Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 cited by

Emergent Language: A Survey and Taxonomy

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2409.02645 v2 pith:IA5SUYSC submitted 2024-09-04 cs.MA cs.CL

classification cs.MAcs.CL
keywords languageartificialemergentresearchagentsemergencefieldhuman
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

0 comments
read the original abstract

The field of emergent language represents a novel area of research within the domain of artificial intelligence, particularly within the context of multi-agent reinforcement learning. Although the concept of studying language emergence is not new, early approaches were primarily concerned with explaining human language formation, with little consideration given to its potential utility for artificial agents. In contrast, studies based on reinforcement learning aim to develop communicative capabilities in agents that are comparable to or even superior to human language. Thus, they extend beyond the learned statistical representations that are common in natural language processing research. This gives rise to a number of fundamental questions, from the prerequisites for language emergence to the criteria for measuring its success. This paper addresses these questions by providing a comprehensive review of 181 scientific publications on emergent language in artificial intelligence. Its objective is to serve as a reference for researchers interested in or proficient in the field. Consequently, the main contributions are the definition and overview of the prevailing terminology, the analysis of existing evaluation methods and metrics, and the description of the identified research gaps.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 3 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Generative Emergent Communication: Large Language Model is a Collective World Model

    cs.AI 2024-12 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    LLMs acquire world knowledge by statistically decoding a collective world model that human societies encoded in language.

  2. Reward-Independent Messaging for Decentralized Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning

    cs.MA 2025-05 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    MARL-CPC lets decentralized agents learn to send informative messages through a self-supervised reconstruction objective, and outperforms message-as-action baselines in non-cooperative multi-agent tasks.

  3. Forbidden Science: Dual-Use AI Challenge Benchmark and Scientific Refusal Tests

    cs.CL 2025-02 reject novelty 4.0 of 10

    A new 512-prompt benchmark claims to measure LLM over-refusal on scientific dual-use questions, but its design and labeling flaws undermine the claim.

Pith tools