Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 3 minor 1 cited by

The mass of the Milky Way from outer halo stars measured by DESI DR1

T0 review · 3 major / 3 minor · reviewed 2026-08-05 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read DESI outer-halo stars place the Milky Way's enclosed mass within 100 kpc at 0.57 × 10^12 solar masses, with a virial mass near 0.8 × 10^12.

desk verdict New DESI outer halo tracers give a lower-end MW mass, but the quoted errors are posterior-only; still a solid, citable measurement. read the letter →

arxiv 2508.19351 v1 pith:IDMDUELC submitted 2025-08-26 astro-ph.GA

Gustavo E. Medina , Ting S. Li , Gwendolyn M. Eadie , Alexander H. Riley , Monica Valluri , Nabeel Rehemtulla , Jiaxin Han , Wenting Wang
show 45 more authors
Amanda Byström Leandro Beraldo e Silva S. E. Koposov N. R. Sandford R. G. Carlberg M. Lambert O. Y. Gnedin A. P. Cooper J. García-Bellido N. Kizhuprakkat B. A. Weaver J. Aguilar S. Ahlen A. Anand D. Bianchi D. Brooks T. Claybaugh A. Cuceu A. de la Macorra P. Doel S. Ferraro J. E. Forero-Romero E. Gaztañaga J. Guy R. Kehoe S. Kent T. Kisner M. Landriau L. Le Guillou M. E. Levi M. Manera A. Meisner R. Miquel N. Palanque-Delabrouille W. J. Percival F. Prada I. Pérez-Ráfols G. Rossi E. Sanchez D. Schlegel M. Schubnell J. Silber D. Sprayberry G. Tarlé H. Zou
This is my paper
classification astro-ph.GA
keywords MilkyWaymassouterhalostarsbluehorizontalbranchRRLyraedistributionfunctionhierarchicalBayesianinferenceDESISurveydarkmatter
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper uses 330 blue horizontal-branch stars and 110 RR Lyrae stars in the Milky Way's outer halo (Galactocentric distances 50–100 kpc), combining DESI line-of-sight velocities with Gaia proper motions, to fit a spherical power-law model of the Galactic potential through a hierarchical Bayesian estimator. Its central result is an enclosed mass of 0.57 (+0.08/−0.07) × 10^12 solar masses within 100 kpc from blue horizontal-branch stars and 0.55 (+0.12/−0.10) × 10^12 from RR Lyrae stars, with extrapolated virial masses of 0.85 and 0.78 × 10^12. Validation on mock DESI-like catalogs shows the method recovers the true enclosed mass to within a few percent at 100 kpc when only stars beyond 50 kpc are used, while including inner stars biases the answer low by up to ~20%. This matters because the Milky Way's total mass is a benchmark for comparing our galaxy with cosmological simulations and for interpreting dark-matter measurements in our own halo.

What carries the argument

The central object is the phase-space distribution function F(E,L; α, β, γ, Φ0) for a spherical galaxy, built from a power-law potential Φ(r)=Φ0 r^(−γ), a power-law tracer density ρ ∝ r^(−α), and a constant velocity anisotropy β. This function acts as the prior linking each star's position and velocity to four model parameters, and the enclosed mass follows from M(<r) ∝ γ Φ0 r^(1−γ). Missing proper motions are treated as nuisance parameters in the hierarchical Bayesian posterior, allowing the model to use stars with incomplete 6D information.

What would settle it

Refit the same DESI tracers with a broken power-law tracer density and an explicit Large Magellanic Cloud perturbation; if the enclosed mass at 100 kpc shifts by more than the mock-calibrated ~20%, the spherical single-power-law equilibrium assumption is what is carrying the quoted value.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

On the paper's own terms, the central discovery is that the Milky Way's cumulative mass profile can be pinned down at 50–100 kpc using DESI's spectroscopic velocities for halo distance indicators, yielding M(<100 kpc) = 0.57 (+0.08/−0.07) × 10^12 M_sun for blue horizontal-branch stars and 0.55 (+0.12/−0.10) × 10^12 M_sun for RR Lyrae stars, and M200 = 0.85 (+0.16/−0.14) and 0.78 (+0.19/−0.15) × 10^12 M_sun. These masses come from fitting the phase-space distribution function of a spherical power-law potential to full 6D measurements, with missing proper motions treated as nuisance parameters; mock DESI-like catalogs recover the true mass to within a few percent at 100 kpc when stars closer t

Load-bearing premise

The central assumption is that the outer-halo stars are a settled, spherically symmetric population whose density falls off as one smooth power law; if the halo is lopsided, stirred up by the Large Magellanic Cloud, or changes slope inside the fitted region, the inferred mass shifts.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Within 100 kpc, the Milky Way's enclosed mass is constrained to roughly 0.5–0.65 × 10^12 M_sun, tighter than most previous outer-halo estimates.
  • The extrapolated virial mass M200 ≈ 0.8–0.9 × 10^12 M_sun favors the lower end of the literature range and agrees with rotation-curve and stellar-stream measurements rather than satellite-based estimates.
  • DESI's growing spectroscopic sample can serve as a precision mass probe; future data releases with more stars beyond 100 kpc should shrink the credible intervals on the extrapolated profile.
  • Survey selection matters: including tracers inside 50 kpc, or incompleteness beyond ~80 kpc, can shift the inferred mass by 10–30%, so selection effects must be modelled rather than simply cut away.
  • Different tracers and methods bracket the mass: BHBs and RRLs agree with each other, while a Jeans-based analysis gives roughly 25% higher mass, so the systematic spread exceeds the statistical errors of any single method.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • A consequence the authors leave implicit is that a single-power-law model cannot simultaneously describe the inner and outer halo; the mock-calibrated ~20% downward bias when inner stars are included is a direct argument for a broken tracer-density profile in future fits.
  • The agreement between BHBs and RRLs, and with stream-based masses at 100 kpc, suggests the lower-mass side of the literature is the more plausible one, though the 25% Jeans offset keeps the door open for a higher true mass.
  • A natural testable extension is to let the tracer density slope break near 30–50 kpc and to let the velocity anisotropy vary with radius; that would convert the paper's main caveat into an explicit, falsifiable test of the equilibrium assumption.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 3 minor

Summary. The paper measures the Milky Way's cumulative mass profile using 6D phase-space information for 330 blue horizontal-branch stars and 110 RR Lyrae stars from DESI DR1 at Galactocentric radii above 50 kpc. The authors apply a hierarchical Bayesian Galactic Mass Estimator (GME) based on an Evans-family distribution function with a power-law potential (Eq. 9), a power-law tracer density (Eq. 10), and constant velocity anisotropy (Eq. 11). They report M(<100 kpc) = 0.57^{+0.08}_{-0.07} × 10^12 M_sun from BHBs and 0.55^{+0.12}_{-0.10} × 10^12 M_sun from RRLs, with extrapolated M_200 = 0.85^{+0.16}_{-0.14} and 0.78^{+0.19}_{-0.15} × 10^12 M_sun, respectively. The method is validated on AuriDESI mocks constructed from two Auriga halos, and additional systematic checks include Sgr-stream removal, RRL completeness limits, target/program variations, and an independent Jeans analysis with NIMBLE.

