Progressive Bird's Eye View Perception for Safety-Critical Autonomous Driving: A Comprehensive Survey

Haozhi Bai; Jianli Lu; Jie Zhao; Lei Yang; Naibang Wang; Nanxin Zeng; Nayu Su; Susanto Rahardja; Xiaojuan Zhang; Xiaoxi Hu

REVIEW 3 major objections 4 minor 300 references

Progressive Bird's Eye View Perception for Safety-Critical Autonomous Driving: A Comprehensive Survey

T0 review · 3 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-05 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read This survey claims BEV perception becomes safer as it moves from single-sensor, to fused multi-sensor, to multi-agent shared perception, with benchmark evidence that fusion stops detection collapse under corruption.

desk verdict Useful SafeBEV taxonomy and broad coverage, but Table 6 and the BEVFormer 'multimodal' claim are internally inconsistent; needs revision before it can serve as a trusted reference. read the letter →

arxiv 2508.07560 v1 pith:HHMFGH2J submitted 2025-08-11 cs.RO cs.CV

Yan Gong , Naibang Wang , Jianli Lu , Xinyu Zhang , Yongsheng Gao , Jie Zhao , Zifan Huang , Haozhi Bai

show 8 more authors

Nanxin Zeng Nayu Su Lei Yang Ziying Song Xiaoxi Hu Xinmin Jiang Xiaojuan Zhang Susanto Rahardja

This is my paper

classification cs.ROcs.CV

keywords bird's-eye-viewperceptionautonomousdrivingmultimodalsensorfusioncollaborativesafety-criticalsystemsrobustnessbenchmarkscorruptionV2Xcommunication

verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This survey set out to organize the bird's-eye-view (BEV) perception field for autonomous driving around one question: what makes BEV perception safe enough for real roads? It claims to be the first systematic review of BEV perception from a safety-critical perspective, and it structures its answer as three progressive stages—single-modality vehicle-side perception, multimodal vehicle-side fusion, and multi-agent collaborative perception—covering well over one hundred published methods and dozens of public datasets. The quantitative centerpiece is a robustness comparison: on the nuScenes-C and BEV-Robust corruption benchmarks, single-modality models such as BEVDet and BEVDepth are reported to collapse (BEVDet's mAP falls to 3.3% under noise), while multimodal fusion models such as BEVFusion and TransFusion keep mAP and NDS above 60% across corruptions. If the survey is right, the field gains a safety-oriented reference taxonomy, a dataset map graded by safety relevance, and evidence that sensor redundancy—not any single sensor—is the main defense against perception collapse in adverse conditions.

What carries the argument

Two pieces of machinery carry the argument. The first is the SafeBEV taxonomy: the bird's-eye view representation—a top-down grid in which multi-camera, LiDAR, and radar inputs are projected into one shared spatial coordinate system—plus the three-stage progression that organizes every method reviewed (single-modality, multimodal fusion, multi-agent collaboration). The taxonomy gives the survey its structure and its claim that robustness increases across stages. The second is the robustness benchmarking protocol: the nuScenes-C and BEV-Robust standardized corruption sets (camera failure, quantization, motion blur, noise, digital artifacts, weather) together with the metrics mAP, NDS, mCE, an

What would settle it

Open the original nuScenes-C and BEV-Robust result tables (references [294] and [295]) and check three numbers: BEVDet's BEV-Robust blur mAP/NDS (printed here as '11.6/20.6521.22/30.523.8/33.8'), BEVDet's noise mAP (3.3%), and BEVFormer's nuScenes-C mRR values (printed here as 52.1–67.8 while the prose says above 96%). If the original tables match what Table 6 prints, the central claim stands on its data; if they do not, the survey's headline robustness result has not been reliably reported.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper's central claim: BEV perception has evolved through three stages of safety, and robustness increases at each step. In SafeBEV 1.0 a single sensor (camera or LiDAR) builds the top-down BEV map; in SafeBEV 2.0 cameras, LiDAR, and radar are fused in that shared BEV coordinate system; in SafeBEV 3.0 BEV features are exchanged and fused across vehicles and roadside infrastructure (V2V, V2I, V2X, I2I). The survey's evidence for the stage-wise robustness gain is a benchmark comparison following the nuScenes-C and BEV-Robust corruption protocols. It reports that single-modality detectors collapse—BEVDet reaches only 3.3% mAP under noise and 11.6% under blur, with NDS below 11%—while BEVFus

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is that Table 6 and the Section 5.4.2 prose faithfully transcribe the published nuScenes-C and BEV-Robust benchmark numbers; the table's BEVDet row merges cells, and its BEVFormer mRR values sit at 52.1–67.8 while the prose says they stay above 96%, so if the transcription is wrong the survey's central robustness comparison is unsupported.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

If the robustness comparison is right, the practical route to avoiding perception collapse in bad weather, noise, or blur is to equip vehicles with complementary sensors and fuse them in BEV space—a direct argument for camera–LiDAR–radar suites over single-sensor designs.
If the taxonomy is right, any new BEV method, dataset, or open problem can be placed on a three-stage progress map that makes the remaining safety gaps visible.
The safety-relevance grading of datasets tells practitioners which benchmark exercises which failure mode (extreme weather, occlusion, sensor noise, accident scenarios), easing dataset choice beyond raw task fit.
The open challenges named in the survey delimit the near-term research agenda: open-set recognition, semi-supervised and synthetic data for multi-agent learning, corruption-aware training, uncertainty modeling, and latency-aware collaborative fusion.
The accompanying open-source repository turns the survey's organization into a working resource for reproducing method and dataset comparisons.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

The stage-wise framing suggests a monotonic robustness hierarchy (collaboration > multimodal fusion > single modality), but the paper only benchmarks vehicle-side models; running the same nuScenes-C/BEV-Robust corruptions on V2X collaborative models—with added communication latency and packet loss—would supply the missing SafeBEV 3.0 robustness evidence.
Table 6's BEVDet row merges several cells and its BEVFormer mRR values contradict the Section 5.4.2 claim, so the headline robustness figures deserve re-checking against the original [294] and [295] tables before being quoted; the qualitative claim likely survives, but specific percentages may not.
The sensor-failure formula in Section 6.3, 1-(1-p)^n, points to a design tension the survey leaves implicit: more sensors mean a higher probability that at least one input is corrupted, so the value of redundancy should be benchmarked against single-modality dropout, not just additive corruption.
A testable extension of the dataset analysis would map each of the six safety scenario families (Fig. 8) onto a concrete evaluation protocol, so that 'dataset supports extreme weather' becomes a measurable claim rather than a qualitative one.

Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Desk Editor's Note

read the letter

Here's my read. The SafeBEV 1.0/2.0/3.0 taxonomy is a genuinely useful organizing device, and I don't know of a prior survey that spans vehicle-side, roadside, V2V, V2I, and I2I in one place. The dataset tables are extensive and current, and the GitHub repository is a plus. For a subfield drowning in single-task surveys, this could become a commonly cited entry point.

But the centerpiece robustness comparison in Section 5.4 is not ready. The prose claims BEVFormer maintains mRR above 96% on nuScenes-C; the same table lists 52.1, 59.6, 61.0, and 67.8. Those two cannot both be true. The BEVDet row is also corrupted—'11.6/20.6521.22/30.523.8/33.8'—three merged cells with no separators. Since the paper's headline safety takeaway is that multimodal fusion prevents perceptual collapse while single-modality collapses, that argument rests entirely on Table 6 being a faithful transcription of nuScenes-C and BEV-Robust. Right now the reader cannot verify that. The authors need to recheck every row against the source papers and fix the table.

There is also a classification problem. BEVFormer is placed under SafeBEV 2.0 (multimodal) in Table 6, but it is a camera-only architecture. So is BEVerse. The prose then uses BEVFormer's robustness to argue for sensor redundancy, which is wrong on its face. That's not a small annotation slip; it undercuts the causal claim.

The contribution is also slightly oversold. The paper says it 'establishes' benchmarks when it actually re-tabulates existing ones, and Section 5 overlaps heavily with the authors' own earlier dataset survey (ref [8]) without disclosing the extent. Not fatal, but it needs disclosure.

Overall: the taxonomy and dataset organization are solid and the coverage is genuinely broad. The numbers need to be rechecked and the prose reconciled with the table. As it stands, I would not cite the robustness table, but I would cite the survey once corrected. Send it to peer review—it deserves referee time—but expect a major revision.

Referee Report

3 major / 4 minor

Summary. This survey reviews bird's-eye-view (BEV) perception for autonomous driving from a safety- and robustness-oriented perspective. It organizes the literature into three progressive stages — SafeBEV 1.0 (single-modality vehicle-side), SafeBEV 2.0 (multimodal vehicle-side), and SafeBEV 3.0 (multi-agent collaborative perception) — and covers representative methods, public datasets, robustness benchmarks, open challenges, and future directions. The authors also provide an open-source repository. The quantitative centerpiece is Section 5.4, where results from nuScenes-C and BEV-Robust are used to argue that single-modality perception collapses under corruption while multimodal fusion maintains high mAP/NDS.

Significance. If the survey's methodological classifications and quantitative comparisons are reliable, the paper would be a useful safety-oriented reference for the BEV perception community. Its strengths are the breadth of coverage (roughly 200 methods and 50 datasets), the explicit three-stage taxonomy, the recent references, and the accompanying open-source repository. However, the central quantitative evidence in Table 6 and Section 5.4.2 contains internal contradictions and corrupted table entries. Because the headline conclusion about the robustness advantage of multimodal fusion depends on these numbers, the manuscript is not yet trustworthy as a secondary source for benchmark results. The organizational and qualitative content is valuable; the quantitative centerpiece needs correction and verification.

major comments (3)

[Section 5.4.2 and Table 6] There is a direct internal contradiction. The text states: 'BEVFormer also performs robustly under nuScenes-C corruptions, maintaining mCE below 102% and mRR above 96%.' However, Table 6 lists BEVFormer's nuScenes-C mRR values as 59.6, 67.8, 52.1, and 61.0 — all far below 96%. The same table does show mCE values below 102%, so the prose appears to conflate mCE and mRR. This is load-bearing because the paragraph uses these numbers to support the conclusion that multimodal/temporal fusion methods are resilient. The authors must correct the prose, the table, or both and verify every entry against the original nuScenes-C [294] and BEV-Robust [295] sources.
[Table 6, BEVDet row] The BEVDet row contains a corrupted merged cell: '3.3/10.5 11.6/20.6521.22/30.523.8/33.8 29.2/37.2'. The blur, digital, and weather entries are concatenated without separators, making the row unreadable and the reported values ambiguous. This is not merely a typo: it directly affects the paper's central quantitative comparison and raises concerns about the reliability of the entire table's transcription. Please regenerate the table and add a machine-readable or clearly formatted version.
[Section 5.3 and Figure 8] The radar charts in Figure 8 purport to show dataset support for six safety-critical capabilities, and Section 5.3 uses them to draw conclusions such as 'most datasets still offer limited support for high-risk scenarios.' However, no scoring rubric, annotation protocol, or source is provided for these values. Without a defined scale or a transparent methodology, the quantitative appearance of these charts is not reproducible. Either replace them with documented categorical assessments or provide the scoring criteria and the per-dataset evidence.

minor comments (4)

[Section 2.1 vs Table 6] BEVFormer is described in Section 2 as a camera-based single-modality method, yet Table 6 categorizes it under SafeBEV 2.0 (multimodal/temporal fusion). Since the SafeBEV taxonomy is one of the paper's main contributions, this inconsistency should be clarified. The original BEVFormer is camera-only; if the authors intend to treat temporal fusion as a distinct 'modality' dimension, that criterion should be stated explicitly.
[Section 5.4.2] The sentence 'On nuScenes-C, models like BEVDet and BEVerse report mCE values exceeding 120%, with mRR declines of more than 50%' is not directly supported by Table 6 as printed. BEVDet's mCE reaches 121.8 in one setting and BEVerse reaches 121.8 in another, but the mRR values in the table are 44.8–66.7. If 'decline' is computed relative to clean performance, the definition should be given and the numbers recomputed.
[Tables 4 and 5] Several table cells are ambiguous due to compressed formatting. For example, Table 4's 'Frames/Annotation' columns show entries like '8K 15 - 15' for CamVid and '133K - 8 4' for Lane Det, with no clear indication of which number corresponds to which column. Table 5 has similar issues in the Size/Agents columns. Please add clear column headers and units.
[General] There are small typographical errors: the author email 'su11031915@163,com' uses a comma instead of a dot, and Section 5.2.1 spells 'RCooper' as 'RCooperr'. These are minor but should be fixed.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the survey's central robustness conclusion is anchored in external benchmarks; the only self-citation is non-load-bearing.

full rationale

This is a survey, not a derivation chain. The only quantitative inference in the paper—that single-modality BEV models collapse under corruption while multimodal fusion retains mAP/NDS above 60%—is explicitly drawn from two external benchmarks, nuScenes-C [294] and BEV-Robust [295] (Section 5.4, Table 6). The table's corrupted cells (e.g., BEVDet '11.6/20.6521.22/30.523.8/33.8') and the contradiction between the prose claim 'mRR above 96%' for BEVFormer and the listed 52.1–67.8 mRR values are transcription/reporting errors; they undermine factual reliability but do not make the conclusion an input to itself. The SafeBEV 1.0/2.0/3.0 framework is an organizing taxonomy imposed by the authors, not a result derived from a fitted parameter; categorizing methods into self-defined stages is definitional only in the benign sense of any survey structure. The only self-citation is ref [8] (Wang et al. 2025, overlapping authors), cited in Section 5's opening alongside two other references to support the general statement that high-quality datasets are essential for perception evaluation; the dataset tables are compiled from primary dataset papers, and the central safety-robustness conclusion does not depend on ref [8]. No load-bearing self-citation, no imported uniqueness theorem, no ansatz smuggled in via citation, and no fitted input renamed as prediction. The benchmark-number corruption flagged by the reader is a correctness risk, not circularity.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 3 assumptions · 1 invented entities

