REVIEW 1 cited by
Quantile and pseudo-Huber Tensor Decomposition
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Signed reviews
read the original abstract
This paper studies the computational and statistical aspects of quantile and pseudo-Huber tensor decomposition. The integrated investigation of computational and statistical issues of robust tensor decomposition poses challenges due to the non-smooth loss functions. We propose a projected sub-gradient descent algorithm for tensor decomposition, equipped with either the pseudo-Huber loss or the quantile loss. In the presence of both heavy-tailed noise and Huber's contamination error, we demonstrate that our algorithm exhibits a so-called phenomenon of two-phase convergence with a carefully chosen step size schedule. The algorithm converges linearly and delivers an estimator that is statistically optimal with respect to both the heavy-tailed noise and arbitrary corruptions. Interestingly, our results achieve the first minimax optimal rates under Huber's contamination model for noisy tensor decomposition. Compared with existing literature, quantile tensor decomposition removes the requirement of specifying a sparsity level in advance, making it more flexible for practical use. We also demonstrate the effectiveness of our algorithms in the presence of missing values. Our methods are subsequently applied to the food balance dataset and the international trade flow dataset, both of which yield intriguing findings.
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
Statistical Inference for Low-Rank Tensor Models
A debiased tangent-space projection estimator yields asymptotically normal and minimax-optimal confidence intervals for general linear functionals of low-Tucker-rank tensors.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.