Pith. sign in

REVIEW

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2102.08475 v1 pith:HZG6WUT6 submitted 2021-02-16 cs.NE

Neuroevolution in Deep Learning: The Role of Neutrality

classification cs.NE
keywords trainingdeepevolutionarynetworksneuralneutralalgorithmsautomated
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

A variety of methods have been applied to the architectural configuration and learning or training of artificial deep neural networks (DNN). These methods play a crucial role in the success or failure of the DNN for most problems and applications. Evolutionary Algorithms (EAs) are gaining momentum as a computationally feasible method for the automated optimisation of DNNs. Neuroevolution is a term which describes these processes of automated configuration and training of DNNs using EAs. However, the automatic design and/or training of these modern neural networks through evolutionary algorithms is computanalli expensive. Kimura's neutral theory of molecular evolution states that the majority of evolutionary changes at molecular level are the result of random fixation of selectively neutral mutations. A mutation from one gene to another is neutral if it does not affect the phenotype. This work discusses how neutrality, given certain conditions, can help to speed up the training/design of deep neural networks.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.