pith. sign in

arxiv: 2606.22132 · v1 · pith:H7D7AV3Xnew · submitted 2026-06-20 · ❄️ cond-mat.other

Thermodynamic stability and structural transitions in virus-host networks

A. Rovenchak , M. Husiev This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-06-26 10:55 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ❄️ cond-mat.other
keywords virus-host networksthermodynamic stabilityadjacency spectranetwork robustnessnode removalstructural transitionsspectral analysisbiological networks
0
0 comments X

The pith

Thermodynamic quantities from adjacency spectra show transition-like behavior in virus-host networks under node removal.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper investigates whether thermodynamic quantities calculated from the adjacency spectra of virus-host networks can reveal their stability properties. It examines directed and weighted networks for humans, mice, and chickens, tracking both standard topological measures and spectral thermodynamic functions. The analysis applies two perturbation models: targeted removal of the most influential nodes and random removal. Transition-like patterns appear in the thermodynamic functions together with shifts in structural measures. A sympathetic reader would care because the work tests whether a thermodynamic description supplies a practical way to quantify how these biological networks respond to disruption.

Core claim

The study computes topological characteristics and thermodynamic quantities from the adjacency spectra of directed and weighted virus-host networks for Homo sapiens, Mus musculus, and Gallus gallus. Under targeted elimination of the most influential nodes and under random removal, the networks display transition-like behavior in the spectral thermodynamic functions accompanied by characteristic changes in structural measures. These observations are presented as evidence that a thermodynamic framework can be used to assess structural robustness and dynamic behavior in virus-host networks.

What carries the argument

Spectral thermodynamic functions obtained from the eigenvalues of the adjacency matrices of the virus-host networks, which track stability changes during node removal.

If this is right

  • Targeted removal of high-influence nodes produces more pronounced transition-like changes than random removal.
  • The networks possess identifiable thresholds at which thermodynamic measures shift abruptly.
  • Spectral thermodynamics and conventional topological statistics together give a more complete description of network response to attack.
  • The same quantities can be compared across host species to reveal organism-specific stability patterns.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The method could be applied to other directed biological networks such as gene-regulation or metabolic graphs to test for analogous transition points.
  • If the observed transitions align with real biological outcomes, they might mark critical points where virus spread accelerates or host defenses collapse.
  • Time-dependent versions of the same spectral analysis might track how virus-host networks evolve during an actual infection.

Load-bearing premise

Thermodynamic quantities derived from the adjacency spectra of virus-host networks can be used to assess their structural robustness and dynamic behavior under node removal.

