REVIEW 3 cited by
MathChat: Converse to Tackle Challenging Math Problems with LLM Agents
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
Employing Large Language Models (LLMs) to address mathematical problems is an intriguing research endeavor, considering the abundance of math problems expressed in natural language across numerous science and engineering fields. LLMs, with their generalized ability, are used as a foundation model to build AI agents for different tasks. In this paper, we study the effectiveness of utilizing LLM agents to solve math problems through conversations. We propose MathChat, a conversational problem-solving framework designed for math problems. MathChat consists of an LLM agent and a user proxy agent which is responsible for tool execution and additional guidance. This synergy facilitates a collaborative problem-solving process, where the agents engage in a dialogue to solve the problems. We perform evaluation on difficult high school competition problems from the MATH dataset. Utilizing Python, we show that MathChat can further improve previous tool-using prompting methods by 6%.
Forward citations
Cited by 3 Pith papers
-
Who&When Pro: Can LLMs Really Attribute Failures in AI Agents?
A warm-start error-injection pipeline yields 12,326 golden-labeled multimodal agent failures, and current LLMs remain weak at step-and-mode failure attribution.
-
From EduVisBench to EduVisAgent: A Benchmark and Multi-Agent Framework for Reasoning-Driven Pedagogical Visualization
EduVisAgent, a five-agent framework, outperforms all baseline AI models at generating pedagogically effective interactive visualizations for STEM problems, according to the new EduVisBench benchmark and its GPT-4o-bas...
-
CAF-I: A Collaborative Multi-Agent Framework for Enhanced Irony Detection with Large Language Models
CAF-I, a multi-agent LLM framework with context, semantic, and rhetorical agents plus a refinement evaluator, reports state-of-the-art zero-shot irony detection, averaging 76.31 Macro-F1 across four benchmarks.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.