Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 cited by

SoK: Memorization in General-Purpose Large Language Models

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2310.18362 v1 pith:J5PDCDDF submitted 2023-10-24 cs.CL cs.CRcs.LG

classification cs.CLcs.CRcs.LG
keywords memorizationllmsmodellanguagelargememorizemodelstraining
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Large Language Models (LLMs) are advancing at a remarkable pace, with myriad applications under development. Unlike most earlier machine learning models, they are no longer built for one specific application but are designed to excel in a wide range of tasks. A major part of this success is due to their huge training datasets and the unprecedented number of model parameters, which allow them to memorize large amounts of information contained in the training data. This memorization goes beyond mere language, and encompasses information only present in a few documents. This is often desirable since it is necessary for performing tasks such as question answering, and therefore an important part of learning, but also brings a whole array of issues, from privacy and security to copyright and beyond. LLMs can memorize short secrets in the training data, but can also memorize concepts like facts or writing styles that can be expressed in text in many different ways. We propose a taxonomy for memorization in LLMs that covers verbatim text, facts, ideas and algorithms, writing styles, distributional properties, and alignment goals. We describe the implications of each type of memorization - both positive and negative - for model performance, privacy, security and confidentiality, copyright, and auditing, and ways to detect and prevent memorization. We further highlight the challenges that arise from the predominant way of defining memorization with respect to model behavior instead of model weights, due to LLM-specific phenomena such as reasoning capabilities or differences between decoding algorithms. Throughout the paper, we describe potential risks and opportunities arising from memorization in LLMs that we hope will motivate new research directions.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 4 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. OpenAlex reports about 9 citations worldwide. Full citation record

  1. LLM in the Middle: A Systematic Review of Threats and Mitigations to Real-World LLM-based Systems

    cs.CR 2025-09 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    A systematic review that categorizes LLM threats, severity scores, and mitigations across development and operation life cycles and multiple deployment scenarios.

  2. Towards Revealing the Effectiveness of Small-Scale Fine-tuning in R1-style Reinforcement Learning

    cs.LG 2025-05 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Re-distilling a model's own RL-trained policy into 1K SFT samples reproduces RL accuracy at a fraction of the compute.

  3. A Lightweight Method to Disrupt Memorized Sequences in LLM

    cs.LG 2025-02 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    A decoding-time intervention that substitutes a small model's probabilities for common function words into a large model's output reduces exact training-data recall by up to 10x with minimal measured quality loss.

  4. On Recipe Memorization and Creativity in Large Language Models: Is Your Model a Creative Cook, a Bad Cook, or Merely a Plagiator?

    cs.CL 2025-06 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    Mixtral's recipe ingredients are mostly traceable to online recipes, and an LLM-as-judge pipeline can reproduce human memorization annotations with up to 78 percent accuracy.

Pith tools