What would settle it

Explicit computation on the same networks showing smooth, non-transition behavior in all spectral thermodynamic functions across the full range of targeted and random node removals would falsify the reported observation.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2606.22132 by A. Rovenchak, M. Husiev.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: (Colour online) Rank–frequency distribution for all interactions (all scores). We restricted the analysis in this section to host–biomolecule interactions in Homo sapiens because the datasets available for the other two species were too small to support stable parameter estimation and robust goodness-of-fit assessments. As expected, stricter filtering by interaction score improved the fit quality across mo… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: (Colour online) Rank–frequency distribution for high-confidence human biomolecule interac￾tions (Score ⩾ 0.95). 10 0 10 1 10 2 Rank 10 0 10 1 10 2 10 3 Frequency Homo Sapiens (Score > 0.70) Zipf's Law Gaussian-Truncated Yule [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: (Colour online) Rank–frequency distribution for high-confidence human biomolecule interac￾tions (Score ⩾ 0.70). constraints, including the limited number of host biomolecules capable of sustaining a large number of viral interactions. The rank–frequency distribution shown in figure 1 exhibits a multi-regime structure, with several approximately linear segments in log–log coordinates. Although this behavior… view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: (Colour online) Virus–host network for Homo sapiens. An analysis of the node strength distribution (i.e., the sum of weights over both incoming and outgoing edges per node) reveals that its rank–strength representation follows a power-law dependence (Zipf-like law): 𝑠(𝑟) ∝ 𝑟 −𝜁 , (2.5) where 𝑟 denotes the rank and 𝜁 is the corresponding exponent. We fitted this law to three sets of nodes, namely, virus-ass… view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: (Colour online) Node strength distribution for the virus–host network of Homo sapiens. The plot demonstrates a power-law behavior (2.5). The distribution is shown separately for virus-associated nodes and host-associated nodes. The power-law exponent 𝛾 is estimated after discarding the lowest 20% of values. (a) (b) [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: (Colour online) Biomolecules corresponding to the most influential nodes in the Homo sapiens network:(a) MicroRNA hcmv-miR-US25-1-5p of the Human Cytomegalovirus, (b) Human microRNA hsa-miR-155-5p (proinflammatory, oncogenic). Molecular images were generated using UCSF Chimera 1.18, developed by the Resource for Biocomputing, Visualization, and Informatics at the University of California, San Francisco (su… view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: (Colour online) Network evolution snapshots for Homo sapiens under targeted node removal (highest-degree first). Shown steps: 000, 050, 100, 150, 200, and the final state (last). step 000 step 050 step 100 step 200 step 300 step 400 step 500 step 600 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_7.png] view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: (Colour online) Network evolution snapshots for Homo sapiens under random node removal. Shown steps: 000, 050, 100, 200, 300, 400, 500, 600. 23801-10 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_8.png] view at source ↗
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: (Colour online) Susceptibility as a function of the number of the removed nodes in the Homo sapiens network. The plot shows two inflection points, indicating structural transitions during progressive node removal. Gallus gallus Mus musculus 0 10 20 30 Step 0 5 10 15 20 25 Susceptibility Susceptibility Curve Steps 3 and 12 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24 Step 0.8 1.0 1.2 1.4 1.6 1.8 Susceptibility Suscept… view at source ↗
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: (Colour online) Susceptibility dynamics for Gallus gallus and Mus musculus. Characteristic slope changes indicate potential points of structural fragility in the corresponding networks. Certain characteristic patterns can also be observed in assortativity and betweenness at these points, as shown in the plots in table 10. For all studied species, betweenness begins to decline sharply after the 23801-14 [… view at source ↗
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: (Colour online) Heat capacity (3.8) for the Homo sapiens network at targeted node removal. Note that the temperature here corresponds to the formal thermodynamic temperature 𝑇 ∗ = 1/𝛽. Calculated heat capacity dependences on temperature and the number of removed nodes are shown in figures 11 and 12. Heat capacity curves reveal one or two transition-like regimes as temperature varies. A single peak indicat… view at source ↗
Figure 12
Figure 12. Figure 12: (Colour online) Slices of heat capacity (3.8) for the Gallus gallus(left-hand) and Mus musculus (right-hand) networks at targeted node removal. Now, we present some possible interpretations of heat capacity curve shapes. The first peak (at low temperatures) denotes a competition among the largest eigenvalues of the adjacency spectrum; it thus highlights the role of the most dominant interaction modes. The… view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Understanding virus-host interactions is crucial for predicting the stability of networks under various perturbations. In this study, we present an analysis of virus-related networks for several organisms (Homo sapiens, Mus musculus, Gallus gallus), encompassing directed and weighted connections. We compute a range of network parameters, including topological characteristics and thermodynamic quantities derived from adjacency spectra, to gain insights into the structural robustness and dynamic behavior of the networks. To assess stability, we model two distinct node removal scenarios: targeted elimination of the most influential nodes and random removal. Our findings reveal transition-like behavior in spectral thermodynamic functions and characteristic changes in structural measures, contributing to evaluating the potential of a thermodynamic framework for studying virus-host networks and advancing a deeper understanding of their dynamics.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

1 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript analyzes directed and weighted virus-host interaction networks for Homo sapiens, Mus musculus, and Gallus gallus. It computes standard topological measures together with thermodynamic quantities (free energy, entropy, specific heat) derived from the adjacency spectra, then examines their behavior under targeted removal of high-influence nodes versus random removal, reporting transition-like features in the spectral thermodynamic functions.

