v2 pith:GLRPULGU submitted 2024-12-21 cond-mat.other cond-mat.mtrl-sciphysics.atm-clusphysics.chem-phphysics.comp-ph

Chiara Ribaldone , Jacques Kontak Desmarais This is my paper · ORCID
classification cond-mat.othercond-mat.mtrl-sciphysics.atm-clusphysics.chem-phphysics.comp-ph MSC 33C5533C45
keywords solidharmonicsspherical-to-CartesiantransformationGaussian-typeorbitalscoefficientsmultipoleexpansionHartreepotentialrealSlaterfunctions
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

Solid harmonics are the angular building blocks of atomic orbitals; quantum-chemistry programs often prefer them because fewer functions are needed, but integral routines work with Cartesian monomials. This paper derives a single closed-form expression, Eq. (29), for the coefficients $C^{\ell|m|}_{tuv}$ in the expansion of a solid harmonic into monomials $x^t y^u z^v$ with $t+u+v=\ell$, including the round-down upper limit $\sigma_{\ell|m|}=\lfloor(\ell-|m|)/2\rfloor$ that earlier treatments mishandled. The authors tabulate real coefficients up to $\ell=10$ and supply code for arbitrary $\ell$. They then use the coefficients to evaluate the Hartree potential of the La$_2$ molecule by multipole expansion, finding that moments up to $\ell=14$ reproduce the reference value. If the formula is correct, any spherical-harmonic basis function can be converted exactly to Cartesian form at any angular momentum, removing a long-standing bottleneck in high-$\ell$ calculations.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing mechanism is the derivative identity $(\partial/\partial x)^n (x+a)^m = \frac{m!}{(m-n)!}(x+a)^{m-n}H[m-n]$ with $H[0]=1$, applied twice: once to move from the derivative in $z/r$ to powers of $r$ and $z$, and once to extract monomial coefficients by differentiating at the origin. Around this sit the standard derivative formula for the associated Legendre function $P^{|m|}_\ell$, the binomial expansion of $(x+iy)^{|m|}$ and of $(x^2+y^2+z^2)^k$, and the Kronecker-delta conditions that pin each coefficient to a specific triple $(t,u,v)$. The parity factor $M_{tu|m|}$ selects monomials whose total degree in $x$ and $y$ has the same parity as $|m|$, and the Heaviside product $\Theta_{tu|m|kq}=H[k-\eta_{tu|m|}]H[t-2q]H[|m|-t+2q]$ with $\eta_{tu|m|}=(t+u-|m|)/2$ keeps all summation indices inside their valid ranges.

What would settle it

Evaluate Eq. (29) for a high angular momentum, say $\ell=9$, $m=4$, and a nontrivial exponent triple such as $(t,u,v)=(3,2,4)$, and compare the polynomial with a direct numerical evaluation of $Y^4_9(r)$ at a point with all three coordinates nonzero; any mismatch would falsify the coefficient formula. For the Hartree application, compute the multipole potential at several off-axis distances and for a second molecule and check whether the $\ell=14$ partial sum still matches the reference value from the direct integral.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

Starting from the standard derivative formula for the associated Legendre function, the paper rewrites $Y^{|m|}_\ell(r)$ as a derivative of a polynomial in $z/r$, trades $e^{i|m|\varphi}$ for $(x+iy)^{|m|}$, and expands $r^{2k}=(x^2+y^2+z^2)^k$ by the binomial theorem. Differentiating both sides of the monomial expansion and evaluating at the origin isolates each coefficient through Kronecker deltas. The resulting Eq. (29) expresses $C^{\ell|m|}_{tuv}$ as a double sum over $k$ and $q$ of binomial coefficients, factorials, and Heaviside steps, with a parity factor $M_{tu|m|}=[1-\mathrm{mod}(t+u-|m|,2)]\,H[t+u-|m|]$ that forces the correct symmetry and a step function $\Theta_{tu|m|kq}$ that enforces the summation bounds. Real solid-harmonic coefficients are obtained by taking the real part for $m\ge0$ and the imaginary part for $m<0$. The paper's central claim is that this formula is exact for all $\ell$ and $m$, with the floor operation on $\sigma_{\ell|m|}$ resolving the noninteger upper bound that plagued an earlier transformation formula.

