Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 cited by

The Gradient of Generative AI Release: Methods and Considerations

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2302.04844 v1 pith:I5JPCICC submitted 2023-02-05 cs.CY cs.AI

classification cs.CYcs.AI
keywords generativeaccesssystemsfullyreleasegradientclosedconsiderations
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

As increasingly powerful generative AI systems are developed, the release method greatly varies. We propose a framework to assess six levels of access to generative AI systems: fully closed; gradual or staged access; hosted access; cloud-based or API access; downloadable access; and fully open. Each level, from fully closed to fully open, can be viewed as an option along a gradient. We outline key considerations across this gradient: release methods come with tradeoffs, especially around the tension between concentrating power and mitigating risks. Diverse and multidisciplinary perspectives are needed to examine and mitigate risk in generative AI systems from conception to deployment. We show trends in generative system release over time, noting closedness among large companies for powerful systems and openness among organizations founded on principles of openness. We also enumerate safety controls and guardrails for generative systems and necessary investments to improve future releases.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 3 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Attestable Audits: Verifiable AI Safety Benchmarks Using Trusted Execution Environments

    cs.AI 2025-06 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    A TEE-based protocol for cryptographically verifiable AI safety benchmark results, demonstrated on Llama-3.1 with AWS Nitro Enclaves.

  2. Position Paper: Model Access should be a Key Concern in AI Governance

    cs.CY 2024-12 accept novelty 4.0 of 10

    Model access decisions should be studied and coordinated through a dedicated research field, with recommendations for evaluators, companies, governments, and international bodies.

  3. AI Safety Frameworks Should Include Procedures for Model Access Decisions

    cs.CY 2024-11 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

    The paper introduces Responsible Access Policies as a recommended component of frontier AI safety frameworks for governing model access.

Pith tools