The survey does not fit parameters or postulate physical entities; its free-parameter count is zero. It does make load-bearing assumptions: (1) the three-stage taxonomy is the right organizing frame for safety (Section 1, Fig. 1); (2) the consolidated benchmark table (Table 6) accurately reflects nuScenes-C and BEV-Robust; (3) the first comprehensive safety-critical survey claim is valid relative to the cited survey landscape; and (4) Section 5's dataset catalog, drawn in large part from the authors' own prior survey (ref [8]), is accurate. The only invented entity is the SafeBEV 1.0/2.0/3.0 framework, a naming and organization device with no independent evidence. These are typical axioms for a review; they transfer the survey's credibility burden to the accuracy of its restatements.

assumptions (3)

domain assumption The three-stage progression (single-modality, multimodal, multi-agent collaborative) is the right organizing axis for safety and robustness
Stated in Section 1 and Fig. 1 as the field's evolution toward safety; nowhere derived. A survey's value depends on this frame being useful rather than merely imposed on the literature.
domain assumption Table 6 faithfully reproduces the nuScenes-C and BEV-Robust benchmark numbers
Section 5.4.2 draws its central conclusions (fusion maintains accuracy above 60%, single-modality collapses) from this table. The table contains a merged-entry formatting corruption and a prose/table contradiction on BEVFormer mRR, so the table cannot be trusted as printed without cross-checking the original benchmark sources [294], [295].
domain assumption The first comprehensive safety-critical survey claim is valid relative to the cited survey landscape
Section 1 identifies gaps in Ma et al. [96], Li et al. [23], Zhao et al. [24], and Singh et al. [14]. The first claim is only as strong as this comparison, and the authors' own prior dataset survey [8] overlaps substantially with Section 5.

invented entities (1)

SafeBEV 1.0/2.0/3.0 progressive-stage taxonomy
purpose: Organizes the survey and the historical timeline of BEV perception into three maturity stages (single-modality, multimodal, multi-agent collaboration)
A framing and branding device introduced by this paper (Section 1, Fig. 1, Fig. 2). It carries no falsifiable predictions and cannot be verified independently; its value is purely organizational.

how reviews work

0 comments

Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Progressive Bird's Eye View Perception for Safety-Critical Autonomous Driving: A Comprehensive Survey." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/HHMFGH2J

@misc{pith2026250807560,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Progressive Bird's Eye View Perception for Safety-Critical Autonomous Driving: A Comprehensive Survey},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/HHMFGH2J}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2508.07560}
}

read the original abstract

Bird's-Eye-View (BEV) perception has become a foundational paradigm in autonomous driving, enabling unified spatial representations that support robust multi-sensor fusion and multi-agent collaboration. As autonomous vehicles transition from controlled environments to real-world deployment, ensuring the safety and reliability of BEV perception in complex scenarios - such as occlusions, adverse weather, and dynamic traffic - remains a critical challenge. This survey provides the first comprehensive review of BEV perception from a safety-critical perspective, systematically analyzing state-of-the-art frameworks and implementation strategies across three progressive stages: single-modality vehicle-side, multimodal vehicle-side, and multi-agent collaborative perception. Furthermore, we examine public datasets encompassing vehicle-side, roadside, and collaborative settings, evaluating their relevance to safety and robustness. We also identify key open-world challenges - including open-set recognition, large-scale unlabeled data, sensor degradation, and inter-agent communication latency - and outline future research directions, such as integration with end-to-end autonomous driving systems, embodied intelligence, and large language models.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

300 extracted references · 35 canonical work pages

[8]

arXiv preprint arXiv:2504.12696 (2025)

Wang, N., Shang, D., Gong, Y., Hu, X., Song, Z., Yang, L., Huang, Y., Wang, X., Lu, J.: Collaborative perception datasets for autonomous driving: A review. arXiv preprint arXiv:2504.12696 (2025)

arXiv 2025
[294]

IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence (2025)

Xie, S., Kong, L., Zhang, W., Ren, J., Pan, L., Chen, K., Liu, Z.: Benchmarking and improving bird’s eye view perception robustness in autonomous driving. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence (2025)

work page 2025
[295]

In: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pp

Zhu, Z., Zhang, Y., Chen, H., Dong, Y., Zhao, S., Ding, W., Zhong, J., Zheng, S.: Under- standing the robustness of 3d object detection with bird’s-eye-view representations in 61 autonomous driving. In: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pp. 21600–21610 (2023)

work page 2023
[1]

IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems for Video Technology34(7), 5753–5764 (2024)

Wang, J., Li, F., An, Y., Zhang, X., Sun, H.: Toward robust lidar-camera fusion in bev space via mutual deformable attention and temporal aggregation. IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems for Video Technology34(7), 5753–5764 (2024)

2024
[2]

IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems for Video Technology34(4), 2619–2632 (2023)

Song, Z., Jia, C., Yang, L., Wei, H., Liu, L.: Graphalign++: An accurate feature align- ment by graph matching for multi-modal 3d object detection. IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems for Video Technology34(4), 2619–2632 (2023)

2023
[3]

IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Vehicles (2024)

Gong, Y., Jiang, X., Wang, L., Xu, L., Lu, J., Liu, H., Lin, L., Zhang, X.: Tclanenet: Task- conditioned lane detection network driven by vibration information. IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Vehicles (2024)

2024
[4]

IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Vehicles 9(2), 4025–4039 (2023)

Zhang, X., Gong, Y., Lu, J., Li, Z., Li, S., Wang, S., Liu, W., Wang, L., Li, J.: Oblique convolution: A novel convolution idea for redefining lane detection. IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Vehicles 9(2), 4025–4039 (2023)

2023
[5]

Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence 129, 107575 (2024)

Liu, W., Gong, Y., Zhang, G., Lu, J., Zhou, Y., Liao, J.: Glmdrivenet: Global–local multimodal fusion driving behavior classification network. Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence 129, 107575 (2024)

2024

Show all 300 references

[6]

In: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pp

Sun, P., Kretzschmar, H., Dotiwalla, X., Chouard, A., Patnaik, V., Tsui, P., Guo, J., Zhou, Y., Chai, Y., Caine, B.,et al.: Scalability in perception for autonomous driving: Waymo open dataset. In: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recogniti...

2020
[7]

IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks and Learning Systems 32(8), 3412–3432 (2020)

Li, Y., Ma, L., Zhong, Z., Liu, F., Chapman, M.A., Cao, D., Li, J.: Deep learning for lidar point clouds in autonomous driving: A review. IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks and Learning Systems 32(8), 3412–3432 (2020)

2020
[9]

In: 2020 IEEE 16th International Conference 36 on Intelligent Computer Communication and Processing (ICCP), pp

Velasco-Hernandez, G., Barry, J., Walsh, J., et al.: Autonomous driving architectures, perception and data fusion: A review. In: 2020 IEEE 16th International Conference 36 on Intelligent Computer Communication and Processing (ICCP), pp. 315–321 (2020). IEEE

2020
[10]

IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Vehicles8(6), 3605–3619 (2023)

Zhang, X., Gong, Y., Lu, J., Wu, J., Li, Z., Jin, D., Li, J.: Multi-modal fusion technology based on vehicle information: A survey. IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Vehicles8(6), 3605–3619 (2023)

2023
[11]

arXiv preprint arXiv:2401.03907 (2024)

Song, Z., Zhang, G., Liu, L., Yang, L., Xu, S., Jia, C., Jia, F., Wang, L.: Robo- fusion: Towards robust multi-modal 3d obiect detection via sam. arXiv preprint arXiv:2401.03907 (2024)

2024 arXiv
[12]

IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems for Video Technology (2024)

Lu, Z., Cao, B., Hu, Q.: Lidar-camera continuous fusion in voxelized grid for semantic scene completion. IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems for Video Technology (2024)

2024
[13]

2023 IEEE 26th International Conference on Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITSC), 5292–5299 (2023) https://doi.org/10.1109/ITSC57777.2023.10421963

Xiang, C., Xie, X., Feng, C., Bai, Z., Niu, Z., Yang, M.: V2I-BEVF: Multi-modal Fusion Based on BEV Representation for Vehicle-Infrastructure Perception. 2023 IEEE 26th International Conference on Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITSC), 5292–5299 (2023) https://doi.org/10.1...

2023
[14]

In: 2023 IEEE Intelligent Vehicles Symposium (IV), pp

Singh, A.: Vision-radar fusion for robotics bev detections: A survey. In: 2023 IEEE Intelligent Vehicles Symposium (IV), pp. 1–7 (2023). IEEE

2023
[15]

IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems 24(12), 14121–14132 (2023)

Li, R., Dong, Y.: Robust lane detection through self pre-training with masked sequen- tial autoencoders and fine-tuning with customized polyloss. IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems 24(12), 14121–14132 (2023)

2023
[16]

IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems (2024)

Gong, Y., Zhang, X., Lu, J., Jiang, X., Wang, Z., Liu, H., Li, Z., Wang, L., Yang, Q., Wu, X.: Steering angle-guided multimodal fusion lane detection for autonomous driving. IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems (2024)

2024
[17]

In: 2023 IEEE 26th International Conference on Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITSC), pp

Zhao, Z., Li, Y., Chen, Y., Zhang, X., Tian, R.: A spatial alignment framework using geolocation cues for roadside multi-view multi-sensor fusion. In: 2023 IEEE 26th International Conference on Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITSC), pp. 3633–3640 (2023). IEEE

2023
[18]

Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 34, 29541–29552 (2021)

Li, Y., Ren, S., Wu, P., Chen, S., Feng, C., Zhang, W.: Learning distilled collaboration graph for multi-agent perception. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 34, 29541–29552 (2021)

2021
[19]

In: Computer Vision–ECCV 2020: 16th European Conference, Glasgow, UK, August 23–28, 2020, Proceedings, Part II 16, pp

Wang, T.-H., Manivasagam, S., Liang, M., Yang, B., Zeng, W., Urtasun, R.: V2vnet: Vehicle-to-vehicle communication for joint perception and prediction. In: Computer Vision–ECCV 2020: 16th European Conference, Glasgow, UK, August 23–28, 2020, Proceedings, Part II 16, pp. 605–62...

2020
[20]

Journal of Dynamic 37 Systems, Measurement, and Control 143(7), 071002 (2021)

Viana, I.B., Kanchwala, H., Ahiska, K., Aouf, N.: A comparison of trajectory plan- ning and control frameworks for cooperative autonomous driving. Journal of Dynamic 37 Systems, Measurement, and Control 143(7), 071002 (2021)

2021
[21]

In: European Conference on Computer Vision, pp

Song, Z., Yang, L., Xu, S., Liu, L., Xu, D., Jia, C., Jia, F., Wang, L.: Graphbev: Towards robust bev feature alignment for multi-modal 3d object detection. In: European Conference on Computer Vision, pp. 347–366 (2025). Springer

2025
[22]

In: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pp

Man, Y., Gui, L.-Y., Wang, Y.-X.: Bev-guided multi-modality fusion for driving per- ception. In: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pp. 21960–21969 (2023)

2023
[23]

IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence 46(4), 2151–2170 (2023)

Li, H., Sima, C., Dai, J., Wang, W., Lu, L., Wang, H., Zeng, J., Li, Z., Yang, J., Deng, H., et al.: Delving into the devils of bird’s-eye-view perception: A review, evaluation and recipe. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence 46(4), 2151–2170 (2023)

2023
[24]

Expert Systems with Applications 258, 125103 (2024)

Zhao, J., Shi, J., Zhuo, L.: Bev perception for autonomous driving: State of the art and future perspectives. Expert Systems with Applications 258, 125103 (2024)

2024
[25]

IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems 22(3), 1341–1360 (2020)

Feng, D., Haase-Sch¨ utz, C., Rosenbaum, L., Hertlein, H., Glaeser, C., Timm, F., Wies- beck, W., Dietmayer, K.: Deep multi-modal object detection and semantic segmentation for autonomous driving: Datasets, methods, and challenges. IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportati...

2020
[26]

arXiv preprint arXiv:2207.02202 (2022)

Xu, R., Tu, Z., Xiang, H., Shao, W., Zhou, B., Ma, J.: Cobevt: Cooperative bird’s eye view semantic segmentation with sparse transformers. arXiv preprint arXiv:2207.02202 (2022)

2022 arXiv
[27]

In: 2023 IEEE 26th International Conference on Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITSC), pp

Xiang, C., Xie, X., Feng, C., Bai, Z., Niu, Z., Yang, M.: V2i-bevf: Multi-modal fusion based on bev representation for vehicle-infrastructure perception. In: 2023 IEEE 26th International Conference on Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITSC), pp. 5292–5299 (2023). IEEE

2023
[28]

arXiv preprint arXiv:2310.06008 (2023)

Qiao, D., Zulkernine, F.: Cobevfusion: Cooperative perception with lidar-camera bird’s- eye view fusion. arXiv preprint arXiv:2310.06008 (2023)

2023 arXiv
[29]

Transportation Research Record 2679(5), 319–334 (2025)

Dong, Y., Zhang, L., Farah, H., Zgonnikov, A., Arem, B.: Data-driven semi-supervised machine learning with safety indicators for abnormal driving behavior detection. Transportation Research Record 2679(5), 319–334 (2025)

2025
[30]

In: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pp

Yang, L., Yu, K., Tang, T., Li, J., Yuan, K., Wang, L., Zhang, X., Chen, P.: Bevheight: A robust framework for vision-based roadside 3d object detection. In: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pp. 21611–21620 (2023)

2023
[31]

In: 2023 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA), pp

Zou, J., Zhu, Z., Huang, J., Yang, T., Huang, G., Wang, X.: Hft: Lifting perspective representations via hybrid feature transformation for bev perception. In: 2023 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA), pp. 7046–7053 (2023). 38 IEEE

2023
[32]

In: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pp

Wang, Y., Chao, W.-L., Garg, D., Hariharan, B., Campbell, M., Weinberger, K.Q.: Pseudo-lidar from visual depth estimation: Bridging the gap in 3d object detection for autonomous driving. In: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pp....

