Pith. sign in

REVIEW 10 cited by

Interpretability in Parameter Space: Minimizing Mechanistic Description Length with Attribution-based Parameter Decomposition

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2501.14926 v4 pith:HZR6AAVJ submitted 2025-01-24 cs.LG stat.ML

Interpretability in Parameter Space: Minimizing Mechanistic Description Length with Attribution-based Parameter Decomposition

classification cs.LG stat.ML
keywords networkmechanisticneuralcomponentsdecompositionidentifyinginterpretabilitymechanisms
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

Mechanistic interpretability aims to understand the internal mechanisms learned by neural networks. Despite recent progress toward this goal, it remains unclear how best to decompose neural network parameters into mechanistic components. We introduce Attribution-based Parameter Decomposition (APD), a method that directly decomposes a neural network's parameters into components that (i) are faithful to the parameters of the original network, (ii) require a minimal number of components to process any input, and (iii) are maximally simple. Our approach thus optimizes for a minimal length description of the network's mechanisms. We demonstrate APD's effectiveness by successfully identifying ground truth mechanisms in multiple toy experimental settings: Recovering features from superposition; separating compressed computations; and identifying cross-layer distributed representations. While challenges remain to scaling APD to non-toy models, our results suggest solutions to several open problems in mechanistic interpretability, including identifying minimal circuits in superposition, offering a conceptual foundation for 'features', and providing an architecture-agnostic framework for neural network decomposition.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 10 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. WriteSAE: Sparse Autoencoders for Recurrent State

    cs.LG 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 8.0

    WriteSAE introduces sparse autoencoders with rank-1 matrix atoms for recurrent state updates, allowing replacement tests that outperform deletion on 92.4% of positions and a formula predicting logit changes with R²=0.98.

  2. WriteSAE: Sparse Autoencoders for Recurrent State

    cs.LG 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 8.0

    WriteSAE is the first sparse autoencoder that factors decoder atoms into the native d_k x d_v cache write shape of recurrent models and supplies a closed-form per-token logit shift for atom substitution.

  3. WriteSAE: Sparse Autoencoders for Recurrent State

    cs.LG 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 8.0

    WriteSAE decomposes recurrent model cache writes into substitutable atoms with a closed-form logit shift, achieving high substitution success and targeted behavioral installs on models like Qwen3.5 and Mamba-2.

  4. WriteSAE: Sparse Autoencoders for Recurrent State

    cs.LG 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    WriteSAE factors sparse autoencoder decoder atoms to the native d_k x d_v cache write shape in recurrent models, provides a closed-form logit shift, and demonstrates high success in atom substitution and behavioral ed...

  5. From Mechanistic to Compositional Interpretability

    cs.LG 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    Compositional interpretability defines explanations as commuting syntactic-semantic mapping pairs grounded in compositionality and minimum description length, with compressive refinement and a parsimony theorem guaran...

  6. From Mechanistic to Compositional Interpretability

    cs.LG 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    The paper introduces compositional interpretability as a category-theoretic framework that casts mechanistic explanations as commuting syntactic-semantic mappings optimized under faithfulness and complexity constraint...

  7. Compressed Computation under $L^4$ Loss is likely Computation in Superposition

    cs.LG 2026-07 accept novelty 6.5

    Training a 50-neuron ReLU network under L4 loss elicits sparse binary codewords over neurons that compute 100 sparse ReLUs in superposition, recovered by a three-scalar ansatz.

  8. Individual Parameters in Weight-Sparse Transformers Appear Interpretable

    cs.LG 2026-07 conditional novelty 6.5

    An automated LLM pipeline finds that 12–31% of nonzero weights in weight-sparse transformers admit short, held-out-validated descriptions of when they matter, far above dense controls.

  9. Targeted Recovery of Weight-Space Mechanisms From Neural Networks

    cs.LG 2026-06 conditional novelty 6.0

    A targeted decomposition method recovers the weight-space mechanisms behind specific inputs at low FLOPs, enabling focused ablation and rewiring of a 12-block transformer.

  10. Probabilistic Modeling of Latent Agentic Substructures in Deep Neural Networks

    cs.LG 2025-09 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    Proposes a probabilistic framework for latent agentic substructures in DNNs using log-score utilities and log pooling, with proofs on unanimity and an application to persona emergence in LLM alignment.