RSPO: Risk-Seeking Policy Optimization for Pass@k and Max@k Metrics in Large Language Models
Reviewed by Pithpith:IVHD2WKQopen to challenge →
read the original abstract
Current large language model post-training optimizes a risk-neutral objective that maximizes expected reward, yet evaluation relies heavily on risk-seeking metrics like Pass@k (at least one success in k trials) and Max@k (maximum reward across k responses). This mismatch in risk preferences can inevitably lead to suboptimal performance. To bridge this gap, we propose Risk-Seeking Policy Optimization (RSPO), a novel method that directly targets Pass@k and Max@k during training. A key challenge in optimizing these metrics is the "hitchhiking" problem: low-reward responses are inadvertently reinforced if they co-occur with a high-reward response within a sample of k generations, resulting in inefficient optimization. RSPO addresses this problem by leveraging the closed-form probability that a given response is the maximum among k samplings. Despite the complexity of nested gradients over multiple responses, RSPO produces efficient, unbiased gradient estimators for both metrics. We validate our approach with both rigorous theoretical analysis and comprehensive experimental results.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
Leveraging Error Diversity in Group Rollouts for Reinforcement Learning
EDAS modulates advantage signals in RLVR to penalize repeated errors more and rare errors less, yielding consistent gains on math benchmarks when added to existing methods.
-
Leveraging Error Diversity in Group Rollouts for Reinforcement Learning
EDAS modulates RL advantage signals for incorrect rollouts by amplifying penalties on repeated errors and attenuating them on rare ones, yielding average gains of 6.29 points over DAPO on Qwen3-8B across seven math be...
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.