Load-bearing premise

The broad practical claim that the method produces accurate arbitrary-order multipole Hartree potentials for general molecular densities rests on a single validation point, 4 Å from the nearest La nucleus in La$_2$; if the multipole series converges differently for other geometries, the application claim would exceed what is shown.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Any spherical-harmonic Gaussian or Slater function can be rewritten exactly as a finite sum of Cartesian Gaussians, so Cartesian integral engines can process spherical bases without approximation at any $\ell$.
  • Real solid-harmonic coefficients follow directly from real and imaginary parts, enabling real-algebra implementations that avoid complex arithmetic.
  • The Hartree potential can be expanded to arbitrarily high multipole order with these coefficients; in the tested La$_2$ case the series reaches the reference value with moments through $\ell=14$.
  • The same transformation coefficients apply unchanged to Slater functions, since only the radial factor is replaced.
  • The floor operation in Eq. (29) removes the noninteger summation bound of an earlier transformation formula, giving a well-defined prescription for every $\ell$ and $m$.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The coefficient formula is purely algebraic and exact, so it should extend to analytic derivatives of the basis functions; forces and stress tensors for spherical-basis calculations could be generated by differentiating the same sums.
  • The multipole validation is limited to one molecule at one evaluation point 4 Å from the nearest nucleus; testing additional distances, bond lengths, and molecular shapes would show whether $\ell=14$ is a general rule or a property of this particular density.
  • Because the coefficients are rational for integer exponents, they could be precomputed once and stored, making the spherical-to-Cartesian conversion essentially free inside an integral code.
  • Fast multipole methods in periodic electronic-structure codes need solid-harmonic moments of Gaussian densities at high $\ell$; this closed form supplies those moments directly and may simplify their implementation.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper derives a closed-form expression, Eq. (29), for the coefficients C^{ℓ|m|}_{tuv} in the Cartesian monomial expansion of unnormalized complex solid harmonics Y^{|m|}_ℓ(r), starting from Rodrigues' formula for associated Legendre functions and extracting coefficients by differentiation at the origin. Real solid-harmonic coefficients D^{ℓm}_{tuv} are then obtained by taking real or imaginary parts, and numerical values are tabulated up to ℓ=6 in the main text and ℓ=10 in the Supplementary Material, with a Fortran source code on GitHub. As an application, the coefficients are used in a multipole expansion of the Hartree potential, which is tested on the La2 molecule at a single evaluation point 4 Å from the nearest La nucleus.

Significance. If Eq. (29) is correct, it is a useful and general closed-form alternative to the Schlegel–Frisch transformation, with immediate applicability to electronic-structure codes that use real solid harmonic Gaussians together with Cartesian integral algorithms. The derivation is transparent, the formula is parameter-free, and the paper ships machine-checkable artifacts: Fortran source, GitHub repository, and tabulated coefficients up to ℓ=10. The Hartree-potential demonstration is illustrative rather than systematic; its main role is to show that the coefficients can be embedded in a standard multipole workflow, but the convergence claims attached to it are stronger than the single test supports.

