Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

NOLA: Compressing LoRA using Linear Combination of Random Basis

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2310.02556 v2 pith:GP6STP4A submitted 2023-10-04 cs.CL cs.CV

classification cs.CLcs.CV
keywords loraranknolalinearmodelsnumberparametersadaptation
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Fine-tuning Large Language Models (LLMs) and storing them for each downstream task or domain is impractical because of the massive model size (e.g., 350GB in GPT-3). Current literature, such as LoRA, showcases the potential of low-rank modifications to the original weights of an LLM, enabling efficient adaptation and storage for task-specific models. These methods can reduce the number of parameters needed to fine-tune an LLM by several orders of magnitude. Yet, these methods face two primary limitations: (1) the parameter count is lower-bounded by the rank one decomposition, and (2) the extent of reduction is heavily influenced by both the model architecture and the chosen rank. We introduce NOLA, which overcomes the rank one lower bound present in LoRA. It achieves this by re-parameterizing the low-rank matrices in LoRA using linear combinations of randomly generated matrices (basis) and optimizing the linear mixture coefficients only. This approach allows us to decouple the number of trainable parameters from both the choice of rank and the network architecture. We present adaptation results using GPT-2, LLaMA-2, and ViT in natural language and computer vision tasks. NOLA performs as well as LoRA models with much fewer number of parameters compared to LoRA with rank one, the best compression LoRA can archive. Particularly, on LLaMA-2 70B, our method is almost 20 times more compact than the most compressed LoRA without degradation in accuracy. Our code is available here: https://github.com/UCDvision/NOLA

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Chebyshev Manifold Adaptation

    cs.LG 2026-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    ChebyMA uses Chebyshev polynomial surfaces to parameterize weight updates, claiming a better parameter-accuracy trade-off than LoRA, TLoRA, and StelLA on CIFAR and text classification.

  2. Multi-Modal Learning meets Genetic Programming: Analyzing Alignment in Latent Space Optimization

    cs.NE 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 5.0 of 10

    SNIP's symbolic-numeric alignment stays coarse and does not improve during optimization, so multi-modal LSO does not yet deliver effective bi-modal search for symbolic regression.

Pith tools