The reviewed record of science sign in
Pith

arxiv: 2207.12237 · v1 · pith:HZJ4WCRA · submitted 2022-07-25 · astro-ph.HE · astro-ph.CO· astro-ph.IM

Evaluating the prevalence of spurious correlations in pulsar timing array datasets

Reviewed by Pith T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 kernel pith:HZJ4WCRArecord.jsonopen to challenge →

classification astro-ph.HE astro-ph.COastro-ph.IM
keywords processnoisetimingpulsararraycommon-spectrumcommoncorrelations
0
0 comments X
read the original abstract

Pulsar timing array collaborations have recently reported evidence for a noise process with a common spectrum among the millisecond pulsars in the arrays. The spectral properties of this common-noise process are consistent with expectations for an isotropic gravitational-wave background (GWB) from inspiralling supermassive black-hole binaries. However, recent simulation analyses based on Parkes Pulsar Timing Array data indicate that such a detection may arise spuriously. In this paper, we use simulated pulsar timing array datasets to further test the robustness of the inference methods for spectral and spatial correlations from a GWB. Expanding on our previous results, we find strong support (Bayes factors exceeding $10^5$) for the presence of a common-spectrum noise process in datasets where no common process is present, under a wide range of timing noise prescriptions per pulsar. We show that these results are highly sensitive to the choice of Bayesian priors on timing noise parameters, with priors that more closely match the injected distributions of timing noise parameters resulting in diminished support for a common-spectrum noise process. These results emphasize shortcomings in current methods for inferring the presence of a common-spectrum process, and imply that the detection of a common process is not a reliable precursor to detection of the GWB. Future searches for the nanohertz GWB should remain focussed on detecting spatial correlations, and make use of more tailored specifications for a common-spectrum noise process.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Comparing gravitational wave background predictions from cosmological simulations to pulsar timing observations

    astro-ph.GA 2026-07 conditional novelty 6.0

    FABLE simulation predictions for the nanohertz gravitational wave background are statistically consistent with NANOGrav 15-year data at 1–2.5σ tension, with physically motivated population modifications further improv...