major comments (3)
  1. [Section III, Eq. (32), Table III, Fig. 1] The multipole Hartree-potential validation is limited to a single evaluation point 4 Å from the nearest La nucleus, and the manuscript does not specify the expansion center R or the direction of r relative to the La2 axis. Because a Gaussian density has infinite support, no finite sphere centered at R contains the whole charge distribution, so the multipole series in Eq. (32) is asymptotic rather than convergent; the non-monotone errors in Table III (ℓ=16 and ℓ=18 overshoot the target) are consistent with that behavior. The abstract's phrase 'arbitrary-order multipole expansion' is therefore stronger than what is demonstrated. The authors should either specify R and r, add convergence tests at several geometries and evaluation points, and discuss the asymptotic character, or temper the application claim to a formal capability to generate multipole moments up to arbitrary order.
  2. [Eq. (29)] As printed, Eq. (29) contains the factor (-1)^{(|m|-t+2q)/2} for values of |m|-t+2q that are odd, where the exponent is a half-integer and the expression is not well-defined. This is not an empty case: for example, the entry (ℓ,m,t,u,v)=(1,-1,0,1,0) from Table I corresponds to |m|-t+2q=1. The underlying complex coefficient is genuinely imaginary in such cases, so the formula should use i^{|m|-t+2q} explicitly, or the real and imaginary parts should be written out separately without fractional powers of -1. This is a formal defect in the central equation, even though the tabulated real coefficients are recovered by taking the appropriate branch.
  3. [Section III, text before Eq. (32)] The statement that Eq. (32) applies when r is external to a sphere centered at R 'which contains the whole charge distribution' is not strictly satisfiable for a Gaussian-basis density, which has non-vanishing support everywhere. This assumption is load-bearing for the claimed convergence guarantee of the multipole expansion, and the manuscript should state that the expansion is used in an asymptotic sense for exponentially decaying (but not compact) densities.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Eq. (11)] The derivative rule uses m!/(m-n)! together with H[m-n]; for n>m the factorial of a negative integer is undefined. This is harmless only if the Heaviside factor is interpreted as forcing the term to zero before evaluating the factorial, but the convention should be stated explicitly.
  2. [Eqs. (16)–(29)] The transition from Eq. (22) to Eq. (25) is terse: the elimination of the summation indices s and p via the Kronecker deltas is not shown, and the reader must reconstruct the intermediate algebra. A brief explanatory sentence or an intermediate display would improve accessibility.
  3. [Abstract] The abstract contains a grammatical slip: 'a linear combinations' should be 'linear combinations'.
  4. [Table I, caption] The illustrative sentence 'For instance: X3 3 =15x3 −45xy2' is incomplete; it should be completed with the full monomial expression or removed.
  5. [Ref. 28 footnote] The formula '(ℓ+2 choose 2)' for the number of CGTOs is written without the binomial notation being typeset, and the sentence ends with a stray comma and period ('2ℓ + 1,.'). This should be cleaned up.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: Eq. (29) is derived from the defining Rodrigues formula via algebraic manipulation, and the Hartree-potential check uses an independent Boys-function target.

full rationale

The paper's central result, Eq. (29), is obtained by starting from the defining expression for unnormalized solid harmonics, Eq. (1), inserting Rodrigues' formula, Eq. (6), rewriting in Cartesian coordinates through Eqs. (8)-(14), expanding with the binomial theorem in Eq. (16), and then extracting the monomial coefficients by differentiation at the origin (Eqs. (17)-(25)). No fitted parameter is introduced and no target coefficient value is used as an input; the coefficient formula is in this sense a self-contained algebraic derivation from the definition. The validation of the Hartree-potential application in Table III and Fig. 1 compares the multipole expansion of Eq. (32) with the target value obtained from the first line of Eq. (32) 'computed using the semi-analytical Boys-function based method of Ref. 19' — an independent external baseline, not the same formula being tested. The only caveat is that the numerical application is a single-point test, which affects the generality of the application claim but is not circularity: the application is not claimed to be derived from the test point. Self-citations (e.g., Refs. 5, 35, 36) are used for background context on the CRYSTAL code and Ewald-multipole techniques, not as load-bearing justification for the transformation formula itself. No uniqueness theorem is invoked to forbid alternatives, and no known result is merely renamed. Therefore no circular step is present.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central formula is a pure derivation from standard definitions; no free parameters or new entities are introduced. The only assumptions are standard analytical tools and the physical domain of the multipole expansion.