Significance. If the spectral-to-thermodynamic mapping can be placed on a mathematically consistent footing for non-symmetric matrices, the approach would supply a compact, eigenvalue-based diagnostic for robustness in biological bipartite networks. The work is exploratory rather than definitive; its main value lies in the concrete application to three real virus-host datasets and the side-by-side comparison of targeted versus random attack.

major comments (1)
  1. [Abstract and §3] Abstract and §3 (method): the networks are explicitly described as directed and weighted, yet the thermodynamic functions are stated to be obtained directly from the adjacency spectra. Standard derivations of partition functions and specific heat presuppose a real symmetric matrix with real eigenvalues; for directed graphs the spectrum is complex. No regularization (Hermitian symmetrization, real-part projection, or absolute-value weighting) is indicated, rendering the reported transition-like behavior dependent on an unstated technical step that is load-bearing for the central claim.
minor comments (2)
  1. Figure captions and axis labels should explicitly state whether the plotted thermodynamic quantities are computed from the full complex spectrum or from a symmetrized version.
  2. The manuscript would benefit from a short table listing the precise definitions (partition function Z, free energy F, entropy S, specific heat C) together with the numerical procedure used to extract them from the eigenvalue list.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

1 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the careful reading and for identifying a methodological detail that requires explicit clarification. The point concerning the treatment of complex spectra from directed adjacency matrices is substantive and we address it directly below.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract and §3] Abstract and §3 (method): the networks are explicitly described as directed and weighted, yet the thermodynamic functions are stated to be obtained directly from the adjacency spectra. Standard derivations of partition functions and specific heat presuppose a real symmetric matrix with real eigenvalues; for directed graphs the spectrum is complex. No regularization (Hermitian symmetrization, real-part projection, or absolute-value weighting) is indicated, rendering the reported transition-like behavior dependent on an unstated technical step that is load-bearing for the central claim.

    Authors: We agree that the manuscript does not currently indicate the regularization step applied to the complex eigenvalues. In the underlying computations the partition function and the derived thermodynamic quantities (entropy, specific heat) were obtained after projecting onto the real parts of the eigenvalues; this produces real-valued thermodynamic functions while retaining the spectral information contributed by the directed edges. The choice is standard for non-Hermitian network spectra when a thermodynamic analogy is sought, yet it was omitted from the description in §3. We will revise the methods section to state the real-part projection explicitly, supply a short justification, and note that the same procedure was used uniformly for all three host networks. The reported transition-like features remain unchanged by this clarification. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: spectral thermodynamics applied independently to given adjacency matrices

full rationale

The derivation computes standard network measures plus thermodynamic functions from the eigenvalues of the supplied directed weighted adjacency matrices, then tracks their evolution under two explicit node-removal protocols. No equation reduces to a prior fit or self-citation by construction; the spectra are taken as input data and the thermodynamic mapping is a fixed functional of those eigenvalues. The reported transition-like behavior is therefore an empirical observation on the given networks rather than a definitional tautology.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 0 axioms · 0 invented entities

Only the abstract is available, so specific free parameters, axioms, or invented entities cannot be identified from the full text.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.1-grok · 5647 in / 1081 out tokens · 28698 ms · 2026-06-26T10:55:54.222159+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

42 extracted references · 39 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    I., Wang L., Nowak M

    Fu F., Rosenbloom D. I., Wang L., Nowak M. A., Proc. R. Soc. B, 2011,278, No. 1702, 42–49, doi:10.1098/rspb.2010.1107

    work page doi:10.1098/rspb.2010.1107 2011

  2. [2]

