Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 cited by

Label-free Node Classification on Graphs with Large Language Models (LLMS)

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2310.04668 v3 pith:JRM553QA submitted 2023-10-07 cs.LG cs.AIcs.CL

classification cs.LGcs.AIcs.CL
keywords llmsllm-gnnnodeclassificationgnnsgraphslargenodes
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

In recent years, there have been remarkable advancements in node classification achieved by Graph Neural Networks (GNNs). However, they necessitate abundant high-quality labels to ensure promising performance. In contrast, Large Language Models (LLMs) exhibit impressive zero-shot proficiency on text-attributed graphs. Yet, they face challenges in efficiently processing structural data and suffer from high inference costs. In light of these observations, this work introduces a label-free node classification on graphs with LLMs pipeline, LLM-GNN. It amalgamates the strengths of both GNNs and LLMs while mitigating their limitations. Specifically, LLMs are leveraged to annotate a small portion of nodes and then GNNs are trained on LLMs' annotations to make predictions for the remaining large portion of nodes. The implementation of LLM-GNN faces a unique challenge: how can we actively select nodes for LLMs to annotate and consequently enhance the GNN training? How can we leverage LLMs to obtain annotations of high quality, representativeness, and diversity, thereby enhancing GNN performance with less cost? To tackle this challenge, we develop an annotation quality heuristic and leverage the confidence scores derived from LLMs to advanced node selection. Comprehensive experimental results validate the effectiveness of LLM-GNN. In particular, LLM-GNN can achieve an accuracy of 74.9% on a vast-scale dataset \products with a cost less than 1 dollar.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 3 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Both Topology and Text Matter: Revisiting LLM-guided Out-of-Distribution Detection on Text-attributed Graphs

    cs.LG 2026-02 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    LG-Plug mines pseudo-OOD exposures from clustered unlabeled nodes via iterative LLM prompting and regularizes topology-driven graph OOD detectors, cutting FPR95 by ≥7% across six TAG benchmarks.

  2. Efficient Text-Attributed Graph Learning through Selective Annotation and Graph Alignment

    cs.LG 2025-06 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    GAGA matches or exceeds state-of-the-art accuracy on several text-attributed graph benchmarks while requiring large language model annotations for only 1% of nodes or edges.

  3. NOCL: Node-Oriented Conceptualization LLM for Graph Tasks without Message Passing

    cs.LG 2025-05 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    NOCL lets an LLM handle node, edge, and graph tasks on text and non-text graphs by compressing each node's description into one semantic embedding and turning the graph into a text prompt.

Pith tools