REVIEW 2 cited by
Adversarial score matching and improved sampling for image generation
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Signed reviews
read the original abstract
Denoising Score Matching with Annealed Langevin Sampling (DSM-ALS) has recently found success in generative modeling. The approach works by first training a neural network to estimate the score of a distribution, and then using Langevin dynamics to sample from the data distribution assumed by the score network. Despite the convincing visual quality of samples, this method appears to perform worse than Generative Adversarial Networks (GANs) under the Fr\'echet Inception Distance, a standard metric for generative models. We show that this apparent gap vanishes when denoising the final Langevin samples using the score network. In addition, we propose two improvements to DSM-ALS: 1) Consistent Annealed Sampling as a more stable alternative to Annealed Langevin Sampling, and 2) a hybrid training formulation, composed of both Denoising Score Matching and adversarial objectives. By combining these two techniques and exploring different network architectures, we elevate score matching methods and obtain results competitive with state-of-the-art image generation on CIFAR-10.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
The GAN is dead; long live the GAN! A Modern GAN Baseline
A minimalist GAN with a regularized relativistic loss and modern backbone matches or beats StyleGAN2 and several diffusion models on standard FID benchmarks.
-
Diffusion Models for Hyperspectral Image Analysis: A Comprehensive Review
A literature review that organizes diffusion-model work for hyperspectral imaging into eight task categories and compiles comparative performance tables from prior papers.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.