assumptions (4)
  • standard math Associated Legendre functions are defined by Rodrigues' formula (Eq. 6) and used to express solid harmonics.
    This is the starting point of the derivation; it fixes the normalization convention of the harmonics.
  • standard math The Heaviside step function is used with the H[0]=1 convention (Eq. 11).
    The derivative rule in Eq. (11) and the compact notation in Eqs. (25)-(29) depend on this convention to handle zero arguments.
  • domain assumption The Neumann-Laplace expansion (Eq. 32) is valid for the chosen test point, i.e., r lies outside the bounding sphere of the charge distribution.
    The multipole construction of the Hartree potential relies on this expansion; the paper states the condition but verifies it only at one point.
  • standard math Gaussian product theorem and the Hermite polynomial integral representation (Eq. 38) are used to evaluate the multipole moments in Eq. (37).
    Standard identities in Gaussian basis quantum chemistry; their validity is assumed without proof.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Spherical to Cartesian Coordinates Transformation for Solid Harmonics Revisited." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/GLRPULGU

@misc{pith2026241216733,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Spherical to Cartesian Coordinates Transformation for Solid Harmonics Revisited},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/GLRPULGU}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2412.16733}
}
abstract

Spherical Harmonic Gaussian type orbitals and Slater functions can be expressed using spherical coordinates or a linear combinations of the appropriate Cartesian functions. General expressions for the transformation coefficients between the two representations are provided. Values for the transformation coefficients are tabulated up to the quantum number $\ell = 10$. The formula is applied to construct the Hartree potential by an arbitrary-order multipole expansion.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2412.16733 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. FIG. 1. Target (dotted line) and multipole (solid line) Hartree po [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_1.png] view at source ↗

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

47 extracted references · 47 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    author author R. J. \ Buehler \ and\ author J. O. \ Hirschfelder ,\ title title Bipolar expansion of coulombic potentials , \ @noop journal journal Physical Review \ volume 83 ,\ pages 628 ( year 1951 ) NoStop

    work page 1951

  2. [2]

    Takahashi \ and\ author D

    author author Y. Takahashi \ and\ author D. Scheeres ,\ title title Small body surface gravity fields via spherical harmonic expansions , \ @noop journal journal Celestial Mechanics and Dynamical Astronomy \ volume 119 ,\ pages 169--206 ( year 2014 ) NoStop

    work page 2014

  3. [3]

    Carrascal , author G

    author author B. Carrascal , author G. Estevez , author P. Lee , \ and\ author V. Lorenzo ,\ title title Vector spherical harmonics and their application to classical electrodynamics , \ @noop journal journal European Journal of Physics \ volume 12 ,\ pages 184 ( year 1991 ) NoStop

    work page 1991

  4. [4]

    Kumar \ and\ author R

    author author L. Kumar \ and\ author R. M. \ Hegde ,\ title title Near-field acoustic source localization and beamforming in spherical harmonics domain , \ @noop journal journal IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing \ volume 64 ,\ pages 3351--3361 ( year 2016 ) NoStop

    work page 2016

  5. [5]

    Saunders , author C

    author author V. Saunders , author C. Freyria-Fava , author R. Dovesi , author L. Salasco , \ and\ author C. Roetti ,\ title title On the electrostatic potential in crystalline systems where the charge density is expanded in gaussian functions , \ @noop journal journal Molecular Physics \ volume 77 ,\ pages 629--665 ( year 1992 ) NoStop

    work page 1992

  6. [6]

    author author M. A. \ Watson , author Y. Kurashige , author T. Nakajima , \ and\ author K. Hirao ,\ title title Linear-scaling multipole-accelerated Gaussian and finite-element Coulomb method , \ @noop journal journal The Journal of chemical physics \ volume 128 ( year 2008 ) NoStop

    work page 2008

  7. [7]

    author author C. A. \ White \ and\ author M. Head-Gordon ,\ title title Derivation and efficient implementation of the fast multipole method , \ @noop journal journal The Journal of Chemical Physics \ volume 101 ,\ pages 6593--6605 ( year 1994 ) NoStop

    work page 1994

  8. [8]

    author author K. N. \ Kudin \ and\ author G. E. \ Scuseria ,\ title title Linear-scaling density-functional theory with gaussian orbitals and periodic boundary conditions: Efficient evaluation of energy and forces via the fast multipole method , \ @noop journal journal Physical Review B \ volume 61 ,\ pages 16440 ( year 2000 ) NoStop

    work page 2000

Show all 47 references
  1. [9]

    author author R. D. \ C. Pisani \ and\ author C. Roetti ,\ @noop title Hartree Fock Ab Initio Treatment of Crystalline Systems (Lecture Notes in Chemistry) \ ( publisher Springer-Verlag, Berlin ,\ year 1988 ) NoStop

