REVIEW 3 cited by
Automatic Instruction Evolving for Large Language Models
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
Fine-tuning large pre-trained language models with Evol-Instruct has achieved encouraging results across a wide range of tasks. However, designing effective evolving methods for instruction evolution requires substantial human expertise. This paper proposes Auto Evol-Instruct, an end-to-end framework that evolves instruction datasets using large language models without any human effort. The framework automatically analyzes and summarizes suitable evolutionary strategies for the given instruction data and iteratively improves the evolving method based on issues exposed during the instruction evolution process. Our extensive experiments demonstrate that the best method optimized by Auto Evol-Instruct outperforms human-designed methods on various benchmarks, including MT-Bench, AlpacaEval, GSM8K, and HumanEval.
Forward citations
Cited by 3 Pith papers
-
Tag-Evol: Achieving Efficient Instruction Evolving via Tag Injection
Tag-Evol generates harder, more diverse instruction data by injecting sampled knowledge tags into seed instructions, improving downstream SFT accuracy across math, code, and general benchmarks.
-
Improving Natural Language Understanding for LLMs via Large-Scale Instruction Synthesis
A large synthetic instruction corpus with guidelines, preference rules, and format variants improves LLM performance on five NLU benchmarks by an average of 3.1%.
-
Mediator: Memory-efficient LLM Merging with Less Parameter Conflicts and Uncertainty Based Routing
Mediator merges fine-tuned LLMs by averaging low-conflict layers and routing high-conflict layers through sparse task-arithmetic experts, with uncertainty-based selection.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.