Significance. If the quoted uncertainties are taken at face value, this is a valuable measurement because it uses a homogeneous, well-characterized DESI sample of outer-halo tracers, applies a public and reproducible Bayesian code, and tests the method on realistic mocks. The paper is also transparent about known limitations: it reports the AuriDESI biases, the 10-30% variations from selection choices, and the 25% higher NIMBLE Jeans result. The main body of evidence supports the central value, but the error budget is not yet complete: the quoted posterior intervals in Table 4 do not include model-form, selection-function, or method-dependence systematics shown in Sections 4.3, 5.2, and Appendix C. The paper would be substantially strengthened by a systematic-error budget or a range of results across model choices.

major comments (3)
  1. [Table 3, §5] The inferred tracer-density slope α is pinned at the prior boundary: α = 3.001^{+0.001}_{-0.000} for BHBs and 3.002^{+0.004}_{-0.002} for RRLs. Given the model restriction α > 3 stated in §3.1, the data cannot constrain α, and the posterior is dominated by the prior. Since α is an integral part of the assumed distribution-function family, this makes it difficult to know how much of the mass inference is driven by the parametric form rather than by the data. The paper treats α as a nuisance parameter, but the sensitivity of M(<100 kpc) and M_200 to the α prior and to alternative tracer-density profiles should be quantified and reported; otherwise the error bars in Table 4 understate the model dependence.
  2. [§4.3, Tables 1–2, Figure 5] The AuriDESI validation is narrower than the abstract's claim of recovery 'between 50 and 200 kpc.' The mock catalogs contain stars only out to about 80 kpc (Figure 5 and §4.2), so the 80-100 kpc range where the DESI samples are concentrated is not directly exercised. Only two Auriga halos are used, with M_200 between 1-2 × 10^12 M_sun (§4), i.e., not near the inferred 0.8 × 10^12 M_sun. The Au-6 recovery at RGC>50 kpc is good, but Au-21 shows biases inside 100 kpc and beyond, and the paper itself reports up to ~20% underestimation when 30-50 kpc stars are included. Thus the mock tests establish the method's behavior on a limited set of high-mass halos, but they do not by themselves support the full precision and accuracy claim over the distance and mass range of the real inference.
  3. [§5.2, Appendix C.2, Table 4] The principal quoted results are posterior intervals only. Section 5.2 lists mass shifts of 10-30% from Sgr-removal choices, RRL completeness (15% from including stars with G>20), and program/target selections. Appendix C.2 shows that an independent Jeans analysis (NIMBLE) using DESI RRLs gives masses 25% higher at 100 kpc. None of these are incorporated into the Table 4 uncertainties. The central values may be correct, but as reported the errors are not a measurement-level systematic budget. The authors should either propagate these systematic terms into the final uncertainties, present a systematic-error table, or reframe the quoted numbers as conditional on the assumed DF family and selection model.
minor comments (3)
  1. [§5.1] The sentence 'we obtain an enclosed mass of 0.58^{+0.12}_{-0.10} × 10^12 M_sun and 0.65^{+0.09}_{-0.08} × 10^12 M_sun, respectively' does not match Table 4, which reports 0.57^{+0.08}_{-0.07} for BHBs and 0.55^{+0.12}_{-0.10} for RRLs. Please correct the inconsistency or clarify which profile is being quoted.
  2. [Abstract and Table 4] The abstract and Section 6 state 330 BHBs and 110 RRLs, while Table 4 reports N=321 and N=101. The difference is not explained in the text. Please reconcile the sample counts.
  3. [§3.1, Eq. (5)] In Eq. (5), the condition '1.50 < log(g) − k·Teff < 2.65' has units mixing dex and K; the constant k=0.00014 is presumably intended as K^{-1}. A short statement of units would avoid confusion.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: mass is inferred from phase-space data via a fitted potential, with independent mock validation.

full rationale

The central claim, M(<100 kpc), is obtained by fitting the potential parameters Φ0 and γ (Eq. 9) to the 6D phase-space data of BHB/RRL stars through the hierarchical Bayesian likelihood (Eqs. 17–19), then evaluating the enclosed mass from Eq. 13. This is standard parameter estimation: the positions, velocities, and proper motions are not themselves the mass, and the mapping through the assumed Evans-family distribution function is a dynamical model, not an identity. No quantity is fitted to the reported mass and then re-presented as a prediction. The method is validated against AuriDESI mocks with known masses (Section 4.3), an external benchmark, and the paper explicitly quantifies and flags limitations—selection effects (10–30% shifts), Sgr removal, completeness, and the NIMBLE Jeans comparison (25% higher mass)—as caveats rather than claiming they are captured by the quoted posterior intervals. Self-citations to Eadie et al. (2015, 2017) and Shen et al. (2022) provide the algorithm and background; they are not load-bearing because the code is public and the method is re-tested on independent simulations in this paper. The pinned α near its lower bound is a nuisance-parameter/model-identifiability issue, not a circular reduction. No circular step is identified.

Assumptions & free parameters 4 free parameters · 6 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central mass estimate comes from fitting four distribution-function parameters under strong symmetry and equilibrium assumptions. No new physical entities are introduced.

free parameters (4)
  • Phi0 = 40.6 (BHBs), 43.7 (RRLs) in 10^4 km^2/s^2
    Normalization of the gravitational potential; fitted to kinematic data via posterior sampling.
  • gamma = 0.421 (BHBs), 0.466 (RRLs)
    Power-law slope of the potential; determines radial scaling of the mass.
  • alpha = 3.001 (BHBs), 3.002 (RRLs)
    Slope of the tracer density profile; constrained near the lower bound of 3 and treated as a nuisance parameter.
  • beta = 0.247 (BHBs), 0.304 (RRLs)
    Velocity anisotropy, assumed constant across the radial range.
assumptions (6)
  • domain assumption Spherical symmetry of the gravitational potential and tracer distribution
    Used in Eqs. 9-11 and throughout; the paper acknowledges it is an oversimplification (Section 6).
  • domain assumption Dynamical equilibrium and steady state of halo tracers
    Required for the distribution function approach; the paper reviews evidence that the outer halo may not be fully relaxed (Section 5.2).
  • domain assumption Single power-law forms Phi(r) proportional to r^{-gamma} and rho(r) proportional to r^{-alpha} are valid for RGC > 50 kpc
    Adopted from Evans et al. (1997) and Shen et al. (2022); the paper argues the outer halo can be approximated by a simple power law (Section 3.1).
  • domain assumption Constant velocity anisotropy beta
    Part of the model definition (Eq. 11); no radial variation is allowed.
  • ad hoc to paper Survey selection function and completeness can be ignored in the likelihood
    Stated in Section 3.2: the model 'does not explicitly consider the survey's limitations'. The paper tests some effects but does not marginalize over them.
  • domain assumption The RRL sample is complete up to G = 20 mag
    Assumed from the amplitude-magnitude distribution (Section 2.5.1); used to cut the RRL sample to 110 stars.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of The mass of the Milky Way from outer halo stars measured by DESI DR1." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/IDMDUELC

@misc{pith2026250819351,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: The mass of the Milky Way from outer halo stars measured by DESI DR1},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/IDMDUELC}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2508.19351}
}
abstract

