Pith. sign in

REVIEW

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 1704.04295 v2 pith:JQVQTAAV submitted 2017-04-13 math.CO

Diffusion on graphs is eventually periodic

classification math.CO
keywords diffusioneventuallyperiodicvertexchip-firingchipsgamegraph
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

We study a variant of the chip-firing game called \emph{diffusion}. In diffusion on a graph, each vertex of the graph is initially labelled with an integer interpreted as the number of chips at that vertex, and at each subsequent step, each vertex simultaneously fires one chip to each of its neighbours with fewer chips. Since this firing rule may result in negative labels, diffusion, unlike the parallel chip-firing game, is not obviously periodic. In 2016, Duffy, Lidbetter, Messinger and Nowakowski nevertheless conjectured that diffusion is always eventually periodic, and moreover, that the process eventually has period either 1 or 2. Here, we establish this conjecture.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.