Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

TurtleBench: A Visual Programming Benchmark in Turtle Geometry

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2411.00264 v2 pith:H5VOCR2K submitted 2024-10-31 cs.AI cs.CV

classification cs.AIcs.CV
keywords turtlelmmsturtlebenchvisualcodegeometrictasksbenchmark
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
abstract

Humans have the ability to reason about geometric patterns in images and scenes from a young age. However, developing large multimodal models (LMMs) capable of similar reasoning remains a challenge, highlighting the need for robust evaluation methods to assess these capabilities. We introduce \Turtle, a benchmark designed to evaluate LMMs' capacity to interpret geometric patterns -- given visual examples, textual instructions, or both -- and generate precise code outputs. Inspired by turtle geometry, a notion used to teach children foundational coding and geometric concepts, TurtleBench features tasks with patterned shapes that have underlying algorithmic logic. Our evaluation reveals that leading LMMs struggle significantly with these tasks, with GPT-4o achieving only 19\% accuracy on the simplest tasks and few-shot prompting only marginally improves their performance ($<2\%$). \Turtle highlights the gap between human and AI performance in intuitive and visual geometrical understanding, setting the stage for future research in this area. \Turtle stands as one of the few benchmarks to evaluate the integration of visual understanding and code generation capabilities in LMMs, setting the stage for future research. Code and Dataset for this paper is provided here: \href{https://github.com/sinaris76/TurtleBench}{https://github.com/sinaris76/TurtleBench}

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. SC2Arena and StarEvolve: Benchmark and Self-Improvement Framework for LLMs in Complex Decision-Making Tasks

    cs.LG 2025-08 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    The authors propose SC2Arena, a full-coverage StarCraft II benchmark for LLMs, and StarEvolve, a planner-executor-verifier self-improvement framework, claiming superior strategic planning.

  2. Unfolding Spatial Cognition: Evaluating Multimodal Models on Visual Simulations

    cs.CV 2025-06 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    STARE is a 4K-task benchmark showing multimodal LLMs perform near random chance on multi-step spatial simulation tasks such as cube net folding and tangrams, despite strong 2D transformation results.

Pith tools