2019
[33]

IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence (2024)

Li, Z., Wang, W., Li, H., Xie, E., Sima, C., Lu, T., Yu, Q., Dai, J.: Bevformer: learn- ing bird’s-eye-view representation from lidar-camera via spatiotemporal transformers. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence (2024)

2024
[34]

In: 2024 International Conference on 3D Vision (3DV), pp

Sautier, C., Puy, G., Boulch, A., Marlet, R., Lepetit, V.: Bevcontrast: Self-supervision in bev space for automotive lidar point clouds. In: 2024 International Conference on 3D Vision (3DV), pp. 559–568 (2024). IEEE

2024
[35]

In: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pp

Shi, S., Wang, X., Li, H.: Pointrcnn: 3d object proposal generation and detection from point cloud. In: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pp. 770–779 (2019)

2019
[36]

In: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pp

Lang, A.H., Vora, S., Caesar, H., Zhou, L., Yang, J., Beijbom, O.: Pointpillars: Fast encoders for object detection from point clouds. In: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pp. 12697–12705 (2019)

2019
[37]

arXiv preprint arXiv:2411.08402 (2024)

Huang, X., Wang, J., Xia, Q., Chen, S., Yang, B., Wang, C., Wen, C.: V2x-r: Cooperative lidar-4d radar fusion for 3d object detection with denoising diffusion. arXiv preprint arXiv:2411.08402 (2024)

2024 arXiv
[38]

IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters 5(2), 1263–1270 (2020)

Palffy, A., Dong, J., Kooij, J.F., Gavrila, D.M.: Cnn based road user detection using the 3d radar cube. IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters 5(2), 1263–1270 (2020)

2020
[39]

In: 2022 IEEE 25th International Conference on Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITSC), pp

Zheng, L., Ma, Z., Zhu, X., Tan, B., Li, S., Long, K., Sun, W., Chen, S., Zhang, L., Wan, M., et al.: Tj4dradset: A 4d radar dataset for autonomous driving. In: 2022 IEEE 25th International Conference on Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITSC), pp. 493–498 (2022). IEEE

2022
[40]

arXiv preprint arXiv:2306.00349 (2023)

Sun, J., Zheng, H., Zhang, Q., Prakash, A., Mao, Z.M., Xiao, C.: Calico: Self- supervised camera-lidar contrastive pre-training for bev perception. arXiv preprint arXiv:2306.00349 (2023)

2023 arXiv
[41]

arXiv preprint arXiv:2203.17054 (2022)

Huang, J., Huang, G.: Bevdet4d: Exploit temporal cues in multi-camera 3d object detection. arXiv preprint arXiv:2203.17054 (2022)

2022 arXiv
[42]

Authorea Preprints

Li, H., Zhao, Y., Zhong, J., Wang, B., Sun, C., Sun, F.: Delving into the secrets of bev 3d object detection in autonomous driving: A comprehensive survey. Authorea Preprints
[43]

39 IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence (2024)

Li, Y., Huang, B., Chen, Z., Cui, Y., Liang, F., Shen, M., Liu, F., Xie, E., Sheng, L., Ouyang, W., et al.: Fast-bev: A fast and strong bird’s-eye view perception baseline. 39 IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence (2024)

2024
[44]

IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Vehicles8(11), 4498–4514 (2023)

Chang, C., Zhang, J., Zhang, K., Zhong, W., Peng, X., Li, S., Li, L.: Bev-v2x: Cooper- ative birds-eye-view fusion and grid occupancy prediction via v2x-based data sharing. IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Vehicles8(11), 4498–4514 (2023)

2023
[45]

IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Vehicles (2024)

Wang, P., Zhu, M., Zheng, X., Lu, H., Zhong, H., Chen, X., Shen, S., Wang, X., Wang, Y., Wang, F.-Y.: Bevgpt: Generative pre-trained foundation model for autonomous driving prediction, decision-making, and planning. IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Vehicles (2024)

2024
[46]

arXiv preprint arXiv:2409.17659 (2024)

Lu, S., He, L., Li, S.E., Luo, Y., Wang, J., Li, K.: Hierarchical end-to-end autonomous driving: Integrating bev perception with deep reinforcement learning. arXiv preprint arXiv:2409.17659 (2024)

2024 arXiv
[47]

IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters (2024)

Jiang, J., Yang, Y., Deng, Y., Ma, C., Zhang, J.: Bevnav: Robot autonomous naviga- tion via spatial-temporal contrastive learning in bird’s-eye view. IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters (2024)

2024
[48]

arXiv preprint arXiv:2501.11260 (2025)

Feng, T., Wang, W., Yang, Y.: A survey of world models for autonomous driving. arXiv preprint arXiv:2501.11260 (2025)

2025 arXiv
[49]

arXiv preprint arXiv:2112.11790 (2021)

Huang, J., Huang, G., Zhu, Z., Ye, Y., Du, D.: Bevdet: High-performance multi-camera 3d object detection in bird-eye-view. arXiv preprint arXiv:2112.11790 (2021)

2021 arXiv
[50]

In: 2024 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS), pp

Sun, R., Fu, M., Liang, H., Zhu, C., Dong, Z., Yang, Y.: Robust multi-camera bev perception: An image-perceptive approach to counter imprecise camera calibration. In: 2024 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS), pp. 5002–5008 (2024). IEEE

2024
[51]

In: European Conference on Computer Vision, pp

Liu, C., Zhu, M., Ma, C.: H-v2x: A large scale highway dataset for bev perception. In: European Conference on Computer Vision, pp. 139–157 (2024). Springer

2024
[52]

Image and vision computing 16(8), 585–590 (1998)

Bertozz, M., Broggi, A., Fascioli, A.: Stereo inverse perspective mapping: theory and applications. Image and vision computing 16(8), 585–590 (1998)

1998
[53]

Applied Intelligence 53(19), 22117–22131 (2023)

Gong, Y., Wang, L., Xu, L.: A feature aggregation network for multispectral pedestrian detection. Applied Intelligence 53(19), 22117–22131 (2023)

2023
[54]

Automotive Innovation, 1–17 (2025)

Gong, Y., Zhang, X., Liu, H., Jiang, X., Li, Z., Gao, X., Lin, L., Jin, D., Li, J., Liu, H.: Skipcrossnets: Adaptive skip-cross fusion for road detection. Automotive Innovation, 1–17 (2025)

2025
[55]

In: Computer Vision–ECCV 2020: 16th European Conference, Glasgow, UK, August 23–28, 2020, Proceedings, Part XIV 16, pp

Philion, J., Fidler, S.: Lift, splat, shoot: Encoding images from arbitrary camera rigs by implicitly unprojecting to 3d. In: Computer Vision–ECCV 2020: 16th European Conference, Glasgow, UK, August 23–28, 2020, Proceedings, Part XIV 16, pp. 194–210 (2020). Springer 40

2020
[56]

In: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision, pp

Hu, A., Murez, Z., Mohan, N., Dudas, S., Hawke, J., Badrinarayanan, V., Cipolla, R., Kendall, A.: Fiery: Future instance prediction in bird’s-eye view from surround monocular cameras. In: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision, pp. 15273–15282 (2021)

2021
[57]

In: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pp

Roddick, T., Cipolla, R.: Predicting semantic map representations from images using pyramid occupancy networks. In: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pp. 11138–11147 (2020)

2020
[58]

In: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pp

Yang, W., Li, Q., Liu, W., Yu, Y., Ma, Y., He, S., Pan, J.: Projecting your view attentively: Monocular road scene layout estimation via cross-view transformation. In: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pp. 15536– 15545 (2021)

2021
[59]

In: 2022 International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA), pp

Saha, A., Mendez, O., Russell, C., Bowden, R.: Translating images into maps. In: 2022 International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA), pp. 9200–9206 (2022). IEEE

2022
[60]

In: Proceedings of the 30th ACM International Conference on Multimedia, pp

Chen, Z., Li, Z., Zhang, S., Fang, L., Jiang, Q., Zhao, F.: Graph-detr3d: rethinking overlapping regions for multi-view 3d object detection. In: Proceedings of the 30th ACM International Conference on Multimedia, pp. 5999–6008 (2022)

2022
[61]

In: European Conference on Computer Vision, pp

Liu, Y., Wang, T., Zhang, X., Sun, J.: Petr: Position embedding transformation for multi- view 3d object detection. In: European Conference on Computer Vision, pp. 531–548 (2022). Springer

2022
[62]

In: Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, vol

Li, Y., Ge, Z., Yu, G., Yang, J., Wang, Z., Shi, Y., Sun, J., Li, Z.: Bevdepth: Acquisition of reliable depth for multi-view 3d object detection. In: Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, vol. 37, pp. 1477–1485 (2023)

2023
[63]

arXiv preprint arXiv:2302.02367 (2023)

Zhou, S., Tian, Z., Chu, X., Zhang, X., Zhang, B., Lu, X., Feng, C., Jie, Z., Chiang, P.Y., Ma, L.: Fastpillars: a deployment-friendly pillar-based 3d detector. arXiv preprint arXiv:2302.02367 (2023)

2023 arXiv
[64]

In: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pp

Zhang, G., Chen, J., Gao, G., Li, J., Liu, S., Hu, X.: Safdnet: A simple and effective net- work for fully sparse 3d object detection. In: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pp. 14477–14486 (2024)

2024
[65]

In: Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, vol

Qiu, S., Li, X., Xue, X., Pu, J.: Pc-bev: An efficient polar-cartesian bev fusion framework for lidar semantic segmentation. In: Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, vol. 39, pp. 6612–6620 (2025)

2025
[66]

In: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pp

Shi, S., Guo, C., Jiang, L., Wang, Z., Shi, J., Wang, X., Li, H.: Pv-rcnn: Point-voxel fea- ture set abstraction for 3d object detection. In: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pp. 10529–10538 (2020)

2020
[67]

In: Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pp

Qi, C.R., Su, H., Mo, K., Guibas, L.J.: Pointnet: Deep learning on point sets for 3d 41 classification and segmentation. In: Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pp. 652–660 (2017)

2017
[68]

Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence 133, 108550 (2024)

Thakur, A., Mishra, S.K.: An in-depth evaluation of deep learning-enabled adaptive approaches for detecting obstacles using sensor-fused data in autonomous vehicles. Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence 133, 108550 (2024)

2024
[69]

In: Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, vol

Kim, Y., Kim, S., Choi, J.W., Kum, D.: Craft: Camera-radar 3d object detection with spatio-contextual fusion transformer. In: Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, vol. 37, pp. 1160–1168 (2023)

2023
[70]

IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Vehicles 9(1), 1524–1536 (2023)

Yu, Z., Wan, W., Ren, M., Zheng, X., Fang, Z.: Sparsefusion3d: Sparse sensor fusion for 3d object detection by radar and camera in environmental perception. IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Vehicles 9(1), 1524–1536 (2023)

2023
[71]

In: 2024 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS), pp

Schramm, J., V¨odisch, N., Petek, K., Kiran, B.R., Yogamani, S., Burgard, W., Valada, A.: Bevcar: Camera-radar fusion for bev map and object segmentation. In: 2024 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS), pp. 1435–1442 (2024). IEEE

2024
[72]

In: 2023 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA), pp

Liu, Z., Tang, H., Amini, A., Yang, X., Mao, H., Rus, D.L., Han, S.: Bevfusion: Multi- task multi-sensor fusion with unified bird’s-eye view representation. In: 2023 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA), pp. 2774–2781 (2023). IEEE

2023
[73]

Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 35, 10421–10434 (2022)

Liang, T., Xie, H., Yu, K., Xia, Z., Lin, Z., Wang, Y., Tang, T., Wang, B., Tang, Z.: Bevfusion: A simple and robust lidar-camera fusion framework. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 35, 10421–10434 (2022)

2022
[74]

arXiv preprint arXiv:2309.05257 (2023)

Hu, C., Zheng, H., Li, K., Xu, J., Mao, W., Luo, M., Wang, L., Chen, M., Peng, Q., Liu, K., et al.: Fusionformer: A multi-sensory fusion in bird’s-eye-view and temporal consistent transformer for 3d object detection. arXiv preprint arXiv:2309.05257 (2023)

2023 arXiv
[75]

In: European Conference on Computer Vision, pp

Yang, B., Guo, R., Liang, M., Casas, S., Urtasun, R.: Radarnet: Exploiting radar for robust perception of dynamic objects. In: European Conference on Computer Vision, pp. 496–512 (2020). Springer

2020
[76]

In: 2022 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS), pp

Wang, L., Zhang, X., Xv, B., Zhang, J., Fu, R., Wang, X., Zhu, L., Ren, H., Lu, P., Li, J., et al.: Interfusion: Interaction-based 4d radar and lidar fusion for 3d object detection. In: 2022 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS), pp. 12247–...

2022
[77]

In: 2022 ACM/IEEE 13th International Conference on Cyber-Physical Systems (ICCPS), pp

Malawade, A.V., Mortlock, T., Al Faruque, M.A.: Hydrafusion: Context-aware selec- tive sensor fusion for robust and efficient autonomous vehicle perception. In: 2022 ACM/IEEE 13th International Conference on Cyber-Physical Systems (ICCPS), pp. 68–79 (2022). IEEE 42

2022
[78]

In: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pp

Chen, X., Zhang, T., Wang, Y., Wang, Y., Zhao, H.: Futr3d: A unified sensor fusion framework for 3d detection. In: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pp. 172–181 (2023)

2023
[79]

In: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pp

Wu, P., Chen, S., Metaxas, D.N.: Motionnet: Joint perception and motion prediction for autonomous driving based on bird’s eye view maps. In: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pp. 11385–11395 (2020)

2020
[80]

arXiv preprint arXiv:2205.09743 (2022)

Zhang, Y., Zhu, Z., Zheng, W., Huang, J., Huang, G., Zhou, J., Lu, J.: Beverse: Unified perception and prediction in birds-eye-view for vision-centric autonomous driving. arXiv preprint arXiv:2205.09743 (2022)

2022 arXiv
[81]

In: 2023 IEEE 26th International Conference on Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITSC), pp

Li, Y., Han, Q., Yu, M., Jiang, Y., Yeo, C.K., Li, Y., Huang, Z., Liu, N., Chen, H., Wu, X.: Towards efficient 3d object detection in bird’s-eye-space for autonomous driv- ing: A convolutional-only approach. In: 2023 IEEE 26th International Conference on Intelligent Transporta...