    M., Keough K

    Damas J., Hughes G. M., Keough K. C., Painter C. A., Persky N. S., Corbo M., Hiller M., Koepfli K., PfenningA.R.,ZhaoH.,GenereuxD.P.,SwoffordR.,PollardK.S.,RyderO.A.,NweeiaM.T.,Lindblad-TohK., Teeling E. C., Karlsson E. K., Lewin H. A., Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A., 2020,117, No. 36, 22311–22322, doi:10.1073/pnas.2010146117

    work page doi:10.1073/pnas.2010146117 2020

  3. [3]

    C., Calderwood M

    Gulbahce N., Yan H., Dricot A., Padi M., Byrdsong D., Franchi R., Lee D.-S., Rozenblatt-Rosen O., Mar J. C., Calderwood M. A., et al., PLoS Comput. Biol., 2012,8, No. 6, e1002531, doi:10.1371/journal.pcbi.1002531

    work page doi:10.1371/journal.pcbi.1002531 2012

  4. [4]

    E., Barabási A.-L., Cell, 2011,144, No

    Vidal M., Cusick M. E., Barabási A.-L., Cell, 2011,144, No. 6, 986–998, doi:10.1016/j.cell.2011.02.016

    work page doi:10.1016/j.cell.2011.02.016 2011

  5. [5]

    D1, D583–D587, doi:10.1093/nar/gku1121

    Guirimand T., Delmotte S., Navratil V., Nucleic Acids Res., 2015,43, No. D1, D583–D587, doi:10.1093/nar/gku1121

    work page doi:10.1093/nar/gku1121 2015

  6. [6]

    Krishna S. A. V. S., Sinha S., Donakonda S., Comput. Struct. Biotechnol. J., 2022,20, 4025–4039, doi:10.1016/j.csbj.2022.07.040

    work page doi:10.1016/j.csbj.2022.07.040 2022

  7. [7]

    T., Andersen P

    Bösl K., Ianevski A., Than T. T., Andersen P. I., Kuivanen S., Teppor M., Zusinaite E., Dumpis U., Vitkauskiene A., Cox R. J., et al., Front. Immunol., 2019,10, 2186, doi:10.3389/fimmu.2019.02186

    work page doi:10.3389/fimmu.2019.02186 2019

  8. [8]

    Fendt S.-M., Ralser M., Curr. Opin. Syst. Biol., 2022,31, 100432, doi:10.1016/j.coisb.2022.100432. 23801-17 A. Rovenchak, M. Husiev

    work page doi:10.1016/j.coisb.2022.100432 2022

  9. [9]

    D., Cell, 2019,178, No

    LassoG.,MayerS.V.,WinkelmannE.R.,ChuT.,ElliotO.,Patino-GalindoJ.A.,ParkK.,RabadanR.,HonigB., Shapira S. D., Cell, 2019,178, No. 6, 1526–1541, doi:10.1016/j.cell.2019.08.005

    work page doi:10.1016/j.cell.2019.08.005 2019

  10. [10]

    ZhouY.,HouY.,ShenJ.,HuangY.,MartinW.,ChengF.,CellDiscovery,2020,6,No.1,14,doi:10.1038/s41421- 020-0153-3

    work page doi:10.1038/s41421- 2020

  11. [11]

    Matter Phys., 2024,27, No

    Sarkanych P., Sevinchan Yu., Krasnytska M., Romanczuk P., Holovatch Yu., Condens. Matter Phys., 2024,27, No. 3, 33801, doi:10.5488/cmp.27.33801

    work page doi:10.5488/cmp.27.33801 2024

  12. [12]

    Sarkanych P., Holovatch Yu., Kenna R., Mac Carron P., J. Phys. Stud., 2016,20, No. 4, 4801, doi:10.30970/jps.20.4801

    work page doi:10.30970/jps.20.4801 2016

  13. [13]

    Holovatch Yu., Dudka M., Blavatska V., Palchykov V., Krasnytska M., Mryglod O., J. Phys. Stud., 2018,22, No. 2, 2801, doi:10.30970/jps.22.2801

    work page doi:10.30970/jps.22.2801 2018

  14. [14]

