REVIEW 3 cited by
Towards Tracing Trustworthiness Dynamics: Revisiting Pre-training Period of Large Language Models
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
Ensuring the trustworthiness of large language models (LLMs) is crucial. Most studies concentrate on fully pre-trained LLMs to better understand and improve LLMs' trustworthiness. In this paper, to reveal the untapped potential of pre-training, we pioneer the exploration of LLMs' trustworthiness during this period, focusing on five key dimensions: reliability, privacy, toxicity, fairness, and robustness. To begin with, we apply linear probing to LLMs. The high probing accuracy suggests that \textit{LLMs in early pre-training can already distinguish concepts in each trustworthiness dimension}. Therefore, to further uncover the hidden possibilities of pre-training, we extract steering vectors from a LLM's pre-training checkpoints to enhance the LLM's trustworthiness. Finally, inspired by~\citet{choi2023understanding} that mutual information estimation is bounded by linear probing accuracy, we also probe LLMs with mutual information to investigate the dynamics of trustworthiness during pre-training. We are the first to observe a similar two-phase phenomenon: fitting and compression~\citep{shwartz2017opening}. This research provides an initial exploration of trustworthiness modeling during LLM pre-training, seeking to unveil new insights and spur further developments in the field. We will make our code publicly accessible at \url{https://github.com/ChnQ/TracingLLM}.
Forward citations
Cited by 3 Pith papers
-
Demystifying Reasoning Dynamics with Mutual Information: Thinking Tokens are Information Peaks in LLM Reasoning
Reasoning tokens like 'Hmm' and 'Wait' mark steps where a model's internal state carries unusually high dependence with the correct answer, and suppressing them hurts accuracy.
-
Towards AI-$45^{\circ}$ Law: A Roadmap to Trustworthy AGI
The paper proposes the AI-45 degree law, a Causal Ladder framework, and five trustworthiness levels as a roadmap toward trustworthy AGI.
-
Explainable and Interpretable Multimodal Large Language Models: A Comprehensive Survey
A survey maps the field of MLLM explainability and interpretability into data, model, and training and inference perspectives.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.