2023
[82]

World Electric Vehicle Journal 15(1), 20 (2024)

Alaba, S.Y., Gurbuz, A.C., Ball, J.E.: Emerging trends in autonomous vehicle percep- tion: Multimodal fusion for 3d object detection. World Electric Vehicle Journal 15(1), 20 (2024)

2024
[83]

PhD thesis, University of Glasgow (2025)

Yu, T.: Samfusion3d: Self-adaptive multi-modality fusion for 3d object detection in autonomous driving. PhD thesis, University of Glasgow (2025)

2025
[84]

IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Vehicles 9(1), 79–92 (2023)

Xiong, W., Liu, J., Huang, T., Han, Q.-L., Xia, Y., Zhu, B.: Lxl: Lidar excluded lean 3d object detection with 4d imaging radar and camera fusion. IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Vehicles 9(1), 79–92 (2023)

2023
[85]

In: 2024 IEEE Intelligent Vehicles Symposium (IV), pp

Zhang, C., Tian, B., Meng, S., Qi, S., Sun, Y., Ai, Y., Chen, L.: V2x-bgn: Camera-based v2x-collaborative 3d object detection with bev global non-maximum suppression. In: 2024 IEEE Intelligent Vehicles Symposium (IV), pp. 602–607 (2024). IEEE

2024
[86]

In: 2024 IEEE Intelligent Vehicles Symposium (IV), pp

Liu, X., Li, B., Xu, R., Ma, J., Li, X., Li, J., Yu, H.: V2x-dsi: A density-sensitive infras- tructure lidar benchmark for economic vehicle-to-everything cooperative perception. In: 2024 IEEE Intelligent Vehicles Symposium (IV), pp. 490–495 (2024). IEEE

2024
[87]

IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems 25(2), 2153–2166 (2024) https://doi.org/10.1109/TITS.2023.3314919

Yin, H., Tian, D., Lin, C., Duan, X., Zhou, J., Zhao, D., Cao, D.: V2VFormer++: Multi-Modal Vehicle-to-Vehicle Cooperative Perception via Global-Local Transformer. IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems 25(2), 2153–2166 (2024) https://doi.org/10.1109/TITS.2023.3314919

2024
[88]

arXiv (2020)

Wang, T.-H., Manivasagam, S., Liang, M., Yang, B., Zeng, W., Tu, J., Urtasun, R.: V2VNet: Vehicle-to-Vehicle Communication for Joint Perception and Prediction. arXiv (2020). https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2008.07519

2020 doi arXiv
[89]

In: 2023 IEEE 29th International Conference on Parallel 43 and Distributed Systems (ICPADS), pp

Shi, S., Zhang, C., Lv, A., He, S.: Mcot: Multi-modal vehicle-to-vehicle cooperative perception with transformers. In: 2023 IEEE 29th International Conference on Parallel 43 and Distributed Systems (ICPADS), pp. 1612–1619 (2023). IEEE

2023
[90]

arXiv (2023)

Yu, H., Tang, Y., Xie, E., Mao, J., Yuan, J., Luo, P., Nie, Z.: Vehicle-Infrastructure Cooperative 3D Object Detection via Feature Flow Prediction. arXiv (2023). https: //doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2303.10552

2023 doi arXiv
[91]

arXiv (2024)

R ¨oßle, D., Gerner, J., Bogenberger, K., Cremers, D., Schmidtner, S., Sch¨on, T.: Unlock- ing Past Information: Temporal Embeddings in Cooperative Bird’s Eye View Prediction. arXiv (2024). https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2401.14325

2024 doi
[92]

Sensors 24(13), 4101 (2024)

Li, B., Zhao, Y., Tan, H.: Coformernet: A transformer-based fusion approach for enhanced vehicle-infrastructure cooperative perception. Sensors 24(13), 4101 (2024)

2024
[93]

Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 36, 28462–28477 (2023)

Wei, S., Wei, Y., Hu, Y., Lu, Y., Zhong, Y., Chen, S., Zhang, Y.: Asynchrony-robust collaborative perception via bird’s eye view flow. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 36, 28462–28477 (2023)

2023
[94]

IEEE Intelligent Transportation Systems Magazine (2023)

Han, Y., Zhang, H., Li, H., Jin, Y., Lang, C., Li, Y.: Collaborative percep- tion in autonomous driving: Methods, datasets, and challenges. IEEE Intelligent Transportation Systems Magazine (2023)

2023
[95]

IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems (2024)

Bai, Z., Wu, G., Barth, M.J., Liu, Y., Sisbot, E.A., Oguchi, K., Huang, Z.: A survey and framework of cooperative perception: From heterogeneous singleton to hierarchical cooperation. IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems (2024)

2024
[96]

IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence (2024)

Ma, Y., Wang, T., Bai, X., Yang, H., Hou, Y., Wang, Y., Qiao, Y., Yang, R., Zhu, X.: Vision-centric bev perception: A survey. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence (2024)

2024
[97]

IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems for Video Technology 33(8), 3962–3975 (2023)

Tao, C., Cao, J., Wang, C., Zhang, Z., Gao, Z.: Pseudo-mono for monocular 3d object detection in autonomous driving. IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems for Video Technology 33(8), 3962–3975 (2023)

2023
[98]

arXiv preprint arXiv:1906.06310 (2019)

You, Y., Wang, Y., Chao, W.-L., Garg, D., Pleiss, G., Hariharan, B., Campbell, M., Wein- berger, K.Q.: Pseudo-lidar++: Accurate depth for 3d object detection in autonomous driving. arXiv preprint arXiv:1906.06310 (2019)

1906 arXiv
[99]

arXiv preprint arXiv:2504.01957 (2025)

Lu, S.-W., Tsai, Y.-H., Chen, Y.-T.: Gaussianlss–toward real-world bev perception: Depth uncertainty estimation via gaussian splatting. arXiv preprint arXiv:2504.01957 (2025)

2025 arXiv
[100]

In: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision, pp

Ma, X., Wang, Z., Li, H., Zhang, P., Ouyang, W., Fan, X.: Accurate monocular 3d object detection via color-embedded 3d reconstruction for autonomous driving. In: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision, pp. 6851– 6860 (2019) 44

2019
[101]

3225–3233 (2021)

Simonelli, A., Bulo, S.R., Porzi, L., Kontschieder, P., Ricci, E.: Are we missing confi- dence in pseudo-lidar methods for monocular 3d object detection? In: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision, pp. 3225–3233 (2021)

2021
[102]

arXiv preprint arXiv:1811.08188 (2018)

Roddick, T., Kendall, A., Cipolla, R.: Orthographic feature transform for monocular 3d object detection. arXiv preprint arXiv:1811.08188 (2018)

2018 arXiv
[103]

In: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pp

Reading, C., Harakeh, A., Chae, J., Waslander, S.L.: Categorical depth distribution net- work for monocular 3d object detection. In: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pp. 8555–8564 (2021)

2021
[104]

Biological cybernetics 64(3), 177–185 (1991)

Mallot, H.A., B¨ ulthoff, H.H., Little, J.J., Bohrer, S.: Inverse perspective mapping sim- plifies optical flow computation and obstacle detection. Biological cybernetics 64(3), 177–185 (1991)

1991
[105]

In: 2019 IEEE Intelligent Vehicles Symposium (IV), pp

Kim, Y., Kum, D.: Deep learning based vehicle position and orientation estimation via inverse perspective mapping image. In: 2019 IEEE Intelligent Vehicles Symposium (IV), pp. 317–323 (2019). IEEE

2019
[106]

arXiv preprint arXiv:2210.06006 (2022)

Wang, R., Qin, J., Li, K., Li, Y., Cao, D., Xu, J.: Bev-lanedet: A simple and effective 3d lane detection baseline. arXiv preprint arXiv:2210.06006 (2022)

2022 arXiv
[107]

In: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision, pp

Can, Y.B., Liniger, A., Paudel, D.P., Van Gool, L.: Structured bird’s-eye-view traf- fic scene understanding from onboard images. In: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision, pp. 15661–15670 (2021)

2021
[108]

IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters 7(2), 1968–1975 (2022)

Gosala, N., Valada, A.: Bird’s-eye-view panoptic segmentation using monocular frontal view images. IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters 7(2), 1968–1975 (2022)

1968
[109]

Neurocomputing 422, 129–138 (2021)

Zhang, C., Liao, K., Lin, C., Zhao, Y.: Pseudo-lidar point cloud magnification. Neurocomputing 422, 129–138 (2021)

2021
[110]

In: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pp

Qian, R., Garg, D., Wang, Y., You, Y., Belongie, S., Hariharan, B., Campbell, M., Weinberger, K.Q., Chao, W.-L.: End-to-end pseudo-lidar for image-based 3d object detection. In: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pp. 5881–5890 (2020)

2020
[111]

Meng, H., Li, C., Chen, G., Knoll, A.: Accurate and real-time pseudo lidar detection: Is stereo neural network really necessary? arXiv preprint arXiv:2206.13858 (2022)

2022 arXiv
[112]

In: 2022 IEEE 25th International Conference on Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITSC), pp

Li, C., Meng, H., Chen, G., Chen, L.: Real-time pseudo-lidar 3d object detection with geometric constraints. In: 2022 IEEE 25th International Conference on Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITSC), pp. 3298–3303 (2022). IEEE

2022
[113]

In: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision, pp

Zhou, H., Ge, Z., Li, Z., Zhang, X.: Matrixvt: Efficient multi-camera to bev transfor- mation for 3d perception. In: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision, pp. 8548–8557 (2023) 45

2023
[114]

In: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision, pp

Chitta, K., Prakash, A., Geiger, A.: Neat: Neural attention fields for end-to-end autonomous driving. In: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision, pp. 15793–15803 (2021)

2021
[115]

IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters5(3), 4867–4873 (2020)

Pan, B., Sun, J., Leung, H.Y.T., Andonian, A., Zhou, B.: Cross-view semantic segmenta- tion for sensing surroundings. IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters5(3), 4867–4873 (2020)

2020
[116]

In: Conference on Robot Learning, pp

Bartoccioni, F., Zablocki, ´E., Bursuc, A., P´erez, P., Cord, M., Alahari, K.: Lara: Latents and rays for multi-camera bird’s-eye-view semantic segmentation. In: Conference on Robot Learning, pp. 1663–1672 (2023). PMLR

2023
[117]

In: Conference on Robot Learning, pp

Wang, Y., Guizilini, V.C., Zhang, T., Wang, Y., Zhao, H., Solomon, J.: Detr3d: 3d object detection from multi-view images via 3d-to-2d queries. In: Conference on Robot Learning, pp. 180–191 (2022). PMLR

2022
[118]

In: Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, vol

Jiang, Y., Zhang, L., Miao, Z., Zhu, X., Gao, J., Hu, W., Jiang, Y.-G.: Polarformer: Multi-camera 3d object detection with polar transformer. In: Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, vol. 37, pp. 1042–1050 (2023)

2023
[119]

arXiv preprint arXiv:2206.10965 (2022)

Chen, S., Wang, X., Cheng, T., Zhang, Q., Huang, C., Liu, W.: Polar parametrization for vision-based surround-view 3d detection. arXiv preprint arXiv:2206.10965 (2022)

2022 arXiv
[120]

In: European Conference on Computer Vision, pp

Lu, J., Zhou, Z., Zhu, X., Xu, H., Zhang, L.: Learning ego 3d representation as ray tracing. In: European Conference on Computer Vision, pp. 129–144 (2022). Springer

2022
[121]

In: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision, pp

Zhang, J., Zhang, Y., Liu, Q., Wang, Y.: Sa-bev: Generating semantic-aware bird’s- eye-view feature for multi-view 3d object detection. In: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision, pp. 3348–3357 (2023)

2023
[122]

In: Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, vol

Jiang, X., Li, S., Liu, Y., Wang, S., Jia, F., Wang, T., Han, L., Zhang, X.: Far3d: Expanding the horizon for surround-view 3d object detection. In: Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, vol. 38, pp. 2561–2569 (2024)

2024
[123]

In: European Conference on Computer Vision, pp

Li, P., Shen, W., Huang, Q., Cui, D.: Dualbev: Unifying dual view transformation with probabilistic correspondences. In: European Conference on Computer Vision, pp. 286–302 (2024). Springer

2024
[124]

In: European Conference on Computer Vision, pp

Jiang, K., Huang, J., Xie, W., Lei, J., Li, Y., Shao, L., Lu, S.: Da-bev: Unsuper- vised domain adaptation for bird’s eye view perception. In: European Conference on Computer Vision, pp. 322–341 (2024). Springer

2024
[125]

In: 2025 IEEE/CVF Winter Conference on Applications of Computer Vision (WACV), pp

Chabot, F., Granger, N., Lapouge, G.: Gaussianbev: 3d gaussian representation meets perception models for bev segmentation. In: 2025 IEEE/CVF Winter Conference on Applications of Computer Vision (WACV), pp. 2250–2259 (2025). IEEE

2025
[126]

In: Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, vol

Deng, J., Shi, S., Li, P., Zhou, W., Zhang, Y., Li, H.: Voxel r-cnn: Towards high 46 performance voxel-based 3d object detection. In: Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, vol. 35, pp. 1201–1209 (2021)

2021
[127]

In: Pro- ceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pp

Yin, T., Zhou, X., Krahenbuhl, P.: Center-based 3d object detection and tracking. In: Pro- ceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pp. 11784–11793 (2021)

2021
[128]

In: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision, pp

Mao, J., Xue, Y., Niu, M., Bai, H., Feng, J., Liang, X., Xu, H., Xu, C.: Voxel transformer for 3d object detection. In: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision, pp. 3164–3173 (2021)