    1988

  2. [10]

    author author E. W. \ Hobson ,\ @noop title The theory of spherical and ellipsoidal harmonics \ ( publisher CUP Archive ,\ year 1931 ) NoStop

    1931

  3. [11]

    author author M. J. \ Caola ,\ title title Solid harmonics and their addition theorems , \ @noop journal journal Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and General \ volume 11 ,\ pages L23 ( year 1978 ) NoStop

    1978

  4. [12]

    Bell ,\ @noop title Special Functions for Scientists and Engineers \ ( publisher Butler and Tanner Ltd., Frome and London ,\ year 1968 ) NoStop

    author author W. Bell ,\ @noop title Special Functions for Scientists and Engineers \ ( publisher Butler and Tanner Ltd., Frome and London ,\ year 1968 ) NoStop

    1968

  5. [13]

    author author S. F. \ Boys ,\ title title Electronic wave functions-i. a general method of calculation for the stationary states of any molecular system , \ @noop journal journal Proc. R. Soc. Lond. \ volume 200 ,\ pages 542--554 ( year 1950 ) NoStop

    1950

  6. [14]

    McWeeny ,\ title title Gaussian approximations, to wave functions , \ @noop journal journal Nature \ volume 166 ,\ pages 21--22 ( year 1950 ) NoStop

    author author R. McWeeny ,\ title title Gaussian approximations, to wave functions , \ @noop journal journal Nature \ volume 166 ,\ pages 21--22 ( year 1950 ) NoStop

    1950

  7. [15]

    author author J. C. \ Slater ,\ title title Analytic atomic wave functions , \ @noop journal journal Physical Review \ volume 42 ,\ pages 33 ( year 1932 ) NoStop

    1932

  8. [16]

    author author P. M. \ Gill ,\ title title Molecular integrals over gaussian basis functions , \ in\ @noop booktitle Advances in quantum chemistry ,\ Vol. volume 25 \ ( year 1994 )\ pp.\ pages 141--205 NoStop

    1994

  9. [17]

    Dupuis , author J

    author author M. Dupuis , author J. Rys , \ and\ author H. F. \ King ,\ title title Evaluation of molecular integrals over gaussian basis functions , \ @noop journal journal The Journal of Chemical Physics \ volume 65 ,\ pages 111--116 ( year 1976 ) NoStop

    1976

  10. [18]

    Helgaker \ and\ author P

    author author T. Helgaker \ and\ author P. R. \ Taylor ,\ title title Gaussian basis sets and molecular integrals , \ @noop journal journal Modern Electronic Structure Theory: Part II \ ,\ pages 725--856 ( year 1995 ) NoStop

    1995

  11. [19]

    Saunders ,\ title title Molecular integrals for gaussian type functions , \ in\ @noop booktitle Methods in computational molecular physics \ ( year 1983 )\ pp.\ pages 1--36 NoStop

    author author V. Saunders ,\ title title Molecular integrals for gaussian type functions , \ in\ @noop booktitle Methods in computational molecular physics \ ( year 1983 )\ pp.\ pages 1--36 NoStop

    1983

  12. [20]

    author author L. E. \ McMurchie \ and\ author E. R. \ Davidson ,\ title title One-and two-electron integrals over cartesian gaussian functions , \ @noop journal journal Journal of Computational Physics \ volume 26 ,\ pages 218--231 ( year 1978 ) NoStop

    1978

  13. [21]

    Obara \ and\ author A

    author author S. Obara \ and\ author A. Saika ,\ title title Efficient recursive computation of molecular integrals over cartesian gaussian functions , \ @noop journal journal The Journal of chemical physics \ volume 84 ,\ pages 3963--3974 ( year 1986 ) NoStop

    1986

  14. [22]

    Obara \ and\ author A

    author author S. Obara \ and\ author A. Saika ,\ title title General recurrence formulas for molecular integrals over cartesian gaussian functions , \ @noop journal journal The Journal of chemical physics \ volume 89 ,\ pages 1540--1559 ( year 1988 ) NoStop

    1988

  15. [23]

    Head-Gordon \ and\ author J

    author author M. Head-Gordon \ and\ author J. A. \ Pople ,\ title title A method for two-electron gaussian integral and integral derivative evaluation using recurrence relations , \ @noop journal journal The Journal of chemical physics \ volume 89 ,\ pages 5777--5786 ( year 19...