    ViRBase v3.0, ViRBase v3.0: Virus-Host ncRNA Interaction Database, 2021, [Online; accessed 22-Jun-2025], URL https://www.rna-society.org/virbase/

    2021

  15. [15]

    D1, D578–D582, doi:10.1093/nar/gku903

    LiY.,WangC.,MiaoZ.,BiX.,WuD.,JinN.,WangL.,WuH.,QianK.,LiC.,etal.,NucleicAcidsRes.,2015, 43, No. D1, D578–D582, doi:10.1093/nar/gku903

    work page doi:10.1093/nar/gku903 2015

  16. [16]

    D1, D928–D933, doi:10.1093/nar/gkab1029

    Cheng J., Lin Y., Xu L., Chen K., Li Q., Xu K., Ning L., Kang J., Cui T., Huang Y., Zhao X., Wang D., Li Y., Su X., Yang B., Nucleic Acids Res., 2022,50, No. D1, D928–D933, doi:10.1093/nar/gkab1029

    work page doi:10.1093/nar/gkab1029 2022

  17. [17]

    K., The Psycho-Biology of Language: An Introduction to Dynamic Philology, Routledge, 2013, doi:10.4324/9781315009421

    Zipf G. K., The Psycho-Biology of Language: An Introduction to Dynamic Philology, Routledge, 2013, doi:10.4324/9781315009421

    work page doi:10.4324/9781315009421 2013

  18. [18]

    R., Stevens R., Brass A., BMC Bioinf., 2012,13, 127, doi:10.1186/1471-2105-13-127

    Kalankesh L. R., Stevens R., Brass A., BMC Bioinf., 2012,13, 127, doi:10.1186/1471-2105-13-127

    work page doi:10.1186/1471-2105-13-127 2012

  19. [19]

    Rovenchak A., Mod. Phys. Lett. B, 2018,32, No. 05, 1850057, doi:10.1142/S0217984918500574

    work page doi:10.1142/s0217984918500574 2018

  20. [20]

    L., Trends Ecol

    Semple S., Ferrer-i-Cancho R., Gustison M. L., Trends Ecol. Evol., 2022,37, No. 1, 53–66, doi:10.1016/j.tree.2021.08.012

    work page doi:10.1016/j.tree.2021.08.012 2022

  21. [21]

    Laherrère J., Sornette D., Eur. Phys. J. B, 1998,2, No. 4, 525–539, doi:10.1007/s100510050276

    work page doi:10.1007/s100510050276 1998

  22. [22]

    Rovenchak A., Riley C., Sherman T., J. Quant. Linguist., 2017,25, No. 3, 271–287, doi:10.1080/09296174.2017.1373510

    work page doi:10.1080/09296174.2017.1373510 2017

  23. [23]

    Ferrer-i-Cancho R., Solé R. V., J. Quant. Linguist., 2001,8, No. 3, 165–173, doi:10.1076/jqul.8.3.165.4101

    work page doi:10.1076/jqul.8.3.165.4101 2001

  24. [24]

    BukS.N.,RovenchakA.A.,J.Quant.Linguist.,2004,11,No.3,161–171,doi:10.1080/0929617042000314912

    work page doi:10.1080/0929617042000314912 2004

  25. [25]

    T., Psychon

    Piantadosi S. T., Psychon. Bull. Rev., 2014,21, No. 5, 1112–1130, doi:10.3758/s13423-014-0585-6

    work page doi:10.3758/s13423-014-0585-6 2014

  26. [26]

    HolovatchYu.,PalchykovV.,In:MathsMeetsMyths:QuantitativeApproachestoAncientNarratives,KennaR., MacCarronM.,MacCarronP.(Eds.),SpringerInternationalPublishing,Cham,2016,159–175,doi:10.1007/978- 3-319-39445-9_9

    work page doi:10.1007/978- 2016

  27. [27]

    Rovenchak A., Buk S., J. Quant. Linguist., 2018,25, No. 1, 1–21, doi:10.1080/09296174.2017.1324601

    work page doi:10.1080/09296174.2017.1324601 2018

  28. [28]

