Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

New Insights on Target Speaker Extraction

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2202.00733 v2 pith:GNK6QMHY submitted 2022-02-01 eess.AS cs.SD

New Insights on Target Speaker Extraction

classification eess.AS cs.SD
keywords informationauxiliaryperformancespeakerextractiondatasetssystemstarget
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN
read the original abstract

Speaker extraction (SE) aims to segregate the speech of a target speaker from a mixture of interfering speakers with the help of auxiliary information. Several forms of auxiliary information have been employed in single-channel SE, such as a speech snippet enrolled from the target speaker or visual information corresponding to the spoken utterance. The effectiveness of the auxiliary information in SE is typically evaluated by comparing the extraction performance of SE with uninformed speaker separation (SS) methods. Following this evaluation protocol, many SE studies have reported performance improvement compared to SS, attributing this to the auxiliary information. However, such studies have been conducted on a few datasets and have not considered recent deep neural network architectures for SS that have shown impressive separation performance. In this paper, we examine the role of the auxiliary information in SE for different input scenarios and over multiple datasets. Specifically, we compare the performance of two SE systems (audio-based and video-based) with SS using a common framework that utilizes the recently proposed dual-path recurrent neural network as the main learning machine. Experimental evaluation on various datasets demonstrates that the use of auxiliary information in the considered SE systems does not always lead to better extraction performance compared to the uninformed SS system. Furthermore, we offer insights into the behavior of the SE systems when provided with different and distorted auxiliary information given the same mixture input.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Discriminative-Generative Target Speaker Extraction with Decoder-Only Language Models

    eess.AS 2026-01 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    A hybrid two-stage framework pairs a discriminative front-end for interference suppression with a generative decoder-only LM back-end to improve perceptual quality and speaker consistency in target speaker extraction ...