    1988

  16. [24]

    author author P. M. \ Gill \ and\ author J. A. \ Pople ,\ title title The prism algorithm for two-electron integrals , \ @noop journal journal International journal of quantum chemistry \ volume 40 ,\ pages 753--772 ( year 1991 ) NoStop

    1991

  17. [25]

    author author B. G. \ Johnson , author P. M. \ Gill , \ and\ author J. A. \ Pople ,\ title title Exact and approximate solutions to the one-center mcmurchie--davidson tree-search problem , \ @noop journal journal Int. J. Quant. Chem. \ volume 40 ,\ pages 809--827 ( year 1991 ) NoStop

    1991

  18. [26]

    Cisneros ,\ title title Improved solutions to the one-center mcmurchie—davidson tree search problem , \ @noop journal journal J

    author author G. Cisneros ,\ title title Improved solutions to the one-center mcmurchie—davidson tree search problem , \ @noop journal journal J. Comput. Chem. \ volume 14 ,\ pages 452--454 ( year 1993 ) NoStop

    1993

  19. [27]

    author author P. M. \ Gill , author M. Head-Gordon , \ and\ author J. A. \ Pople ,\ title title An efficient algorithm for the generation of two-electron repulsion integrals over gaussian basis functions , \ @noop journal journal Int. J. Quant. Chem. \ volume 36 ,\ pages 269--...

    1989

  20. [28]

    The general formula for the number of CGTOs at given is provided by the ``stars and bars'' (also known as ``sticks and stones'') problem of combinatorics and reads +2 2 , while the number of SGTOs is just 2 +1 ,\ @noop NoStop

  21. [29]

    author author R. Ahlrichs ,\ title title Efficient evaluation of three-center two-electron integrals over gaussian functions , \ @noop journal journal Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics \ volume 6 ,\ pages 5119--5121 ( year 2004 ) NoStop

    2004

  22. [30]

    author author T. J. \ Giese \ and\ author D. M. \ York ,\ title title Contracted auxiliary gaussian basis integral and derivative evaluation , \ @noop journal journal The Journal of chemical physics \ volume 128 ( year 2008 ) NoStop

    2008

  23. [31]

    Peels \ and\ author G

    author author M. Peels \ and\ author G. Knizia ,\ title title Fast evaluation of two-center integrals over gaussian charge distributions and gaussian orbitals with general interaction kernels , \ @noop journal journal Journal of chemical theory and computation \ volume 16 ,\ p...

    2020

  24. [32]

    author author H. B. \ Schlegel \ and\ author M. J. \ Frisch ,\ title title Transformation between cartesian and pure spherical harmonic gaussians , \ @noop journal journal International Journal of Quantum Chemistry \ volume 54 ,\ pages 83--87 ( year 1995 ) NoStop

    1995

  25. [33]

    eq1 in Cartesian coordinates, derivatives w.r.t

    For instance, when representing Eq. eq1 in Cartesian coordinates, derivatives w.r.t. the z -component are applied on a function which does not depend on z (2nd line of Eq. (6) of Ref. frisch_1994 ). In their Eq. (14), terms depending on a summation index are present outside th...

  26. [34]

    Helgaker , author P

    author author T. Helgaker , author P. Jorgensen , \ and\ author J. Olsen ,\ @noop title Molecular electronic-structure theory \ ( publisher John Wiley & Sons ,\ year 2013 ) NoStop

    2013

  27. [35]

    Erba , author J

    author author A. Erba , author J. K. \ Desmarais , author S. Casassa , author B. Civalleri , author L. Don \`a , author I. J. \ Bush , author B. Searle , author L. Maschio , author L. Edith-Daga , author A. Cossard , et al. ,\ title title Crystal23: A program for computational...

