Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Natural Language Counterfactual Explanations for Graphs Using Large Language Models

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2410.09295 v2 pith:JHAQ3Q7K submitted 2024-10-11 cs.AI cs.CL

classification cs.AIcs.CL
keywords counterfactuallanguageexplanationsmodelsnaturalexplainersinstanceslarge
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI) has emerged as a critical area of research to unravel the opaque inner logic of (deep) machine learning models. Among the various XAI techniques proposed in the literature, counterfactual explanations stand out as one of the most promising approaches. However, these "what-if" explanations are frequently complex and technical, making them difficult for non-experts to understand and, more broadly, challenging for humans to interpret. To bridge this gap, in this work, we exploit the power of open-source Large Language Models to generate natural language explanations when prompted with valid counterfactual instances produced by state-of-the-art explainers for graph-based models. Experiments across several graph datasets and counterfactual explainers show that our approach effectively produces accurate natural language representations of counterfactual instances, as demonstrated by key performance metrics.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. How good is my story? Towards quantitative metrics for evaluating LLM-generated XAI narratives

    cs.CL 2024-12 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    This paper introduces an automated evaluation framework with extraction-based faithfulness metrics, perplexity for assumptions, and embedding-based human similarity, and shows it can reveal LLM sign self-correction on...

Pith tools