2021
[129]

In: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pp

Noh, J., Lee, S., Ham, B.: Hvpr: Hybrid voxel-point representation for single-stage 3d object detection. In: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pp. 14605–14614 (2021)

2021
[130]

In: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision, pp

Mao, J., Niu, M., Bai, H., Liang, X., Xu, H., Xu, C.: Pyramid r-cnn: Towards better performance and adaptability for 3d object detection. In: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision, pp. 2723–2732 (2021)

2021
[131]

In: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pp

Fan, L., Pang, Z., Zhang, T., Wang, Y.-X., Zhao, H., Wang, F., Wang, N., Zhang, Z.: Embracing single stride 3d object detector with sparse transformer. In: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pp. 8458– 8468 (2022)

2022
[132]

In: European Conference on Computer Vision, pp

Shi, G., Li, R., Ma, C.: Pillarnet: Real-time and high-performance pillar-based 3d object detection. In: European Conference on Computer Vision, pp. 35–52 (2022). Springer

2022
[133]

In: Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, vol

Hu, Y., Ding, Z., Ge, R., Shao, W., Huang, L., Li, K., Liu, Q.: Afdetv2: Rethinking the necessity of the second stage for object detection from point clouds. In: Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, vol. 36, pp. 969–979 (2022)

2022
[134]

International Journal of Computer Vision 131(2), 531–551 (2023)

Shi, S., Jiang, L., Deng, J., Wang, Z., Guo, C., Shi, J., Wang, X., Li, H.: Pv-rcnn++: Point- voxel feature set abstraction with local vector representation for 3d object detection. International Journal of Computer Vision 131(2), 531–551 (2023)

2023
[135]

In: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pp

He, C., Zeng, H., Huang, J., Hua, X.-S., Zhang, L.: Structure aware single-stage 3d object detection from point cloud. In: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pp. 11873–11882 (2020)

2020
[136]

arXiv preprint arXiv:2009.00206 (2020)

Liang, Z., Zhang, M., Zhang, Z., Zhao, X., Pu, S.: Rangercnn: Towards fast and accurate 3d object detection with range image representation. arXiv preprint arXiv:2009.00206 (2020)

2009 arXiv
[137]

Sensors 18(10), 3337 (2018)

Yan, Y., Mao, Y., Li, B.: Second: Sparsely embedded convolutional detection. Sensors 18(10), 3337 (2018)

2018
[138]

In: Computer Vision–ECCV 2020: 16th European Conference, Glasgow, UK, August 23–28, 2020, Proceedings, Part X 16, pp

Wang, J., Lan, S., Gao, M., Davis, L.S.: Infofocus: 3d object detection for autonomous 47 driving with dynamic information modeling. In: Computer Vision–ECCV 2020: 16th European Conference, Glasgow, UK, August 23–28, 2020, Proceedings, Part X 16, pp. 405–420 (2020). Springer

2020
[139]

In: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pp

Miao, Z., Chen, J., Pan, H., Zhang, R., Liu, K., Hao, P., Zhu, J., Wang, Y., Zhan, X.: Pvgnet: A bottom-up one-stage 3d object detector with integrated multi-level fea- tures. In: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pp. 3279–3288 (2021)

2021
[140]

In: 2020 IEEE Intelligent Vehicles Symposium (IV), pp

Aksoy, E.E., Baci, S., Cavdar, S.: Salsanet: Fast road and vehicle segmentation in lidar point clouds for autonomous driving. In: 2020 IEEE Intelligent Vehicles Symposium (IV), pp. 926–932 (2020). IEEE

2020
[141]

In: European Conference on Computer Vision, pp

Zhou, Z., Zhao, X., Wang, Y., Wang, P., Foroosh, H.: Centerformer: Center-based transformer for 3d object detection. In: European Conference on Computer Vision, pp. 496–513 (2022). Springer

2022
[142]

IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters 3(4), 3434–3440 (2018)

Zeng, Y., Hu, Y., Liu, S., Ye, J., Han, Y., Li, X., Sun, N.: Rt3d: Real-time 3-d vehicle detection in lidar point cloud for autonomous driving. IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters 3(4), 3434–3440 (2018)

2018
[143]

In: Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pp

Yang, B., Luo, W., Urtasun, R.: Pixor: Real-time 3d object detection from point clouds. In: Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pp. 7652–7660 (2018)

2018
[144]

In: 2018 21st Interna- tional Conference on Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITSC), pp

Beltr ´an, J., Guindel, C., Moreno, F.M., Cruzado, D., Garcia, F., De La Escalera, A.: Birdnet: a 3d object detection framework from lidar information. In: 2018 21st Interna- tional Conference on Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITSC), pp. 3517–3523 (2018). IEEE

2018
[145]

In: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pp

Zhang, Y., Zhou, Z., David, P., Yue, X., Xi, Z., Gong, B., Foroosh, H.: Polarnet: An improved grid representation for online lidar point clouds semantic segmenta- tion. In: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pp. 9601–9610 (2020)

2020
[146]

In: 2024 IEEE Intelligent Vehicles Symposium (IV), pp

Wang, S., Caesar, H., Nan, L., Kooij, J.F.: Unibev: Multi-modal 3d object detection with uniform bev encoders for robustness against missing sensor modalities. In: 2024 IEEE Intelligent Vehicles Symposium (IV), pp. 2776–2783 (2024). IEEE

2024
[147]

In: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pp

Yin, J., Shen, J., Chen, R., Li, W., Yang, R., Frossard, P., Wang, W.: Is-fusion: Instance- scene collaborative fusion for multimodal 3d object detection. In: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pp. 14905–14915 (2024)

2024
[148]

arXiv preprint arXiv:2502.04377 (2025) 48

Hao, X., Diao, Y., Wei, M., Yang, Y., Hao, P., Yin, R., Zhang, H., Li, W., Zhao, S., Liu, Y.: Mapfusion: A novel bev feature fusion network for multi-modal map construction. arXiv preprint arXiv:2502.04377 (2025) 48

2025 arXiv
[149]

In: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision, pp

Kim, Y., Shin, J., Kim, S., Lee, I.-J., Choi, J.W., Kum, D.: Crn: Camera radar net for accurate, robust, efficient 3d perception. In: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision, pp. 17615–17626 (2023)

2023
[150]

IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement 72, 1–14 (2023)

Zheng, L., Li, S., Tan, B., Yang, L., Chen, S., Huang, L., Bai, J., Zhu, X., Ma, Z.: Rcfusion: Fusing 4-d radar and camera with bird’s-eye view features for 3-d object detection. IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement 72, 1–14 (2023)

2023
[151]

IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Vehicles 9(1), 1358– 1368 (2023)

Cui, C., Ma, Y., Lu, J., Wang, Z.: Redformer: Radar enlightens the darkness of camera perception with transformers. IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Vehicles 9(1), 1358– 1368 (2023)

2023
[152]

In: 2019 Sensor Data Fusion: Trends, Solutions, Applications (SDF), pp

Nobis, F., Geisslinger, M., Weber, M., Betz, J., Lienkamp, M.: A deep learning-based radar and camera sensor fusion architecture for object detection. In: 2019 Sensor Data Fusion: Trends, Solutions, Applications (SDF), pp. 1–7 (2019). IEEE

2019
[153]

In: Image and Video Technology: 9th Pacific-Rim Symposium, PSIVT 2019, Sydney, NSW, Australia, November 18–22, 2019, Proceedings 9, pp

John, V., Mita, S.: Rvnet: Deep sensor fusion of monocular camera and radar for image- based obstacle detection in challenging environments. In: Image and Video Technology: 9th Pacific-Rim Symposium, PSIVT 2019, Sydney, NSW, Australia, November 18–22, 2019, Proceedings 9, pp. ...

2019
[154]

In: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Winter Conference on Applications of Computer Vision, pp

Nabati, R., Qi, H.: Centerfusion: Center-based radar and camera fusion for 3d object detection. In: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Winter Conference on Applications of Computer Vision, pp. 1527–1536 (2021)

2021
[155]

In: Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, vol

Long, Y., Kumar, A., Morris, D., Liu, X., Castro, M., Chakravarty, P.: Radiant: Radar- image association network for 3d object detection. In: Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, vol. 37, pp. 1808–1816 (2023)

2023
[156]

IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Vehicles8(2), 1523–1535 (2023)

Zhou, T., Chen, J., Shi, Y., Jiang, K., Yang, M., Yang, D.: Bridging the view disparity between radar and camera features for multi-modal fusion 3d object detection. IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Vehicles8(2), 1523–1535 (2023)

2023
[157]

Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 35, 18442–18455 (2022)

Li, Y., Chen, Y., Qi, X., Li, Z., Sun, J., Jia, J.: Unifying voxel-based representation with transformer for 3d object detection. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 35, 18442–18455 (2022)

2022
[158]

In: Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pp

Chen, X., Ma, H., Wan, J., Li, B., Xia, T.: Multi-view 3d object detection network for autonomous driving. In: Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pp. 1907–1915 (2017)

1907
[159]

In: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pp

Wang, C., Ma, C., Zhu, M., Yang, X.: Pointaugmenting: Cross-modal augmentation for 3d object detection. In: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pp. 11794–11803 (2021)

2021
[160]

In: Proceedings of the 49 IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision, pp

Gautam, S., Meyer, G.P., Vallespi-Gonzalez, C., Becker, B.C.: Sdvtracker: Real-time multi-sensor association and tracking for self-driving vehicles. In: Proceedings of the 49 IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision, pp. 3012–3021 (2021)

2021
[161]

In: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Winter Conference on Applications of Computer Vision, pp

Pang, S., Morris, D., Radha, H.: Fast-clocs: Fast camera-lidar object candidates fusion for 3d object detection. In: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Winter Conference on Applications of Computer Vision, pp. 187–196 (2022)

2022
[162]

In: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pp

Bai, X., Hu, Z., Zhu, X., Huang, Q., Chen, Y., Fu, H., Tai, C.-L.: Transfusion: Robust lidar-camera fusion for 3d object detection with transformers. In: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pp. 1090–1099 (2022)

2022
[163]

arXiv preprint arXiv:2201.06493 (2022)

Chen, Z., Li, Z., Zhang, S., Fang, L., Jiang, Q., Zhao, F., Zhou, B., Zhao, H.: Autoalign: Pixel-instance feature aggregation for multi-modal 3d object detection. arXiv preprint arXiv:2201.06493 (2022)

2022 arXiv
[164]

In: European Conference on Computer Vision, pp

Chen, Z., Li, Z., Zhang, S., Fang, L., Jiang, Q., Zhao, F.: Deformable feature aggregation for dynamic multi-modal 3d object detection. In: European Conference on Computer Vision, pp. 628–644 (2022). Springer

2022
[165]

arXiv preprint arXiv:2303.17099 (2023)

Cai, H., Zhang, Z., Zhou, Z., Li, Z., Ding, W., Zhao, J.: Bevfusion4d: Learning lidar-camera fusion under bird’s-eye-view via cross-modality guidance and temporal aggregation. arXiv preprint arXiv:2303.17099 (2023)

2023 arXiv
[166]

IEEE Sensors Journal 22(7), 6964–6974 (2022)

Ravindran, R., Santora, M.J., Jamali, M.M.: Camera, lidar, and radar sensor fusion based on bayesian neural network (clr-bnn). IEEE Sensors Journal 22(7), 6964–6974 (2022)

2022
[167]

In: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pp

Ding, F., Palffy, A., Gavrila, D.M., Lu, C.X.: Hidden gems: 4d radar scene flow learn- ing using cross-modal supervision. In: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pp. 9340–9349 (2023)

2023
[168]

URL https://arxiv

Li, Z., Wang, W., Li, H., Xie, E., Sima, C., Lu, T., Yu, Q., Dai, J.: Bevformer: Learning bird’s-eye-view representation from multi-camera images via spatiotemporal transformers.(2022). URL https://arxiv. org/abs/2203.17270 (2022)

2022 arXiv
[169]

In: European Conference on Computer Vision, pp

Hu, S., Chen, L., Wu, P., Li, H., Yan, J., Tao, D.: St-p3: End-to-end vision-based autonomous driving via spatial-temporal feature learning. In: European Conference on Computer Vision, pp. 533–549 (2022). Springer

2022
[170]

In: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision, pp

Liu, Y., Yan, J., Jia, F., Li, S., Gao, A., Wang, T., Zhang, X.: Petrv2: A unified frame- work for 3d perception from multi-camera images. In: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision, pp. 3262–3272 (2023)

2023
[171]

In: European Conference on Computer Vision, pp

Wang, T., Pang, J., Lin, D.: Monocular 3d object detection with depth from motion. In: European Conference on Computer Vision, pp. 386–403 (2022). Springer

2022
[172]

In: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision, pp

Wang, S., Liu, Y., Wang, T., Li, Y., Zhang, X.: Exploring object-centric temporal 50 modeling for efficient multi-view 3d object detection. In: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision, pp. 3621–3631 (2023)

2023
[173]

arXiv preprint arXiv:2210.02443 (2022)

Park, J., Xu, C., Yang, S., Keutzer, K., Kitani, K., Tomizuka, M., Zhan, W.: Time will tell: New outlooks and a baseline for temporal multi-view 3d object detection. arXiv preprint arXiv:2210.02443 (2022)

2022 arXiv
[174]

In: Conference on Robot Learning, pp

Qing, L., Wang, T., Lin, D., Pang, J.: Dort: Modeling dynamic objects in recurrent for multi-camera 3d object detection and tracking. In: Conference on Robot Learning, pp. 3749–3765 (2023). PMLR

2023
[175]

IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems for Video Technology (2024)

Yang, Y., Liu, J., Huang, T., Han, Q.-L., Ma, G., Zhu, B.: Ralibev: Radar and lidar bev fusion learning for anchor box free object detection systems. IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems for Video Technology (2024)

2024
[176]

