Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 cited by

Scaling Sparse Fine-Tuning to Large Language Models

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2401.16405 v2 pith:IX2K6MDJ submitted 2024-01-29 cs.CL cs.AIcs.LG

classification cs.CLcs.AIcs.LG
keywords fine-tuningllmssparsespieldeltasindicesparametersterms
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Large Language Models (LLMs) are difficult to fully fine-tune (e.g., with instructions or human feedback) due to their sheer number of parameters. A family of parameter-efficient sparse fine-tuning methods have proven promising in terms of performance but their memory requirements increase proportionally to the size of the LLMs. In this work, we scale sparse fine-tuning to state-of-the-art LLMs like LLaMA 2 7B and 13B. We propose SpIEL, a novel sparse fine-tuning method which, for a desired density level, maintains an array of parameter indices and the deltas of these parameters relative to their pretrained values. It iterates over: (a) updating the active deltas, (b) pruning indices (based on the change of magnitude of their deltas) and (c) regrowth of indices. For regrowth, we explore two criteria based on either the accumulated gradients of a few candidate parameters or their approximate momenta estimated using the efficient SM3 optimizer. We experiment with instruction-tuning of LLMs on standard dataset mixtures, finding that SpIEL is often superior to popular parameter-efficient fine-tuning methods like LoRA (low-rank adaptation) in terms of performance and comparable in terms of run time. We additionally show that SpIEL is compatible with both quantization and efficient optimizers, to facilitate scaling to ever-larger model sizes. We release the code for SpIEL at https://github.com/AlanAnsell/peft and for the instruction-tuning experiments at https://github.com/ducdauge/sft-llm.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 4 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Leave it to the Specialist: Repair Sparse LLMs with Sparse Fine-Tuning via Sparsity Evolution

    cs.AI 2025-05 unverdicted novelty 6.0 of 10

    SEFT fine-tunes sparse LLMs by dynamically growing and pruning a sparse set of weight updates, preserving target sparsity while improving downstream task performance over sparsity-preserving baselines.

  2. Super-Tuning: From Activation-Aware Pruning to Sparse Fine-Tuning

    cs.LG 2026-07 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    Wanda- or magnitude-ordered fixed sparse supports, alone or hybridized with LoRA under a matched budget, can outperform tested PEFT baselines on Math17K arithmetic fine-tuning.

  3. Exploring Sparse Adapters for Scalable Merging of Parameter Efficient Experts

    cs.LG 2025-07 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    Sparse adapters trained with max connection sensitivity outperform LoRA and full fine-tuning both alone and after merging 20 task experts, but still lag multitask training on unseen tasks.

  4. DeFTX: Denoised Sparse Fine-Tuning for Zero-Shot Cross-Lingual Transfer

    cs.CL 2025-05 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    DeFT-X applies SVD denoising to weight updates before magnitude pruning in composable sparse fine-tuning, showing small average gains over LT-SFT on NusaX and AmericasNLI.

Pith tools