Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Discriminative Reasoning for Document-level Relation Extraction

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2106.01562 v1 pith:HYMZDBZD submitted 2021-06-03 cs.CL

classification cs.CL
keywords reasoningrelationdiscriminativedocumententitypairdocredocument-level
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Document-level relation extraction (DocRE) models generally use graph networks to implicitly model the reasoning skill (i.e., pattern recognition, logical reasoning, coreference reasoning, etc.) related to the relation between one entity pair in a document. In this paper, we propose a novel discriminative reasoning framework to explicitly model the paths of these reasoning skills between each entity pair in this document. Thus, a discriminative reasoning network is designed to estimate the relation probability distribution of different reasoning paths based on the constructed graph and vectorized document contexts for each entity pair, thereby recognizing their relation. Experimental results show that our method outperforms the previous state-of-the-art performance on the large-scale DocRE dataset. The code is publicly available at https://github.com/xwjim/DRN.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. NovBench: Evaluating Large Language Models on Academic Paper Novelty Assessment

    cs.CL 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 8.0 of 10

    NovBench is the first large-scale benchmark with 1,684 expert-annotated pairs to evaluate LLMs on assessing academic paper novelty via a four-dimensional framework of Relevance, Correctness, Coverage, and Clarity.

Pith tools