In: 2021 Ieee International Conference on Robotics and Automation (icra), pp

Saha, A., Mendez, O., Russell, C., Bowden, R.: Enabling spatio-temporal aggregation in birds-eye-view vehicle estimation. In: 2021 Ieee International Conference on Robotics and Automation (icra), pp. 5133–5139 (2021). IEEE

2021
[177]

In: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision, pp

Qin, Z., Chen, J., Chen, C., Chen, X., Li, X.: Unifusion: Unified multi-view fusion transformer for spatial-temporal representation in bird’s-eye-view. In: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision, pp. 8690–8699 (2023)

2023
[178]

arXiv (2023)

Yang, L., Tang, T., Li, J., Chen, P., Yuan, K., Wang, L., Huang, Y., Zhang, X., Yu, K.: BEVHeight++: Toward Robust Visual Centric 3D Object Detection. arXiv (2023). https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2309.16179

2023 doi arXiv
[179]

arXiv (2024)

Shi, H., Pang, C., Zhang, J., Yang, K., Wu, Y., Ni, H., Lin, Y., Stiefelhagen, R., Wang, K.: CoBEV: Elevating Roadside 3D Object Detection with Depth and Height Complementarity. arXiv (2024). https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2310.02815

2024 doi arXiv
[180]

arXiv (2024)

Wang, W., Lu, Y., Zheng, G., Zhan, S., Ye, X., Tan, Z., Wang, J., Wang, G., Li, X.: BEVSpread: Spread Voxel Pooling for Bird’s-Eye-View Representation in Vision- based Roadside 3D Object Detection. arXiv (2024). https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv. 2406.08785

2024 doi arXiv
[181]

arXiv (2023)

Fan, S., Wang, Z., Huo, X., Wang, Y., Liu, J.: Calibration-free BEV Representation for Infrastructure Perception. arXiv (2023). https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2303.03583

2023 doi arXiv
[182]

arXiv (2024)

Jia, J., Yi, G., Shi, Y.: RopeBEV: A Multi-Camera Roadside Perception Network in Bird’s-Eye-View. arXiv (2024). https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2409.11706

2024 doi arXiv
[183]

Journal of Advanced Transportation 2022, 1–14 (2022) https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/2771085 arXiv:2201.04756 [cs]

Zhang, T., Jin, P.J.: Roadside Lidar Vehicle Detection and Tracking Using Range And Intensity Background Subtraction. Journal of Advanced Transportation 2022, 1–14 (2022) https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/2771085 arXiv:2201.04756 [cs]

2022 arXiv
[184]

IEEE Intelligent Systems34(3), 44–51 (2019) https://doi.org/10.1109/MIS.2019.2918115

Cui, Y., Xu, H., Wu, J., Sun, Y., Zhao, J.: Automatic Vehicle Tracking With Roadside 51 LiDAR Data for the Connected-Vehicles System. IEEE Intelligent Systems34(3), 44–51 (2019) https://doi.org/10.1109/MIS.2019.2918115

2019
[185]

In: 2017 IEEE 20th International Conference on Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITSC), pp

Wu, J., Xu, H., Zheng, J.: Automatic background filtering and lane identification with roadside lidar data. In: 2017 IEEE 20th International Conference on Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITSC), pp. 1–6 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1109/ITSC.2017. 8317723

2017 doi
[186]

IEEE Sensors Journal21(8), 10029–10038 (2021) https://doi.org/10.1109/JSEN.2021.3057999

Lin, C., Guo, Y., Li, W., Liu, H., Wu, D.: An Automatic Lane Marking Detection Method With Low-Density Roadside LiDAR Data. IEEE Sensors Journal21(8), 10029–10038 (2021) https://doi.org/10.1109/JSEN.2021.3057999

2021
[187]

Sustainability 15(3), 2628 (2023) https://doi.org/10.3390/ su15032628

Shi, H., Hou, D., Li, X.: Center-Aware 3D Object Detection with Attention Mechanism Based on Roadside LiDAR. Sustainability 15(3), 2628 (2023) https://doi.org/10.3390/ su15032628

2023
[188]

Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies 100, 68–87 (2019) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trc.2019.01.007

Zhao, J., Xu, H., Liu, H., Wu, J., Zheng, Y., Wu, D.: Detection and tracking of pedes- trians and vehicles using roadside LiDAR sensors. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies 100, 68–87 (2019) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trc.2019.01.007

2019 doi
[189]

In: International Conference on Neural Information Processing, pp

Li, X., Zhang, J., Gu, J., Lu, X., Zhang, L.: Bevroad: A cross-modal and temporary- recurrent 3d object detector for infrastructure perception. In: International Conference on Neural Information Processing, pp. 270–284 (2024). Springer

2024
[190]

IEEE Sensors Journal 24(19), 30643–30653 (2024) https://doi.org/10.1109/JSEN.2024.3444816

Chen, Y., Wang, H.: Accurate and Robust Roadside 3-D Object Detection Based on Height-Aware Scene Reconstruction. IEEE Sensors Journal 24(19), 30643–30653 (2024) https://doi.org/10.1109/JSEN.2024.3444816

2024
[191]

IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement 71, 1–14 (2022) https://doi.org/10.1109/TIM.2022.3201938

Wang, S., Pi, R., Li, J., Guo, X., Lu, Y., Li, T., Tian, Y.: Object Tracking Based on the Fusion of Roadside LiDAR and Camera Data. IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement 71, 1–14 (2022) https://doi.org/10.1109/TIM.2022.3201938

2022
[192]

arXiv (2022)

Xu, R., Tu, Z., Xiang, H., Shao, W., Zhou, B., Ma, J.: CoBEVT: Cooperative Bird’s Eye View Semantic Segmentation with Sparse Transformers. arXiv (2022). https://doi. org/10.48550/arXiv.2207.02202

2022 doi arXiv
[193]

In: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pp

Hu, Y., Lu, Y., Xu, R., Xie, W., Chen, S., Wang, Y.: Collaboration helps camera overtake lidar in 3d detection. In: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pp. 9243–9252 (2023)

2023
[194]

arXiv (2023)

Wei, S., Wei, Y., Hu, Y., Lu, Y., Zhong, Y., Chen, S., Zhang, Y.: Asynchrony-Robust Collaborative Perception via Bird’s Eye View Flow. arXiv (2023). https://doi.org/10. 48550/arXiv.2309.16940

2023 doi arXiv
[195]

IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Vehicles8(4), 2650–2660 (2023) https://doi.org/10.1109/TIV.2023.3260040 52 arXiv:2212.08273 [cs]

Li, J., Xu, R., Liu, X., Ma, J., Chi, Z., Ma, J., Yu, H.: Learning for Vehicle-to- Vehicle Cooperative Perception under Lossy Communication. IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Vehicles8(4), 2650–2660 (2023) https://doi.org/10.1109/TIV.2023.3260040 52 arXiv:2212.08273 [cs]

2023
[196]

arXiv (2023)

Qiao, D., Zulkernine, F.: CoBEVFusion: Cooperative Perception with LiDAR-Camera Bird’s-Eye View Fusion. arXiv (2023). https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2310.06008

2023 doi arXiv
[197]

arXiv (2023)

Xiang, H., Xu, R., Ma, J.: HM-ViT: Hetero-modal Vehicle-to-Vehicle Cooperative perception with vision transformer. arXiv (2023). https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2304. 10628

2023 doi
[198]

In: 2023 IEEE 29th International Conference on Parallel and Distributed Systems (ICPADS), pp

Shi, S., Zhang, C., Lv, A., He, S.: Mcot: Multi-modal vehicle-to-vehicle cooperative perception with transformers. In: 2023 IEEE 29th International Conference on Parallel and Distributed Systems (ICPADS), pp. 1612–1619 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1109/ ICPADS60453.2023.00226

2023
[199]

arXiv (2023)

Wang, Z., Fan, S., Huo, X., Xu, T., Wang, Y., Liu, J., Chen, Y., Zhang, Y.-Q.: VIMI: Vehicle-Infrastructure Multi-view Intermediate Fusion for Camera-based 3D Object Detection. arXiv (2023). https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2303.10975

2023 doi arXiv
[200]

In: Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, vol

Wang, W., Wang, J., Deng, Y., Tan, G.: Bevsync: Asynchronous data alignment for camera-based vehicle-infrastructure cooperative perception under uncertain delays. In: Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, vol. 39, pp. 14699– 14707 (2025)

2025
[201]

Meng, J., Zhao, J.: Vi-bev: Vehicle-infrastructure collaborative perception for 3-d object detection on bird’s-eye view6, 256–265 https://doi.org/10.1109/OJITS.2025.3543831

2025
[202]

Sensors24(13), 4101 (2024) https://doi.org/10.3390/s24134101

Li, B., Zhao, Y., Tan, H.: CoFormerNet: A Transformer-Based Fusion Approach for Enhanced Vehicle-Infrastructure Cooperative Perception. Sensors24(13), 4101 (2024) https://doi.org/10.3390/s24134101

2024 doi
[203]

IEEE Transactions on Network Science and Engineering (2024)

Yi, S., Zhang, H., Liu, K.: V2iviewer: Towards efficient collaborative perception via point cloud data fusion and vehicle-to-infrastructure communications. IEEE Transactions on Network Science and Engineering (2024)

2024
[204]

IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters 9(4), 3570–3577 (2024) https://doi.org/10

Zhou, L., Gan, Z., Fan, J.: CenterCoop: Center-Based Feature Aggregation for Communication-Efficient Vehicle-Infrastructure Cooperative 3D Object Detection. IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters 9(4), 3570–3577 (2024) https://doi.org/10. 1109/LRA.2023.3339399

2024
[205]

IEEE Transactions on Mobile Computing (2024)

Zhou, X., Wang, C., Xie, Q., Qiu, T.: V2i-coop: Accurate object detection for connected automated vehicles at accident black spots with v2i cross-modality cooperation. IEEE Transactions on Mobile Computing (2024)

2024
[206]

arXiv (2023)

Jiao, Y., Jie, Z., Chen, S., Chen, J., Ma, L., Jiang, Y.-G.: MSMDFusion: Fusing LiDAR and Camera at Multiple Scales with Multi-Depth Seeds for 3D Object Detection. arXiv (2023). https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2209.03102 53

2023 doi arXiv
[207]

arXiv (2022)

Chen, R., Mu, Y., Xu, R., Shao, W., Jiang, C., Xu, H., Li, Z., Luo, P.: COˆ3: Cooperative Unsupervised 3D Representation Learning for Autonomous Driving. arXiv (2022). https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2206.04028

2022 doi
[208]

2022 5th World Conference on Mechanical Engineering and Intelligent Manufacturing (WCMEIM), 811–816 (2022) https://doi.org/10.1109/WCMEIM56910.2022.10021459

Yu, H., Zhao, Y., Zou, Y., Li, Q., Yu, H., Ren, Y.: Multistage Fusion Approach of Lidar and Camera for Vehicle-Infrastructure Cooperative Object Detection. 2022 5th World Conference on Mechanical Engineering and Intelligent Manufacturing (WCMEIM), 811–816 (2022) https://doi.or...

2022
[209]

arXiv preprint arXiv:2407.21581 (2024)

Zhang, X., Li, Y., Wang, J., Qin, X., Shen, Y., Fan, Z., Tan, X.: Inscope: A new real- world 3d infrastructure-side collaborative perception dataset for open traffic scenarios. arXiv preprint arXiv:2407.21581 (2024)

2024
[210]

arXiv e-prints, 2401 (2024)

Liu, M., Yurtsever, E., Zhou, X., Fossaert, J., Cui, Y., Luka Zagar, B., Knoll, A.C.: A survey on autonomous driving datasets: Data statistic, annotation, and outlook. arXiv e-prints, 2401 (2024)

2024
[211]

IEEE Transactions on Computational Social Systems 11(1), 1244–1259 (2023)

Gong, Y., Lu, J., Liu, W., Li, Z., Jiang, X., Gao, X., Wu, X.: Sifdrivenet: Speed and image fusion for driving behavior classification network. IEEE Transactions on Computational Social Systems 11(1), 1244–1259 (2023)

2023
[212]

Pattern recognition letters 30(2), 88–97 (2009)

Brostow, G.J., Fauqueur, J., Cipolla, R.: Semantic object classes in video: A high- definition ground truth database. Pattern recognition letters 30(2), 88–97 (2009)

2009
[213]

In: Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision, pp

Lee, S., Kim, J., Shin Yoon, J., Shin, S., Bailo, O., Kim, N., Lee, T.-H., Seok Hong, H., Han, S.-H., So Kweon, I.: Vpgnet: Vanishing point guided network for lane and road marking detection and recognition. In: Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Computer Visi...

1947
[214]

In: Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, vol

Pan, X., Shi, J., Luo, P., Wang, X., Tang, X.: Spatial as deep: Spatial cnn for traffic scene understanding. In: Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, vol. 32 (2018)

2018
[215]

International Journal of Computer Vision 126, 973–992 (2018)

Sakaridis, C., Dai, D., Van Gool, L.: Semantic foggy scene understanding with synthetic data. International Journal of Computer Vision 126, 973–992 (2018)

2018
[216]

In: Proceedings of the Ieee/cvf Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pp

Voigtlaender, P., Krause, M., Osep, A., Luiten, J., Sekar, B.B.G., Geiger, A., Leibe, B.: Mots: Multi-object tracking and segmentation. In: Proceedings of the Ieee/cvf Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pp. 7942–7951 (2019)

2019
[217]

In: 2019 IEEE Winter Conference on Applications of Computer Vision (WACV), pp

Varma, G., Subramanian, A., Namboodiri, A., Chandraker, M., Jawahar, C.: Idd: A dataset for exploring problems of autonomous navigation in unconstrained environ- ments. In: 2019 IEEE Winter Conference on Applications of Computer Vision (WACV), pp. 1743–1751 (2019). IEEE

2019
[218]

In: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer 54 Vision and Pattern Recognition Workshops, pp

Cheng, W., Luo, H., Yang, W., Yu, L., Chen, S., Li, W.: Det: A high-resolution dvs dataset for lane extraction. In: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer 54 Vision and Pattern Recognition Workshops, pp. 0–0 (2019)

2019
[219]

In: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision, pp

Sakaridis, C., Dai, D., Van Gool, L.: Acdc: The adverse conditions dataset with corre- spondences for semantic driving scene understanding. In: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision, pp. 10765–10775 (2021)

2021
[220]

arXiv preprint arXiv:1911.11132 (2019)

Hendrycks, D., Basart, S., Mazeika, M., Zou, A., Kwon, J., Mostajabi, M., Steinhardt, J., Song, D.: Scaling out-of-distribution detection for real-world settings. arXiv preprint arXiv:1911.11132 (2019)

1911 arXiv
[221]

In: 2024 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA), pp

Zhao, R., Heng, Y., Wang, H., Gao, Y., Liu, S., Yao, C., Chen, J., Cai, W.: Advance- ments in 3d lane detection using lidar point clouds: From data collection to model development. In: 2024 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA), pp. 5382–5388 (2024). IEEE

2024
[222]

In: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pp

Xie, Y., Wei, H., Liu, Z., Wang, X., Ji, X.: Synfog: A photo-realistic synthetic fog dataset based on end-to-end imaging simulation for advancing real-world defogging in autonomous driving. In: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, ...