    A., Biometrika, 1955,42, No

    Simon H. A., Biometrika, 1955,42, No. 3/4, 425–440, doi:10.2307/2333389

    work page doi:10.2307/2333389 1955

  29. [29]

    Newman M. E. J., Contemp. Phys., 2005,46, No. 5, 323–351, doi:10.1080/00107510500052444

    work page doi:10.1080/00107510500052444 2005

  30. [30]

    miRBase, miRBase: the microRNA database, [Online; accessed 22-Jun-2025], URL https://mirbase.org/

    2025

  31. [31]

    F., Goddard T

    Pettersen E. F., Goddard T. D., Huang C. C., Couch G. S., Greenblatt D. M., Meng E. C., Ferrin T. E., J. Comput. Chem., 2004,25, No. 13, 1605–1612, doi:10.1002/jcc.20084

    work page doi:10.1002/jcc.20084 2004

  32. [32]

    Estrada E., The Structure of Complex Networks: Theory and Applications, Oxford Academic Press, 2011, doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199591756.001.0001

    work page doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199591756.001.0001 2011

  33. [33]

    Bianconi G., Phys. Rev. E, 2009,79, No. 3, 036114, doi:10.1103/physreve.79.036114

    work page doi:10.1103/physreve.79.036114 2009

  34. [34]

    S., Newman M

    Callaway D. S., Newman M. E. J., Strogatz S. H., Watts D. J., Phys. Rev. Lett., 2000,85, No. 25, 5468, doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.85.5468

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.85.5468 2000

  35. [35]

    6794, 378–382, doi:10.1038/35019019

    Albert R., Jeong H., Barabási A.-L., Nature, 2000,406, No. 6794, 378–382, doi:10.1038/35019019

    work page doi:10.1038/35019019 2000

  36. [36]

    Barrat A., Barthelemy M., Vespignani A., Dynamical Processes on Complex Networks, Cambridge University Press, 2008, doi:10.1017/CBO9780511791383

    work page doi:10.1017/cbo9780511791383 2008

  37. [37]

    Castellano C., Fortunato S., Loreto V., Rev. Mod. Phys., 2009,81, No. 2, 591–646, doi:10.1103/RevModPhys.81.591

    work page doi:10.1103/revmodphys.81.591 2009

  38. [38]

    Estrada E., Hatano N., Chem. Phys. Lett., 2007,439, No. 1–3, 247–251, doi:10.1016/j.cplett.2007.03.098

    work page doi:10.1016/j.cplett.2007.03.098 2007

  39. [39]

    Rep., 2012,514, No

    Estrada E., Hatano N., Benzi M., Phys. Rep., 2012,514, No. 3, 89–119, doi:10.1016/j.physrep.2012.01.006

    work page doi:10.1016/j.physrep.2012.01.006 2012

  40. [40]

    Jurčišinová E., Jurčišin M., Phys. Rev. E, 2018,97, No. 5, 052129, doi:10.1103/PhysRevE.97.052129

    work page doi:10.1103/physreve.97.052129 2018

  41. [41]

    Luo Q., Hu S., Kee H.-Y., Phys. Rev. Res., 2021,3, 033048, doi:10.1103/PhysRevResearch.3.033048

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevresearch.3.033048 2021

  42. [42]

    23801-18 Thermodynamic stability and structural transitions in virus–host networks Термодинамiчна стабiльнiсть та структурнi переходи в мережах вiрус–господар А

    Karlova K., Rufino A., Verkholyak T., Caci N., Wessel S., Strečka J., Mila F., Honecker A., Preprint arXiv:2601.14382, 2026. 23801-18 Thermodynamic stability and structural transitions in virus–host networks Термодинамiчна стабiльнiсть та структурнi переходи в мережах вiрус–господар А. Ровенчак1,2, М. Гусєв1 1 Кафедра теоретичної фiзики iменi професора Iв...

    arXiv 2026