As a benchmark for galaxy evolution and dark matter studies, the total mass of the Milky Way is a parameter of cosmological significance, and its value at large radii from the Galactic center remains highly uncertain. Following a hierarchical Bayesian inference approach, we measure the cumulative mass of the Milky Way using full 6D phase-space information of stars from the first data release of the Dark Energy Spectroscopic Instrument (DESI). We employ 330 blue horizontal-branch stars (BHBs) and 110 RR Lyrae stars (RRLs) in DESI covering Galactocentric distances in the range $\sim$50--100 kpc. Within 100 kpc from the Galactic center, we report an enclosed mass of $M(<100\ {\rm kpc}) = 0.57^{+0.08}_{-0.07}\times10^{12}$ M$_\odot$ and $M(<100\ {\rm kpc}) = 0.55^{+0.12}_{-0.10}\times10^{12}$ M$_\odot$ when using BHBs and RRLs, respectively. Extrapolating our mass profiles beyond the extent of our data, we find the virial mass of the Galaxy to be $M_{200}=0.85^{+0.16}_{-0.14}\times10^{12}$ M$_\odot$ and $M_{200}=0.78^{+0.19}_{-0.15}\times10^{12}$ M$_\odot$, respectively. We validate the effectiveness and limitations of our method using mock BHBs and RRLs from two AuriDESI halos. These tests show that the code recovers the enclosed mass of the mock galaxy with high precision and accuracy between 50 and 200 kpc, independent of the stellar tracer used and their spatial distribution. The tests also suggest an underestimation of the galaxy's cumulative mass at a level of up to $\sim20$\% if stars close to the Galactic center are used in the models. Our mass estimates lay the groundwork for future inference of the Galactic mass with upcoming DESI data releases and spectroscopic surveys mapping the halo.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2508.19351 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Spatial distribution in Equatorial coordinates of the DESI BHBs and RRLs (left and right panels, respectively). The upper panels show the full catalogs of BHBs and RRLs used in this work, whereas the bottom panels depict the samples used for our GME analysis, resulting from employing the cuts described in Section 2.5. 2011b; Fermani & Sch¨onrich 2013; Barbosa et al. 2022 for BHBs, and Catelan & Smith 2015; Bhardwaj … view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Heliocentric distance distribution of the BHBs and RRLs in DESI DR1. The significant overdensities of stars at dH > 30 kpc correspond to various substructures in the halo (intact satellites, stellar streams, and remnants from accretion events). contains 5,290 unique BHBs, which are used as a start￾ing point for the analysis (concerning BHBs) presented in this work [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Distribution of heliocentric distances (dH), az￾imuthal velocities (vϕ), and line-of-sight velocities (vlos) of the DESI BHBs and RRLs used in this work for the MW mass determination (i.e., after the selection cuts de￾scribed in Section 2.5). Stars in the RRL sample beyond the limit at which we consider the catalog to be complete (int average g > 20) are represented by grey markers. our sample, as shown in [PITH_FU… view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (8 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Column-normalized 2D histograms showing the (peak-to-peak) G−band amplitude as a function of G−band intensity￾averaged magnitude for the RRab and RRc stars in the Gaia DR2 and DR3 RRL catalogs. A blue solid line is used to depict the variation of the median G−band ampl…
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Heliocentric distance distribution of the Au￾riDESI BHB and RRL catalogs in Au-6 (top) and Au-21 (bottom). The depicted distributions correspond to the stars selected as part of the DESI DR1-like catalogs (the tiled footprint). Given the design of the AuriDESI simulati…
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Spatial distribution of the tiled BHB (top panels) and RRL (bottom panels) samples in the AuriDESI mock galaxies Au-6 (left panels) and Au-21 (right panels), shown as 2D histograms. The footprint of these stars shown correspond to the tiled catalogs, which resemble the…
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Cumulative mass profile of the AuriDESI galaxy Au-6 (left) and Au-21 (right), measured using our GME analysis and the mock BHB and RRL samples (in blue and red, respectively) as described in Section 4.3. In both panels, shaded regions represent the confidence intervals…
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: Corner plots showing the marginal posterior probabilities and correlations for the mass estimation model parameters (Φ0 in units of 104 km2 s −2 , γ, β, α), obtained when using the BHB (left) and RRL (right) samples from DESI DR1, as described in Section 3. Vertical da…
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: Left: Cumulative mass profile (Galactocentric distance vs. enclosed mass) of the Galaxy, derived from our BHB and RRL samples. Vertical lines represent the distance of the individual tracers used for our mass modeling. Right: Same as left but including the cumulative m…
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: Adapted from Bobylev & Baykova (2023) and Bayer et al. (2025). Enclosed mass of the MW de￾rived from different methods and tracers. In this case, we highlight specific works from the literature, following: 1– (K¨upper et al. 2015), 2–(Malhan & Ibata 2019), 3–(Prudil e…
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: Comparison of our results (DESI BHBs and DESI RRLs) with MW mass measurements from the literature. We compare our results with those obtained with different methods, namely distribution function (DF), escape velocity, Jeans equation, halo kinematics, rotation curve, a…

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. The Milky Way - Large Magellanic Cloud Interaction with Simulation Based Inference

    astro-ph.GA 2025-10 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    Simulation-based inference on outer-halo star velocities gives a Milky Way reflex speed of 26.4 km/s and an LMC enclosed mass of 9.2×10^10 solar masses within 50 kpc.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

169 extracted references · 33 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper

  1. [1]

    , " * write output.state after.block = add.period write newline

    ENTRY address archivePrefix author booktitle chapter doi edition editor eprint howpublished institution journal key month number organization pages publisher school series title misctitle type volume year version url label extra.label sort.label short.list INTEGERS output.state before.all mid.sentence after.sentence after.block FUNCTION init.state.consts ...

  2. [2]

    write newline

    " write newline "" before.all 'output.state := FUNCTION format.url url empty "" new.block "" url * "" * if FUNCTION format.eprint eprint empty "" archivePrefix empty "" archivePrefix "arXiv" = new.block " " eprint * " " * new.block " " eprint * " " * if if if FUNCTION format.doi doi empty "" " " doi * " " * if FUNCTION format.pid doi empty eprint empty ""...

  3. [3]

    - [1] #1 = = ^ ^ ^ .\!\!^ d .\!\!^ h .\!\!^ m .\!\!^ s .\!\!^ @mss

    thebibliography [1] 20pt to REFERENCES 6pt =0pt -12pt 10pt plus 3pt =0pt =0pt =1pt plus 1pt =0pt =0pt -12pt =13pt plus 1pt =20pt =13pt plus 1pt \@M =10000 =-1.0em =0pt =0pt 0pt =0pt =1.0em @enumiv\@empty 10000 10000 `\.\@m \@noitemerr \@latex@warning Empty `thebibliography' environment \@ifnextchar \@reference \@latexerr Missing key on reference command E...