2024
[223]

The international journal of robotics research 32(11), 1231–1237 (2013)

Geiger, A., Lenz, P., Stiller, C., Urtasun, R.: Vision meets robotics: The kitti dataset. The international journal of robotics research 32(11), 1231–1237 (2013)

2013
[224]

In: Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pp

Cordts, M., Omran, M., Ramos, S., Rehfeld, T., Enzweiler, M., Benenson, R., Franke, U., Roth, S., Schiele, B.: The cityscapes dataset for semantic urban scene understanding. In: Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pp. 3213–3223 (2016)

2016
[225]

In: Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pp

Ros, G., Sellart, L., Materzynska, J., Vazquez, D., Lopez, A.M.: The synthia dataset: A large collection of synthetic images for semantic segmentation of urban scenes. In: Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pp. 3234–3243 (2016)

2016
[226]

The International Journal of Robotics Research 36(1), 3–15 (2017)

Maddern, W., Pascoe, G., Linegar, C., Newman, P.: 1 year, 1000 km: The oxford robotcar dataset. The International Journal of Robotics Research 36(1), 3–15 (2017)

2017
[227]

IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems 19(3), 934–948 (2018)

Choi, Y., Kim, N., Hwang, S., Park, K., Yoon, J.S., An, K., Kweon, I.S.: Kaist multi- spectral day/night data set for autonomous and assisted driving. IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems 19(3), 934–948 (2018)

2018
[228]

In: Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition Workshops, pp

Huang, X., Cheng, X., Geng, Q., Cao, B., Zhou, D., Wang, P., Lin, Y., Yang, R.: The apolloscape dataset for autonomous driving. In: Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition Workshops, pp. 954–960 (2018)

2018
[229]

In: 2020 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation 55 (ICRA), pp

Pham, Q.-H., Sevestre, P., Pahwa, R.S., Zhan, H., Pang, C.H., Chen, Y., Mustafa, A., Chandrasekhar, V., Lin, J.: A* 3d dataset: Towards autonomous driving in challenging environments. In: 2020 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation 55 (ICRA), pp. 2267–2273 (2...

2020
[230]

: Argoverse: 3d tracking and forecasting with rich maps

Chang, M.-F., Lambert, J., Sangkloy, P., Singh, J., Bak, S., Hartnett, A., Wang, D., Carr, P., Lucey, S., Ramanan, D., et al. : Argoverse: 3d tracking and forecasting with rich maps. In: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pp. 874...

2019
[231]

In: 2019 16th European Radar Conference (EuRAD), pp

Meyer, M., Kuschk, G.: Automotive radar dataset for deep learning based 3d object detection. In: 2019 16th European Radar Conference (EuRAD), pp. 129–132 (2019). IEEE

2019
[232]

In: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision, pp

Behley, J., Garbade, M., Milioto, A., Quenzel, J., Behnke, S., Stachniss, C., Gall, J.: Semantickitti: A dataset for semantic scene understanding of lidar sequences. In: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision, pp. 9297– 9307 (2019)

2019
[233]

In: 2019 International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA), pp

Patil, A., Malla, S., Gang, H., Chen, Y.-T.: The h3d dataset for full-surround 3d multi-object detection and tracking in crowded urban scenes. In: 2019 International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA), pp. 9552–9557 (2019). IEEE

2019
[234]

In: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pp

Caesar, H., Bankiti, V., Lang, A.H., Vora, S., Liong, V.E., Xu, Q., Krishnan, A., Pan, Y., Baldan, G., Beijbom, O.: nuscenes: A multimodal dataset for autonomous driving. In: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pp. 11621–11631 (2020)

2020
[235]

In: Proceed- ings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pp

Yu, F., Chen, H., Wang, X., Xian, W., Chen, Y., Liu, F., Madhavan, V., Darrell, T.: Bdd100k: A diverse driving dataset for heterogeneous multitask learning. In: Proceed- ings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pp. 2636–2645 (2020)

2020
[236]

arXiv preprint arXiv:2001.10773 (2020)

Cabon, Y., Murray, N., Humenberger, M.: Virtual kitti 2. arXiv preprint arXiv:2001.10773 (2020)

2001 arXiv
[237]

In: 2021 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA), pp

Wang, Z., Ding, S., Li, Y., Fenn, J., Roychowdhury, S., Wallin, A., Martin, L., Ryvola, S., Sapiro, G., Qiu, Q.: Cirrus: A long-range bi-pattern lidar dataset. In: 2021 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA), pp. 5744–5750 (2021). IEEE

2021
[238]

In: 2020 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA), pp

Barnes, D., Gadd, M., Murcutt, P., Newman, P., Posner, I.: The oxford radar robotcar dataset: A radar extension to the oxford robotcar dataset. In: 2020 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA), pp. 6433–6438 (2020). IEEE

2020
[239]

In: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pp

Bijelic, M., Gruber, T., Mannan, F., Kraus, F., Ritter, W., Dietmayer, K., Heide, F.: Seeing through fog without seeing fog: Deep multimodal sensor fusion in unseen adverse weather. In: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pp. 1168...

2020
[240]

IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence 45(3), 3292–3310 (2022)

Liao, Y., Xie, J., Geiger, A.: Kitti-360: A novel dataset and benchmarks for urban scene understanding in 2d and 3d. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence 45(3), 3292–3310 (2022)

2022
[241]

In: 2021 IEEE International Intelligent Transportation Systems Conference (ITSC), pp

Xiao, P., Shao, Z., Hao, S., Zhang, Z., Chai, X., Jiao, J., Li, Z., Wu, J., Sun, K., Jiang, K., et al.: Pandaset: Advanced sensor suite dataset for autonomous driving. In: 2021 IEEE International Intelligent Transportation Systems Conference (ITSC), pp. 3095–3101 (2021). IEEE

2021
[242]

arXiv preprint arXiv:2004.06320 (2020)

Geyer, J., Kassahun, Y., Mahmudi, M., Ricou, X., Durgesh, R., Chung, A.S., Hauswald, L., Pham, V.H., M¨ uhlegg, M., Dorn, S., et al.: A2d2: Audi autonomous driving dataset. arXiv preprint arXiv:2004.06320 (2020)

2004 arXiv
[243]

arXiv preprint arXiv:2106.11810 (2021)

Caesar, H., Kabzan, J., Tan, K.S., Fong, W.K., Wolff, E., Lang, A., Fletcher, L., Beijbom, O., Omari, S.: nuplan: A closed-loop ml-based planning benchmark for autonomous vehicles. arXiv preprint arXiv:2106.11810 (2021)

2021 arXiv
[244]

In: 2021 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA), pp

Sheeny, M., De Pellegrin, E., Mukherjee, S., Ahrabian, A., Wang, S., Wallace, A.: Radiate: A radar dataset for automotive perception in bad weather. In: 2021 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA), pp. 1–7 (2021). IEEE

2021
[245]

arxiv 2021

Mao, J., Niu, M., Jiang, C., Liang, H., Chen, J., Liang, X., Li, Y., Ye, C., Zhang, W., Li, Z., et al.: One million scenes for autonomous driving: Once dataset. arxiv 2021. arXiv preprint arXiv:2106.11037 (2021)

2021 arXiv
[246]

Weng, X., Man, Y., Park, J., Yuan, Y., O’Toole, M., Kitani, K.M.: All-in-one drive: A comprehensive perception dataset with high-density long-range point clouds (2021)

2021
[247]

In: Pro- ceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pp

Sun, T., Segu, M., Postels, J., Wang, Y., Van Gool, L., Schiele, B., Tombari, F., Yu, F.: Shift: a synthetic driving dataset for continuous multi-task domain adaptation. In: Pro- ceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pp. 21371–21382 (2022)

2022
[248]

: Persformer: 3d lane detection via perspective transformer and the open- lane benchmark

Chen, L., Sima, C., Li, Y., Zheng, Z., Xu, J., Geng, X., Li, H., He, C., Shi, J., Qiao, Y., et al. : Persformer: 3d lane detection via perspective transformer and the open- lane benchmark. In: European Conference on Computer Vision, pp. 550–567 (2022). Springer

2022
[249]

In: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pp

Yan, F., Nie, M., Cai, X., Han, J., Xu, H., Yang, Z., Ye, C., Fu, Y., Mi, M.B., Zhang, L.: Once-3dlanes: Building monocular 3d lane detection. In: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pp. 17143–17152 (2022)

2022
[250]

human-driven vehicles

Li, G., Jiao, Y., Knoop, V.L., Calvert, S.C., Van Lint, J.: Large car-following data based on lyft level-5 open dataset: Following autonomous vehicles vs. human-driven vehicles. In: 2023 IEEE 26th International Conference on Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITSC), pp. 5818–...

2023
[251]

In: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision, pp

Alibeigi, M., Ljungbergh, W., Tonderski, A., Hess, G., Lilja, A., Lindstr ¨om, C., Motorniuk, D., Fu, J., Widahl, J., Petersson, C.: Zenseact open dataset: A large-scale and diverse multimodal dataset for autonomous driving. In: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF International Confer...

2023
[252]

arXiv preprint arXiv:2301.00493 (2023)

Wilson, B., Qi, W., Agarwal, T., Lambert, J., Singh, J., Khandelwal, S., Pan, B., Kumar, R., Hartnett, A., Pontes, J.K., et al.: Argoverse 2: Next generation datasets for self-driving perception and forecasting. arXiv preprint arXiv:2301.00493 (2023)

2023 arXiv
[253]

: Man truckscenes: A multimodal dataset for autonomous trucking in diverse conditions

Fent, F., Kuttenreich, F., Ruch, F., Rizwin, F., Juergens, S., Lechermann, L., Nissler, C., Perl, A., Voll, U., Yan, M., et al. : Man truckscenes: A multimodal dataset for autonomous trucking in diverse conditions. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 37, 62062–62...

2024
[254]

arXiv preprint arXiv:2412.10734 (2024)

Zheng, L., Yang, L., Lin, Q., Ai, W., Liu, M., Lu, S., Liu, J., Ren, H., Mo, J., Bai, X., et al.: Omnihd-scenes: A next-generation multimodal dataset for autonomous driving. arXiv preprint arXiv:2412.10734 (2024)

2024
[255]

IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology71(3), 2437–2447 (2022)

Zhang, X., Li, Z., Gong, Y., Jin, D., Li, J., Wang, L., Zhu, Y., Liu, H.: Openmpd: An open multimodal perception dataset for autonomous driving. IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology71(3), 2437–2447 (2022)

2022
[256]

In: 17th International IEEE Conference on Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITSC), pp

Strigel, E., Meissner, D., Seeliger, F., Wilking, B., Dietmayer, K.: The ko-per inter- section laserscanner and video dataset. In: 17th International IEEE Conference on Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITSC), pp. 1900–1901 (2014). IEEE

1900
[257]

In: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pp

Tang, Z., Naphade, M., Liu, M.-Y., Yang, X., Birchfield, S., Wang, S., Kumar, R., Anas- tasiu, D., Hwang, J.-N.: Cityflow: A city-scale benchmark for multi-target multi-camera vehicle tracking and re-identification. In: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision...

2019
[258]

arXiv preprint arXiv:1910.03088 (2019)

Zhan, W., Sun, L., Wang, D., Shi, H., Clausse, A., Naumann, M., Kummerle, J., Konigshof, H., Stiller, C., La Fortelle, A., et al.: Interaction dataset: An interna- tional, adversarial and cooperative motion dataset in interactive driving scenarios with semantic maps. arXiv pre...