    2022

  28. [36]

    author author J. K. \ Desmarais , author A. Erba , \ and\ author R. Dovesi ,\ title title Generalization of the periodic lcao approach in the crystal code to g-type orbitals , \ @noop journal journal Theoretical Chemistry Accounts \ volume 137 ,\ pages 1--11 ( year 2018 ) NoStop

    2018

  29. [37]

    author author J. K. \ Desmarais , author A. De Frenza , \ and\ author A. Erba ,\ title title Efficient calculation of derivatives of integrals in a basis of non-separable gaussians , \ @noop journal journal The Journal of Chemical Physics \ volume 158 ( year 2023 ) NoStop

    2023

  30. [38]

    Doll , author V

    author author K. Doll , author V. Saunders , \ and\ author N. Harrison ,\ title title Analytical hartree--fock gradients for periodic systems , \ @noop journal journal Int. J. Q. Chem. \ volume 82 ,\ pages 1--13 ( year 2001 ) NoStop

    2001

  31. [39]

    Doll ,\ title title Implementation of analytical hartree--fock gradients for periodic systems , \ @noop journal journal Comput

    author author K. Doll ,\ title title Implementation of analytical hartree--fock gradients for periodic systems , \ @noop journal journal Comput. Phys. Commun. \ volume 137 ,\ pages 74--88 ( year 2001 ) NoStop

    2001

  32. [40]

    Doll , author R

    author author K. Doll , author R. Dovesi , \ and\ author R. Orlando ,\ title title Analytical hartree--fock gradients with respect to the cell parameter: systems periodic in one and two dimensions , \ @noop journal journal Theor. Chem. Acc. \ volume 115 ,\ pages 354--360 ( yea...

    2006

  33. [41]

    Jeffrey , editor D

    title title Definite Integrals of Elementary Functions , \ in\ @noop booktitle Table of Integrals, Series, and Products (Seventh Edition) ,\ editor edited by\ editor A. Jeffrey , editor D. Zwillinger , editor I. Gradshteyn , \ and\ editor I. Ryzhik \ ( publisher Academic Press...

    2007

  34. [42]

    \ Kobayashi , author S

    author author S.-i. \ Kobayashi , author S. Mori , author S. Iida , author H. Ando , author T. Takenobu , author Y. Taguchi , author A. Fujiwara , author A. Taninaka , author H. Shinohara , \ and\ author Y. Iwasa ,\ title title Conductivity and field effect transistor of la2@ ...

    2003

  35. [43]

    author author M. O. \ Ishitsuka , author S. Sano , author H. Enoki , author S. Sato , author H. Nikawa , author T. Tsuchiya , author Z. Slanina , author N. Mizorogi , author M. T. H. \ Liu , author T. Akasaka , \ and\ author S. Nagase ,\ title title Regioselective Bis-function...

    2011

  36. [44]

    Zhao , author K

    author author R. Zhao , author K. Yuan , author S. Zhao , author X. Zhao , \ and\ author M. Ehara ,\ title title Quantum chemical insight into la2c96: metal carbide fullerene la2c2@ c94 versus dimetallofullerene la2@ c96 , \ @noop journal journal Inorganic Chemistry \ volume 5...

    2017

  37. [45]

    Nishibori , author M

    author author E. Nishibori , author M. Takata , author M. Sakata , author A. Taninaka , \ and\ author H. Shinohara ,\ title title Pentagonal-Dodecahedral La2 Charge Density in [80-Ih]Fullerene: La2@C80 , \ @noop journal journal Angewandte Chemie International Edition \ volume ...

    2001

  38. [46]

    @noop howpublished https://www.crystal.unito.it/Basis_Sets/lanthanum.html NoStop

  39. [47]

    @noop howpublished https://github.com/crblcoding/spherical_harmonics_cartesian_conversion.git NoStop

Pith tools

Reviewed August 11, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.