    2021

  4. [4]

    51 틽 RJ) !

    thebibliography [1] 20pt to REFERENCES 6pt =0pt 10pt plus 3pt =0pt =0pt =1pt plus 1pt =0pt =0pt -12pt =13pt plus 1pt =20pt =13pt plus 1pt \@M =10000 =-1.0em =0pt =0pt 0pt =0pt =1.0em @enumiv\@empty 10000 10000 `\.\@m \@noitemerr \@latex@warning Empty `thebibliography' environment \@ifnextchar \@reference \@latexerr Missing key on reference command Each re...

    2019

  5. [5]

    2017, , 846, 10, 10.3847/1538-4357/aa83b2

    Ablimit , I., & Zhao , G. 2017, , 846, 10, 10.3847/1538-4357/aa83b2

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/aa83b2 2017

  6. [6]

    Ablimit , I., Zhao , G., Flynn , C., & Bird , S. A. 2020, , 895, L12, 10.3847/2041-8213/ab8d45

    doi:10.3847/2041-8213/ab8d45 2020

  7. [7]

    C., Wilhelm , R., et al

    Allende Prieto , C., Beers , T. C., Wilhelm , R., et al. 2006, , 636, 804, 10.1086/498131

    doi:10.1086/498131 2006

  8. [8]

    Amarante , J. A. S., Koposov , S. E., & Laporte , C. F. P. 2024, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2404.09825, 10.48550/arXiv.2404.09825

    arXiv doi:10.48550/arxiv.2404.09825 2024

Show all 169 references
  1. [9]

    2024, , 168, 124, 10.3847/1538-3881/ad60c2

    Anand , A., Guy , J., Bailey , S., et al. 2024, , 168, 124, 10.3847/1538-3881/ad60c2

    2024 doi

  2. [10]

    M., Guhathakurta , P., & Johnston , K

    Apfel , M., McKinnon , K., Rockosi , C. M., Guhathakurta , P., & Johnston , K. V. 2025, , 988, 225, 10.3847/1538-4357/ade43d

    2025 doi

  3. [11]

    P., Tollerud , E

    Astropy Collaboration , Robitaille , T. P., Tollerud , E. J., et al. 2013, , 558, A33, 10.1051/0004-6361/201322068

    2013 doi

  4. [12]

    M., Sip o cz , B

    Astropy Collaboration , Price-Whelan , A. M., Sip o cz , B. M., et al. 2018, , 156, 123, 10.3847/1538-3881/aabc4f

    2018 doi

  5. [13]

    M., Lim , P

    Astropy Collaboration , Price-Whelan , A. M., Lim , P. L., et al. 2022, , 935, 167, 10.3847/1538-4357/ac7c74

    2022 doi

  6. [14]

    T., & Bobylev , V

    Bajkova , A. T., & Bobylev , V. V. 2016, Astronomy Letters, 42, 567, 10.1134/S1063773716090012

    2016 doi

  7. [15]

    O., Santucci , R

    Barbosa , F. O., Santucci , R. M., Rossi , S., et al. 2022, , 940, 30, 10.3847/1538-4357/ac983f

    2022 doi

  8. [16]

    2005, , 364, 433, 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2005.09367.x

    Battaglia , G., Helmi , A., Morrison , H., et al. 2005, , 364, 433, 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2005.09367.x

    2005

  9. [17]

    F., et al

    Bayer , M., Starkenburg , E., Thomas , G. F., et al. 2025, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2502.17319, 10.48550/arXiv.2502.17319

    2025 doi arXiv

  10. [18]

    W., Koposov , S

    Belokurov , V., Erkal , D., Evans , N. W., Koposov , S. E., & Deason , A. J. 2018, , 478, 611, 10.1093/mnras/sty982

    2018 doi

  11. [19]

    E., Evans , N

    Belokurov , V., Koposov , S. E., Evans , N. W., et al. 2014, , 437, 116, 10.1093/mnras/stt1862

    2014 doi

  12. [20]

    2023, , 944, L51, 10.3847/2041-8213/acba7f

    Bhardwaj , A., Marconi , M., Rejkuba , M., et al. 2023, , 944, L51, 10.3847/2041-8213/acba7f

    2023 doi

  13. [21]

    2014, , 785, 63, 10.1088/0004-637X/785/1/63

    Bhattacharjee , P., Chaudhury , S., & Kundu , S. 2014, , 785, 63, 10.1088/0004-637X/785/1/63

    2014 doi

  14. [22]

    2008, Galactic Dynamics: Second Edition

    Binney , J., & Tremaine , S. 2008, Galactic Dynamics: Second Edition

    2008

  15. [23]

    A., Xue , X.-X., Liu , C., et al

    Bird , S. A., Xue , X.-X., Liu , C., et al. 2019, , 157, 104, 10.3847/1538-3881/aafd2e

    2019 doi

  16. [24]

    2021, , 919, 66, 10.3847/1538-4357/abfa9e

    ---. 2021, , 919, 66, 10.3847/1538-4357/abfa9e

    2021 doi

  17. [25]

    2022, , 516, 731, 10.1093/mnras/stac2036

    ---. 2022, , 516, 731, 10.1093/mnras/stac2036

    2022 doi

  18. [26]

    2016, , 54, 529, 10.1146/annurev-astro-081915-023441

    Bland-Hawthorn , J., & Gerhard , O. 2016, , 54, 529, 10.1146/annurev-astro-081915-023441

    2016 doi

  19. [27]

    V., & Baykova , A

    Bobylev , V. V., & Baykova , A. T. 2023, Astronomy Reports, 67, 812, 10.1134/S1063772923080024

    2023 doi

  20. [28]

    F., Crestani , J., Fabrizio , M., et al

    Braga , V. F., Crestani , J., Fabrizio , M., et al. 2021, , 919, 85, 10.3847/1538-4357/ac1074

    2021 doi

  21. [29]

    2012, , 427, 127, 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2012.21948.x

    Bressan , A., Marigo , P., Girardi , L., et al. 2012, , 427, 127, 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2012.21948.x

    2012

  22. [30]

    E., Lilleengen , S., et al

    Bystr \"o m , A., Koposov , S. E., Lilleengen , S., et al. 2024, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2410.09149, 10.48550/arXiv.2410.09149

    2024 doi arXiv

  23. [31]

    M., Cautun , M., Deason , A

    Callingham , T. M., Cautun , M., Deason , A. J., et al. 2019, , 484, 5453, 10.1093/mnras/stz365

    2019 doi

  24. [32]

    A., Clayton , G

    Cardelli , J. A., Clayton , G. C., & Mathis , J. S. 1989, , 345, 245, 10.1086/167900

    1989 doi

  25. [33]

    Catelan , M., & Smith , H. A. 2015, Pulsating Stars

    2015

  26. [34]

    J., et al

    Cautun , M., Ben \' tez-Llambay , A., Deason , A. J., et al. 2020, , 494, 4291, 10.1093/mnras/staa1017

    2020 doi

  27. [35]

    2023, , 525, 3075, 10.1093/mnras/stad2296

    Chen , A., Li , Z., Wang , Y., et al. 2023, , 525, 3075, 10.1093/mnras/stad2296

    2023 doi

  28. [36]

    2015, , 452, 1068, 10.1093/mnras/stv1281

    Chen , Y., Bressan , A., Girardi , L., et al. 2015, , 452, 1068, 10.1093/mnras/stv1281

    2015 doi

  29. [37]

