Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

A Survey on Feedback-based Multi-step Reasoning for Large Language Models on Mathematics

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2502.14333 v1 pith:GTYZLGW6 submitted 2025-02-20 cs.CL cs.AI

classification cs.CLcs.AI
keywords reasoningfeedbackllmsmulti-stepprocessstrategiesenhancelanguage
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Recent progress in large language models (LLM) found chain-of-thought prompting strategies to improve the reasoning ability of LLMs by encouraging problem solving through multiple steps. Therefore, subsequent research aimed to integrate the multi-step reasoning process into the LLM itself through process rewards as feedback and achieved improvements over prompting strategies. Due to the cost of step-level annotation, some turn to outcome rewards as feedback. Aside from these training-based approaches, training-free techniques leverage frozen LLMs or external tools for feedback at each step to enhance the reasoning process. With the abundance of work in mathematics due to its logical nature, we present a survey of strategies utilizing feedback at the step and outcome levels to enhance multi-step math reasoning for LLMs. As multi-step reasoning emerges a crucial component in scaling LLMs, we hope to establish its foundation for easier understanding and empower further research.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Unveiling Instruction-Specific Neurons & Experts: An Analytical Framework for LLM's Instruction-Following Capabilities

    cs.CL 2025-05 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

    Activation-frequency analysis identifies sparse units in LLMs that respond to instructions; same-category instructions share more of these units than different-category ones, and fine-tuning measurably changes the sets.

Pith tools