Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 cited by

How to Catch an AI Liar: Lie Detection in Black-Box LLMs by Asking Unrelated Questions

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2309.15840 v1 pith:IVAJQSJD submitted 2023-09-26 cs.CL cs.AIcs.LG

classification cs.CLcs.AIcs.LG
keywords llmsdetectorquestionsarchitecturesaskingblack-boxdespitedetection
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Large language models (LLMs) can "lie", which we define as outputting false statements despite "knowing" the truth in a demonstrable sense. LLMs might "lie", for example, when instructed to output misinformation. Here, we develop a simple lie detector that requires neither access to the LLM's activations (black-box) nor ground-truth knowledge of the fact in question. The detector works by asking a predefined set of unrelated follow-up questions after a suspected lie, and feeding the LLM's yes/no answers into a logistic regression classifier. Despite its simplicity, this lie detector is highly accurate and surprisingly general. When trained on examples from a single setting -- prompting GPT-3.5 to lie about factual questions -- the detector generalises out-of-distribution to (1) other LLM architectures, (2) LLMs fine-tuned to lie, (3) sycophantic lies, and (4) lies emerging in real-life scenarios such as sales. These results indicate that LLMs have distinctive lie-related behavioural patterns, consistent across architectures and contexts, which could enable general-purpose lie detection.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 3 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. OpenAlex reports about 6 citations worldwide. Full citation record

  1. Introspection Fine-Tuning (IFT): Training Small LLMs to Introspect

    cs.CL 2026-05 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Small LLMs can be fine-tuned to localize activation-steering perturbations, raising Llama-1B accuracy from 9.6% to 60.6% and generalizing to a strength-comparison task.

  2. Reliable Weak-to-Strong Monitoring of LLM Agents

    cs.AI 2025-08 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Monitor scaffolding, not monitor awareness or omniscience, drives detection reliability, and a hybrid chunked monitor lets weak models supervise strong LLM agents.

  3. Hallucination Detection and Mitigation with Diffusion in Multi-Variate Time-Series Foundation Models

    cs.LG 2025-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Pre-trained multivariate time-series imputation models frequently return values that violate known relations between variables, and a diffusion-based score can detect and filter these errors.

Pith tools