    2014, , 444, 2525, 10.1093/mnras/stu1605

    Chen , Y., Girardi , L., Bressan , A., et al. 2014, , 444, 2525, 10.1093/mnras/stu1605

    2014 doi

  30. [38]

    2019, , 622, A60, 10.1051/0004-6361/201833374

    Clementini , G., Ripepi , V., Molinaro , R., et al. 2019, , 622, A60, 10.1051/0004-6361/201833374

    2019 doi

  31. [39]

    2023, , 674, A18, 10.1051/0004-6361/202243964

    Clementini , G., Ripepi , V., Garofalo , A., et al. 2023, , 674, A18, 10.1051/0004-6361/202243964

    2023 doi

  32. [41]

    P., Koposov , S

    Cooper , A. P., Koposov , S. E., Allende Prieto , C., et al. 2023, , 947, 37, 10.3847/1538-4357/acb3c0

    2023 doi

  33. [42]

    2022, , 511, 2610, 10.1093/mnras/stab3726

    Correa Magnus , L., & Vasiliev , E. 2022, , 511, 2610, 10.1093/mnras/stab3726

    2022 doi

  34. [43]

    S., Agertz , O., Berbel , A

    de Jong , R. S., Agertz , O., Berbel , A. A., et al. 2019, The Messenger, 175, 3, 10.18727/0722-6691/5117

    2019 doi

  35. [46]

    J., Belokurov , V., Evans , N

    Deason , A. J., Belokurov , V., Evans , N. W., & An , J. 2012 a , , 424, L44, 10.1111/j.1745-3933.2012.01283.x

    2012

  36. [47]

    J., Belokurov , V., Evans , N

    Deason , A. J., Belokurov , V., Evans , N. W., & McCarthy , I. G. 2012 b , , 748, 2, 10.1088/0004-637X/748/1/2

    2012 doi

  37. [48]

    J., Belokurov, V., & Koposov, S

    Deason, A. J., Belokurov, V., & Koposov, S. E. 2018, The Astrophysical Journal, 852, 118, 10.3847/1538-4357/aa9d19

    2018 doi

  38. [49]

    J., Fattahi , A., Belokurov , V., et al

    Deason , A. J., Fattahi , A., Belokurov , V., et al. 2019, , 485, 3514, 10.1093/mnras/stz623

    2019 doi

  39. [50]

    J., Erkal , D., Belokurov , V., et al

    Deason , A. J., Erkal , D., Belokurov , V., et al. 2021, , 501, 5964, 10.1093/mnras/staa3984

    2021 doi

  40. [51]

    E., & Sachania , J

    Dehnen , W., McLaughlin , D. E., & Sachania , J. 2006, , 369, 1688, 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2006.10404.x

    2006

  41. [52]

    2016 a , arXiv e-prints, arXiv:1611.00036, 10.48550/arXiv.1611.00036

    DESI Collaboration , Aghamousa , A., Aguilar , J., et al. 2016 a , arXiv e-prints, arXiv:1611.00036, 10.48550/arXiv.1611.00036

    2016 doi arXiv

  42. [53]

    2016 b , arXiv e-prints, arXiv:1611.00037, 10.48550/arXiv.1611.00037

    ---. 2016 b , arXiv e-prints, arXiv:1611.00037, 10.48550/arXiv.1611.00037

    2016 doi arXiv

  43. [54]

    2022, , 164, 207, 10.3847/1538-3881/ac882b

    DESI Collaboration , Abareshi , B., Aguilar , J., et al. 2022, , 164, 207, 10.3847/1538-3881/ac882b

    2022 doi

  44. [55]

    G., Aguilar , J., et al

    DESI Collaboration , Adame , A. G., Aguilar , J., et al. 2024, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2411.12022, 10.48550/arXiv.2411.12022

    2024 doi arXiv

  45. [56]

    G., et al

    DESI Collaboration , Abdul-Karim , M., Adame , A. G., et al. 2025 a , arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2503.14745, 10.48550/arXiv.2503.14745

    2025 doi arXiv

  46. [57]

    2025 b , arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2503.14738, 10.48550/arXiv.2503.14738

    DESI Collaboration , Abdul-Karim , M., Aguilar , J., et al. 2025 b , arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2503.14738, 10.48550/arXiv.2503.14738

    2025 doi arXiv

  47. [58]

    D., Pendleton , B

    Duane , S., Kennedy , A. D., Pendleton , B. J., & Roweth , D. 1987, Physics Letters B, 195, 216, 10.1016/0370-2693(87)91197-X

    1987 doi

  48. [59]

    2019, , 875, 159, 10.3847/1538-4357/ab0f97

    Eadie , G., & Juri \'c , M. 2019, , 875, 159, 10.3847/1538-4357/ab0f97

    2019 doi

  49. [60]

    M., & Harris , W

    Eadie , G. M., & Harris , W. E. 2016, , 829, 108, 10.3847/0004-637X/829/2/108

    2016 doi

  50. [61]

    M., Harris , W

    Eadie , G. M., Harris , W. E., & Widrow , L. M. 2015, , 806, 54, 10.1088/0004-637X/806/1/54

    2015 doi

  51. [62]

    M., Springford , A., & Harris , W

    Eadie , G. M., Springford , A., & Harris , W. E. 2017, , 835, 167, 10.3847/1538-4357/835/2/167

    2017 doi

  52. [63]

    A., & Parkin , D

    Erkal , D., Belokurov , V. A., & Parkin , D. L. 2020, , 498, 5574, 10.1093/mnras/staa2840

    2020 doi

  53. [64]

    J., Belokurov , V., et al

    Erkal , D., Deason , A. J., Belokurov , V., et al. 2021, , 506, 2677, 10.1093/mnras/stab1828

    2021 doi

  54. [65]

    W., Hafner , R

    Evans , N. W., Hafner , R. M., & de Zeeuw , P. T. 1997, , 286, 315, 10.1093/mnras/286.2.315

    1997 doi

  55. [66]

    J., Frenk , C

    Fattahi , A., Deason , A. J., Frenk , C. S., et al. 2020, , 497, 4459, 10.1093/mnras/staa2221

    2020 doi

  56. [67]

    2013, , 430, 1294, 10.1093/mnras/sts703

    Fermani , F., & Sch \"o nrich , R. 2013, , 430, 1294, 10.1093/mnras/sts703

    2013 doi

  57. [68]

    K., Di Cintio , A., Battaglia , G., Brook , C., & Taibi , S

    Fritz , T. K., Di Cintio , A., Battaglia , G., Brook , C., & Taibi , S. 2020, , 494, 5178, 10.1093/mnras/staa1040

    2020 doi

  58. [69]

    2019, Publications of the Astronomical Society of Japan, 71, 72, 10.1093/pasj/psz052

    Fukushima, T., Chiba, M., Tanaka, M., et al. 2019, Publications of the Astronomical Society of Japan, 71, 72, 10.1093/pasj/psz052

    2019 doi

  59. [70]

    E., Sarro , L

    Garofalo , A., Delgado , H. E., Sarro , L. M., et al. 2022, , 513, 788, 10.1093/mnras/stac735

    2022 doi

  60. [71]