1910 arXiv
[259]

IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems 23(3), 1852–1864 (2020)

Arnold, E., Dianati, M., Temple, R., Fallah, S.: Cooperative perception for 3d object detection in driving scenarios using infrastructure sensors. IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems 23(3), 1852–1864 (2020)

2020
[260]

In: 2022 International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA), pp

Wang, H., Zhang, X., Li, Z., Li, J., Wang, K., Lei, Z., Haibing, R.: Ips300+: a chal- lenging multi-modal data sets for intersection perception system. In: 2022 International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA), pp. 2539–2545 (2022). IEEE

2022
[261]

In: 2022 IEEE Intelligent Vehicles Symposium (IV), pp

Busch, S., Koetsier, C., Axmann, J., Brenner, C.: Lumpi: The leibniz university multi- perspective intersection dataset. In: 2022 IEEE Intelligent Vehicles Symposium (IV), pp. 1127–1134 (2022). IEEE 58

2022
[262]

In: 2022 IEEE Intelligent Vehicles Symposium (IV), pp

Creß, C., Zimmer, W., Strand, L., Fortkord, M., Dai, S., Lakshminarasimhan, V., Knoll, A.: A9-dataset: Multi-sensor infrastructure-based dataset for mobility research. In: 2022 IEEE Intelligent Vehicles Symposium (IV), pp. 965–970 (2022). IEEE

2022
[263]

In: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pp

Ye, X., Shu, M., Li, H., Shi, Y., Li, Y., Wang, G., Tan, X., Ding, E.: Rope3d: The roadside perception dataset for autonomous driving and monocular 3d object detection task. In: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pp. 21341–21350 (2022)

2022
[264]

In: 2023 IEEE 26th International Conference on Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITSC), pp

Zimmer, W., Creß, C., Nguyen, H.T., Knoll, A.C.: Tumtraf intersection dataset: All you need for urban 3d camera-lidar roadside perception. In: 2023 IEEE 26th International Conference on Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITSC), pp. 1030–1037 (2023). IEEE

2023
[265]

In: European Conference on Computer Vision, pp

Zhu, X., Sheng, H., Cai, S., Deng, B., Yang, S., Liang, Q., Chen, K., Gao, L., Song, J., Ye, J.: Roscenes: A large-scale multi-view 3d dataset for roadside perception. In: European Conference on Computer Vision, pp. 331–347 (2024). Springer

2024
[266]

In: Pro- ceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pp

Hao, R., Fan, S., Dai, Y., Zhang, Z., Li, C., Wang, Y., Yu, H., Yang, W., Yuan, J., Nie, Z.: Rcooper: A real-world large-scale dataset for roadside cooperative perception. In: Pro- ceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pp. 22347–22357 (2024)

2024
[267]

The International Archives of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences 43, 255–263 (2021)

Yuan, Y., Sester, M.: Comap: A synthetic dataset for collective multi-agent perception of autonomous driving. The International Archives of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences 43, 255–263 (2021)

2021
[268]

IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters 7(2), 1502–1509 (2021)

Arnold, E., Mozaffari, S., Dianati, M.: Fast and robust registration of partially overlapping point clouds. IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters 7(2), 1502–1509 (2021)

2021
[269]

In: 2022 International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA), pp

Xu, R., Xiang, H., Xia, X., Han, X., Li, J., Ma, J.: Opv2v: An open benchmark dataset and fusion pipeline for perception with vehicle-to-vehicle communication. In: 2022 International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA), pp. 2583–2589 (2022). IEEE

2022
[270]

In: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pp

Xu, R., Xia, X., Li, J., Li, H., Zhang, S., Tu, Z., Meng, Z., Xiang, H., Dong, X., Song, R., et al.: V2v4real: A real-world large-scale dataset for vehicle-to-vehicle cooperative perception. In: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition,...

2023
[271]

In: 2023 IEEE Intelligent Vehicles Symposium (IV), pp

Axmann, J., Moftizadeh, R., Su, J., Tennstedt, B., Zou, Q., Yuan, Y., Ernst, D., Alkhatib, H., Brenner, C., Sch ¨on, S.: Lucoop: Leibniz university cooperative perception and urban navigation dataset. In: 2023 IEEE Intelligent Vehicles Symposium (IV), pp. 1–8 (2023). IEEE

2023
[272]

arXiv preprint arXiv:2401.13964 (2024) 59

Lu, Y., Hu, Y., Zhong, Y., Wang, D., Wang, Y., Chen, S.: An extensible framework for open heterogeneous collaborative perception. arXiv preprint arXiv:2401.13964 (2024) 59

2024 arXiv
[273]

In: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pp

Li, Y., Li, Z., Chen, N., Gong, M., Lyu, Z., Wang, Z., Jiang, P., Feng, C.: Multia- gent multitraversal multimodal self-driving: Open mars dataset. In: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pp. 22041–22051 (2024)

2024
[274]

arXiv preprint arXiv:2502.09980 (2025)

Chiu, H.-k., Hachiuma, R., Wang, C.-Y., Smith, S.F., Wang, Y.-C.F., Chen, M.-H.: V2v-llm: Vehicle-to-vehicle cooperative autonomous driving with multi-modal large language models. arXiv preprint arXiv:2502.09980 (2025)

2025
[275]

In: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pp

Yu, H., Luo, Y., Shu, M., Huo, Y., Yang, Z., Shi, Y., Guo, Z., Li, H., Hu, X., Yuan, J., et al.: Dair-v2x: A large-scale dataset for vehicle-infrastructure cooperative 3d object detection. In: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, p...

2022
[276]

: V2x-seq: A large-scale sequential dataset for vehicle-infrastructure cooperative perception and forecasting

Yu, H., Yang, W., Ruan, H., Yang, Z., Tang, Y., Gao, X., Hao, X., Shi, Y., Pan, Y., Sun, N., et al. : V2x-seq: A large-scale sequential dataset for vehicle-infrastructure cooperative perception and forecasting. In: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and ...

2023
[277]

In: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pp

Ma, C., Qiao, L., Zhu, C., Liu, K., Kong, Z., Li, Q., Zhou, X., Kan, Y., Wu, W.: Holovic: Large-scale dataset and benchmark for multi-sensor holographic intersection and vehicle-infrastructure cooperative. In: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Patte...

2024
[278]

In: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pp

Zimmer, W., Wardana, G.A., Sritharan, S., Zhou, X., Song, R., Knoll, A.C.: Tumtraf v2x cooperative perception dataset. In: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pp. 22668–22677 (2024)

2024
[279]

In: 2024 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS), pp

Zhu, H., Wang, Y., Kong, Q., Wei, Y., Xia, X., Deng, B., Xiong, R., Wang, Y.: Otvic: A dataset with online transmission for vehicle-to-infrastructure cooperative 3d object detection. In: 2024 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS), pp. 10732...

2024
[280]

IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems (2024)

Wang, H., Niu, Y., Chen, L., Li, Y., Sotelo, M.A., Li, Z., Cai, Y.: Dair-v2xreid: A new real-world vehicle-infrastructure cooperative re-id dataset and cross-shot feature aggre- gation network perception method. IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems (2024)

2024
[281]

arXiv preprint arXiv:2411.10962 (2024)

Yang, L., Zhang, X., Li, J., Wang, C., Song, Z., Zhao, T., Song, Z., Wang, L., Zhou, M., Shen, Y., et al.: V2x-radar: A multi-modal dataset with 4d radar for cooperative perception. arXiv preprint arXiv:2411.10962 (2024)

2024
[282]

IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters 7(4), 10914–10921 (2022)

Li, Y., Ma, D., An, Z., Wang, Z., Zhong, Y., Chen, S., Feng, C.: V2x-sim: Multi- agent collaborative perception dataset and benchmark for autonomous driving. IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters 7(4), 10914–10921 (2022)

2022
[283]

In: Proceedings of the Asian Conference on Computer Vision, pp

Mao, R., Guo, J., Jia, Y., Sun, Y., Zhou, S., Niu, Z.: Dolphins: Dataset for collaborative 60 perception enabled harmonious and interconnected self-driving. In: Proceedings of the Asian Conference on Computer Vision, pp. 4361–4377 (2022)

2022
[284]

In: European Conference on Computer Vision, pp

Xu, R., Xiang, H., Tu, Z., Xia, X., Yang, M.-H., Ma, J.: V2x-vit: Vehicle-to-everything cooperative perception with vision transformer. In: European Conference on Computer Vision, pp. 107–124 (2022). Springer

2022
[285]

Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems37, 13430–13457 (2025)

Ruan, H., Yu, H., Yang, W., Fan, S., Nie, Z.: Learning cooperative trajectory represen- tations for motion forecasting. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems37, 13430–13457 (2025)

2025
[286]

arXiv preprint arXiv:2412.01812 (2024)

Zhou, Z., Xiang, H., Zheng, Z., Zhao, S.Z., Lei, M., Zhang, Y., Cai, T., Liu, X., Liu, J., Bajji, M., et al.: V2xpnp: Vehicle-to-everything spatio-temporal fusion for multi-agent perception and prediction. arXiv preprint arXiv:2412.01812 (2024)

2024 arXiv
[287]

In: Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, vol

Wang, T., Kim, S., Wenxuan, J., Xie, E., Ge, C., Chen, J., Li, Z., Luo, P.: Deepaccident: A motion and accident prediction benchmark for v2x autonomous driving. In: Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, vol. 38, pp. 5599–5606 (2024)

2024
[288]

In: European Conference on Computer Vision, pp

Xiang, H., Zheng, Z., Xia, X., Xu, R., Gao, L., Zhou, Z., Han, X., Ji, X., Li, M., Meng, Z., et al.: V2x-real: a largs-scale dataset for vehicle-to-everything cooperative perception. In: European Conference on Computer Vision, pp. 455–470 (2025). Springer

2025
[289]

arXiv preprint arXiv:2409.04980 (2024)

Li, R., Pei, X.: Multi-v2x: A large scale multi-modal multi-penetration-rate dataset for cooperative perception. arXiv preprint arXiv:2409.04980 (2024)

2024 arXiv
[290]

arXiv preprint arXiv:2410.06380 (2024)

Karvat, M., Givigi, S.: Adver-city: Open-source multi-modal dataset for collaborative perception under adverse weather conditions. arXiv preprint arXiv:2410.06380 (2024)

2024 arXiv
[291]

arXiv preprint arXiv:2411.13340 (2024)

Chen, S., Song, Z., Zhou, S., et al.: Whales: A multi-agent scheduling dataset for enhanced cooperation in autonomous driving. arXiv preprint arXiv:2411.13340 (2024)

2024 arXiv
[292]

arXiv preprint arXiv:2408.03065 (2024)

Gamerdinger, J., Teufel, S., Schulz, P., Amann, S., Kirchner, J.-P., Bringmann, O.: Scope: A synthetic multi-modal dataset for collective perception including physical- correct weather conditions. arXiv preprint arXiv:2408.03065 (2024)

2024 arXiv
[293]

arXiv preprint arXiv:2502.14156 (2025)

Luo, K.Z., Dao, M.-Q., Liu, Z., Campbell, M., Chao, W.-L., Weinberger, K.Q., Malis, E., Fremont, V., Hariharan, B., Shan, M., et al.: Mixed signals: A diverse point cloud dataset for heterogeneous lidar v2x collaboration. arXiv preprint arXiv:2502.14156 (2025)

2025 arXiv
[296]

In: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pp

Mescheder, L., Oechsle, M., Niemeyer, M., Nowozin, S., Geiger, A.: Occupancy net- works: Learning 3d reconstruction in function space. In: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pp. 4460–4470 (2019)

2019
[297]

: Learning transferable visual models from natural language supervision

Radford, A., Kim, J.W., Hallacy, C., Ramesh, A., Goh, G., Agarwal, S., Sastry, G., Askell, A., Mishkin, P., Clark, J., et al. : Learning transferable visual models from natural language supervision. In: International Conference on Machine Learning, pp. 8748–8763 (2021). PmLR

2021
[298]

Advances in neural information processing systems 36, 19769–19782 (2023)

Zou, X., Yang, J., Zhang, H., Li, F., Li, L., Wang, J., Wang, L., Gao, J., Lee, Y.J.: Segment everything everywhere all at once. Advances in neural information processing systems 36, 19769–19782 (2023)

2023
[299]

In: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pp

Cheng, T., Song, L., Ge, Y., Liu, W., Wang, X., Shan, Y.: Yolo-world: Real-time open- vocabulary object detection. In: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pp. 16901–16911 (2024)

2024
[300]

arXiv preprint arXiv:2412.20645 (2024)

Liu, L., Feng, J., Chen, H., Wang, A., Song, L., Han, J., Ding, G.: Yolo-uniow: Efficient universal open-world object detection. arXiv preprint arXiv:2412.20645 (2024)

2024 arXiv

Pith tools

Reviewed August 5, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.

[1] [8]

arXiv preprint arXiv:2504.12696 (2025)

Wang, N., Shang, D., Gong, Y., Hu, X., Song, Z., Yang, L., Huang, Y., Wang, X., Lu, J.: Collaborative perception datasets for autonomous driving: A review. arXiv preprint arXiv:2504.12696 (2025)

arXiv 2025

[2] [294]

IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence (2025)

Xie, S., Kong, L., Zhang, W., Ren, J., Pan, L., Chen, K., Liu, Z.: Benchmarking and improving bird’s eye view perception robustness in autonomous driving. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence (2025)

work page 2025

[3] [295]

In: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pp

Zhu, Z., Zhang, Y., Chen, H., Dong, Y., Zhao, S., Ding, W., Zhong, J., Zheng, S.: Under- standing the robustness of 3d object detection with bird’s-eye-view representations in 61 autonomous driving. In: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pp. 21600–21610 (2023)

work page 2023

[4] [1]

IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems for Video Technology34(7), 5753–5764 (2024)

Wang, J., Li, F., An, Y., Zhang, X., Sun, H.: Toward robust lidar-camera fusion in bev space via mutual deformable attention and temporal aggregation. IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems for Video Technology34(7), 5753–5764 (2024)

2024

[5] [2]

IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems for Video Technology34(4), 2619–2632 (2023)

Song, Z., Jia, C., Yang, L., Wei, H., Liu, L.: Graphalign++: An accurate feature align- ment by graph matching for multi-modal 3d object detection. IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems for Video Technology34(4), 2619–2632 (2023)

2023

[6] [3]

IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Vehicles (2024)

Gong, Y., Jiang, X., Wang, L., Xu, L., Lu, J., Liu, H., Lin, L., Zhang, X.: Tclanenet: Task- conditioned lane detection network driven by vibration information. IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Vehicles (2024)

2024

[7] [4]

IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Vehicles 9(2), 4025–4039 (2023)

Zhang, X., Gong, Y., Lu, J., Li, Z., Li, S., Wang, S., Liu, W., Wang, L., Li, J.: Oblique convolution: A novel convolution idea for redefining lane detection. IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Vehicles 9(2), 4025–4039 (2023)

2023

[8] [5]

Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence 129, 107575 (2024)

Liu, W., Gong, Y., Zhang, G., Lu, J., Zhou, Y., Liao, J.: Glmdrivenet: Global–local multimodal fusion driving behavior classification network. Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence 129, 107575 (2024)

2024