Sanity checks for patch visualisation in prototype-based image classification
Reviewed by Pith T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 kernel pith:GT5G23CGrecord.jsonopen to challenge →
classification
cs.CV
keywords
methodsimagemodelvisualisationanalysisbehaviourbiaschecks
read the original abstract
In this work, we perform an analysis of the visualisation methods implemented in ProtoPNet and ProtoTree, two self-explaining visual classifiers based on prototypes. We show that such methods do not correctly identify the regions of interest inside of the images, and therefore do not reflect the model behaviour, which can create a false sense of bias in the model. We also demonstrate quantitatively that this issue can be mitigated by using other saliency methods that provide more faithful image patches.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet.
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.