    Gibbons , S. L. J., Belokurov , V., & Evans , N. W. 2014, , 445, 3788, 10.1093/mnras/stu1986

    2014 doi

  61. [72]

    Y., Brown , W

    Gnedin , O. Y., Brown , W. R., Geller , M. J., & Kenyon , S. J. 2010, , 720, L108, 10.1088/2041-8205/720/1/L108

    2010 doi

  62. [73]

    Grand , R. J. J., Deason , A. J., White , S. D. M., et al. 2019, , 487, L72, 10.1093/mnrasl/slz092

    2019 doi

  63. [74]

    Grand , R. J. J., Fragkoudi , F., G \'o mez , F. A., et al. 2024, , 532, 1814, 10.1093/mnras/stae1598

    2024 doi

  64. [75]

    Grand , R. J. J., G \'o mez , F. A., Marinacci , F., et al. 2017, , 467, 179, 10.1093/mnras/stx071

    2017 doi

  65. [76]

    Grand , R. J. J., Helly , J., Fattahi , A., et al. 2018, , 481, 1726, 10.1093/mnras/sty2403

    2018 doi

  66. [77]

    2021, , 647, A59, 10.1051/0004-6361/202040208

    GRAVITY Collaboration , Abuter , R., Amorim , A., et al. 2021, , 647, A59, 10.1051/0004-6361/202040208

    2021 doi

  67. [78]

    2023, , 165, 144, 10.3847/1538-3881/acb212

    Guy , J., Bailey , S., Kremin , A., et al. 2023, , 165, 144, 10.3847/1538-3881/acb212

    2023 doi

  68. [79]

    Han , J., Wang , W., Cole , S., & Frenk , C. S. 2016, , 456, 1017, 10.1093/mnras/stv2522

    2016 doi

  69. [80]

    J., Conroy, C., Johnson, B

    Han, J. J., Conroy, C., Johnson, B. D., et al. 2022, The Astronomical Journal, 164, 249, 10.3847/1538-3881/ac97e9

    2022 doi

  70. [81]

    2021, , 508, 5468, 10.1093/mnras/stab2898

    Hattori , K., Valluri , M., & Vasiliev , E. 2021, , 508, 5468, 10.1093/mnras/stab2898

    2021 doi

  71. [82]

    2017, , 850, 96, 10.3847/1538-4357/aa960c

    Hernitschek , N., Sesar , B., Rix , H.-W., et al. 2017, , 850, 96, 10.3847/1538-4357/aa960c

    2017 doi

  72. [83]

    D., & Gelman, A

    Hoffman, M. D., & Gelman, A. 2014, Journal of Machine Learning Research, 15, 1593

    2014

  73. [84]

    Hunt , J. A. S., & Vasiliev , E. 2025, , 100, 101721, 10.1016/j.newar.2024.101721

    2025

  74. [85]

    Hunter , J. D. 2007, Computing in Science and Engineering, 9, 90, 10.1109/MCSE.2007.55

    2007 doi

  75. [86]

    O., Wende-von Berg , S., Dreizler , S., et al

    Husser , T. O., Wende-von Berg , S., Dreizler , S., et al. 2013, , 553, A6, 10.1051/0004-6361/201219058

    2013 doi

  76. [87]

    2021, , 502, 5686, 10.1093/mnras/stab005

    Iorio , G., & Belokurov , V. 2021, , 502, 5686, 10.1093/mnras/stab005

    2021 doi

  77. [88]

    Jeans , J. H. 1915, , 76, 70, 10.1093/mnras/76.2.70

    1915 doi

  78. [89]

    R., Sharma , S., Lewis , G

    Kafle , P. R., Sharma , S., Lewis , G. F., & Bland-Hawthorn , J. 2012, , 761, 98, 10.1088/0004-637X/761/2/98

    2012 doi

  79. [90]

    2014, , 794, 59, 10.1088/0004-637X/794/1/59

    ---. 2014, , 794, 59, 10.1088/0004-637X/794/1/59

    2014 doi

  80. [91]

    V., Benito , M., Iocco , F., Trotta , R., & Geringer-Sameth , A

    Karukes , E. V., Benito , M., Iocco , F., Trotta , R., & Geringer-Sameth , A. 2020, , 2020, 033, 10.1088/1475-7516/2020/05/033

    2020 doi

  81. [92]

    C., Murphy , S., Prior , S., DaCosta , G., & Schmidt , B

    Keller , S. C., Murphy , S., Prior , S., DaCosta , G., & Schmidt , B. 2008, , 678, 851, 10.1086/526516

    2008 doi

  82. [93]

    P., Riley , A

    Kizhuprakkat , N., Cooper , A. P., Riley , A. H., et al. 2024, , 531, 4108, 10.1093/mnras/stae1415

    2024 doi

  83. [94]

    E., Belokurov , V., Li , T

    Koposov , S. E., Belokurov , V., Li , T. S., et al. 2019, , 485, 4726, 10.1093/mnras/stz457

    2019 doi

  84. [95]

    E., Erkal , D., Li , T

    Koposov , S. E., Erkal , D., Li , T. S., et al. 2023, , 521, 4936, 10.1093/mnras/stad551

    2023 doi

  85. [96]

    E., Allende Prieto , C., Cooper , A

    Koposov , S. E., Allende Prieto , C., Cooper , A. P., et al. 2024, , 533, 1012, 10.1093/mnras/stae1842

    2024 doi

  86. [97]

    E., Li , T

    Koposov , S. E., Li , T. S., Allende Prieto , C., et al. 2025, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2505.14787, 10.48550/arXiv.2505.14787

    2025 doi

  87. [98]

    K \"u pper , A. H. W., Balbinot , E., Bonaca , A., et al. 2015, , 803, 80, 10.1088/0004-637X/803/2/80

    2015 doi

  88. [99]

    Kurucz , R. L. 1979, , 40, 1, 10.1086/190589

    1979 doi

  89. [100]

    1993, SYNTHE spectrum synthesis programs and line data

    ---. 1993, SYNTHE spectrum synthesis programs and line data

    1993

  90. [101]

    S., Koposov , S

    Li , T. S., Koposov , S. E., Zucker , D. B., et al. 2019, , 490, 3508, 10.1093/mnras/stz2731

    2019 doi

  91. [103]

    2020, , 894, 10, 10.3847/1538-4357/ab84f0

    Li , Z.-Z., Qian , Y.-Z., Han , J., et al. 2020, , 894, 10, 10.3847/1538-4357/ab84f0

    2020 doi

  92. [104]

    1987, , 320, 493, 10.1086/165567

    Little , B., & Tremaine , S. 1987, , 320, 493, 10.1086/165567

    1987 doi

  93. [105]

    R., Skrutskie , M

    Majewski , S. R., Skrutskie , M. F., Weinberg , M. D., & Ostheimer , J. C. 2003, , 599, 1082, 10.1086/379504

    2003 doi

  94. [106]

    Malhan , K., & Ibata , R. A. 2019, , 486, 2995, 10.1093/mnras/stz1035

    2019 doi

  95. [107]

    2024, Research Notes of the American Astronomical Society, 8, 85, 10.3847/2515-5172/ad3540

