Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 cited by

Text Modular Networks: Learning to Decompose Tasks in the Language of Existing Models

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2009.00751 v2 pith:IGRCN2TD submitted 2020-09-01 cs.CL cs.AI

classification cs.CLcs.AI
keywords existinglanguagemodelssub-questionssystemstaskscomplexdatasets
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

0 comments
read the original abstract

We propose a general framework called Text Modular Networks(TMNs) for building interpretable systems that learn to solve complex tasks by decomposing them into simpler ones solvable by existing models. To ensure solvability of simpler tasks, TMNs learn the textual input-output behavior (i.e., language) of existing models through their datasets. This differs from prior decomposition-based approaches which, besides being designed specifically for each complex task, produce decompositions independent of existing sub-models. Specifically, we focus on Question Answering (QA) and show how to train a next-question generator to sequentially produce sub-questions targeting appropriate sub-models, without additional human annotation. These sub-questions and answers provide a faithful natural language explanation of the model's reasoning. We use this framework to build ModularQA, a system that can answer multi-hop reasoning questions by decomposing them into sub-questions answerable by a neural factoid single-span QA model and a symbolic calculator. Our experiments show that ModularQA is more versatile than existing explainable systems for DROP and HotpotQA datasets, is more robust than state-of-the-art blackbox (uninterpretable) systems, and generates more understandable and trustworthy explanations compared to prior work.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 3 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. FLIP Reasoning Challenge

    cs.CV 2025-04 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    The FLIP benchmark of 11,674 blockchain image-story puzzles shows best open and closed AI models reach 75.5% and 77.9% accuracy, below the 95.3% human consensus baseline.

  2. SearchOS-V1: Towards Robust Open-Domain Information-Seeking Agent Collaboration

    cs.AI 2026-07 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    A multi-agent web-search framework that stores progress in shared evidence, coverage, and failure state reports the best F1 scores among compared baselines on WideSearch (80.3 item F1) and GISA (76.5 set F1).

  3. Enhancing LLM Reasoning with Multi-Path Collaborative Reactive and Reflection agents

    cs.CL 2024-12 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

    A multi-path, reactive-plus-reflection agent framework improves gpt-3.5-turbo accuracy on MMLU physics, math, and moral reasoning subsets compared with CoT, self-consistency, and self-refine baselines.

Pith tools