REVIEW 1 cited by
A Survey on Feedback-based Multi-step Reasoning for Large Language Models on Mathematics
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
Recent progress in large language models (LLM) found chain-of-thought prompting strategies to improve the reasoning ability of LLMs by encouraging problem solving through multiple steps. Therefore, subsequent research aimed to integrate the multi-step reasoning process into the LLM itself through process rewards as feedback and achieved improvements over prompting strategies. Due to the cost of step-level annotation, some turn to outcome rewards as feedback. Aside from these training-based approaches, training-free techniques leverage frozen LLMs or external tools for feedback at each step to enhance the reasoning process. With the abundance of work in mathematics due to its logical nature, we present a survey of strategies utilizing feedback at the step and outcome levels to enhance multi-step math reasoning for LLMs. As multi-step reasoning emerges a crucial component in scaling LLMs, we hope to establish its foundation for easier understanding and empower further research.
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
Unveiling Instruction-Specific Neurons & Experts: An Analytical Framework for LLM's Instruction-Following Capabilities
Activation-frequency analysis identifies sparse units in LLMs that respond to instructions; same-category instructions share more of these units than different-category ones, and fine-tuning measurably changes the sets.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.