    Mateu , C. 2024, Research Notes of the American Astronomical Society, 8, 85, 10.3847/2515-5172/ad3540

    2024 doi

  96. [108]

    2020, , 496, 3291, 10.1093/mnras/staa1676

    Mateu , C., Holl , B., De Ridder , J., & Rimoldini , L. 2020, , 496, 3291, 10.1093/mnras/staa1676

    2020 doi

  97. [109]

    McMillan , P. J. 2011, , 414, 2446, 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2011.18564.x

    2011

  98. [110]

    2017, , 465, 76, 10.1093/mnras/stw2759

    ---. 2017, , 465, 76, 10.1093/mnras/stw2759

    2017 doi

  99. [111]

    E., Mu \ n oz , R

    Medina , G. E., Mu \ n oz , R. R., Carlin , J. L., et al. 2024, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2402.14055, 10.48550/arXiv.2402.14055

    2024 doi arXiv

  100. [112]

    E., Mu \ n oz , R

    Medina , G. E., Mu \ n oz , R. R., Vivas , A. K., et al. 2018, , 855, 43, 10.3847/1538-4357/aaad02

    2018 doi

  101. [113]

    E., Li , T

    Medina , G. E., Li , T. S., Koposov , S. E., et al. 2025 a , arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2504.02924, 10.48550/arXiv.2504.02924

    2025 doi arXiv

  102. [114]

    E., Li , T

    Medina , G. E., Li , T. S., Allende Prieto , C., et al. 2025 b , arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2505.10614, 10.48550/arXiv.2505.10614

    2025 doi arXiv

  103. [115]

    N., Doel , P., Gutierrez , G., et al

    Miller , T. N., Doel , P., Gutierrez , G., et al. 2024, , 168, 95, 10.3847/1538-3881/ad45fe

    2024 doi

  104. [116]

    A., Grand , R

    Monachesi , A., G \'o mez , F. A., Grand , R. J. J., et al. 2019, , 485, 2589, 10.1093/mnras/stz538

    2019 doi

  105. [117]

    2018, , 616, L9, 10.1051/0004-6361/201833748

    Monari , G., Famaey , B., Carrillo , I., et al. 2018, , 616, L9, 10.1051/0004-6361/201833748

    2018 doi

  106. [118]

    P., Conroy , C., Bonaca , A., et al

    Naidu , R. P., Conroy , C., Bonaca , A., et al. 2020, , 901, 48, 10.3847/1538-4357/abaef4

    2020 doi

  107. [119]

    2024, , 689, A138, 10.1051/0004-6361/202450364

    Narloch , W., Hajdu , G., Pietrzy \'n ski , G., et al. 2024, , 689, A138, 10.1051/0004-6361/202450364

    2024 doi

  108. [120]

    2022, , 926, 189, 10.3847/1538-4357/ac4244

    Necib , L., & Lin , T. 2022, , 926, 189, 10.3847/1538-4357/ac4244

    2022 doi

  109. [121]

    2024, , 528, 693, 10.1093/mnras/stae034

    Ou , X., Eilers , A.-C., Necib , L., & Frebel , A. 2024, , 528, 693, 10.1093/mnras/stae034

    2024 doi

  110. [122]

    B., Erkal , D., & Li , T

    Pace , A. B., Erkal , D., & Li , T. S. 2022, , 940, 136, 10.3847/1538-4357/ac997b

    2022 doi

  111. [123]

    Patel , E., Besla , G., Mandel , K., & Sohn , S. T. 2018, , 857, 78, 10.3847/1538-4357/aab78f

    2018 doi

  112. [124]

    Peebles , P. J. E. 1995, , 449, 52, 10.1086/176031

    1995 doi

  113. [125]

    2014, , 562, A91, 10.1051/0004-6361/201322531

    Piffl , T., Scannapieco , C., Binney , J., et al. 2014, , 562, A91, 10.1051/0004-6361/201322531

    2014 doi

  114. [126]

    2014, , 444, 237, 10.1093/mnras/stu1408

    Pillepich , A., Vogelsberger , M., Deason , A., et al. 2014, , 444, 237, 10.1093/mnras/stu1408

    2014 doi

  115. [127]

    Planck Collaboration , Ade , P. A. R., Aghanim , N., et al. 2016, , 594, A13, 10.1051/0004-6361/201525830

    2016 doi

  116. [128]

    2024, , 168, 245, 10.3847/1538-3881/ad76a4

    Poppett , C., Tyas , L., Aguilar , J., et al. 2024, , 168, 245, 10.3847/1538-3881/ad76a4

    2024 doi

  117. [129]

    2019, , 621, A56, 10.1051/0004-6361/201833355

    Posti , L., & Helmi , A. 2019, , 621, A56, 10.1051/0004-6361/201833355

    2019 doi

  118. [130]

    J., Lemasle , B., et al

    Prudil , Z., Koch-Hansen , A. J., Lemasle , B., et al. 2022, , 664, A148, 10.1051/0004-6361/202142251

    2022 doi

  119. [131]

    P., Grand , R

    Pu , S.-Y., Cooper , A. P., Grand , R. J. J., G \'o mez , F. A., & Monachesi , A. 2025, , 980, 63, 10.3847/1538-4357/ada382

    2025 doi

  120. [132]

    2022, , 511, 5536, 10.1093/mnras/stac400

    Rehemtulla , N., Valluri , M., & Vasiliev , E. 2022, , 511, 5536, 10.1093/mnras/stac400

    2022 doi

  121. [133]

    H., Shipp , N., Simpson , C

    Riley , A. H., Shipp , N., Simpson , C. M., et al. 2025, , 10.1093/mnras/staf1350

    2025 doi

  122. [134]

    Sakamoto , T., Chiba , M., & Beers , T. C. 2003, , 397, 899, 10.1051/0004-6361:20021499

    2003 doi

  123. [135]

    F., & Finkbeiner , D

    Schlafly , E. F., & Finkbeiner , D. P. 2011, , 737, 103, 10.1088/0004-637X/737/2/103

    2011 doi

  124. [136]

    F., Kirkby , D., Schlegel , D

    Schlafly , E. F., Kirkby , D., Schlegel , D. J., et al. 2023, , 166, 259, 10.3847/1538-3881/ad0832

    2023 doi

  125. [137]

    V., & Wiemer , W

    Schultz , G. V., & Wiemer , W. 1975, , 43, 133

    1975

  126. [138]

    2017, , 153, 204, 10.3847/1538-3881/aa661b

    Sesar , B., Hernitschek , N., Mitrovi \'c , S., et al. 2017, , 153, 204, 10.3847/1538-3881/aa661b

    2017 doi

  127. [139]

    M., Murray , N., et al

    Shen , J., Eadie , G. M., Murray , N., et al. 2022, , 925, 1, 10.3847/1538-4357/ac3a7a

    2022 doi

  128. [140]

    H., Simpson , C

    Shipp , N., Riley , A. H., Simpson , C. M., et al. 2025, , 542, 1109, 10.1093/mnras/staf1283

    2025 doi

  129. [141]

    M., Grand , R

    Simpson , C. M., Grand , R. J. J., G \'o mez , F. A., et al. 2018, , 478, 548, 10.1093/mnras/sty774

