Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

ABBA: Adaptive Brownian bridge-based symbolic aggregation of time series

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2003.12469 v1 pith:JT6CZ4SL submitted 2020-03-27 cs.LG stat.ML

classification cs.LGstat.ML
keywords abbaseriestimerepresentationsymbolicadaptiveapproximationbrownian
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

A new symbolic representation of time series, called ABBA, is introduced. It is based on an adaptive polygonal chain approximation of the time series into a sequence of tuples, followed by a mean-based clustering to obtain the symbolic representation. We show that the reconstruction error of this representation can be modelled as a random walk with pinned start and end points, a so-called Brownian bridge. This insight allows us to make ABBA essentially parameter-free, except for the approximation tolerance which must be chosen. Extensive comparisons with the SAX and 1d-SAX representations are included in the form of performance profiles, showing that ABBA is able to better preserve the essential shape information of time series compared to other approaches. Advantages and applications of ABBA are discussed, including its in-built differencing property and use for anomaly detection, and Python implementations provided.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Signal, Image, or Symbolic: Exploring the Best Input Representation for Electrocardiogram-Language Models Through a Unified Framework

    cs.AI 2025-05 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    A unified benchmark across six ECG datasets and five text-generation metrics finds tokenized symbolic ECG inputs outperform raw signal and image inputs for ECG-language models.

Pith tools