    2018 doi

  130. [142]

    2022, , 924, 131, 10.3847/1538-4357/ac390b

    Slizewski , A., Dufresne , X., Murdock , K., et al. 2022, , 924, 131, 10.3847/1538-4357/ac390b

    2022 doi

  131. [143]

    C., Ruchti , G

    Smith , M. C., Ruchti , G. R., Helmi , A., et al. 2007, , 379, 755, 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2007.11964.x

    2007

  132. [144]

    T., Watkins , L

    Sohn , S. T., Watkins , L. L., Fardal , M. A., et al. 2018, , 862, 52, 10.3847/1538-4357/aacd0b

    2018 doi

  133. [145]

    2008, , 391, 1685, 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2008.14066.x

    Springel , V., Wang , J., Vogelsberger , M., et al. 2008, , 391, 1685, 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2008.14066.x

    2008

  134. [146]

    M., Drlica-Wagner , A., Macri , L., et al

    Stringer , K. M., Drlica-Wagner , A., Macri , L., et al. 2021, , 911, 109, 10.3847/1538-4357/abe873

    2021 doi

  135. [147]

    2023, Research in Astronomy and Astrophysics, 23, 015013, 10.1088/1674-4527/ac9e91

    Sun , G., Wang , Y., Liu , C., et al. 2023, Research in Astronomy and Astrophysics, 23, 015013, 10.1088/1674-4527/ac9e91

    2023 doi

  136. [148]

    2023, , 945, 3, 10.3847/1538-4357/acb92c

    Sylos Labini , F., Chrob \'a kov \'a , Z ., Capuzzo-Dolcetta , R., & L \'o pez-Corredoira , M. 2023, , 945, 3, 10.3847/1538-4357/acb92c

    2023 doi

  137. [149]

    2014, , 445, 4287, 10.1093/mnras/stu2029

    Tang , J., Bressan , A., Rosenfield , P., et al. 2014, , 445, 4287, 10.1093/mnras/stu2029

    2014 doi

  138. [150]

    2025, pandas-dev/pandas: Pandas , v2.3.1, Zenodo, 10.5281/zenodo.3509134

    The pandas development Team . 2025, pandas-dev/pandas: Pandas , v2.3.1, Zenodo, 10.5281/zenodo.3509134

    2025 doi

  139. [151]

    F., McConnachie , A

    Thomas , G. F., McConnachie , A. W., Ibata , R. A., et al. 2018, , 481, 5223, 10.1093/mnras/sty2604

    2018 doi

  140. [152]

    B., Scannapieco , C., Beers , T

    Tissera , P. B., Scannapieco , C., Beers , T. C., & Carollo , D. 2013, , 432, 3391, 10.1093/mnras/stt691

    2013 doi

  141. [153]

    C., & Varoquaux , G

    van der Walt , S., Colbert , S. C., & Varoquaux , G. 2011, Computing in Science and Engineering, 13, 22, 10.1109/MCSE.2011.37

    2011 doi

  142. [154]

    2019, , 484, 2832, 10.1093/mnras/stz171

    Vasiliev , E. 2019, , 484, 2832, 10.1093/mnras/stz171

    2019 doi

  143. [155]

    2021, , 505, 5978, 10.1093/mnras/stab1475

    Vasiliev , E., & Baumgardt , H. 2021, , 505, 5978, 10.1093/mnras/stab1475

    2021 doi

  144. [156]

    2021, , 501, 2279, 10.1093/mnras/staa3673

    Vasiliev , E., Belokurov , V., & Erkal , D. 2021, , 501, 2279, 10.1093/mnras/staa3673

    2021 doi

  145. [157]

    E., et al

    Virtanen, P., Gommers, R., Oliphant, T. E., et al. 2020, Nature Methods, 17, 261, 10.1038/s41592-019-0686-2

    2020 doi

  146. [158]

    2022, , 510, 2242, 10.1093/mnras/stab3258

    Wang , J., Hammer , F., & Yang , Y. 2022, , 510, 2242, 10.1093/mnras/stab3258

    2022 doi

  147. [159]

    Wang , W., Han , J., Cautun , M., Li , Z., & Ishigaki , M. N. 2020, Science China Physics, Mechanics, and Astronomy, 63, 109801, 10.1007/s11433-019-1541-6

    2020 doi

  148. [160]

    2018, , 476, 5669, 10.1093/mnras/sty706

    Wang , W., Han , J., Cole , S., et al. 2018, , 476, 5669, 10.1093/mnras/sty706

    2018 doi

  149. [161]

    P., et al

    Wang , W., Han , J., Cooper , A. P., et al. 2015, , 453, 377, 10.1093/mnras/stv1647

    2015 doi

  150. [162]

    L., Evans , N

    Watkins , L. L., Evans , N. W., & An , J. H. 2010, , 406, 264, 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2010.16708.x

    2010

  151. [163]

    L., van der Marel , R

    Watkins , L. L., van der Marel , R. P., Sohn , S. T., & Evans , N. W. 2019, , 873, 118, 10.3847/1538-4357/ab089f

    2019 doi

  152. [164]

    2000, , 143, 9, 10.1051/aas:2000332

    Wenger , M., Ochsenbein , F., Egret , D., et al. 2000, , 143, 9, 10.1051/aas:2000332

    2000 doi

  153. [165]

    I., & Evans , N

    Wilkinson , M. I., & Evans , N. W. 1999, , 310, 645, 10.1046/j.1365-8711.1999.02964.x

    1999

  154. [166]

    A., Belokurov , V., Casey , A

    Williams , A. A., Belokurov , V., Casey , A. R., & Evans , N. W. 2017, , 468, 2359, 10.1093/mnras/stx508

    2017 doi

  155. [167]

    A., & Evans , N

    Williams , A. A., & Evans , N. W. 2015, , 454, 698, 10.1093/mnras/stv1967

    2015 doi

  156. [168]

    Y., Klein , C., Bullock , J

    Xia , L. Y., Klein , C., Bullock , J. S., et al. 2025, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2506.08508, 10.48550/arXiv.2506.08508

    2025 doi arXiv

  157. [169]

    X., Rix , H

    Xue , X. X., Rix , H. W., Zhao , G., et al. 2008, , 684, 1143, 10.1086/589500

    2008 doi

  158. [170]

    2020, , 888, 114, 10.3847/1538-4357/ab5b93

    Zaritsky , D., Conroy , C., Zhang , H., et al. 2020, , 888, 114, 10.3847/1538-4357/ab5b93

    2020 doi

  159. [171]

    W., Schommer , R

    Zaritsky , D., Olszewski , E. W., Schommer , R. A., Peterson , R. C., & Aaronson , M. 1989, , 345, 759, 10.1086/167947

    1989 doi

  160. [172]

    2023, , 946, 73, 10.3847/1538-4357/acadd9

    Zhou , Y., Li , X., Huang , Y., & Zhang , H. 2023, , 946, 73, 10.3847/1538-4357/acadd9

    2023 doi

  161. [173]

    K., et al

    Zinn , R., Horowitz , B., Vivas , A. K., et al. 2014, , 781, 22, 10.1088/0004-637X/781/1/22

    2014 doi

Pith tools

Reviewed August 5, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.